logo
Trump says US-UK deal ‘done' as steel tariffs still up in air

Trump says US-UK deal ‘done' as steel tariffs still up in air

Donald Trump and Sir Keir Starmer have finalised a US-UK deal that will slash trade barriers on goods from both countries, but leaves the future of tariffs on British steel up in the air.
The Prime Minister said the move marked a 'very important day' for both sides as the US president announced the agreement was 'done' in a joint appearance on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada.
The deal will grant British carmakers a reprieve by the end of June as levies drop from 25% to 10%, while the aerospace sector will face no import taxes.
But tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium.
The Prime Minister described the pact as a 'sign of strength' in the transatlantic relationship, while Mr Trump praised Sir Keir as a 'friend' who had done a 'great job' securing the deal that eluded leaders before him.
Following the hastily arranged meeting, the two leaders posed for pictures outside the G7 venue with the signed documents, which the US president dropped before Sir Keir picked them up.
Mr Trump also mistakenly referred to the pact as a 'trade agreement with the European Union.'
In an impromptu media spray, the US president was asked whether steel tariffs would be eliminated, to which he replied: 'We're gonna let you have that information in a little while.'
The Department for Business and Trade said the two leaders had pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed'.
Asked whether Britain would be shielded from future tariffs, Mr Trump said the UK was protected 'because I like them'.
'The UK is very well protected, you know why? Because I like them. That's their ultimate protection,' he said.
The PM told the US President: 'Donald, thank you very much… A really important agreement. And so this is a very good day for both of our countries, a real sign of strength.'
The terms of the deal were agreed in May, but neither Washington nor London had yet taken the necessary steps to reduce tariffs.
Reports have since suggested the US could also push for the NHS to pay more for American drugs in exchange for softened tariffs, with White House sources telling the Telegraph the service would be expected to pay higher prices.
Downing Street insisted the Government will 'only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests' but did not rule out discussing the issue with Washington.
The Prime Minister was also insistent that a nuclear submarine deal between the UK, US and Australia, called Aukus, is 'very important' to both the United States and Britain.
He said it was proceeding despite Washington launching a review into the pact, which is worth around £176 billion and believed to be aimed at countering China.
He said: 'We're proceeding with that, it's a really important deal to both of us.
'I think the president is doing a review, we did a review when we came into government, and that makes good sense to me.'
Sir Keir and his fellow world leaders are locked in a week of intense diplomacy amid the spiralling conflict in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine.
The Prime Minister joined Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Carney and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a glass of wine and informal discussions on Sunday night.
Downing Street dismissed suggestions that the get-together had been a 'Trump-handling' exercise to prove the summit against the US president's unpredictability as leaders seek to put on a united front in the face of heightened global instability.
On Monday, splits opened up in the response to Russia, which Mr Trump suggested should not have been kicked out of the former G8 following its annexation of Crimea in 2014.
The US leader also signalled his reluctance to impose further American sanctions on Moscow despite a European push to heap more pressure on Vladimir Putin as he resists calls for an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine.
Standing alongside Sir Keir, who had earlier said G7 allies would seek to ratchet up measures against the Kremlin, Mr Trump said sanctions were 'not that easy' and would cost Washington 'a tremendous amount of money'.
Asked whether Washington supported European efforts to impose further measures, he told reporters ahead of a bilateral meeting with the UK Prime Minister: 'Well Europe is saying that, but they haven't done it yet.
'Let's see them do it first.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outgoing Guernsey chief minister warns over corporate tax changes
Outgoing Guernsey chief minister warns over corporate tax changes

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Outgoing Guernsey chief minister warns over corporate tax changes

Guernsey's next assembly should not make big changes to the island's corporate tax regime, the outgoing president of Policy and Resources (P&R) has warned. Deputy Lyndon Trott OBE led the campaign to introduce the zero-10 programme in 2008, which means some companies pay no corporation tax and others pay 10%.A number of candidates for the 2025 general election have said Guernsey should move to a zero-15 system or adopt a territorial corporate income tax scheme. "I caution the next States against doing anything unilaterally, only move when those of other size and status are willing to do the same," warned Trott. Proposals to change the island's corporate tax system were rejected on a number of ocassions during the last political States decided eventually to adopt a package of tax reforms, including a 5% GST, a lower income tax rate for earnings under £30,000 and reforms to social security contributions. In a wide-ranging interview with the BBC, before he leaves local politics on 30 June, Trott declared the changes to corporate tax in 2008 were the "biggest challenge" he had said the "damage that we would have done to our community, to our economy, would have been enormous" if the island had not voted for zero-10. Tax rises 'not heresy' Despite the States having agreed to introduce a GST, alongside other tax reforms, Trott suggested the States should look at other changes to make the island's tax system more progressive. He said: "I'm someone who thinks that we pay far too little in terms of income tax. I pay 20%. If 20% means 20% to me, I'd be very happy to pay 22% or even 25%. "There are colleagues of mine who throw their hands up in horror. It's heresy to speak in this way."Deputies rejected proposals from Trott for a temporary increase in the rate of income tax from 20% to 22%. "I genuinely believe in a progressive tax system," commented Trott."In other words, those who can afford to pay should pay. However, we absolutely can't touch the way we treat capital." Covid under-investment When confronted about why zero-10 had not led to greater economic growth, Trott complained that the island had "under-invested" in its infrastructure for "too long".He said: "Part of the problem was Covid. We ran down our reserves during Covid substantially. "We were lucky to have them. And we transferred £150m to support our community from our reserves."During the pandemic, as Vice-President of Policy and Resources, Trott was in charge of the financial support for businesses. He said: "It was essential. "But that is money that we would otherwise have invested directly into our infrastructure, which would have created a far more positive economic downturn than the one we've had."So I'm sort of hiding behind that."He blamed the lack of investment on infrastructure on the island's tax take. He said: "We take something like 21.5% of our GDP in tax. "Jersey takes 26%, the Isle of Man 29% and the UK is nearly 40%. So we are at the very bottom of that league table."

Middlewich Town Council regains control over its cemetery
Middlewich Town Council regains control over its cemetery

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Middlewich Town Council regains control over its cemetery

A town council has reclaimed full control of its cemetery following a long-running legal has been run for many years by a committee that the local authority said "had managed to separate" from the Town Council said the board had "surrendered" its control of the representing the Middlewich Cemetery Board said their client did not wish to comment. Legal proceedings between the council and the board have been ongoing for several this year, a town council investigation into the cemetery was looked into how the board had become separated from the town council, along with outlining the details of the legal report said the dispute had led to residents' council tax bills being also said the investigation had "uncovered numerous significant findings that have had financial, governance and potentially criminal repercussions for individuals, both past and present, who have held public office".Middlewich Town Council said it had submitted an urgent interim injunction application to take control of the cemetery's bank added it would "address any concerns relating to the issues and irregularities uncovered" by the also said the cemetery board had asked for a "drop hands agreement", which is where both parties agree to drop claims and pay their own council said it "simply cannot consider [this as it] is a matter of public interest". 'Historic irregularities' Under an interim arrangement, Cheshire East Council will be responsible for the administration and daily operation of the town council will manage the grounds, maintenance and mayor Simon Whittaker said: "We've had to put in place an urgent interim management plan which has meant that we bring in professional officers to assist us during this challenging period as there are many historic irregularities including financial and compliance issues."In a statement, Cheshire Police said: "Middlewich Town Council referred themselves to Cheshire Constabulary following an internal investigation report. "The report's findings were that there were financial, governance, and potentially criminal repercussions for individuals, both past and present, who have held public office. "Civil litigation remains ongoing and therefore it is not appropriate for Cheshire Constabulary to comment further at this time." Read more stories from Cheshire on the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

Trans guidance is 'important resource' for schools in Jersey
Trans guidance is 'important resource' for schools in Jersey

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trans guidance is 'important resource' for schools in Jersey

Jersey's minister for education and lifelong learning is standing by trans guidance in schools after a petition called for it to be revoked until parents were fully consulted, he a response to the 1,062-signature petition, Robert Ward said the guidance was an "important resource for schools" when children were questioning their said it would not be revoked and was only for the use of teaching and non-teaching staff when a child disclosed to them "their thoughts around their gender".He said this would be "a very small proportion of the school population and most children and families will not be affected by the guidance". Open dialogue He added that the guidance stressed the "vital role" of working with petition raised concerns that parents "should be involved in any discussions on the issue of their child's gender identity".Ward said: "The guidance makes it clear that open dialogue with parents is our goal."He added that information about a child's gender identity would only be withheld or masked in "exceptional circumstances".Ward said: "We won't be 'outing' them to anyone on the sole basis of their identity." He said staff do not need to tell parents if a child who was exploring their gender identity did not ask the school to "facilitate any social transition".If they do, "schools cannot simply choose to not include parents", he said. Petitioners also objected to books parents may consider "unsuitable" placed in school libraries and in the children's section of public said the three books recommended as part of the guidance were professional education resources and were not recommended for children.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store