Washing-up liquid can damage aquatic life, warns study on surfactants: Here's why its usage should be ceased
Live Events
Study highlights impact of surfactants on environment
FAQs
People buying washing-up liquid may soon need to reconsider their choices in the UK. However, a study has alarmed several individuals, with a stern warning to the people using washing-up liquid. The study, published in the Journal of Applied Microbiology, has highlighted the negative impact of such products and their components on the planet.In the UK, this common household item is typically sold in plastic bottles. On an annual basis, the households in the country end up using millions of these bottles, Daily Express reported.Experts in the home cleaning industry have expressed major concerns related to the usage of washing-up liquid, which go beyond its packaging issue. They have claimed that the bottle as well as the ingredients used in it pose a significant threat to the environment, according to a Mirror report.As per the experts, the combination of fossil fuels and the chemicals inside the bottle might end up putting the aquatic life at danger.In its defence after the claims, Sustainably Lazy suggests that the liquids from its company have 'surfactants', an active ingredient that is responsible for removing dirt and stains from the dishes. The organisation stated that it ensures that the particles in the liquid dissolve easily in the water.However, it has been claimed that there are several mainstream brands, which have been using "fossil fuel-derived surfactants". The contents in these products end up reaching and polluting the rivers, putting the aquatic life at risk.The warning against the use of washing-up liquid has also received support from Ethical Superstore, which highlights the availability of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) in most of the conventional liquids that people buy from stores. The SLS component works as a surfactant and reduces water's surface tension. Also, it creates foam, which makes cleaning easier.However, the ingredient does not "just dissolve away to nothing when it's used," Ethical Superstore states. According to them, it ultimately ends up lingering in mainstream water bodies. This endangers marine life and also possesses damage to the ecosystem.In a recent study, which came out in the Journal of Applied Microbiology, the researchers showed how surfactants can have a negative impact on the environment and damage marine life.It stated that surfactants are being used thoughtlessly in households, along with industries. They are most commonly used in soaps, personal care products, detergents and other items.These surfactants can penetrate cell membranes and prove to be highly toxic for the living organisms, read the study, adding that such components have been found to have caused damage to gills as well as loss of sight in fishes.On an average, the UK generates more than 170 million tonnes of plastic water in a year, while only a third of this packaging gets recycled.People can opt for washing-up liquid bars, besides going for environmentally-friendly liquid options available in the market.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
04-07-2025
- NDTV
GOP Tax Package Gives NASA Billions After Donald Trump Proposed Cuts
The massive GOP tax and spending package, passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday, will provide $10 billion to NASA programs that the administration had proposed to partially cut, including the space agency's marquee moon program and operations at the International Space Station. The reconciliation package includes $4.1 billion for NASA's Boeing Co.-built Space Launch System, or SLS, rocket and $20 million directed to the Lockheed Martin Corp. Orion crew capsule to help fund the fourth and fifth missions of the agency's Artemis moon program. These missions, which Trump had suggested canceling in his original budget request, would establish a lunar space station called Gateway and utilize a contracted landing system from Blue Origin for the first time to place humans on the moon. President Donald Trump is scheduled to sign the bill into law at 5 p.m. local time in Washington on Friday, according to the White House. In May, the administration had called to phase out the "grossly expensive and delayed" SLS rocket and Orion crew capsule after the third Artemis mission and replace them with commercial options for sending humans to the moon. The tax package also allocates $1.25 billion for maintaining the International Space Station over the next five years after the administration had instead proposed reducing crew and cargo missions to the orbiting laboratory. It further directs $700 million for a Mars communication spacecraft that could assist with bringing samples of Martian soil back to Earth, a long-term science initiative the White House had planned to outright cancel. Congress's push to allocate billions of dollars to the space agency suggests that lawmakers may be concerned about sustaining some of NASA's most prominent programs. The Artemis program in particular has been fiercely supported in Congress in part because the development of the SLS rocket and Orion crew capsule supports tens of thousands of jobs in Republican-controlled states like Texas, Alabama, Mississippi and Florida. Lawmakers have also made the case that the current Artemis architecture is the fastest way to beat China to the moon and protect the US's national security interests. The legislation also highlights Congress's desire for NASA to send humans back to the moon. Trump, while being advised by SpaceX Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk, had previously called for sending humans to Mars, signaling a potential change in direction for the space agency. The package imposes a fee on rockets and spacecraft that launch to space and land back on Earth, a charge that is likely to most directly affect SpaceX, the world's most prolific launch provider. The provision is projected to generate around $60 million to support the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation through 2034, according to a summary of the bill. Other last-minute adds to the legislation included a tax credit for spaceports, which would give these facilities the ability to issue tax-exempt bonds, and a provision allocating $85 million to transfer one of NASA's historic Space Shuttle vehicles to the Johnson Space Center in Houston for public exhibition. The transfer of the shuttle, a win for the Texas delegation, narrowly made it into the legislation after being subject to a review by the Senate rules-keeper for final inclusion.
Economic Times
11-06-2025
- Economic Times
Trump vs Musk: How a political feud threatens to send NASA into the ‘biggest crisis' in its history
$22 billion at stake Live Events NASA caught in political crossfire Human spaceflight, too, is on edge Artemis and Mars ambitions in jeopardy The SLS vs Starship debate Global partnerships fray Earth loses out DAVINCI+ and VERITAS (Venus missions) Landsat Next, critical for climate change monitoring EnVision, a joint mission with ESA Mars Sample Return, a flagship programme in partnership with ESA Existing missions like Juno, Mars Odyssey, New Horizons, and MAVEN, which could face premature shutdowns A legacy at risk (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The spectacle of President Donald Trump 's public feud with billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has now spilled into one of America's most strategic and fragile domains: space. What began as a war of words over a contentious spending bill has become a flashpoint threatening to unravel decades of US leadership in space science and the centre of the dispute is the White House's proposed federal budget, which seeks to radically reshape NASA's priorities. If passed, it could place over 40 current and future missions at risk, many involving climate science and planetary exploration, while funnelling resources into a narrowly defined vision: putting American boots back on the Moon, and eventually, on fuel to the fire, Trump has openly threatened to cancel federal contracts with Musk's SpaceX, a company now central to NASA's operations. That threat risks not only logistical disruptions, like resupplying the International Space Station ISS ), but also casts long shadows over future crewed missions that depend on SpaceX's Starship rocket.'The astonishing exchanges, snap decisions and U-turns we've witnessed in the last week undermine the very foundations that we build our ambitions on,' said Dr Simeon Barber, space scientist at the Open University, as quoted by the BBC. 'Space science and exploration rely upon long-term planning and cooperation between government, companies and academic institutions.'At the heart of the storm are nearly $22 billion in government contracts awarded to SpaceX, spanning NASA's Commercial Crew Program, ISS cargo missions, and the Artemis Moon programme. The feud escalated on June 5, 2025, when Trump publicly threatened to scrap all government contracts with Musk's responded with a dramatic (later-deleted) post on X:'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.'He later backed down, replying to a user urging restraint:'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.'Even before this drama unfolded, NASA was staring down an existential challenge. The proposed budget includes a 25% overall cut, with science and Earth observation missions absorbing the brunt. Programmes that track climate change, explore the solar system, and enable global partnerships, some decades in the making, are now Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society, called it 'the biggest crisis ever to face the US space programme.' That's no exaggeration: while the budget proposes a $100 million boost for Mars-related initiatives, almost everything else is on the chopping block.'President Trump is repurposing NASA to land astronauts on the Moon before the Chinese, and eventually to plant a US flag on Mars,' said Dr Adam Baker, a space analyst at Cranfield University, reported BBC. 'Everything else is secondary.'SpaceX's Crew Dragon is currently NASA's only certified spacecraft capable of carrying astronauts to and from the ISS. Under a $5 billion contract, it ended NASA's reliance on Russia's Soyuz after the Space Shuttle's Crew Dragon is supporting the Crew-10 mission, while Axiom Space prepares a fourth private astronaut mission. Boeing's Starliner remains uncertified and unproven for long-term operational SpaceX, human spaceflight missions could face serious setbacks, Dreier warned:'The potential cancellation of these contracts would delay or completely halt US-led missions to the ISS.'NASA's Artemis III mission, aiming to land astronauts on the Moon in 2027, relies on SpaceX's Starship as its lunar lander. So far, the company has received over $15 billion in NASA contracts for Falcon 9 and Starship Starship's recent test flights have ended in failure, and if the partnership collapses, it could derail timelines and leave the door open for rivals, particularly China, to lead in lunar long-touted goal of sending astronauts to Mars, once aligned with Musk's vision, now appears politically volatile. This focus comes at the cost of near-term science and Earth-based officials have justified the cuts as a streamlining effort. NASA's Space Launch System (SLS), with a staggering $4.1 billion launch cost, has long been criticised for overruns and delays. The budget proposes sidelining SLS in favour of cheaper, reusable the private sector may not offer the stability required. Starship's repeated failures and Blue Origin's early-stage development raise questions.'The worry is that NASA may be jumping out of the frying pan into the fire,' Dr Barber said. 'If SpaceX or Blue Origin run into trouble, Congress will have to foot the bill anyway.'NASA is not just a national agency; it's a cornerstone of international space cooperation. Two major joint missions with the European Space Agency, Mars Sample Return and the Rosalind Franklin rover, are in jeopardy due to US budget cuts.'These missions are more than science, they're signals of trust and cooperation,' said Prof Sir Martin Sweeting of Surrey Satellite Technology has signalled plans to build more autonomous space capabilities, reflecting a future where it cannot depend on US some of the worst-hit programmes are the ones that help protect our own planet. Earth observation satellites, critical for tracking wildfires, droughts, and sea level rise, are at risk of 40 active or planned missions are now in danger, including:As per NASA's muted official response came via spokesperson Bethany Stevens:'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space. We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.'But former Deputy Administrator Lori Garver was more direct:'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'This isn't just about rockets or rivalries. It's about a legacy of American leadership in space that now faces erosion due to political volatility and personal per Reuters, if Congress approves the budget, or allows it to take effect by default, the damage could be irreversible. NASA's 18,000-strong workforce faces uncertainty, and global trust in US-led space efforts may erode for years to Dreier puts it: 'Once space missions are turned off, it is hard, if not impossible, to start them up again.'
Hindustan Times
06-06-2025
- Hindustan Times
SpaceX's future in jeopardy amid Elon Musk-Donald Trump feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts
The feud between billionaire Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump can lead to dramatic fallouts for about $22 billion worth of SpaceX's government contracts and multiple US space programmes. The disagreement between them is rooted in Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. In a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk's companies. Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin "decommissioning" SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA. It is the only US vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the US space programme. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS programme, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building a formidable market share that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. "It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities," said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. Under Trump in recent months, the US space industry and NASA's workforce of 18,000 have seen looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the U.S. space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission. But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power.(With Inputs from Reuters)
