Backyard barnyard: rising egg prices prompt hen hires in US
While many people idly muse about backyard farming, for those not ready to take the plunge permanently, there's a solution: renting a henhouse, complete with egg-laying birds.
'I really want to try it out and see whether I like it or not,' the Los Angeles-area resident told AFP as she took delivery of two chickens and all the equipment they need to live a happy egg-laying life.
'Some people I know have chickens at home, but it's a lot of work for them - they had to adjust the whole garden themselves.
'So I think renting a chicken is a good start.'
Hiring hens began to gain ground in the United States around a decade ago in Pennsylvania when a farming couple set up 'Rent The Chicken.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Since then, the project has expanded to more than 40 cities across North America, with local farmers setting up their own offshoots.
The service saw an uptick in interest during the Covid-19 lockdowns, when people were stuck at home.
But it has skyrocketed in recent months as consumers quail over the soaring cost of eggs, thanks to a bird flu pandemic that has seen the wholesale culling of egg-laying birds.
'Especially this year, we have had a much higher interest, I would say, three to four times as much as we were seeing this time last year,' said Victoria Lee, who serves the Los Angeles region from her farm in Agua Dulce.
Some Americans have been forking over more than US$10 for a dozen eggs, up to three times their usual price, with supermarkets putting daily limits on the number of cartons a shopper can buy.
The eyewatering costs were a regular feature of last year's presidential campaign, with US President Donald Trump pledging to lower grocery bills when he got to the White House.
But prices have continued to climb, and in March eggs were 60 per cent more expensive than a year earlier, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.
Lee is quick to point out, however, that raising chickens at home is not cheaper than buying eggs at the store.
Instead, it's a question of quality.
'By the time they get to the grocery store (eggs) are on average 48-60 days old,' she said.
'As eggs sit, no matter the quality at the start of that countdown, over time, the protein in the eggs begins to break down.'
Victoria Lee unloads chickens and a portable chicken coop from her truck as they are delivered to a client's house as part of the 'Rent The Chicken' service in La Crescenta, California, April 21, 2025. PHOTO: AFP
Backyard eggs, in contrast, are only as old as however long it took the owner to pick them up off the henhouse floor.
'Free eggs!'
'Rent the Chicken' offers different options that range from around US$500 to over US$1,000 for six months, depending on location and number of birds desired.
Packages include the birds, food, waterers and feeders, additional treats and a chicken care guide.
But it is the included coop that is most striking - a sort of mini house with what looks like a patio, completely protected by fences.
It's also moveable, thanks to wheels on the bottom.
'Every day, our renters will lift this up ... and move it forward... with the chickens having access to fresh grass each day.
'They're getting the experience of being on wide-open pasture with that new stimulation, new bugs to look for, new grass to dig through, while still being safe in a predator-proof coop.'
The convenience is what made the package attractive to Kim, a university professor living in La Crescenta, near Los Angeles, and when her new coop arrived, she was absolutely thrilled.
'Free eggs!' Lee exclaimed while unloading the new backyard tenants and handing over a complimentary dozen laid the previous week.
A client with two chickens can expect up to 14 eggs per week, Lee explains.
An egg-laying hen gets acclimated to their new yard after the chickens and a portable chicken coop were delivered to a house as part of the 'Rent The Chicken' service in La Crescenta, California, April 21, 2025. PHOTO: AFP
Kim, whose son is an athlete who eats a lot of eggs, says although the supply crisis prompted her to rent the chickens, it's 'bigger than that.'
'I really wanted to have something for the kids, also to learn as a way of life, and to compare the taste of the eggs,' she said. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 minutes ago
- Business Times
Succession with purpose
[SINGAPORE] In January 2021, I began thinking more seriously about my firm's succession plan. Providend has been operating for almost a quarter of a century, and the founding team is now in our mid-fifties and some early sixties. It was time to put in place both an ownership and leadership succession plan as soon as practicable. This was not only good for the outgoing leadership team and owners, but also for our staff, and most importantly, for our clients who trust us to be there for them over the long haul. Learning from other markets I started researching succession planning practices in more established wealth advisory markets such as the United States and Australia. I flew to these countries to learn from conferences and spoke with countless firm owners about how they approached succession. I discovered that many ended up with mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as their chosen path. While that approach may have worked for them, I was not convinced it was the right path for us. Why not? To answer that, I need to go back to the early days of Providend. Why we exist Before the early 2000s, most financial planners in Singapore came from insurance companies, banks, or stockbroking firms – back then the term 'financial adviser' didn't exist because the Financial Adviser Act only came into effect on 1 October 2002. When we started Providend in 2001, we wanted to be different. We set out with a few non-negotiable aspirations: BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up To be a professional service firm that provides honest, independent, and competent advice – not a sales organisation earning commissions by selling products. To be a light in the financial world, a shining example of what it means to owe a duty of care to clients. To demonstrate what professional wealth advisory work should look like and operate accordingly. We modelled our ambitions on the Big Four accounting firms and the most respected legal practices worldwide. Our work was to be anchored in advice, not in selling products. We wanted to change how people saw wealth advisers: not as salespeople peddling investments and insurance, but as trusted professionals providing comprehensive wealth advice that enables clients to achieve their ikigai – their reason for being. These were, and still are, our purpose. The culture we built For more than two decades, we toiled tirelessly to build a firm rooted deeply in advisory excellence and ethics. The founding team made real financial sacrifices to make this happen. We built a culture that safeguards these values, so they would be passed down no matter how large we grew. This is why I doubted that selling to a big private equity firm or a large financial institution would allow us to preserve our culture, aspirations, and purpose – the very reasons Providend exists. Even with the best promises from a buyer, who could guarantee that they would truly understand, let alone uphold, our DNA? So, we decided to do succession our way. Leadership-first approach I decided to focus first on leadership succession and, as much as possible, enable future leaders to be the owners of the firm. I also believed the next chief executive of Providend must have advisory roots in the firm, not just managerial competence. Five years ago, we openly identified our second generation of leaders – the 'G2.' I also began thinking about who our 'G3' might be in time. We gave G2 leaders significant responsibilities and projects, and offered them an Employee Share Purchase Plan. Every one subscribed, becoming shareholders. During the same period, we had private equity firms and strategic buyers approach us with acquisition offers. I have rejected them so far. My concerns were threefold. One, these buyers may not truly understand what real wealth advisory is about, nor grasp the DNA of Providend. Two, buyers may promise not to meddle in management, but no one can guarantee what will happen after the deal closes. Three, even if they keep their word, can they really internalise our culture if they weren't born and bred in the firm? At least for now, I have my doubts. Some may say that being owned by a large institution enables access to more financial resources which can be good for clients. But having advised ultra-wealthy clients for decades, I know that having more money is not always the silver bullet. Following our own advice We work with many business owners as part of our advisory practice. With them, we determine how much wealth they need to achieve their ikigai goals. We calculate how much their business needs to be worth to fund those goals, and value the business today to find the value gap. Then we help them develop an exit plan. A key part of that exit plan is leadership succession. Without a clearly written succession plan, the value of the business can be significantly reduced. More importantly, without it, you may not be able to retire when you wish, because the business cannot run without you. And without good leadership succession, your ownership succession is compromised. No one wants to buy a firm without capable leaders to run it, and you may have no leaders to sell to internally. Thinking long term When we rolled out our succession plan in 2021, we set a 10-year business goal ending in 2030. We are now halfway there. Last year, we extended our planning horizon to 2035. We have been investing heavily in infrastructure to meet these goals, using years of retained earnings. By 2035, it is likely that the founding shareholders will have retired and exited the firm so we may not personally enjoy the full fruits of these investments. But as founders, we agreed that this was the right thing to do – not to maximise our own short-term gain, but to ensure the long-term health of the firm. We would rather invest now, run the firm together with the G2 leaders, and hand over to them a company already running smoothly towards the 2035 goals. We felt that this was the more responsible thing to do. A good succession plan should not be limited to what shareholders want. It must consider the interests of all stakeholders – especially clients and staff. That belief has shaped every decision we have made. While selling to large institutions will better benefit founding shareholders financially, the trade-offs are not what we are prepared to make. We are making ikigai decision before financial ones. In that sense, our approach mirrors what Singapore's founding fathers did for future generations. When Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and his team invested in infrastructure, housing, education and economic development, they knew they would not personally see the Singapore we enjoy today. Yet they made those investments for us. They understood that their stewardship was not just for their own time, but for the future. As Singapore celebrates its 60th birthday this year, I am reminded of the sacrificial leadership that built this nation. Without it, we would not be where we are today. Succession, whether for a country or a company, is not merely about replacing leaders or in the case of a company, owners. It is about preserving purpose, values, and culture. It is about planting seeds whose fruits we may never taste, but which will nourish those who come after us. Happy 60th birthday, Singapore. The writer is chief executive officer of Providend, South-east Asia's first fee-only comprehensive wealth advisory firm
Business Times
38 minutes ago
- Business Times
How investors should prepare for a weaker US dollar
[SINGAPORE] The first half of 2025 saw the worst performance of the US dollar (USD) in over 50 years. This comes on the back of an extended, multi-year period of USD strength. By its peak in January this year, the US dollar had risen almost 50 per cent in inflation-adjusted terms against a trade-weighted basket of currencies of major US trade partners from the low in July 2011. The outlook for a structurally weaker USD in the coming years means that investors are likely to have to unlearn the lessons of the past 15 years, and plan accordingly. Before we discuss the implications of USD weakness, let's examine its drivers. The starting point is its overvaluation. According to the Bank for International Settlement's measure, even after the sell-off so far this year, the USD real effective exchange is trading around the previous peak level of February 2002. The second driver is the USD's reserve currency status. For decades, the USD has been seen as the world's pre-eminent reserve currency because of the US' deep capital markets, strong regulatory infrastructure and predictable policymaking institutions. However, the latter two factors have clearly been eroded quite significantly over the past six months. This is not to say the USD's reserve currency status is really under threat – there is no clear competitor – but its advantage is slowly being chipped away. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The third driver is the US' balance of payments position. The US' net international investment position has deteriorated sharply in recent years. Here, former US president Joe Biden's fiscal stimulus following the Covid pandemic played a significant role by creating excess domestic demand, resulting in a wider current account deficit. This means the US has to attract huge amounts of capital inflows from abroad just to stop the USD from weakening. Implications of a weaker USD Against this backdrop, what would a weaker USD mean for investors? There are three angles to look at here: portfolio construction, managing foreign exchange (FX) risk practically, and the emotional aspect of the impact of FX movements on returns. The first question is the easiest to answer. We can summarise the impact of a weaker USD as 1) typically positive for most investments and 2) particularly, the outperformance of non-US assets over US assets. Therefore, the first defence against USD weakness is to be invested, especially in equities and gold. A weaker USD also argues for reducing exposure to US equities, and indeed we have trimmed our US equity allocation in our globally diversified portfolio. The arguments in favour of this approach are high valuations, the extremely high weight of US stocks as a percentage of global market capitalisation and the uncertain impact of US import tariffs on corporate profitability. After all, the tariffs will be 'paid for' by an uncertain mix of i) exporters who will have to reduce prices; ii) US producers who will have to absorb some of the tariffs, thus hurting profit margins; and iii) consumers who will have to pay increased prices. However, the US is still the world's biggest equity market and the source of a lot of innovation. Meanwhile, US equities generally do better in a weak USD environment than in a strong USD environment. Therefore, we retain a significant allocation to US equities in our portfolios. We have also increased our allocation to non-US equities, primarily via a larger allocation to Asia ex-Japan equities. Should we hedge USD exposure? The second question is whether to hedge the USD currency exposure emanating from your portfolio. For equities, we generally do not think this makes sense as a lower USD should boost US corporate earnings as overseas profits get translated into a weaker currency. For USD bonds and USD-denominated deposits, it is more difficult to answer. Naturally, the potential returns for bonds are generally lower than for equities, and therefore currency fluctuations can really make a big difference to returns in your own currency. However, you also need to factor in the hedging cost, which can be significant. Therefore, hedging USD bond exposure is certainly something to consider. But you should approach it in a measured fashion, perhaps taking advantage of short-term bouts of USD strength to increase hedge ratios. An obvious aside is that it makes sense for any deposits to be diversified across different currencies and not just in USDs. Managing emotions The final part of managing currency fluctuations is how to manage your emotions. I think we all understand that a diversified foundation portfolio, which includes overseas investments, is important and that this comes with currency risks. There will be times when the portfolio is doing well in one currency, but not in another, especially over shorter periods of time. The way I manage this is to look at my portfolio over time in terms of different currencies, such as the USD, GBP and SGD. This gives several perspectives of the performance of the portfolio. Of course, if there is an equity bear market, then all three versions of the portfolio are likely to be lower in value, but it does give some sense as to how much of the movement is due to pure FX movements. This may keep you from over-reacting to portfolio fluctuations measured in one currency. It also highlights where you might have an excessive currency exposure that you should be managing over the longer term. As with all aspects of investing, these decisions are very personal. The key is to try to decipher short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. A weaker USD environment is something we have not been used to for a long time and will have significant implications for different asset classes. However, tweaks to your investment style are in order – by slightly reducing your exposure to USD-based assets – rather than a massive overhaul. The writer is chief investment officer at Standard Chartered Bank's wealth solutions unit
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
India proposes lowering GST on small cars, insurance premiums, source says
[NEW DELHI] India has proposed lowering the Goods and Services tax (GST) on small cars to 18 per cent from the current 28 per cent as part of sweeping consumption tax cuts, a government source said on Monday. The reduction, part of a programme of tax cuts announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday, will boost sales of the country's biggest carmaker Maruti Suzuki. The federal government has suggested lowering GST on small petrol and diesel cars to 18 per cent from the current 28 per cent, said the source who is directly involved in the matter. GST on health and life insurance premiums may also be lowered to 5 per cent or even zero from 18 per cent currently, the same source said. The tax cuts, if approved, are expected to be announced by Diwali, a major, five-day Hindu festival in October, the source said. Diwali is also the country's biggest shopping season. India's finance ministry did not reply to an e-mail seeking comment. Sales of small cars, defined as those having engine capacity below 1200cc for petrol vehicles and 1500cc for diesel and not exceeding 4 metres in length, have slowed over the last few years as buyers switched to bigger, feature-rich SUVs. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Small cars made up a third of the 4.3 million passenger vehicles sold in the world's third-largest automobile market last fiscal year, down from nearly 50 per cent pre-Covid, industry data showed. The tax cut will be a big win for Maruti, whose market share has plunged to about 40 per cent from over 50 per cent in the last five years as sales of its small cars such as Alto, Dzire and Wagon-R dropped. The segment makes up half of all cars sold by Maruti - majority-owned by Japan's Suzuki Motor. Carmakers Hyundai Motor India and Tata Motors also stand to gain. Cars with higher engine capacity that attract a 28 per cent GST and additional levy of up to 22 per cent - resulting in total taxes of about 50 per cent - may come under a new special rate of 40 per cent, the source said. The source added that details are being firmed up to consider if any extra levies should be imposed over the 40 per cent to keep the overall tax incidence for big cars the same at 43 to 50 per cent. REUTERS
