
Why Unmanaged Network Resources Are A Hacker's Dream
Cybersecurity discussions in today's increasingly connected world often emphasize software vulnerabilities, phishing schemes and ransomware threats. However, a more subtle—and equally dangerous—threat lurks beneath the surface: unmanaged digital infrastructure assets that many enterprises, universities and public institutions unknowingly leave exposed.
One of the most overlooked assets is IPv4 address blocks—legacy allocations that, if left unmonitored and unnoticed by management systems, provide a hidden playground for cybercriminals to launch attacks, hide their activities and erode trust in internet systems.
According to Cybersecurity Ventures, ransomware damages are expected to cost the global economy $275 billion annually by 2031. Organizations must face a new reality: They jeopardize security and value if they aren't actively managing their network resources.
The Hidden Risk Of Idle Infrastructure: How Cybercriminals Exploit What We Ignore
The IPv4 address space, which was initially distributed freely during the early days of the internet, has become increasingly scarce and valuable. However, many institutions retain large blocks of addresses without active oversight, making them susceptible to hijacking and abuse.
IP hijacking occurs when a threat actor illegitimately takes control of an IP address block, often by announcing false routes to internet routers and redirecting traffic meant for the rightful owner. Because these IPs seem valid on the public internet, attackers can use them to send spam, host phishing sites or create botnets—all while staying under the radar. In many instances, the legitimate owner is unaware that their addresses are being exploited.
Cybercriminals often scan inactive IP ranges, using them for various malicious activities. Spam distribution remains one of the most common threats: A 2023 report by Statista indicates that spam emails constituted approximately 45.6% of global email traffic. The U.S. and China have emerged as the primary sources of spam emails, sending close to 8 billion spam emails each day per country. Hijacked IP addresses frequently create new, seemingly clean environments to send these messages before detection systems can respond.
Phishing campaigns continue to grow, too. The Cybercrime Info Center reported over 1.8 million unique phishing attacks between May 2022 and April 2023, many of which rely on hijacked or misused network blocks to avoid early detection.
Botnet hosting also thrives on unmanaged infrastructure. According to Spamhaus, botnet command-and-control servers increased by 16% in Q4 2023, illustrating how cybercriminals exploit abandoned address space to carry out malware and ransomware campaigns.
The command-and-control infrastructure for ransomware is especially concerning. The FBI reported a 9% rise in ransomware attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure in 2024, frequently facilitated by compromised or hijacked networks that lack active oversight.
Even cryptocurrency fraud is driven by hijacked resources. The FBI's 2023 Internet Crime Report revealed that cryptocurrency-related fraud caused losses exceeding $5.6 billion, a 45% increase from the previous year, as criminals exploited compromised infrastructure to host phishing websites and steal assets.
These realities underscore a hard truth: Unmanaged infrastructure isn't just wasted; cybercriminals actively weaponize it.
Leasing As A Security Strategy
The traditional view of leasing IP addresses focuses on monetization. However, leasing can also act as a strong security mechanism. When an IP block is actively leased through a trusted, structured platform, it's:
• Continuously monitored for abuse patterns and dips in reputation.
• Protected by know-your-customer (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) processes that screen lessees before allocation.
• Secured with automated blacklisting detection and rapid incident response protocols.
• Actively validated in routing systems, making unauthorized hijacking attempts considerably more difficult.
Instead of remaining idle and exposed, the resource becomes a managed and monitored part of the global internet fabric.
A New Model For Digital Asset Stewardship
Every organization with internet-facing infrastructure must reconsider its stewardship model. It's no longer sufficient to secure servers and patch software—proactive management of network resources has become integral to the cybersecurity mandate.
Practical steps forward:
• Audit your IPv4 and network assets. Understand exactly what you own, where it's located and if it's in use.
• Secure dormant resources. Consider collaborating with reputable leasing platforms that emphasize security, compliance and abuse prevention.
• Align IT, finance and cybersecurity teams. Ensure that digital asset management is collaborative, not isolated.
• Monitor continuously. Establish real-time visibility over leased or unused space to quickly identify anomalies. Inaction is no longer harmless; it's a liability.
Stewardship Or Exposure—The Choice Is Clear
The digital economy rewards those who actively manage and optimize their resources. Just as businesses protect financial assets and intellectual property, they must also secure and enhance their network resources.
The days of neglecting idle IP address blocks without repercussions are over. Cybercriminals are aware of this. Forward-thinking institutions recognize it. Now, the broader enterprise and public sectors must catch up—or risk facing the consequences.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jack Dorsey declares victory over China in Bitcoin mining chip race
Jack Dorsey declares victory over China in Bitcoin mining chip race originally appeared on TheStreet. Twitter co-founder and Block, Inc. (NYSE: XYZ) boss Jack Dorsey thinks his team has outdone China in Bitcoin mining chips. Bitcoin mining is the process of using high-end computers to solve cryptographic functions, validate BTC transactions, and add blocks to the network in return for BTC rewards. Dorsey's fintech venture Block has increasingly adopted Bitcoin over the years, and its unit Proto is dedicated to Bitcoin mining. Proto, aiming to decentralize the supply of Bitcoin mining hardware and the distribution of hash rate, is expected to launch a suite of mining chips on Aug. 14. An X user wondered if Dorsey's Proto has "out engineered" China on Bitcoin mining chips, as it would turn the industry upside down. Dorsey simply responded, "we have." On Aug. 13, Block made another major announcement that it will privately raise $1.5 billion for general corporate purposes. How does Trump's China tariff policy affect Bitcoin mining? While the U.S. is the leading Bitcoin mining country in terms of hash rate, it is China that takes the lead in manufacturing mining rig equipment. The world's three largest manufacturers of Bitcoin mining machines, namely Bitmain, Canaan, and MicroBT — all of Chinese origin — build over 90% of global mining rigs. Bitcoin miners, including those based in the U.S., are highly dependent on the mining hardware supply from China. But President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policy targeted toward China has the U.S. mining industry concerned about its prospects. This is where domestic players like Block come like Block, which recently joined the S&P 500 list, can manufacture Bitcoin mining rigs in the U.S. Co-founder and chairman Dorsey even said during the Q1 2025 earnings call, 'We're building in the United States.' Block's efforts notwithstanding, it will take a few years for the complete onshoring of the Bitcoin mining manufacturing. U.S. manufacturers of mining rigs face the dual challenge of exceeding or at least meeting China's product quality and undercutting its manufacturing costs. The onshoring process could also potentially come to a pause if the U.S. and China reach a long-term consensus on the tariff policy which doesn't put a heavy tax burden on imports of Chinese mining chips. Jack Dorsey declares victory over China in Bitcoin mining chip race first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 13, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 13, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Digital Trends
17 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Are 1080p monitors still worth buying for gaming? You'd be surprised
These days, many of the best gaming monitors fall in the 1440p to 4K category — but does that make 1080p displays obsolete? Many users and manufacturers alike might want you to believe that, but fortunately, there's still a lot to be said about the humble (or not-so-humble, as expensive options exist) 1080p monitor. While 1080p monitors have their charms, gamers tend to go for top-shelf hardware instead, which is why their popularity in those circles is slowly waning. Personally, I think there's a lot to love about 1080p, but it's not all sunshine and rainbows. I'll walk you through whether 1080p is still worth buying in 2025, and how to pick the right monitor for your needs. Why 1080p refuses to die Check any tech outlet or electronics store, and it's all jaw-dropping 4K OLEDs as far as the eye can see. But, for many gamers and casual users alike, the reality is quite different. 1080p monitors are still far from being buried in the tech graveyard alongside CRTs and VGA cables, and with good reason. Recommended Videos For a lot of gamers, 1080p still does exactly what they need it to do, and it does so without setting their bank accounts on fire. You can play just about every game in 1080p and make the most of it, and while many will tell you 1440p looks and feels better, it's not going to make or break your whole setup. It's true that higher resolutions tend to offer better immersion, and more importantly, more screen real estate. But, speaking as someone who only made the 1080p to 1440p switch in the last couple of years, I didn't suddenly become a better player just by switching my monitor. However, I can't deny that I enjoy the extra pixels. However, those extra pixels come at a staggering cost: a hit to raw performance. Rendering fewer pixels means your graphics card doesn't have to work as hard, freeing up frames for smoother gameplay. That's why competitive esports pros still swear by 1080p — you're more likely to get those ultra-high refresh rates on a 1080p monitor. Take this 500Hz Alienware monitor, for example. In our review, we were impressed by how fast it was, and that kind of refresh rate would be infinitely harder to achieve on a 1440p display. And because the technology is so mature, you can get those blistering refresh rates, solid color accuracy, and low input lag for a fraction of the price of a high-refresh 1440p or 4K display. Scaling up to 1440p or 4K is really taxing on the GPU, so you'll often need one of the best graphics cards to comfortably hit 60 frames per second (fps) and more in every title at 1440p and more. That explains why a whopping 54% of all Steam Hardware Survey participants are still using 1080p, although 1440p is at 20% and rising every month. Some trade-offs are hard to ignore It's impossible to fully ignore the benefits of 1440p, though. I currently run a dual-monitor setup consisting of two identical 1440p screens (although I'm considering switching to an ultrawide). The extra screen real estate is nothing to turn your nose up at. Switching to 1440p gives you roughly 78% more pixels on your screen. This feels great, both when you just look at your desktop and when you play games, and having used 1440p and 4K, scaling back to 1080p feels jarring. However, that's also 78% more pixels that your GPU needs to render, making it work extra hard. The benefit of 1440p also lies in the fact that you can easily upgrade to a bigger display while keeping the image perfectly sharp. 1080p monitors do just fine at 24 inches or less, but if you want a display that's 27 inches or bigger, you might notice jagged edges or softer text. Textures don't look anywhere near as nice as they do on a higher resolution display. If you've ever gone from playing a visually rich single-player game on a 4K panel to the same title at 1080p, the downgrade is immediately obvious: less fine detail, more aliasing, and a general sense that the world you're looking at is just a bit blurrier. There's also the question of future-proofing. You might want to buy a budget GPU right now (and who can blame you, considering the current GPU prices), and for that, a 1080p monitor will do just fine. But if you one day upgrade to a high-end model, all that extra firepower will be slightly wasted on a worse display. Conversely, if your GPU can't handle it, buying a 1440p monitor will just result in lower frame rates and a lot of frustration. It's certainly a balancing act, but the fact remains that 1440p and 4K have their benefits — but so do 1080p displays. When 1080p makes perfect sense While there are some downsides, if you're still using 1080p, don't let the FOMO (fear of missing out) get to you. There are still a lot of situations in which 1080p makes perfect sense. As things stand now, pretty much every GPU under $300 is made for 1080p gameplay — meaning that a lot of budget-oriented gamers are better off with a 1080p monitor. There are GPUs like the Intel Arc B580 that are cheap but also equipped with plenty of VRAM, giving them more merit at higher resolutions. Even then, you'll enjoy smoother gameplay at 1080p than if you brute-force your GPU to go up to 1440p or 4K. No one's stopping you from upgrading, of course. A friend of mine uses a 4K 34-inch monitor with an Nvidia GTX 1060 GPU. It works, and he claims he's happy with it even in games like Red Dead Redemption 2, but this is achieved through dialing it back as far as settings go. If you like to play at max settings, you'll need a GPU that can handle higher resolutions and modern AAA gaming. Then, there are the times when you might have the hardware, but may not actually need a bigger display. Gamers who like esports titles are often better off with a snappy 1080p monitor than with a bigger display. After all, you need your monitor to be fast, and pixel density plays a smaller role in winning matches. At 1080p, even a modest GPU can push 200 fps in games like League of Legends. And then there's the price-to-performance sweet spot. High-refresh 1080p monitors are significantly cheaper than their 1440p or 4K counterparts, which means you can invest more of your budget into other parts of your setup. You can get a 240Hz 1080p monitor for $150 or less — this AOC model is a good one. Standard 60 to 75Hz displays can be bought for well under $80. 1440p and 4K monitors are cheaper now than ever before, but you'll still spend extra, especially if you want to invest in a good IPS (or OLED) panel. The bottom line is: Yes, 1080p monitors are still relevant for gamers, and they're still worth buying. If you're a mainstream gamer on a budget and your hardware might struggle with higher resolutions, stick to 1080p. If there's one thing that might force you to upgrade, it's trying out a higher resolution and then going back down. Personally, I know that I'm forever stuck with 1440p or more, because once you try it out, it's hard to go back.


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Palo Alto Networks Completes Its Platform Play With CyberArk Deal
On the heels of a new partnership with identity and access management leader Okta, Palo Alto Networks surprised the tech industry with its recent announcement to acquire identity stalwart CyberArk for an eye-opening $25 billion. If approved by regulators, this deal represents a massive combination of two highly successful and mature cybersecurity infrastructure providers. This opens up a discussion about the value of identity management, what this tie-up could produce both short and long term and how customers might benefit. With that context set, let's dive in. (Note: Palo Alto Networks is an advisory client of my firm, Moor Insights & Strategy.) The Value Of Identity And Privileged Access Management Identity and access management provides a critical control point that weaves together policy, provisioning and lifecycle management, ensuring that users are authenticated to specific resources while blocking the occurrence of malicious lateral movement across networks. Privileged access management takes identity frameworks to higher levels of security, infusing least-privileged-access and zero-trust principles to safeguard access to high-value digital assets. Together, IAM and PAM serve to reduce attack surfaces, secure session activity, improve security posture, provide audit trails and ensure compliance. By all measures, identity is the new hack. It is estimated that an overwhelming majority of data breaches today are a result of stolen or compromised credentials. To address this challenge, a plethora of infrastructure providers including Cisco, CyberArk, IBM, Microsoft, Okta, SailPoint and others offer viable solutions. I have written about many of these companies in the past, highlighting their perceived strengths and weaknesses. I seldom call out an absolute winner, but Palo Alto Networks' decision to acquire CyberArk is interesting for two reasons. First, CyberArk has a strong reputation in PAM, as well as in securing identity across human users and machines. To this end, the company provides workforce password, secrets and endpoint privilege management. Second, CyberArk has experienced high annualized recurring revenue growth over the last two years, nearly doubling its top-line revenue to more than $1 billion at the end of last year. Given CyberArk's portfolio depth and hypergrowth, it is not surprising that it would be attractive to Palo Alto Networks. A New Category For Palo Alto Networks Palo Alto Networks has become one of the largest cybersecurity infrastructure providers in the world. Many pundits, including myself, attribute the company's achievements to a platform approach in delivering security services. I have written about this concept on many occasions, highlighting the power of a platform to consolidate disparate tools to address sprawl, improve security and networking operational efficiency and deliver optimized business outcomes. I also continue to spend considerable time with chief executive Nikesh Arora and his leadership team, and I appreciate their vision for the company to serve as a trusted advisor and provide the right balance of solutions that do not burden customers with a plethora of incremental licensing. The timing of the company's acquisition of CyberArk is not surprising to me. It represents a net-new category entry with significant revenue and profitability upside. Last year, the combined total addressable markets for IAM and PAM were estimated to be just shy of $25 billion. Palo Alto Networks should be able to capitalize and take market share based on a demonstrated history of category leadership realized through its organic solution development efforts and its history of successfully integrating acquisitions. What I also like about the CyberArk acquisition is its potential to serve as a foundation for Palo Alto Networks' Cortex AgentiX agentic AI framework — previewed at RSA Conference earlier this year — to manage agent and machine-to-machine interactions. The framework promises to provide enterprise-grade security, enable intuitive human-AI interaction and massively scale automation using AI. The company's Prisma Access Browser also provides another layer of protection for the safe use of generative AI applications, ensuring that data is protected and that only sanctioned applications are used. In my RSA Conference event wrap-up piece this year, I highlighted my biggest takeaway that the provisioning and identity management of super agents and task agents represents one of the most important aspects of agentic AI's adoption and longer-term success. This is an area where CyberArk's expertise should be a big winner. By my estimation, Palo Alto Networks is well positioned to capitalize on that. Grading The CyberArk Acquisition The $25 billion acquisition of CyberArk represents a significant step forward to allow Palo Alto Networks to complete its cybersecurity platform play. CEO Arora points to three benefits of the transaction — accelerating the company's platform strategy, disrupting the legacy IAM market and securing agentic AI. From my perspective, these are all reasonable assumptions and point to an opportunity for Palo Alto Networks to further its success and capitalize on the modern AI gold rush.