
BOJ sees trade deal as raising chance of meeting inflation goal
Uchida's remark came hours after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a trade deal with Tokyo that cuts tariffs on Japan's mainstay automobile imports and spares Tokyo punishing new levies on some other goods.
"It's a very big progress that reduces uncertainty for Japan's economy," Uchida said on Wednesday, adding that the BOJ will incorporate the deal in its quarterly growth and price projections due at the next policy meeting on July 30-31.
"Given the receding uncertainty, by definition it can be said that the likelihood of Japan durably achieving 2% inflation has heightened," Uchida told a news conference.
BOJ policymakers have repeatedly said they need to be more convinced that inflation will sustainably hit its 2% target before raising interest rates further.
While there was still some uncertainty on how the tariffs could affect domestic and overseas economies, the BOJ was looking at both upside and downside risks to economic activity and prices, Uchida said.
"The BOJ needs to adjust monetary policy to best balance upside and downside risks from the perspective of maintaining economic and price stability," Uchida said in an earlier speech to business leaders in the southern west city of Kochi.
He reiterated the BOJ's resolve to continue raising interest rates if the economy and prices move in line with its forecasts.
Sources have told Reuters the BOJ's next quarterly report will warn of uncertainty over the impact of U.S. tariffs, but may offer a less gloomy view on the near-term hit to the economy than three months ago when market volatility was at its peak.
Uchida said the trade deal would hugely reduce uncertainty for companies and, coupled with intensifying labour shortages, prod them to continue to hike wages.
The BOJ expects underlying inflation, or price rises driven by strength in domestic demand, to reach its 2% target around the latter half of fiscal 2026 through 2027, he added.
While media reports that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba may step down could add to political uncertainty, receding worries about a U.S.-Japan trade deal led some analysts to predict the chance of another rate hike by the end of this year.
"The trade deal with the U.S. announced today removes a key downside risk to Japan's economy," said Marcel Thieliant, head of Asia-Pacific at Capital Economics.
"And while the potential resignation of Ishiba creates political risks, our conviction that the Bank of Japan will resume its tightening cycle before the end of the year has risen," Thieliant said.
A Reuters poll showed a majority of economists expect the BOJ to raise its key interest rate again by year-end, though most expect the bank to stand pat at this month's meeting.
The BOJ exited a decade-long, radical stimulus programme last year and raised short-term interest rates to 0.5% in January on the view that Japan was on the cusp of sustainably hitting its 2% inflation target.
While the central bank has signalled its readiness to raise rates further, concerns about the economic fallout from U.S. tariffs forced it to cut its growth forecasts in May.
Further muddling the rate outlook, core consumer inflation has stayed above the BOJ's target for well over three years with steadily rising food costs hurting households.
Uchida said inflation was running hotter than expected as rises in food costs were spreading beyond the price of rice.
"This suggests that, at least with regards to food prices, firms' price-setting behaviour has changed significantly compared to the past," Uchida said, adding that rising food costs may have a relatively strong influence on households' inflation expectations.
The BOJ will focus on how such price pressures will affect underlying inflation in setting monetary policy, he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
How do Trump's tariffs affect Asian countries?
Donald Trump 's latest tariff hikes have hit Asian countries the hardest, signalling a deepening rift with key economies in his drive to reshape global commerce. The hardened position of the US towards longstanding partners such as India and Japan could reshape strategic alignments in Asia, casting doubt on the reliability of Washington as an ally. Three months after unveiling sweeping tariffs for nearly all major countries in the world, Mr Trump on Friday enforced new and revised levies for over 90 nations, with rates soaring as high as 49 per cent. Among the hardest hit were America's allies in Asia – many heavily reliant on exports to the US markets for clothing, electronics, chips and cars – even as they scrambled to strike deals with Mr Trump's negotiators before his 1 August deadline. Myanmar, India and Laos in particular were slapped with almost prohibitive rates. Steep penalties and divisions in South Asia Mr Trump seemed to single out India among major economies, imposing a steep 25 per cent tariff on the South Asian nation while blasting it for its burgeoning energy and weapons trade with Russia. Mr Trump's aggressive rhetoric in recent days had already undermined hopes of New Delhi getting preferential treatment in trade negotiations compared to other Asian economies given the president's bonhomie with Indian prime minister Narendra Modi. His announcement of a steep tariff put paid to any such hope. The US president went after India even after calling it a 'good friend' and despite the country being regarded as a partner in counterbalancing China in the Indo-Pacific. New Delhi and Washington had been working to finalise a trade deal for months and Indian officials expected an agreement by September or October. In recent weeks, though, the talks had reportedly reached a deadlock over agriculture and dairy. While Washington sought greater access to the Indian market for its farm exports like wheat, corn, cotton, and genetically modified crops, New Delhi insisted that agriculture and dairy sectors, which employ over 80 million people, were off-limits. Although the 25 per cent levy on Indian exports announced on Thursday was slightly less than the 27 per cent proposed in April, it came with an unspecified penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil and weapons. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said on Thursday that India's close relations with Moscow remained a 'point of irritation' in relations with Washington. India's neighbours Sri Lanka and Bangladesh each face a 20 per cent levy, targeting export-reliant economies that send large volumes of textiles and garments to the US. The tariff on Bangladesh is significantly lower than the original 37 per cent rate, a big relief to the world's second-largest garment supplier. Pakistan received a 19 per cent tariff after Mr Trump announced a last-minute trade deal with the country. Pakistan, an ally of China as well as the US, had been wooing Mr Trump ever since he first announced the tariffs in April. It credited American diplomatic intervention for ending a brief military conflict with India in May, while New Delhi denied it, and even nominated the president for the Nobel Peace Prize. Winners and losers in Southeast Asia While Myanmar and Laos were slapped with a 40 per cent tariff rate each, fellow Southeast Asian nations like Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, and the Philippines faced a mid-range tariff of 19 per cent. Myanmar and Laos were among the worst hit globally, with rates that could effectively price their exports out of the US market. These countries were especially vulnerable given their dependence on low-cost textile and agricultural exports. Japan and South Korea managed to strike deals with the Trump administration in time and ended up with a baseline tariff rate of 15 per cent, lower than the 25 per cent floated in April. However, a key area of concern remains unresolved: automobile exports from both East Asian nations continue to face a separate 25 per cent tariff unrelated to Thursday's announcement. Given that Japanese and South Korean cars and semiconductors are their key exports to the US, the continuation of such sector-specific duties casts a shadow over trade relations in the long run. Key US ally, Taiwan, the world's largest major semiconductor manufacturer, saw a tariff reprieve from the previous 32 per cent to 20 per cent. The levy on Taipei, though, is temporary as negotiators are trying to hammer out a deal in Washington. 'The US side informed Taiwan's negotiating team in Washington that a provisional tariff rate of 20 per cent would be applied to Taiwan,' the island's president Lai Ching Te said on Friday. The reason for the provisional tariff was that they had 'yet to hold a concluding meeting due to procedural arrangements', he added. 'If a final agreement is reached later, the rate may be lowered.' In West Asia, Syria was hit with a 41 per cent tariff – the highest on the list – despite limited direct trade due to existing US sanctions. Iraq was put on a 35 per cent rate, raising concerns about its oil and mineral exports. In Central Asia, Kazakhstan was hit with a 25 per cent tariff rate, suggesting that even neutral nations weren't exempt from Washington's pressure tactics. Lower levies for Australia and New Zealand Australia was placed on a 10 per cent tariff rate in April and it appeared to have escaped an increase, at least for now. Trade minister Don Farrell said on Friday the White House had confirmed that no country was on a lower tariff rate than Australia. "While we remain in the best possible position under the United States' new tariff regime," a government spokesperson said, 'we will continue to advocate for the removal of all tariffs in line with our free trade agreement.' Neighbouring New Zealand saw its rate climb from 10 per cent to 15. Trade minister Todd McClay called the move 'unfair', saying Wellington had requested a call with US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer to 'start making a case' for a reduction. Trade with China in limbo China was absent from Mr Trump's latest tariffed nations list, putting one of the world's most critical trade relationships in limbo. The two sides previously agreed a 90-day extension of their trade truce until 12 August. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday a trade deal with China was in the works, but it was "not 100% done". US negotiators "pushed back quite a bit" over two days of trade talks with the Chinese in Stockholm this week, Mr Bessent said in an interview with CNBC. "I believe that we have the makings of a deal," he added. How would the tariffs impact Asian countries? The new tariff for India was expected to impact about $40bn worth of exports to America, an Indian government source with knowledge of the trade discussions told Reuters on Friday. The official said the trade talks were still ongoing and a delegation from the US was expected to visit New Delhi later this month. 'These significant tariffs, coupled with penalties linked to India's dealings with Russian energy and military supplies, pose serious challenges for key export sectors including electronics, pharmaceuticals, automobiles, and textiles,' said Ramnivas Mundada, director of Economic Research at Global Data. Exporters in India said the high tariff would hurt the country's textile exports as its competitors like Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia got lower levies. "We are hoping that the tariffs will be rationalised. We will have to recalibrate our strategies depending on the final tariff imposed, Chintan Thakker, chairman of industry body ASSOCHAM in the state of Gujarat, a major apparel exporter, said. Bangladesh called the new tariff rate a "decisive diplomatic victory". 'We proudly congratulate the Bangladesh tariff negotiators on securing a landmark trade deal with the United States, a decisive diplomatic victory,' interim leader Muhammad Yunus told the press.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump has handed Britain a Brexit dividend – now let's exploit it
Canada is stuck with 35pc. The EU is on 15pc. Switzerland is on 39pc while India is on 25pc, with the rest of the world somewhere between those levels. As Donald Trump unveils what looks like a permanent set of tariffs on imports into the American market, one point is absolutely clear: Britain's 10pc rate is now the best deal in the world. We may have got there as much by accident as design, but that is surely irrelevant now. The real task is to work out how to seize a permanent cost advantage – and use it to rebuild British manufacturing. It turns out that tough negotiations and threats of retaliation didn't do much good. Mark Carney, the prime minister of Canada, may have been elected to stand up to Trump, but he has landed his country with a 35pc tariff rate in its biggest market. With a quarter of Canadian GDP dependent on exports to the US, we will see how that plays out, but it is unlikely to be good. The EU may boast about how it is a regulatory and negotiating superpower, but Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, has only managed to get a 15pc rate in a deal that François Bayrou, the French prime minister, described as a 'humiliation' for the bloc. With a €157bn (£136bn) trade surplus at stake, that is not likely to work out very well either. French wine and spirit makers are already reduced to begging for an exemption, while Emmanuel Macron has laughably told his cabinet that the bloc ought to be 'feared' (by whom?). The Irish pharma industry is about to be incinerated and the German auto giants will soon be scouting for factories in Alabama and Texas. The new regime will be a disaster for Europe's already fragile economy. By contrast – and we should give credit where it is due – Sir Keir Starmer and Lord Mandelson, Britain's ambassador in Washington, have managed to secure a trade deal that now looks as if it will be the best in the world. British exporters will permanently trade with the US on better terms than anyone else in the world. We all know how we got there: outside of the EU, and with trade roughly in balance, we were able to get favourable terms. It may not have been what people envisaged when they voted for Brexit, but that hardly matters now. In reality, it has turned into a diplomatic triumph. No one should kid themselves that it doesn't matter. A 5pc permanent cost advantage in the world's biggest economy is significant. Let's keep in mind that, on current growth projections, the US market will just get more and more dominant within the global economy. It is already 25pc bigger than the EU and with America expanding at 3pc annually and the EU at zero, that gap will only get wider and wider. Likewise, the tariffs look permanent. For all the predictions of disaster from mainstream economists, inflation has remained modest in the US, growth is strong, investment is flooding into the country and it is bringing huge revenues into the Treasury, with July breaking all records. Tariffs accounted for $150bn (£114bn) in extra cash for the American government so far in 2025. Why would any president abandon a policy that is working that well? In reality, the tariffs are here to stay, and so is the long-term competitive advantage that we have just locked in.


BreakingNews.ie
25 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Detail still lacking ‘but Ireland would be worse off without EU-US deal'
A swathe of tariffs imposed on other nations shows Ireland would be worse off if there was not an EU-US trade deal, the Tánaiste said. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order that sees tariffs of 15 per cent or above imposed on trading partners including Brazil, Lesotho, Taiwan and Switzerland. Advertisement The EU struck a trade deal with the US five days before Mr Trump said a 30 per cent tariff would kick in for the bloc. The deal sees 15 per cent tariffs on most EU goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US. President Donald Trump signs an executive order. Photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP. There are 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. Simon Harris said on Friday after a meeting of the trade forum at Government Buildings that a lot of detail of the agreement still needs to be clarified as he defended the deal. Advertisement 'Without a deal between the US and the EU, today would have seen 30% tariffs introduced by President Trump on the EU, and would also have seen very, very significant counter measures introduced by the EU to the tune of around 90 odd billion euro,' the Tanaiste said. 'There's absolutely no doubt that that would have been a moment of catastrophe in terms of our economic wellbeing as a country.' He added: 'We'd be in a very different and a much worse position I think if we were standing here today with no deal. 'You don't have to take my word for that, if you just see the executive order last night and all of the tariffs levelled in other countries, including countries that didn't have deals. Advertisement 'They were generally much, much higher than the tariff rate for the European Union.' He said the EU tariff rate of 15% would come into effect from August 7th. Tariffs on pharmaceuticals would remain at zero until the US administration concludes its Section 232 investigation, relating to imported goods of importance to national security, into the sector. President Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Photo: Jacquelyn Martin/AP. Mr Harris said he was informed by Brussels that this is expected to conclude in around two weeks. Advertisement Mr Harris also said 'there is too many variables' to yet know the effect of the tariff differential between Northern Ireland and Ireland. He said he spoke with Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill, deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, and the Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald who agreed on this. 'So to give you an example, at the moment butter in Ireland already has a tariff of around 16 per cent on it, pre-existing. 'It's had 10 per cent on top of that since President Trump's last round, so that's meant butter in Ireland had a tariff of 26 per cent. Under the new EU deal, that will fall to 16%. Advertisement 'Butter in the UK, if I can use that as a comparison, will actually probably end up with 16%, plus 10%, so 26%. 'I'm just using a pound of butter as an example here, but if you look at it, you know, at a headline rate, you'd say 'Well, there'd be lower tariff on butter in the UK than Ireland', and actually that's probably not the case. 'So we need to tease our way through this. But there is no doubt that there will be challenges that will have to be worked through.' Business Tánaiste to hold talks with Northern leaders over... Read More He said: 'I suppose the last point I'd make is that this is a subset of businesses. It's really a subset of a subset, because this will obviously only affect businesses that are doing cross-border trade and exporting to the United States of America. So it's not to be in any way dismissive of that, but it will obviously only affect that proportion of the business community. 'Pharma is another example. I mean, the EU seems to have a commitment in writing to 15 per cent or less, no more than 15 per cent for pharma. 'The UK language is much more vague. It doesn't have a number beside it, so we'll need to see where that brings us in the weeks ahead.'