Oil giant BP surprises with better than expected earnings
The British group's return to profit in the second quarter contrasted with weaker results from energy rivals, as lower exceptional charges offset falling oil prices.
Profit after tax came in at $1.63 billion in the April-June period, compared with a net loss of $129 million in the second quarter of 2024, BP said in an earnings statement.
Stripping out exceptional items, underlying net profit was down nearly 15 percent.
"This has been another strong quarter for BP operationally and strategically," chief executive Murray Auchincloss said in the earnings statement.
BP on Monday said it made its biggest oil and gas discovery in 25 years off the coast of Brazil.
In February, BP launched a major pivot back to its more profitable oil and gas business, shelving its once industry-leading targets on reducing carbon emissions and slashing clean energy investment.
However, energy prices have come under pressure in recent months on concerns that US President Donald Trump's tariffs will hurt economic growth, while OPEC+ nations have produced more oil.
BP managed to post a profit for the second quarter thanks to impairments which were lower than one year earlier, along with a revaluation of assets -- notably in relation to liquefied natural gas (LNG) -- and divestments.
- Sector woes -
By contrast, US rivals ExxonMobil and Chevron, along with French group TotalEnergies, posted heavy falls to their net profits in the second quarter.
As did oil giant Saudi Aramco, which on Tuesday announced its 10th straight drop in quarterly profits as a slump in prices hit revenues.
The average price for Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark, stood at $67.9 per barrel in the second quarter, down from $85 one year earlier.
British rival Shell still managed to post a slight increase to its profit after tax for the latest reporting period.
As for BP, Auchincloss said the company was launching "a further cost review and, whilst we will not compromise on safety, we are doing this with a view to being best in class in our industry".
Shares in BP gained 2.2 percent in London morning deals following its results and news of a fresh dividend and share buyback.
"A slick turnaround plan pumped up BP's second-quarter results," noted Derren Nathan, head of equity research at Hargreaves Lansdown.
"Despite lower oil and gas prices, it's managed to push underlying profits up by nearly $1 billion from the first quarter to $2.4 billion, well ahead of analyst forecasts."
Nathan added that "shareholders will be glad to see this matched with financial discipline".
BP already announced plans this year to cut cleaner energy investment by more than $5 billion annually and offload assets worth a total of $20 billion by 2027.
It recently agreed to sell its onshore wind energy business in the United States, while Shell has also scaled back its climate objectives.
BP last month named Albert Manifold as its new chairman, replacing Helge Lund, whose departure was announced amid the strategy reset.
The group's net profit plunged 70 percent in its first quarter, hit by weaker oil prices.
By Ben Perry
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump hikes India levy as tariff deadline approaches
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, opening a new front in his trade wars just hours before another wave of duties takes effect. Trump's additional 25-percent tariff on Indian goods, set to come into place in three weeks, stacks atop a separate 25-percent duty entering into force Thursday. This takes the level to 50 percent for many products. Trump's order also threatens potential penalties on other countries for "directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil," a key source of revenue for Moscow's war in Ukraine. But exemptions remain for goods targeted under sector-specific duties such as steel and aluminum, and categories that could be hit later, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Smartphones are also among this list of exempted products for now, notably shielding Apple from a major hit as the US tech titan shifts production from China to India. India's foreign ministry condemned Trump's tariff announcement Wednesday, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable." The ministry had previously said that India began importing from Russia as traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. It noted that Washington at that time had "actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy market stability." But Trump recently ramped up pressure on India over its purchases of Russian oil, threatening new tariffs as part of a campaign to force Moscow into ending its devastating invasion of Ukraine. India's national security adviser was in Moscow on Wednesday, media in New Delhi reported, coinciding with a visit by US envoy Steve Witkoff. The latest 25-percent additional tariff is notably lower than a 100-percent level Trump floated last month when he told Russia to end its war in Ukraine within 50 days or face massive new economic sanctions. The Republican said at the time that these would be "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, seeking to impede Moscow's ability to survive already sweeping Western sanctions. - Tariff turmoil - Trump's latest salvo targeting India came after he separately took aim at Brazil over the trial of his right-wing ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro -- who is accused of planning a coup. On Wednesday, US tariffs on various Brazilian goods surged from 10 percent to 50 percent, although broad exemptions including for orange juice and civil aircraft are expected to soften the blow. Come Thursday, a new wave of tariffs on imports from dozens of other economies, ranging from the European Union to Taiwan, is set to kick in. These updated "reciprocal" tariffs, meant to address trade practices Washington deems unfair, go as high as 41 percent for countries like Syria. Other major US trading partners face varying increases from a current 10-percent level, starting at 15 percent for economies like the EU, Japan and South Korea. Countries not targeted by these "reciprocal" tariff hikes continue facing a 10-percent US levy Trump imposed in April. Trump's plans have sparked a rush to avert the steeper duties, with Switzerland's President Karin Keller-Sutter hurrying to Washington this week ahead of the Thursday deadline. Though she secured a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, it was unclear if she would meet Trump or any top economic officials. Her Alpine country faces a 39-percent duty on many of its exports, and while its key pharmaceutical sector has been spared for now, Trump has said a potential separate tariff could eventually rise to 250 percent. Some of Trump's sweeping tariffs face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers, with the cases likely to ultimately reach the Supreme Court. By Beiyi Seow
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africans are feeling more in control of their money - even in a tough economy
Employed South Africans are showing renewed financial optimism, with three-quarters expecting improvements in their personal finances within six months, marking the highest confidence level since the COVID-19 pandemic. Image: Unsplash Employed South Africans are demonstrating renewed financial optimism and resilience amid persistent economic challenges, according to the latest Old Mutual Savings & Investment Monitor (OMSIM) report released this month. The 2025 OMSIM study, which surveys working South Africans earning at least R8,000 monthly, reveals that three quarters of respondents expect their personal finances to improve within six months, the highest confidence level recorded since the COVID-19 pandemic began. Younger workers, especially those from Gen Z, are even more hopeful, with nearly nine out of 10 anticipating better financial conditions ahead. However, gross domestic product is mediocre at best, with the first quarter's figure at 0.1%, while the International Monetary Fund expects the full year to be 1% year-on-year, a figure that may be undermined by US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs. Income growth is, however, on the rise, with almost half of participants earning more than they did a year ago, Old Mutual found. Many are embracing "poly-jobbing," or earning from multiple income sources, with more than half reporting this practice and three out of four young people engaging in it. Nearly half of respondents own or co-own a business, highlighting a strong entrepreneurial spirit, it said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Working South Africans' optimism is mirrored in their improved country outlook, says Old Mutual. Image: Old Mutual However, debt remains a concern. While more than half have managed to reduce their debt levels over the past year, and about one in three have renegotiated repayment terms with creditors, widespread gambling is troubling, the report noted. More than half of working South Africans reported gambling, with close to two out of five doing so in an attempt to cover expenses or repay debt - signaling financial vulnerability in some sectors, said Old Mutual. Meanwhile, data from DebtBusters and Statistics South Africa continue to show pressure on consumers. Use of personal loans remains widespread, with the vast majority of debt counselling applicants holding such loans amid rising living costs for essentials like electricity and fuel. Old Mutual found that short-term savings habits remain robust, with households typically putting aside more than one-fifth of their income, often through trusted informal savings groups like stokvels. Although almost all agree on the importance of saving for retirement, fewer than one in three prioritise it, pointing to a gap in long-term financial planning.
The Citizen
17 hours ago
- The Citizen
Beyond Trump's pointless pause
A pathway towards pragmatism and patience in South Africa's trade relations with the United States… Just over three months ago, Donald Trump took to the Rose Garden at the White House and unveiled his slate of global tariffs against every country in the world. The numbers cited – ranging from a 10% baseline on every country that had a trade deficit on goods with the US; to the 50% imposed on Lesotho – represented a mix of ideological dogma and some voodoo economic modelling. In simple terms, Trump's calculations for tariff rates were simply based on a comparison of trade gaps/surpluses and import values on goods imported to the US. A country like Lesotho – which exports significantly to the US and can barely afford to buy anything in return; ended up with the highest trade gap, which translated into the highest reciprocal tariff rate. The problem every country faced was that, just because the economic modelling of the US president makes no sense, that doesn't mean they could afford to ignore him. Read more Here are economic and geopolitical factors to affect SMEs For as long as the US consumer market remains the most lucrative in the world, being able to access it as an exporter is fundamental for many businesses across the world. For South African businesses that are reliant on the US market for their exports, the past few months have been a crash course in the intersections of economics and geopolitics that very few would voluntarily sign up for. ALSO READ: 'It's just gone' – Trump's tariffs cost SA company R750m overnight In the world of global trade, access to markets is not simply a question of producing resources that are of interest to the customers in another country. Ensuring that such products can be sold competitively requires the minimisation and possible elimination of trade frictions such as taxes and tariffs. Higher taxes and tariffs diminish the affordability for foreign customers and impact on volumes that can be sold to foreign markets. Ensuring that such costs are minimised falls under the ambit of the government of the day, which has the responsibility of acting as the chief representative of businesses and ensuring that trade deals put in place maximise the prospects of competitiveness, and success for South African businesses. The problem with trade deal negotiations is that they are fundamentally linked to the state of geopolitical relations between the negotiating countries. The more difficult the relationship, the more challenging it is to find a meeting of the minds and put together a deal that represents the best of what each country wants and can deliver. ALSO READ: Government must actively manage fallout from US tariffs with trade crisis committee – BLSA In South Africa's case, the space for negotiations was suffocated by concurrent events – involving the US's perception on South Africa's geopolitical standing; the expulsion of South Africa's ambassador; and the desire of some South Africans to trumpet the idea of a white genocide that only Trump could apparently stop. When Trump implemented a 90-day pause on his tariffs for countries to negotiate deals, the litmus test for success was going to be the question of whether the rate ultimately imposed at the end of the pause period was materially better than what was initially threatened. Given the short timeframes, no single country was ever going to actually put together a brand new trade deal, simply because it just does not happen within 90 days. Instead, each country was expected to create a framework of a deal that would sound interesting enough to Trump for him to issue a more accommodating tariff rate. If a country could put together a framework that was regarded by the US as good enough to warrant a significant revision in proposed tariff rates, then such a country could claim some victory in a war that we all know, produces no winners ultimately. ALSO READ: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger South Africa's ultimate rate of 30% was slightly better than the 34% initially imposed, but this revision had little to do with the substance of what South Africa argued during the pause period and more to do with the predilection of the US president to randomly pick numbers and convert them to binding policy positions at a whim. We know this simply because the US never actually offered any substantive response to South Africa's proposal. The difficulty with any framework was that the primary test for whether it was worth entertaining, was whether it would be more favourable to the United States. Deals seen to be nowhere close to favouring the US, were non-starters. Consequently, countries had to dig deep within their nation's business and political canvas to identify if anything could be offered to the US administration that would meet the threshold. The European Union made a series of commitments that were ambitious enough to secure a deal, though their feasibility remains fanciful at best. In South Africa's case, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) worked on a framework whose single weakness is that it answered the known questions by explaining how economic trade patterns would be rejigged in order to move closer to a deal. The unknown questions that the dtic could not answer related to Trump's ideological posture against South African policy and geopolitical stances. Scrapping BEE might sound like an idea palatable to the South African right-wing lobby that has enjoyed access to US lawmakers, but it would have amounted to a significant departure from the country's longstanding policy – for very little in return. The tricky part is that conceding on long-held policy positions for minimal gains would come back to haunt South Africa. ALSO READ: Tau launches urgent support measures for exporters affected by US tariffs Given the export values in question and the simple fact that Trump was still going to impose tariffs, South Africa's scope for trade-offs was not very wide, and any concessions on non-trade issues would have ignited new hostilities within the fragile government of national unity. In the aftermath of the deadline of 1 August, which passed without South Africa actually receiving a response on its framework proposal, the dtic and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation have opted for continued negotiations and diplomacy, rather than the retaliatory approach that stronger countries like China can opt for. This pragmatic stance – based on the premise that the US negotiators are acting in good faith regardless of the megaphone musings from the White House – is the only sensible stance that avoids getting drawn into mass hysteria. If the US eventually comes to the table and considers South Africa's framework, there may be further carve-outs from the 30% rate, but this largely depends on the whims of the US president and cannot be relied upon as a long-term solution. ALSO READ: Trump's new 30% tariff less about trade and more about power Beyond pragmatism, South Africa – like most countries – must now move to the patience game and hedge its bets on the question of whether all this is a temporary disruption that will be reversed once the true costs of tariffs hit US consumers hard, or if it will simply come to an end with Trump's exit from the White House. If either proposition proves true, the world may yet recover from the interruption in the long run, enriched by the tough lessons of how dangerous it is to be overly reliant on a single consumer market. If this trend will represent the long-term trade relationship between the US and the world that outlives the end of Trump, the world better start figuring out how to trade in a world where America no longer features as a market worth engaging with. Getting that right, will be a major litmus test for states across the world over the next four years. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
