
Indiana Bible College sues choral composer over copyright infringement claims
In a complaint filed June 2 in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, the Indianapolis-based college said statements made by Fred Bock Music Co. and choral music composer Rosephanye Powell have damaged the school's reputation and led it to lose business.
Indiana Bible College drew attention with the late April debut of 'John 1,' and a video of the song being performed by the college choir went viral.
Powell and California-based Gentry Publication maintain that 'John 1' is derivative of the classical a cappella 'The Word Was God,' a popular piece in choral circles that Powell wrote in 1996.
In late May, Powell took to social media to claim the school infringed on her copyrighted work.
Powell claimed IBC copied, altered and performed her song without permission in producing 'John 1.' This was after she and Gentry denied the college permission to use the song in 2024, she said.
Song dispute: 'No credit or consent.' Composer says Indiana Bible College stole her song for streaming
After Gentry made a copyright claim against a 'John 1' video on YouTube, the platform removed the video. IBC still has the video of the spring performance of the song on Facebook.
"John 1" debuted on Apple Music on May 2, 2025, and its sheet music was made available for sale.
'This song is undeniably a derivative of my work,' Powell, a music professor at Auburn University in Alabama, said in a May 23 Facebook post, adding that the Indiana choir made minor alterations to notes, rests and rhythms to "The Word Was God."
Fred Block Music Co. owns Gentry Publication, the publisher of 'The Word Was God,' which is based on the first chapter of the Gospel of John in the Bible.
Indiana Bible College in its lawsuit says 'John 1' is an original composition and does not infringe on 'any protectable elements' of "The Word Was God," and that it owns the music in the new song, with the 'significant musical elements … independently composed in the summer of 2024.'
The college claims Powell and Gentry 'published and amplified false statements across Dr. Powell's and Fred Bock's social-media channels,' 'encouraged others to renounce John 1 and IBC,' and 'used IndyStar to publish an article accusing IBC and its writers of unauthorized derivative, copyright infringement, and intellectual dishonesty.'
College leaders did not respond to IndyStar's request for comment prior to publication of a May 30 story detailing Powell's concerns over "John 1."
Indiana Bible College said the statements made by Powell and Gentry hurt its reputation, resulted in loss of prospective contracts, and led to those listed as writers and composers garnering hostility.
The defendants influenced third parties from doing business with the school, which had prospective business relationships with students, composers, worship communities, venues, and publishers for the use of 'John 1' and other compositions, the lawsuit states.
IndyStar left messages with the college and its lawyer for comment on the lawsuit, but had not heard back by the time of publication.
The college's filing also lists unidentified defendants who have 'published or republished defamatory statements or induced business interference.'
'Third parties have viewed, shared, or reposted Defendants' statements, further damaging Plaintiff's business and personal reputations,' and the defendants are inducing venues, publishers, and worship communities to cease using or promoting 'John 1,' the complaint says.
Powell has seen a lot of support from the choral music community on social media, including statements from state choral associations and businesses. She is the 2025 recipient of the American Choral Directors Association's prestigious Raymond Brock Memorial Commission.
J. W. Pepper, the world's largest sheet music retailer on May 28 posted to its Facebook page, 'We stand with Rosephanye Powell. As a champion of original music, we support the artists whose work we distribute,' the company posted on May 28. ' We applaud Dr. Powell's courage in speaking out to defend her intellectual property. Creative work is not only labor — it's legacy.'
Indiana Bible College is seeking compensatory and punitive damages and asking the court to declare 'John 1' does not infringe on and is not derivative of 'The Word Was God.'
The school also wants the court to order Powell and her publisher not to make defamatory statements, remove defamatory statements from websites and social media and issue public retractions.
It requests a trial by jury.
Both Powell and Gentry Publication said they are standing by their claims that 'John 1' was derived from 'The Word Was God.'
'In the strongest terms we disagree with all of their allegations and will continue to defend Dr. Powell's work and reputation as well as our copyright ownership in 'The Word Was God,' Gentry Publication said in a statement provided to IndyStar June 4.
Powell said she has no plans to back off of claims that the bible college used "The Word Was God" to create "John 1."
'You're going to tell me to be quiet because you're losing money over something based on my work?' she said. 'We're speaking truth. ... They want this to go away.'
'They've got the wrong one."
Indiana Bible College, headed by Rev. Joshua Carson, is affiliated with the United Pentecostal Church International.
Founded in 1981 and currently located at 1502 E. Sumner Ave., the school posted to its social media accounts on May 25 that it was working on clearing up the matter in private.
'The release of the choral arrangement 'John 1' has been met with claims of copyright infringement," it said. "Establishing whether copyright infringement has occurred is extraordinarily fact sensitive, and parties to copyright infringement disputes frequently genuinely disagree whether the legal standard for infringement has been met. We are actively discussing the matter privately with the only party that has a legal standing to dispute the matter.'
The school's filing follows the May 29 receipt of a letter from Gentry and Powell alleging copyright infringement and threatening a lawsuit if the college did not comply with their demands.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-ESPN will not air Spike Lee's docuseries on Colin Kaepernick, citing 'creative differences'
By Rory Carroll and Lisa Richwine BEVERLY HILLS, California (Reuters) -Director Spike Lee's multi-part documentary series for ESPN Films about former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who sparked a national debate when he protested racial injustice nearly a decade ago, will not be released, the filmmaker and ESPN said. "ESPN, Colin Kaepernick and Spike Lee have collectively decided to no longer proceed with this project as a result of certain creative differences," ESPN said in a statement to Reuters on Saturday. "Despite not reaching finality, we appreciate all the hard work and collaboration that went into this film." Lee told Reuters on Friday that the series was not going to be released. "It's not coming out. That's all I can say," Lee said on the red carpet ahead of the Harold and Carole Pump Foundation dinner, a fundraiser for cancer research and treatment, in Beverly Hills, California. Asked why, the Oscar-winning director declined to elaborate, citing a nondisclosure agreement. "I can't. I signed a nondisclosure. I can't talk about it." Kaepernick played for the San Francisco 49ers from 2011 to 2016. He ignited a national debate in 2016 when he knelt during the U.S. national anthem to protest systemic racism and police brutality. The 37-year-old athlete has not played in the NFL since that season. Many experts believed his political activism, which triggered a movement that drew the ire of U.S. President Donald Trump, was the key reason teams were wary of signing him. He later filed a collusion grievance against team owners, which was settled with the league in 2019. A representative for Kaepernick said the player had no comment about the docuseries on Saturday. Production on the series began in 2022, with Walt Disney-owned ESPN touting it as a "full, first-person account" of Kaepernick's journey that would feature extensive interviews with the player. In September, Puck News reported the project faced delays amid disagreements between Kaepernick and Lee over the direction of the film, and that ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro was open to allowing the filmmakers to shop it elsewhere. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stephen A. Smith would be ‘good' with never speaking to Lakers' LeBron James again
The post Stephen A. Smith would be 'good' with never speaking to Lakers' LeBron James again appeared first on ClutchPoints. Stephen A Smith and LeBron James have some major beef against each other. Earlier this year, a series of events led to the Los Angeles Lakers superstar confronting the media personality after a game. James, who took offense to some of Smith's comments regarding his son Bronny, was visibly heated during the conversation. It seems like the relationship between the two is now fully irreparable. In a recent appearance on Gilbert Arenas' podcast, Smith talked about their disagreement. The ESPN personality said that there was no relationship between the two anymore, and that they don't like each other at all. He also took offense to James' actions during that fiasco, including his appearance on 'The Pat McAfee Show', which ran after Smith's 'First Take'. He finished his statement by saying that if they never talk again, he'd be fine with that. 'I'm never going to denigrate any employer, any partner, or myself by getting into anything excessively, unnecessarily, when it comes to him or anybody else,' Smith said on 'Gil's Arena'. 'I'm going to do my job. I'm going to cover the game of basketball. But if I never, ever speak to him again in life, that will be OK. And I'm good with it.' James and Smith got into it last year after Smith made comments about the Lakers star and his son, Bronny. Smith said that LeBron should step in 'as a father' and vouch for Bronny to get less playing time. That clearly rubbed James the wrong way, as the Lakers star chirped at Smith on social media before confronting the ESPN talk show host after one of their games. While Smith seemed initially apologetic over the fiasco, he has since expressed his grievances against James over this feud. The two have gone on interviews talking about the fiasco and their dislike for each other. Related: Lakers' Luka Doncic gets huge update after injury scare Related: Lakers' Luka Doncic suffers apparent injury in EuroBasket exhibition
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'We Need Him To Go Off And Shoot Thor Next.' That Time Chris Hemsworth Wanted To Do An Epic Stunt, But Disney Axed It
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. While Tom Cruise is one of the rare actors who truly does all his own stunts on film, many other actors attempt to do a great deal themselves. Chris Hemsworth has let himself be lit on fire for movies before, which is likely a step further than many others in Hollywood might go. However, while the Thor star has dealt with fire, apparently water is a step too far. It wasn't a stunt for a movie that Chris Hemsworth reveals he wasn't allowed to do recently. He tells THR that for the new season of Limitless: Live Better Now, available with a Disney+ subscription, there had been plans for him to attempt to surf a 40 foot wave. Unfortunately, it seems the powers that be decided such a thing was too risky. Hemsworth said… I was going to attempt to surf a 40-foot wave and train with big wave specialists, but we couldn't get it through the ranks. The risk assessment, basically, was too far gone, so I ended up climbing a 200-meter dam wall. Ironically the episode of Limitless where the wave stunt would have occurred is entitled 'Risk.' Clearly the episode needed to let Hemsworth put himself at some amount of risk, but the wave was seen as too risky, while climbing a dam was apparently fine. One of the major reasons stuntpeople are used in movies isn't that stars are unwilling to put themselves art risk, it's that the studio and/or the insurance company won't let them. If a major film lead gets injured, it can delay movies, costing everybody involved money. Tom Cruise once fired an insurance company for not letting perform a Mission: Impossible stunt. But the issue for Chris Hemsworth wasn't simply that if something went wrong it would cause problems for the Disney+ series. He says it was higher ups at Disney that killed the idea, because getting hurt on Limitless could have jeopardised a his next marvel movie, a film, with a lot riding on it. Hemsworth continued… They both have a fair amount of risk attached to them, but [the dam climb] got past the risk assessment team. So there definitely was [concern from above]: 'No, we need him to go off and shoot Thor next. We can't have him drown while filming a big wave episode.' We know Chris Hemsworth is part of the Avengers: Doomsday cast, and that movie is so important to Disney it's honestly a shock any of the cast is let out in public where they might trip and hurt themselves. While Hemsworth recently confirmed a viral video was not part of an announcement he was walking away from Thor, if the actor ever wants to surf a 40 foot wave, he might need to be done with Thor before anybody will let him. Solve the daily Crossword