&w=3840&q=100)
Trump slams Brazil over Bolsonaro 'witch hunt'; Lula pushes back against US 'interference'
US President Donald Trump on Monday lashed out at Brazilian authorities, accusing them of conducting a 'witch hunt' against his close right-wing ally Jair Bolsonaro.
The comments drew swift backlash from Brasília, which leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva setting diplomatic niceties aside and hitting back at Trump's 'interference', adding that 'no one is above the law.'
Bolsonaro faces trial before Brazil's Supreme Court for allegedly orchestrating a 'criminal organisation' that sought to overturn the results of the 2022 presidential election, which he lost to leftist leader Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In a post on Truth Social, Trump posted, 'Brazil is doing a terrible thing on their treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro. I have watched, as has the World, as they have done nothing but come after him, day after day, night after night, month after month, year after year!'
Defending the far-right leader, Trump added, 'He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE. I have gotten to know Jair Bolsonaro, and he was a strong leader, who truly loved his country — also, a very tough negotiator on TRADE.'
Trump pointed to Bolsonaro's rising popularity, claiming 'his election was very close and now, he is leading in the polls.' He said the trial is 'nothing more, or less, than an attack on a political opponent — something I know much about!'
He continued, 'The great people of Brazil will not stand for what they are doing to their former president. I'll be watching the witch hunt of Jair Bolsonaro, his family, and thousands of his supporters very closely.'
Calling for democratic resolution, Trump said, 'The only trial that should be happening is a trial by the voters of Brazil — it's called an election.'
According to prosecutors, the alleged coup plot failed to materialise due to a lack of support from the military high command.
Bolsonaro faces a possible sentence of up to 40 years in prison.
He claims to be the victim of political persecution to prevent him from running for president next year, despite being barred from running until 2030 for spreading misinformation about the electoral system.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The case carries echoes of Trump's own prosecution over the January 6, 2021 attacks, when Trump supporters overran the US Congress to try to reverse his election loss.
Trump pleaded not guilty and the case was abandoned when he was reelected president.
Bolsonaro's son Eduardo praised Trump's post and said it 'would not be the only news coming from the United States in the near future.'
Trump's comments also came as Lula hosted representatives from China, Russia, Iran and other nations for a BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro.
Leaders attending the summit criticized Trump's tariffs and his bombing of Iran, drawing the US president's ire and a threat of 10 percent additional tariffs on each Brics-aligned country.
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India inches closer to historic US trade deal, can Modi dodge Trump's 26% tariff threat?
Credit where credit is due. Indian trade negotiators have persevered and survived in a tough environment of tariff threats from Donald Trump and rapid-fire letters spitting out of the White strategy: stay calm and carry on. Bring a good ground game, prevent oversimplification of issues, and insist on fairness. An interim India-US trade deal appears tantalisingly close, which, when announced, should remove the sword of 26% tariffs hanging over India. It will be a subset of the 'first tranche' of a BTA that both agreed to complete by fall. Rajesh Agarwal, India's chief negotiator, is here to give the finishing touches but not to make an announcement. That right belongs to Trump. 'Many of us were expecting an announcement two weeks ago. It's impossible to assess what the president's going to do, what his calculus is,' Mark Linscott, a former US trade official, told me. Could the timing be related to trade talks with Pakistan and a desire to make a joint announcement? 'It would not be productive. The India agreement is historic,' said extended the July 9 deadline to August 1, possibly for two reasons - first, negotiations with some countries, including India, were at an advanced stage, and second, he needed to show results. A 'win' in a sea of threats would affirm that his mad strategy is with India have been substantive, with a focus on the long- term trade trajectory. Flexibility is the name of the game. If you are starting with a $45 bn trade surplus, some front-loading of benefits to the US can be digested. The main objective is to avoid the 26% tariffs Trump threatened and protect Indian being finalised would be an interim agreement, which will lead to more detailed discussions on a legal text, which, in turn, would lead to the 'first tranche' of an unprecedented deal and later to a possible second tranche. Neither side has travelled so far so quickly, or held as many meetings and video conferences negotiators are charged up. Sometimes, Delhi has had to wait for DC to respond, belying old beliefs that Indians move slowly, if at US wants more market access for industrial goods, apples, wines, alfalfa hay, soyabean, maize and dairy products. India is open to some, but GMO foods and dairy are red lines - one is banned under law, and the other could spark riots because American cows are fed a non-veg diet. Officials will likely set the most contentious issues for wants lower tariffs on its labour-intensive exports, from leather products to garments to textiles to gems and jewellery. Greater market access for pharma and electronics would be good, too, and while you are at it, don't forget to lower US tariffs on steel, aluminium and auto there are differences on 'standards' - whose standards are right, and should one country automatically accept another's? How do you position your objections? How do you simplify/harmonise the two regulatory structures? The word 'complex' doesn't do justice to the nature of discussions, the pushing and pulling, the stretching of limits, and making the right judgements while weighing the politics of it is on the cusp of something positive in a challenging landscape where every day springs a surprise, often a nasty one. US negotiators have kept everything close to their chest - even their companies don't know the direction of the all part of the strategy of unpredictability - now fully grown from its nascency in Trump 1.0. The letter bombs dropped on Japan, South Korea, Laos, Bangladesh and even Myanmar, are nothing but a pressure campaign to shock them into submission. A letter doesn't mean Trump won't do a trade deal - a Bangladeshi delegation is already here asking for for Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, which proposes 500% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and petrochemical products, it does allow Trump to waive those tariffs for 180 days on national security grounds. A newer version - still secret - is expected to expand Trump's ability to grant the bill is pushed in the US Congress will depend on how talks with Russia progress, or don't. Both Dems and Rs are united in their desire to punish Moscow. India, as a major buyer of Russian oil, will have a problem on hand unless given a waiver. Diplomatic efforts are underway to sensitise Graham and his staff to India's need for energy If the bill becomes law, global oil prices will likely rise, which means higher prices for Americans at the gas pump. That won't be good news for Trump. But an interim trade agreement with India would be. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. The 10-second mystery: Did the Air India crash report hide more than what it revealed? Can Indian IT's 'pyramid' survive the GenAI shake-up? Zee promoters have a new challenge to navigate. And it's not about funding or Sebi probe. The deluge that's cooling oil prices despite the Iran conflict Stock Radar: Natco Pharma stock showing signs of momentum after falling over 30% from highs – what should investors do? In mid-caps, 'just hold' often creates wealth: 10 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential up to 44% F&O Talk | Foreign outflows, IT drag pull nifty lower; next support at 24,500: Rahul Ghose How to use dividend yield in volatile times: 6 stocks where this strategy has a high chance of giving much better returns
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC urges self-regulation, stresses value of free speech on social media
The Supreme Court on Monday said citizens must know the value of freedom of speech and expression and observe self regulation as it mulled guidelines to regulate offensive posts on social media. A bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and KV Viswanathan was hearing a plea of one Wazahat Khan booked in FIRs in several states, including West Bengal, for his objectionable posts on X against a Hindu deity. On June 23, the top court granted him interim protection from coercive action till July 14. Khan had filed a complaint against another social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli for allegedly making communal remarks in a video. Offensive comments should not be made in response to similar posts, his lawyer said in court. The citizens must know the value of the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression. The State can step in case of violations Nobody wants the State to step in (sic), Justice Nagarathna said. The judge continued, All this divisive tendency on social media has to be curbed. The bench clarified it did not mean censorship. "There should be fraternity among citizens," the bench said, as it considered framing guidelines on freedom of speech and expression for citizens. The bench underlined the reasonable restrictions under Article 19 (2) of the Constitution on freedom of speech and expression, saying they had "rightly been placed". The bench, in the meantime, extended the interim protection from arrest to Khan till the next hearing in the case and asked the counsel to assist it in dealing with the larger issue of self regulation of freedom of speech and expression of citizens. Khan was arrested by Kolkata Police on June 9. He moved the apex court alleging that FIRs and complaints have been lodged against him in several states, including Assam, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Haryana, for certain old tweets made by him. The FIRs were in retaliation to a complaint filed by him against Panoli, who was arrested and later released on bail, he argued. "I have deleted all of them and apologised," his counsel said, submitting Khan was perhaps "reaping what he has sown". His counsel argued that the first FIR, according to the petitioner, was dated June 2.
Deccan Herald
29 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Congress, CPI(M) slam Sadanandan Master's RS nomination
Leaders of both the Congress and the CPI(M) in Kerala have expressed concern, accusing the BJP of using the constitutional provision for political gain rather than for recognising excellence in fields like literature, science, arts, and social service, as envisaged under Article 80 of the Constitution.
