Navigating the Current Business Insurance and Employee Health Landscape
The business insurance market in Los Angeles is currently facing significant challenges, notably rising premium costs. Insurers are tightening underwriting standards, leading to more exclusions and higher deductibles, prompting businesses to reassess their risk management strategies. Additionally, California's evolving regulatory environment impacts various aspects of business operations, including insurance requirements.
1. Cyber Liability Insurance: Essential for protecting against data breaches and cyberattacks, especially in California's tech-heavy landscape. Cybersecurity Ventures predicts global cybercrime damages will reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025.
2. Business Interruption Insurance: This coverage helps recover lost income due to unforeseen events, such as wildfires. A study by the Insurance Information Institute found that 40% of small businesses never reopen after a disaster, underscoring its importance.
3. Workers' Compensation Insurance: California continues to experience longer average claim duration and higher average indemnity costs than other states, according to WCIRB California. Ensuring compliance while providing adequate coverage for employees is critical.
4. General Liability Insurance: Vital for protecting against lawsuits related to injury or property damage, particularly in California's litigious environment.
Business leaders can consider several cost-saving strategies to combat these challenges:
1. Risk Management Programs: Implementing comprehensive risk management can reduce claims and lower premiums. Organizations that actively manage risk can cut insurance costs by up to 30%, according to a report by Risk Management Society.
2. Bundling Policies: Many insurers offer discounts for bundling multiple policies, potentially leading to savings of 10% to 20% (Insurance Information Institute, 2023).
3. Self-Insurance: Larger organizations may find self-insurance a viable option, allowing them to retain some risk and reduce premium costs.
4. Regular Policy Reviews: Annual reviews of insurance policies can identify areas for cost savings, including coverage limits, deductibles and potential discounts.
As competition for talent intensifies in Los Angeles, organizations are exploring innovative employee benefits to attract and retain top talent:
1. Mental Health Support: A 2024 SHRM study found that 45% of US workers expect higher levels of mental health support from employers. Offering Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs), mental health days, and counseling services is becoming common.
2. Flexible Work Arrangements: The shift to remote work has increased demand for flexible arrangements. While many companies have conducted a partial 'return to the office' for their employees, a 2024 McKinsey study revealed that 54% of workers prefer remote or hybrid work. With more remote workers, offerings such as telehealth continue to become more popular.
3. Wellness Programs: Comprehensive wellness programs, including fitness memberships and health screenings, are gaining traction. SHRM reported that 70% of organizations offered some form of wellness program in early 2024, with 65% of employers believing these programs positively impact employee retention.
4. Student Loan Repayment Assistance: As student debt burdens many employees, organizations are beginning to offer repayment assistance, appealing particularly to younger employees in competitive job markets such as LA.
The employee benefits market in Los Angeles is influenced by regulatory changes and compliance requirements:
1. Affordable Care Act (ACA) Compliance: Ensuring compliance with ACA regulations, including providing affordable health insurance options, remains a priority.
2. California-Specific Regulations: California has unique laws regarding paid family leave and health benefits. Under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), employers must provide at least 12 weeks of unpaid family leave with job protection, impacting benefits planning.
3. AI in Benefits Administration: The integration of AI is transforming how organizations manage employee health benefits. AI streamlines enrollment processes, enhances communication, and provides personalized recommendations. However, it also poses risks related to data privacy, security, and compliance that employers must consider.
Navigating the current business insurance and employee health benefits landscape requires a proactive approach. By understanding market challenges, prioritizing essential coverages, implementing cost-saving strategies and embracing innovative employee benefits, organizations can enhance resilience and foster a supportive work environment.
At Marsh McLennan Agency, we specialize in partnering with our clients to develop tailored insurance solutions and employee benefits strategies that meet unique business needs, control costs and enhance employee satisfaction. Reach out today to learn more about how we can help.
Brian Hegarty, Principal & Managing Director, Los Angeles Marsh McLennan Agency
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
01-08-2025
- Forbes
Why Unmanaged Network Resources Are A Hacker's Dream
Vincentas Grinius is a tech entrepreneur and cofounder of IPXO, with a focus on internet infrastructure and sustainable digital innovation. Cybersecurity discussions in today's increasingly connected world often emphasize software vulnerabilities, phishing schemes and ransomware threats. However, a more subtle—and equally dangerous—threat lurks beneath the surface: unmanaged digital infrastructure assets that many enterprises, universities and public institutions unknowingly leave exposed. One of the most overlooked assets is IPv4 address blocks—legacy allocations that, if left unmonitored and unnoticed by management systems, provide a hidden playground for cybercriminals to launch attacks, hide their activities and erode trust in internet systems. According to Cybersecurity Ventures, ransomware damages are expected to cost the global economy $275 billion annually by 2031. Organizations must face a new reality: They jeopardize security and value if they aren't actively managing their network resources. The Hidden Risk Of Idle Infrastructure: How Cybercriminals Exploit What We Ignore The IPv4 address space, which was initially distributed freely during the early days of the internet, has become increasingly scarce and valuable. However, many institutions retain large blocks of addresses without active oversight, making them susceptible to hijacking and abuse. IP hijacking occurs when a threat actor illegitimately takes control of an IP address block, often by announcing false routes to internet routers and redirecting traffic meant for the rightful owner. Because these IPs seem valid on the public internet, attackers can use them to send spam, host phishing sites or create botnets—all while staying under the radar. In many instances, the legitimate owner is unaware that their addresses are being exploited. Cybercriminals often scan inactive IP ranges, using them for various malicious activities. Spam distribution remains one of the most common threats: A 2023 report by Statista indicates that spam emails constituted approximately 45.6% of global email traffic. The U.S. and China have emerged as the primary sources of spam emails, sending close to 8 billion spam emails each day per country. Hijacked IP addresses frequently create new, seemingly clean environments to send these messages before detection systems can respond. Phishing campaigns continue to grow, too. The Cybercrime Info Center reported over 1.8 million unique phishing attacks between May 2022 and April 2023, many of which rely on hijacked or misused network blocks to avoid early detection. Botnet hosting also thrives on unmanaged infrastructure. According to Spamhaus, botnet command-and-control servers increased by 16% in Q4 2023, illustrating how cybercriminals exploit abandoned address space to carry out malware and ransomware campaigns. The command-and-control infrastructure for ransomware is especially concerning. The FBI reported a 9% rise in ransomware attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure in 2024, frequently facilitated by compromised or hijacked networks that lack active oversight. Even cryptocurrency fraud is driven by hijacked resources. The FBI's 2023 Internet Crime Report revealed that cryptocurrency-related fraud caused losses exceeding $5.6 billion, a 45% increase from the previous year, as criminals exploited compromised infrastructure to host phishing websites and steal assets. These realities underscore a hard truth: Unmanaged infrastructure isn't just wasted; cybercriminals actively weaponize it. Leasing As A Security Strategy The traditional view of leasing IP addresses focuses on monetization. However, leasing can also act as a strong security mechanism. When an IP block is actively leased through a trusted, structured platform, it's: • Continuously monitored for abuse patterns and dips in reputation. • Protected by know-your-customer (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) processes that screen lessees before allocation. • Secured with automated blacklisting detection and rapid incident response protocols. • Actively validated in routing systems, making unauthorized hijacking attempts considerably more difficult. Instead of remaining idle and exposed, the resource becomes a managed and monitored part of the global internet fabric. A New Model For Digital Asset Stewardship Every organization with internet-facing infrastructure must reconsider its stewardship model. It's no longer sufficient to secure servers and patch software—proactive management of network resources has become integral to the cybersecurity mandate. Practical steps forward: • Audit your IPv4 and network assets. Understand exactly what you own, where it's located and if it's in use. • Secure dormant resources. Consider collaborating with reputable leasing platforms that emphasize security, compliance and abuse prevention. • Align IT, finance and cybersecurity teams. Ensure that digital asset management is collaborative, not isolated. • Monitor continuously. Establish real-time visibility over leased or unused space to quickly identify anomalies. Inaction is no longer harmless; it's a liability. Stewardship Or Exposure—The Choice Is Clear The digital economy rewards those who actively manage and optimize their resources. Just as businesses protect financial assets and intellectual property, they must also secure and enhance their network resources. The days of neglecting idle IP address blocks without repercussions are over. Cybercriminals are aware of this. Forward-thinking institutions recognize it. Now, the broader enterprise and public sectors must catch up—or risk facing the consequences. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Chicago Tribune
30-07-2025
- Chicago Tribune
State lawmakers, officials seek input into how auto insurance rates are set
Just weeks after Gov. JB Pritzker called for action following State Farm's 27.2% rate hike for homeowners insurance, some state lawmakers and officials said they are renewing efforts to address the steady rise in auto insurance rates. Curbing the cost of auto insurance has been the subject of several legislative proposals in the last couple of years, but those measures have yet to go anywhere. The Illinois secretary of state's office, which has unsuccessfully promoted a measure that would eliminate factors such as credit scores and advanced age from being used as metrics to set car insurance rates, is set to launch a campaign to highlight why it thinks employing those factors is unfair to consumers. 'This, to me, is an economic justice issue. People are struggling to pay their bills. People are required to have car insurance, and it's becoming unaffordable for folks to have it,' Giannoulias said. 'So if the purpose of auto insurance is to protect the eight and a half million Illinois motorists, it only makes sense that their driving records … serve as the primary factor for setting their rates.' Car insurance rates have climbed across the country. According to the finance website the rates have increased at a slower pace compared to past years but from 2023 to 2024, full coverage auto insurance jumped by an average of 14% and by 12% from 2024 to 2025. The website, citing an official from the Insurance Information Institute, attributed the rising rates to some of the worst underwriting losses in decades. also suggested President Donald Trump's administration's tariffs on vehicles and auto parts could affect car insurance costs. Democratic state Rep. Will Guzzardi of Chicago, who has worked on legislation aimed at regulating car insurance rates, said he is optimistic there's enough will in the legislature to take on high costs of auto insurance, but acknowledged the need to do so without harming the insurers doing business in Illinois. 'We want to maintain a vibrant, competitive insurance market in Illinois, where companies are competing for your business, and that drives prices down,' Guzzardi said. 'Premiums are rising and Illinois consumers are bearing the brunt of it, and government needs to step in and protect us from those kinds of abuses.' A bill Guzzardi introduced in January would bar insurers from refusing to issue or renew a policy of auto insurance based in whole or in part on 'specified prohibited underwriting or rating factors.' The bill would require auto insurers to show that their handling of claims and algorithm models do not unfairly impact any group of customers based on factors including race, gender, religion or sexual orientation. The bill has been stalled in the House, and Guzzardi acknowledged the difficulty in getting such legislation passed given the insurance lobby's power in Illinois, which is home to both State Farm and Allstate. 'If it's a reasonable increase and (insurers) can justify it, then it's fine. But if they're just raising their rates to protect their profits and pad their CEO pay, then the state has the ability to veto or reduce those premium increases,' Guzzardi said. 'And it (seems) really unfair to base someone's car insurance premium on factors that are out of your control and have nothing to do with whether or not they're a good driver.' In a statement, the Illinois Insurance Association, along with the American Property Casualty Insurance Association and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, said that 'Insurers are not permitted to use and do not use factors like race, income, religion, and/or ethnicity in setting rates. This is true in Illinois and in every state.' But the organizations defended the criteria that are used to set rates. 'Allowing insurers to continue using a wide set of objective criteria to determine risk and set rates will ensure this market can continue to flourish,' the statement read. 'We oppose efforts to limit the actuarial process that has driven companies out of other large states and led to increased premiums for the majority of policyholders.' Another bill that has languished in the legislature, which would affect homeowners as well as auto insurance, would require insurance companies to open their books so that state officials can assess whether the rate increases are too burdensome. Insurers would need to provide information on their rates to the state's Department of Insurance '60 days in advance of a proposed aggregate rate change of 5% or more.' This legislation has the backing of the Pritzker administration and could be the subject of debate during the two-week veto session in October since lawmakers and the insurance industry were busy during the spring session haggling over the bill's details. According to the secretary of state's office, Illinois is one of only two states, the other being Wyoming, that doesn't require a rate review process to protect auto insurance customers from excessive rates. The influence a person's economic status has on their insurance rates has long been a point of contention. Two years ago, the Consumer Federation of America issued a 25-page report showing the impact of car insurance rates when consumer credit information for good drivers who have decent or bad credit scores are factored in by insurers. The 2023 report showed that Illinoisans who were safe drivers with excellent credit paid an average annual premium of $424 for auto insurance, while consumers with a comparable driving record and fair credit paid around $607. At the same time, the report notes, safe drivers with poor credit paid an annual average of $915. These findings were echoed nationally, according to the report. 'These credit disparities are connected to systemic biases against Black, Latino, and Indigenous communities and long-standing structural hurdles to achieving financial stability for communities of color,' the report said. 'When credit information is used to construct credit-based insurance scores for underwriting and rating auto insurance, the result is higher auto insurance premiums for drivers of color.' 'Insurance companies use these rating factors, these non-rating factors, significantly, to set rates, and that can lead to both discriminatory and absurd outcomes,' said Abe Scarr, director of the Illinois Public Interest Research Group, which posted the report on its website. 'Also, it's, I think, somewhat less pronounced and maybe less investigated as well, but they're doing this with homeowners insurance as well.' Under a bill pushed by Giannoulias' office during the spring legislative session, the secretary of state, in partnership with the Office of Risk Management and Insurance Research at the University of Illinois, would look into 'the use of ZIP codes, credit scores, and age in ratemaking and whether the specific factor results in inequitable rates being assessed to certain populations.' The bill had 16 Democratic House sponsors and 17 Democratic Senate sponsors. It passed through the Democratic-controlled House in April on a 70-39 vote. But it never made it through the Senate. State Rep. Jeff Keicher, a Republican from Sycamore who sits on the House Insurance Committee and opposed the bill, said Illinois has one of the lowest rate environments 'given the factors that we are currently using.' The competitive market helps consumers because if the rates are too high with one carrier, they can easily move to another. He said eliminating factors such as where a customer lives and their credit score could increase the rates for suburban drivers. 'So you'd have a rate in Chicago the same as a rate in the middle of a cornfield in Illinois,' said Keicher, a 30-year insurance agent who said he was not speaking on behalf of the industry. 'The industry has proven time and again that that credit-based score is effective and accurate, and there have been no other challenges once regulators have looked at the direct correlation in accident propensity with the factors that insurance companies are currently using,' Keicher said. Kevin Martin, executive director of the Illinois Insurance Association, said there have been a number of studies over the years purported to show credit scores are an appropriate metric, including one that concluded 'better credit scores correlate with lower insurance risk.' As for Giannoulias' bill from the spring, Martin's group had concerns over whether the secretary of state's office's involvement in the study would've led to a 'very, very biased result,' noting the office has come out 'very much opposed to allowing us to use these factors.' 'We have no objections to having a study,' Martin said. 'We were opposed to any reference and any language that would have put (the) secretary of state's office in a position to conduct, lead and write the report.' Lou Sandoval, president and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, which advocates for businesses in the state, echoed Martin's criticism of the bill. 'We're not against transparency of trying to say, 'Hey, listen, what should we get done?'' he said. 'What was problematic is the bill sought to do a study that basically abided with the (confirmation) bias of the bill itself.' 'It was like, 'we're going to do a study to confirm the fact that there's racist policies in place, not to identify what the policies are and whether they're racist or not.' It's like 'we have a thesis. The thesis is, this is racism, and that's the direction we're going,'' Sandoval continued. 'And you know, writ large, we have a problem with government basically stepping in and whacking industries that are major employers in the state.' The statewide advocacy campaign being launched by the secretary of state's office, dubbed 'Driving Change,' will ask state residents 'to share their stories about unfair and discriminatory ratemaking practices employed by auto insurance companies,' according to a news release from Giannoulias' office. There will be town halls on the issue over the next several weeks throughout the state, and the secretary of state's office would be conducting a study using feedback from residents to determine whether factors such as credit score, ZIP code and advanced age unfairly raise insurance premiums for residents. From there, the feedback could be used to aid in crafting new legislation over what factors to include when setting car insurance rates, the secretary of state's office said. Locations and times of the town halls would be posted on 'To me, it doesn't matter whether you live on the South or West side of Chicago or in rural southern Illinois,' said Giannoulias, whose name has been floated as a potential Chicago mayoral contender in 2027. 'Our point is, base it on driving record.'
Yahoo
09-07-2025
- Yahoo
How and when to file a complaint against your car insurance company
You're upset that your auto insurance company won't pay to repair your car after an accident. Perhaps you feel like they unjustly denied your renewal or spiked your premium when you've been a good driver all year. If you tried to explain your position to them without results, consider filing a complaint with the Department of Insurance in your state. 'They will investigate your complaint and work with the insurance company to resolve it,' said Janet Ruiz, spokesperson for the Insurance Information Institute in San Diego. According to data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), tens of thousands of complaints are overturned each year. This embedded content is not available in your region. Learn more: How does car insurance work? The basics explained. It might be hard to know when it's worth going through the time and effort to file an insurance complaint. Here are the most common reasons consumers file complaints against their insurers: It's been weeks or months since you've filed a claim, but there's been no word whatsoever from the insurance company about a resolution You felt disrespected or mistreated by the claims adjuster The adjuster or your insurance agent mishandled your claim Your claim has been denied without an explanation Your settlement offer seems unfairly low, though they won't tell you why The insurance company refuses to issue you a policy or renew your existing policy without a valid reason You're quoted a higher-than-normal price on an auto policy that is not commensurate with your driving record, age, or other determining factors Learn more: How to switch car insurance companies First, find the link to your state insurance department's complaint process on the NAIC website — the search tool is halfway down the page. Most states will have online or written complaint forms that you can fill out, asking you to complete the following information: Your name, address, and telephone number The name of your insurer What type of policy and your policy number Your insurance agent's contact information, if applicable The nature of your complaint Any documents, photos, and correspondence with the insurer or your agent, including emails and texts that support your complaint The type of resolution you're looking for While the complaint process is similar across states, there can be marked differences. Below are four states' procedures to serve as examples. The California Department of Insurance provides an online form to file a complaint and downloadable forms that you can mail to the state. However, the department recommends that consumers file a complaint online, as mailing paper forms may delay the process. The Golden State's complaint form also informs consumers that if they have filed a bad faith insurance claim against their insurer regarding their dispute, the state will defer its investigation until the lawsuit has been decided in court or settled. However, consumers should still lodge a complaint with the state while the lawsuit is ongoing so the state can have a record of it. After the lawsuit is concluded, the consumer and their bad-faith attorney can submit evidence of insurance law violations. Learn more: Car insurance requirements in California — and ways to save money In the Garden State, formal complaints against insurance companies must be submitted in writing — in dark ink and with no highlighted sections so all information is legible. In addition to the standard information mentioned above, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance also asks consumers to include a copy of their auto insurance ID card, a copy of the policy declarations page, and, if applicable, notices of either a nonrenewal, premium increase, or claim denial. Learn more: Car insurance rates are rising in New Jersey. Here's how to save. The Texas Department of Insurance offers thorough step-by-step guides walking consumers through the process of filing a complaint, with optional guides in Spanish. For help with an auto insurance complaint, the Lone Star State recommends consumers follow these steps: Step 1: First, talk to your insurance company to resolve the issue. If you disagree with their decision, let them know why. Step 2: Ask your insurer for an appraisal. It's a three-appraiser process; The insurance company will provide its own appraiser; you hire and pay for your own appraiser; and you pay half of the cost for a third appraiser, chosen by the other two appraisers, to serve as the 'umpire.' Step 3: File a complaint with the state if you disagree with the appraisal results or if you believe your insurer violated any laws. The department details what it can do to resolve issues and what it can't do, like overrule the decision regarding who was at fault in an accident. Step 4: The department will contact the insurance company, which has 15 days to respond to the complaint, with an option to extend that time for another 10 days. Then the department will let you know how the insurer's response impacts your complaint. Step 5: If you are dissatisfied with the results of your complaint, the department provides resources to obtain legal help from a bad-faith attorney. Learn more: Car insurance costs are big in Texas. Here's how to get the cheapest rates. In Colorado, consumers are urged to first contact the Colorado Division of Insurance to explain their situation so a complaint analyst can determine whether the agency can help them and what that assistance would look like — including helping them file a complaint, said Bobbie Baca, the division's director of consumer services for property, casualty, and title insurance. 'While complaints are often warranted, it often happens that a complaint results from a misunderstanding of the complicated world of insurance,' Baca said. 'Complaint resolutions may include claim settlements, facilitating communications, and reversal of non-renewals or cancellations.' Indeed, a total of $4,995,340 last year was recovered for Colorado consumers through the division's investigations into their auto insurance complaints, according to the FY 2023-24 Colorado DOI Annual Complaint & Recoveries Report. It's best to file a complaint with your state's insurance department rather than with the Better Business Bureau or on other sites. The state departments are officially designated to process complaints and are the only ones that can take enforcement action if necessary. Below are five tips to help you file a complaint against your car insurance company, from how to go about it alone to when it's time to seek legal counsel. Tip 1: Start with your insurance agent. Try to resolve the issue first with your insurer or agent, and if they are not willing or able, ask for their supervisor's contact information. 'If you are still not satisfied, let them know that you will file a complaint with the Department of Insurance,' Ruiz said. 'They may be able to find a resolution without going through the complaint process.' Tip 2: Know when to skip the phone call. If the concern is directly related to the behavior of your agent, it may be better to skip calling your state's insurance department and file a complaint first, Baca advised. Tip 3: Compile supporting financial evidence. When including documents to support your complaint, be sure to have estimates from body repair shops and other figures disputing the insurer's decision. Tip 4: Locate an arbitrator. See if the terms of your policy dictate that you first go through either an arbitration or appraisal process with the insurance company. You can find an arbitrator from the American Arbitration Association. Tip 5: Consider a bad-faith attorney. As a final option, you may want to hire a bad-faith attorney, though state insurance departments typically offer their services for free, Baca said. 'We can answer a lot of questions, provide education, point people in the right direction, and if it is something we can investigate, we can help them file a formal complaint,' she said. 'If the division is unable to assist the consumer, that is when they may want to consider talking with an attorney.' Remember, once you hire an attorney, you will no longer be able to communicate directly with your insurance company, Ruiz advised. Tim Manni edited this article.
