
Teen slashed in attempted abduction while jogging
District police chief Assistant Commissioner Mohd Iqbal Ibrahim said police received a report from the 15-year-old victim at 10.42pm.
At 5.15pm, the victim was jogging alone when approached by an old grey car, believed to be a Proton Saga or Iswara, with two men inside.
"One suspect got out, pointed a knife, and ordered the victim into the car.
"The victim refused, struggled with the suspect, and escaped to a nearby condominium guardhouse for help," he said today.
The victim suffered a cut on his right cheek and wounds on both arms. He was taken to hospital for treatment.
The case is being investigated under sections 363/511 and 324 of the Penal Code for kidnapping and causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means, respectively.
The offences carry jail terms of up to seven and 10 years respectively, as well as possible fines or whipping.
"Anyone with information can contact investigating officer Inspector Mohamad Sabri Abd Rani at 017-2892628," said Iqbal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
KL police seek Meta's help in actor defamation case
KUALA LUMPUR: City police will work with Meta Platforms Inc. to identify the individual behind a defamatory and provocative post targeting a popular male actor and singer. Acting Kuala Lumpur Police Chief Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said the identity of the social media account owner remains unknown. "I have instructed our investigating officers to contact Meta Platforms Inc. in Singapore to help trace the individual behind the Threads account. "We will also seek assistance from the Cyber Division of the Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID) to trace the IP address of the account owner," he said when met at the City police headquarters today. He said investigations were still ongoing, and statements have been recorded from four witnesses. It was reported on July 21 that police received a report from a local actor and singer over an alleged defamatory and provocative social media post made on the 'Threads' platform. The post is claimed to have damaged the complainant's reputation. The report was lodged at 4.12pm on July 18, involving a post by a social media account that allegedly contained slanderous, provocative, and seditious elements. Usuf was quoted as saying the post was made publicly and is believed to have the potential to tarnish the complainant's image and reputation. The case is being investigated under Section 500 of the Penal Code for defamation and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, which covers the misuse of network facilities. Those convicted under Section 500 could be liable for a maximum of two years' jail, a fine, or both. Section 233 stipulates a maximum fine of RM500,000 or two years' jail or both if found guilty, as well as a further fine of RM5,000 for each day the offence continues after conviction. Usuf also confirmed that the case was not related to the ongoing investigation involving local artiste Shila Amzah.
![[UPDATED] MACC duo, ex-colleague acquitted of robbing Chinese businessman](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FnhMACC_NSTfield_image_socialmedia.var_1754292738.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] MACC duo, ex-colleague acquitted of robbing Chinese businessman](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75)
New Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] MACC duo, ex-colleague acquitted of robbing Chinese businessman
KUALA LUMPUR: Two Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers and a former colleague were acquitted and discharged of robbing a Chinese businessman in 2021. Sessions Court judge Izralizam Sanusi made the ruling after finding that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against MACC officers Muhamad Haffiz Mohd Radzi, 35, and Mohd Fahmee Mohamad Nor, 43, along with former officer Azwan Asli, 40, at the close of the prosecution's case. The accused had allegedly robbed Kun Gao of his belongings, which were RM952,690 in cash, 1,225 Chinese Yuan, a silver baggage and a black LV bag at Ritz Carlton Residence, Jalan Ampang at about noon on Dec 10, 2021. The trio exhaled deeply, their faces breaking into relieved smiles as the judge delivered the ruling. However, not a single family member was seen in court throughout the proceedings today. In his brief decision, Izralizam said the prosecution failed to prove and establish the elements of robbery in the transaction. He said the police report lodged by the victim, who was the prosecution's first witness (PW1), stated that the presence of the three men at his residence was to initiate an investigation into alleged money laundering offences. "PW1 said he felt threatened because all three accused informed him that he could be arrested if he failed to cooperate with the investigation. "However, the court finds that this does not amount to wrongful restraint if it was done in their capacity as MACC officers. "The victim's own testimony showed he did not appear to be fearful of the trio during the incident, as he maintained he had committed no offence. "There is no evidence that the victim was threatened with a firearm by the three men, although he claimed that one of them had a gun in his backpack," he said. He said the alleged presence of a firearm was never proven during the trial. On Dec 13, 2023, the accused pleaded not guilty to the offence which was allegedly committed at a condominium in Jalan Ampang at around noon on Dec 10, 2021. They were charged under Section 395 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum jail term of 20 years and whipping upon conviction. Deputy public prosecutor Nor Aisyah Mohd Zanyuin prosecuted, while the three accused were represented by lawyers Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad and Azzizul Shariman Mat Yusoff. A total of 17 prosecution witnesses were called during the trial, which began in December 2024. In a related case, Gao, on May 21, this year, filed a lawsuit against politician A.M.A. Tinagaran, his wife J. Latha, MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, the trio and the government, accusing them of theft and extortion involving RM10 million. Tinagaran was appointed as PKR state deputy chairman in the Perak central leadership council for 2018-2021 and contested the Hulu Kinta state seat in the 2013 general election but lost to the Barisan Nasional candidate at that time. The plaintiff claimed Latha informed him that she could return all the plaintiff's belongings which were seized by the raiding team and requested to meet the former later for further discussion. The plaintiff claimed MACC failed to ensure that a proper, strict and binding standing order be issued to all MACC officers to prevent any form of abuse of power. He also claimed the government was vicariously liable for all actions of the said defendants. The plaintiff is seeking general, aggravated, punitive and exemplary damages.


Daily Express
37 minutes ago
- Daily Express
Bullying in schools: A critical issue that can no longer be silenced
Published on: Monday, August 04, 2025 Published on: Mon, Aug 04, 2025 By: Nur Aslina Binti Mustapa Text Size: According to the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), as of October 2024, 6,208 cases had already been recorded. Although this marks a slight decrease from the 6,528 cases reported in 2023, the numbers remain alarmingly high compared to pre-pandemic levels. School bullying is no longer just harmless mischief or a so-called 'rite of passage.' It has become a form of psychological and physical violence that leaves deep and lasting impacts on students—especially those in boarding institutions. Victims often suffer emotional distress, physical injuries, a loss of self-confidence, and in extreme cases, long-term trauma. What's even more troubling is how this toxic culture continues to thrive within a system that fails to offer real protection: complaints are silenced, witnesses are too afraid to speak up, and victims are left to struggle on their own, often developing anxiety and emotional scars that last well beyond their school years. The reality of this issue is reflected in official data. Between January and October 2023 alone, a total of 4,994 bullying cases were reported among school students—an increase from 3,887 cases in 2022 and significantly higher than the 326 cases recorded in 2021 during the Movement Control Order (MCO). According to the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), as of October 2024, 6,208 cases had already been recorded. Although this marks a slight decrease from the 6,528 cases reported in 2023, the numbers remain alarmingly high compared to pre-pandemic levels. In total, nearly 9,207 bullying incidents were reported between 2021 and October 2023. In a statement to the Senate, the Deputy Minister of Education revealed that between 5,703 and 5,891 students were involved in bullying cases in 2023 alone, based on data from the Student Self-Identity System (SSDM). These figures make one thing clear: bullying is not an isolated problem—it is a national crisis affecting thousands of students across the country. Given how serious and widespread bullying has become, real action is urgently needed. In a major step forward, the government introduced two important legal changes on 11 and 12 July 2025: the Penal Code (Amendment) 2025 and the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) 2025. These changes strengthen the law to better deal with both physical and online bullying. They now include harmful actions like doxxing (sharing someone's private information), as well as threats, insults, or messages that damage a person's reputation and cause emotional harm. This is a crucial move toward recognising that bullying is a serious offence—and that students deserve stronger protection. These legal changes introduced new Sections 507B to 507G under the Penal Code, which clearly list punishments for emotional harassment. This includes actions like sending threats, insults, or hurtful messages, as well as sharing someone's personal information without permission (also known as doxxing). These behaviours are now officially recognised as serious crimes and can lead to jail sentences of up to three years. This reform is an important step in fixing gaps in the law that, until now, failed to properly address modern types of psychological and online abuse. The implementation details and objectives of these reforms were presented by the Legal Affairs Division (BHEUU) under the Prime Minister's Department. They emphasized that these amendments not only streamline legal procedures and improve the efficiency of the criminal justice system but also enable faster and firmer action against perpetrators—without infringing on the constitutional right to freedom of expression. Where is our system failing? Despite a now-strengthened legal framework, practical failures in the education system continue to create space for bullying to persist. Many schools still lack adequate physical surveillance, such as CCTV in critical areas like dormitories, lounges, and main walkways. Wardens are often understaffed and under-trained. A culture of fear and silence continues to suppress reporting, as students fear retaliation or being labeled. Existing complaint systems often do not guarantee confidentiality or are not easily accessible to victims. Additionally, comprehensive psychosocial support is not yet a standard; many schools lack full-time trained counselors capable of identifying early warning signs of bullying or providing timely intervention to victims. What's the way forward? With bullying now recognized as a systemic issue, and with various forms now legally punishable under the 2025 amendments, the following actions must be implemented simultaneously for real impact: First, the enforcement of the National Anti-Bullying Act—now partially manifested through the amended Penal and Criminal Procedure Codes—must be paired with specific implementation guidelines for schools. The new laws should be integrated into school procedures so that the definitions of bullying, reporting mechanisms, investigation processes, and victim protection are aligned and effective. Second, the establishment of an Independent Student Complaints Unit is critical. This unit should operate autonomously under the Ministry of Education and be free from school administrative interference. It must provide a user-friendly online platform that guarantees the safety and confidentiality of complainants and has the authority to refer cases to relevant law enforcement agencies, particularly when the acts committed are now classified as criminal under the 2025 amendments. Third, both digital and physical surveillance systems in hostels and schools must be improved. Installing CCTV in strategic locations is not meant to be intrusive but rather to provide real evidence when incidents occur and serve as a preventive tool that enhances students' sense of safety. Fourth, continuous training for wardens, hostel staff, and school administrators must include empathy, trauma management, adolescent psychology, and early intervention—transforming them from mere discipline enforcers into emotional and physical protectors of students. School culture reform must also be a top priority. Harmful 'traditions' that shame, injure, or humiliate juniors in the name of seniority must be abolished and replaced with formal programs that promote positive peer-to-peer relationships and support. Simultaneously, parents and the community should be actively involved through ongoing education about the signs of both victims and perpetrators of bullying. Transparency in communication about incidents must be practiced so external support can be mobilized early. Action, not just awareness Bullying is not just a student's problem—it's a reflection of how seriously we take the safety, dignity, and mental wellbeing of our children. Stronger laws may now be in place, but they will mean very little if schools, families, and communities continue to look the other way. The true test is not in passing amendments—it is in whether we change how we respond, listen, and protect. Every time a complaint is dismissed, every time a child is told to 'toughen up,' and every time witnesses stay silent, we reinforce a culture that allows fear to grow and pain to fester. We must stop normalising suffering. We must replace silence with accountability, and fear with support. Because no child should ever feel alone, unheard, or unsafe in a place meant to nurture their future. The next time bullying happens—and it will—the only question that matters is this: Did we do enough to stop it? 'Bullying is not a culture, it is a crime. Every child deserves to learn in a safe, dignified, and protected environment.' * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia