Perth and Kinross Council spent £3 million on consultants over the past three years
Perth and Kinross Council has spent around £3 million - possibly more - employing the use of consultants over the past three years.
Between 2022 and 2025 the local authority awarded 31 contracts for consultants often due to a lack of resources or in-house specialist knowledge.
The contracts range from £594,300 (exc VAT) for its Perth People Place and Perth Transport Futures programme - which includes the Cross Tay Link Road project - to £5625 (exc VAT) on VAT advice for Perth's new leisure facility PH2O.
Most of the figures are publicly available on the government's Public Contracts Scotland website and exclude VAT. However there were no financial figures published for four of the 31 contracts awarded to consultants by PKC between 2022 and 2025. PKC has suggested this may be due to the information being "commercially sensitive".
Explanations as to why consultants were paid to do a job rather than council employees was provided by Perth and Kinross Council in response to a Freedom of Information request made by the Local Democracy Reporting Service. In many cases it was blamed on a lack of council resources.
A Perth and Kinross Council spokesperson said: "Payments for individual consultants vary depending on the length and nature of the work involved.
"In some cases, costs may not be published if they were commercially sensitive; for example if supplier rates could be worked out from the value of the contract."
In many cases - such as the review of the council's arm's-length external organisations (ALEOs) - PKC said contracting out the work saved the local authority money.
A PKC spokesperson said: "We have saved money by going direct to a consultancy for the options appraisal exercise they have undertaken as this was carried out over a much shorter time period than the temporary post and at a lesser cost."
Vice-convener of Perth and Kinross Council's Scrutiny and Performance Committee Labour councillor Alasdair Bailey believes the mounting figures are the "inevitable consequence of the years of real-terms cuts we've seen to council budgets".
Bailie Bailey said: "This is something that I'll take time to dig into the detail of in order to find and question any cases where spends look excessive. I'd like to thank the Perthshire Advertiser for getting this information into the public domain.
"The headline figures are concerning but - to put this into perspective - the use of consultants sometimes allows the council to do more without having to employ full-time permanent staff. These numbers are therefore an inevitable consequence of the years of real-terms cuts we've seen to council budgets. Gone are the days when a council the size of Perth and Kinross can justify having all the specialists in the building all of the time."
The amount of taxpayers' money spent on consultant fees to provide services to Perth and Kinross Council has risen over the course of the the three years.
In 2022/23 the total cost was £721, 573. It rose to £779,553 in 2023/25 before soaring to £935,210 in 2024/25. All costs indicated on the Public Contracts Scotland website exclude VAT.
Costs not listed include two contracts awarded in 2023 and 2024 for a Development Control Works Package.
Explaining the need for a consultant to provide the package, a PKC spokesperson said: "As part of the Flooding Teams duties, we provide non-statutory consultation to all proposed development applications across Perth and Kinross. While we endeavour to appraise these in-house, during times of increased workload or flooding events where resources are stretched it is not possible to maintain the service and therefore, we require to utilise the support of an external consultant to ensure a continuation of the planning response. The consultant is also occasionally tasked with undertaking design work or focussing on larger, more complex planning applications which may be out with the skill set currently within the Flooding team."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TTG
2 days ago
- TTG
Jet2holidays general manager trade Lloyd Cross to leave operator after 13 years
Cross has spent 13 years at Jet2holidays in several roles including national sales manager, regional sales manager, senior trade sales executive and sales advisor. He took up the general manager position in February 2022. In a LinkedIn post on Thursday (14 August), Cross said: "After 13 fantastic years at Jet2holidays, my time has come to an end. It's certainly been a journey and the growth has been phenomenal! "I have had the pleasure of working with so many brilliant people both internally and with our partners, learning from them along the way. Thanks to everyone who has helped make it such a great experience! I'm staying in the travel industry and can't wait to start a new chapter shortly." Cross was part of the 2020/21 TTG 30 Under 30 cohort and remains an Institute of Travel and Tourism board member.
Daily Record
3 days ago
- Daily Record
Perth and Kinross Council spent £3 million on consultants over the past three years
A Perth and Kinross councillor believes the rising spend on outsourcing work is an "inevitable consequence" of cuts to the local authority's budget Perth and Kinross Council has spent around £3 million - possibly more - employing the use of consultants over the past three years. Between 2022 and 2025 the local authority awarded 31 contracts for consultants often due to a lack of resources or in-house specialist knowledge. The contracts range from £594,300 (exc VAT) for its Perth People Place and Perth Transport Futures programme - which includes the Cross Tay Link Road project - to £5625 (exc VAT) on VAT advice for Perth's new leisure facility PH2O. Most of the figures are publicly available on the government's Public Contracts Scotland website and exclude VAT. However there were no financial figures published for four of the 31 contracts awarded to consultants by PKC between 2022 and 2025. PKC has suggested this may be due to the information being "commercially sensitive". Explanations as to why consultants were paid to do a job rather than council employees was provided by Perth and Kinross Council in response to a Freedom of Information request made by the Local Democracy Reporting Service. In many cases it was blamed on a lack of council resources. A Perth and Kinross Council spokesperson said: "Payments for individual consultants vary depending on the length and nature of the work involved. "In some cases, costs may not be published if they were commercially sensitive; for example if supplier rates could be worked out from the value of the contract." In many cases - such as the review of the council's arm's-length external organisations (ALEOs) - PKC said contracting out the work saved the local authority money. A PKC spokesperson said: "We have saved money by going direct to a consultancy for the options appraisal exercise they have undertaken as this was carried out over a much shorter time period than the temporary post and at a lesser cost." Vice-convener of Perth and Kinross Council's Scrutiny and Performance Committee Labour councillor Alasdair Bailey believes the mounting figures are the "inevitable consequence of the years of real-terms cuts we've seen to council budgets". Bailie Bailey said: "This is something that I'll take time to dig into the detail of in order to find and question any cases where spends look excessive. I'd like to thank the Perthshire Advertiser for getting this information into the public domain. "The headline figures are concerning but - to put this into perspective - the use of consultants sometimes allows the council to do more without having to employ full-time permanent staff. These numbers are therefore an inevitable consequence of the years of real-terms cuts we've seen to council budgets. Gone are the days when a council the size of Perth and Kinross can justify having all the specialists in the building all of the time." The amount of taxpayers' money spent on consultant fees to provide services to Perth and Kinross Council has risen over the course of the the three years. In 2022/23 the total cost was £721, 573. It rose to £779,553 in 2023/25 before soaring to £935,210 in 2024/25. All costs indicated on the Public Contracts Scotland website exclude VAT. Costs not listed include two contracts awarded in 2023 and 2024 for a Development Control Works Package. Explaining the need for a consultant to provide the package, a PKC spokesperson said: "As part of the Flooding Teams duties, we provide non-statutory consultation to all proposed development applications across Perth and Kinross. While we endeavour to appraise these in-house, during times of increased workload or flooding events where resources are stretched it is not possible to maintain the service and therefore, we require to utilise the support of an external consultant to ensure a continuation of the planning response. The consultant is also occasionally tasked with undertaking design work or focussing on larger, more complex planning applications which may be out with the skill set currently within the Flooding team."
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Scots receive a record £2,669 more public spending each than UK average
Scots receive nearly £2,700 more public spending each than the UK average, according to official figures revealing that the gap has widened to record levels. A major report, published by SNP ministers, showed total spending by the UK and Scottish Governments equated to £21,192 per person in Scotland in the 2024/25 financial year. This compared with an average £18,523 of public spending per person across the UK as a whole – £2,669 lower than the figure for Scotland. The cross-border spending gap was by far the largest on record, £2,311 up on the previous year and having nearly doubled over the previous decade. The Scottish Government's annual Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland report also found public spending accounted for a record 52 per cent of the country's GDP, compared with 44.4 per cent of the UK as a whole. This was more than five points higher than before the pandemic. And Scotland's deficit – the difference between total revenue and expenditure – has surged to 11.7 per cent of GDP. This was more than double the UK figure of 5.1 per cent and higher than anywhere else in Europe. The report was published after SNP ministers recently confirmed they backed full fiscal autonomy, with Scotland getting control over all taxes and the abolition of the Barnett formula that provides the higher spending from Westminster. But Ian Murray, the UK Government's Scottish Secretary, said that would mean a funding gap of more than £14bn, resulting in 'turbo-charged austerity and economic chaos for Scotland'. He said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Mr Murray added that Scots want to see 'better outcomes' from the extra money the SNP has to spend on schools, hospitals and policing. Craig Hoy, the Scottish Tories' shadow finance secretary, said: 'The SNP Government's own figures highlight the huge, and rising, Union dividend that Scots enjoy thanks to being in a strong United Kingdom. 'Every single person in the country is almost £2,600 better off because we are part of the UK. If we lost that – as we would if the SNP achieved their goal of Scottish independence – it would have a catastrophic impact on the nation's finances.' He said the figures also demonstrated the 'economic lunacy' of Sir Keir Starmer's opposition to allowing new exploration licences to be issued for the North Sea. Oil and gas revenues in Scotland's geographic share of the UK's waters fell by £800m last year to £4.1bn. The Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland report is produced by Scottish Government economists and calculates public spending on devolved services, such as health and education, by SNP ministers and local authorities. Scotland is also allocated a population share of spending by the UK Government on reserved policy areas such as defence and debt interest. The report said the main reason for Scotland's deficit increasing from 9.7 per cent to 11.7 per cent was 'Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK'. Oil and gas raise tax revenue total Public spending in Scotland rose by £6.2bn to £117.6bn last year, the report said, with the cost of benefits rising more quickly than across the UK. This was partly thanks to the Scottish Government's more generous welfare system. Tax revenues north of the border totalled nearly £91.4bn, £91 per person higher than the UK average. However, they were £578 per person lower when oil and gas were excluded. Scotland's 11. per cent notional deficit amounted to £26.5bn, a rise of more than £5bn compared to the previous year. The next highest deficits in the EU were recorded in Romania (9.3 per cent of GDP), Poland (6.6 per cent) and France (5.8 per cent). Shona Robison, the Scottish finance secretary, said: 'The decisions we have taken here in Scotland are helping support sustainable public finances. For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' But Struan Stevenson, the chief executive of the pro-Union Scottish Business UK group, said: 'The sharp rise of the 'Union dividend' once again in the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland figures show that independence would be a disastrous calamity for Scotland, costing us tens of billions and almost bankrupting the nation at a stroke.'
