Watchdog urged to probe ‘dangerous shambles' of Afghan relocation data breaches
Seven breaches were serious enough to be reported to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), three of which had not been made public, the broadcaster reported.
Those three included one in 2021 and two in 2022, the same year a major leak prompted the Government to obtain an unprecedented superinjunction barring journalists from reporting it.
Sean Humber, a lawyer at Leigh Day, which acts for Afghan citizens affected by previous breaches, said the latest reports are 'shocking' and confirm the MoD 'appears to be institutionally incapable of keeping personal data safe'.
He said: 'These data breaches betray a cavalier attitude to keeping such sensitive information safe as well as a complete disregard for the potentially life and death consequences of failing to do so.
'The Information Commissioner's Office must now roll up its sleeves and carry out a thorough and immediate investigation of what appears to be systemic failures of data protection policies, procedures or practices by the Ministry of Defence. This dangerous shambles cannot be allowed to continue.
Transparency is not optional; it is critical for protecting individuals, maintaining public trust, and ensuring that lessons are learned to prevent future breaches Adnan Malik, for 1,500 people affected
'All those affected must be notified of the breach of their personal data, including the personal data affected, without further delay and appropriate steps taken to ensure their safety.'
Adnan Malik, of Barings Law, which represents 1,500 affected people, said: 'This represents a deeply alarming data failure and the recent 49 Ministry of Defence breaches make clear that the Afghan case was not an isolated error but part of a wider and troubling pattern of negligence.
'Transparency is not optional; it is critical for protecting individuals, maintaining public trust, and ensuring that lessons are learned to prevent future breaches.'
The MoD did not provide any details of the nature of each breach.
Last month, a High Court judge lifted the gagging order relating to the major breach, which saw the details of 18,714 applicants for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in 2022.
When the breach was discovered more than a year later in August 2023, the MoD was granted an unprecedented gagging order amid fears the Taliban could target would-be refugees for reprisals.
It also saw the establishment of a secret £850 million scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), to bring thousands of those affected to the UK.
Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021.
An MoD spokesperson said: 'We take data security extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that any incidents are dealt with properly, and that we follow our legal duties.
'All incidents that meet the threshold under UK data protection laws are referred to the Information Commissioner's Office and any lesser incidents are examined internally to ensure lessons are learned.'
The ICO said it continues to engage with the MoD to be 'assured that they have made the required improvements'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour has failed to convince the public, Streeting admits
Labour has not done enough to persuade voters that its plans will change Britain for the better, Wes Streeting has admitted. The Health Secretary said that the party had not put forward a 'coherent enough story' about how it wants to improve the country. His remarks follow a turbulent first 13 months in power which have seen Sir Keir Starmer's approval rating sink to a record low. Sir Keir is said to be planning a major reset in the autumn in an attempt to fight back against claims Britain is 'broken' under his watch. Mr Streeting said that Labour had scored 'a whole number of achievements' over its first year which it needed to pitch more effectively to voters. He said they included a fall in NHS waiting lists and an expansion of free school meals which will lift 100,000 children out of poverty. However ministers have also been accused of serious failings, most notably on the small boats crisis, with the number of asylum seekers in hotels rising. But faced with his party's dire poll ratings, he admitted: 'It's not wrapped up in a coherent enough story about the change that we're bringing.' The Health Secretary made the remarks in an interview with George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor, about his first year in office. He said that Labour must use its position in power to 'set the agenda' more as it faces a major challenge from Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Mr Farage has challenged the Prime Minister over his record on illegal migration and crime, recently launching a campaign against 'lawless Britain' under Labour. 'We mustn't fall into the trap of letting Farage set the terms of the debate for us,' Mr Streeting said. 'Our most successful moments in the last 12 months have been where we have set the agenda, where we've gone out and made arguments as a government and shown to be delivering as well, because that's what people want. 'People want to feel change. They want to feel like the Government is driving the country forward in the right direction.' Mr Streeting insisted that the Prime Minister was a 'bold' leader but suggested that fact had not been communicated well enough to the public. Labour has begun to heavily target Reform in recent weeks, including on Mr Farage's opposition to online safety laws and reforms to workers' rights. Mr Streeting said that Reform's rise represented 'a major party realignment on the Right' and that the Tories now 'feel less and less relevant' as an opposition. 'If I think back to all of the conversations I've had with Keir in the last 12 months, there hasn't been a single one where he said 'whoa, slow down a minute, I'm not sure about that'. 'It's always been 'go harder, go faster, be bolder.' And I think that side of his leadership we – and I mean his team – we need to show more of that.' He said it had been Sir Keir who had pushed him to take the most radical course on abolishing NHS England, the world's biggest quango. Mr Streeting, who is currently locked in a pay battle with resident doctors who walked out for five days in July, also suggested other ministers had a 'responsibility' to stand up to public sector pay demands. He has ruled out handing them a 30 per cent pay rise, saying they have 'squandered the considerable goodwill' they had with the government by going on strike. Asked whether Cabinet members understood the financial constraints that Rachel Reeves is facing, the Health Secretary replied: 'I think so. 'You look at the range of pressures we're facing domestically, internationally, economically, public services, the expectations of the country, the pain that families are feeling in their pockets and I'm always conscious that over and above everyone else Keir and Rachel are carrying all of those pressures together. 'And so I think it is our responsibility to say to our own departments, or own audiences, or the people we're responsible for and the services that we're responsible for, 'you need to understand that we can't do everything for everyone, everywhere, all at once'.' Mr Streeting's remarks came as it emerged that No 10 is planning a major reset of Sir Keir's premiership next month in an attempt to take the fight to Reform. Downing Street officials are said to be drawing up a new strategy to confront Mr Farage's claims that Britain has become a 'broken' country under Labour. According to the Huffington Post, it will include defending the tax rises in the budget by pointing out the extra money for the NHS has helped cut waiting lists. It will not be the first time that Sir Keir has attempted to relaunch his struggling premiership. His first effort to do so was widely criticised after he launched six new 'milestones', to add to Labour's existing five 'missions' in a move that was branded confusing.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Rising food prices mean hefty obesity costs
Stung by the price of olive oil? Burnt by the cost of your coffee? You are not alone. The cost of food and drink is increasing fast, faster than prices in general. This is a bigger problem, politically, socially and economically, than any politician has yet noticed. The government in particular should be paying attention to food bills, and taking action. The Office for National Statistics this week put the annual inflation rate at 3.8 per cent, but also showed that food and drink prices are rising at 4.9 per cent. The average household spends a bit more than £5,000 annually on food, so those numbers add up to about £250 a year. ONS tracking of public opinion shows that the cost of living remains the number one concern for the public, with more than 90 per cent of people citing rising food bills as a reason — well above the share who cite energy bills as an inflationary worry. Being reminded that things are getting more expensive — meaning that you feel poorer — every time you fill your shopping basket is not a happy experience. Food prices rising faster than the cost of other purchases has been a dismally common feature of the UK economy since 2022, for several reasons: war in Ukraine; too much rain; not enough rain; higher energy costs; not enough migrant workers to pick fruit and veg; higher taxes. The public's daily dismay at food prices, I'd bet, is a bigger reason for Britain feeling generally dissatisfied than noisier issues like immigration or crime. Yet it gets curiously little political attention, given how much it matters to voters' lives and outlook. Labour's spin team should give more thought to finding someone else to blame for rising food bills, not least because the problem is going to get worse. The Bank of England reckons food inflation will hit 5.5 per cent by the end of the year, while the British Retail Consortium says 6 per cent. Get ready for a winter of headlines about the painful cost of your Christmas lunch. Looking further ahead, the problem is even worse, reaching beyond simple political unease into questions of fairness, public health and economic performance. Rising food prices affect some groups more than others, with the poorest facing both the greatest financial pain but also the worst long-term consequences. The worst of these is rising obesity levels. Perhaps that will surprise some readers. How do rising food prices make poor people fat? Surely if it's getting harder to buy food, people will eat less of it and get thinner? In fact, a wealth of evidence shows that when low-income households face rising food prices, they trade quality for quantity, buying more cheap foods that are high in calories but low in nutrients. Social scientists grandly call this the 'food insecurity obesity paradox' but it's arguably just the human version of a common animal instinct to put on fat when times are tough and a hard winter is coming. • From peanuts to pomegranates — the 19 foods that will keep you young Almost a third of UK adults are obese, with rates highest among the poorest. There are many links between obesity and poverty but raw economics is a significant factor. According to the Food Foundation, a campaigning charity founded by former Tory MP Laura Sandys, recent years of inflation have made it almost impossible for poorer people to eat healthily. The foundation reckons that the poorest households would need to spend almost half of their disposable income on food to afford a healthy diet high in fruit and veg with limited sugars and fats. For poor parents, a healthy grocery shop could cost 70 per cent of disposable income. Healthier foods are just more expensive per calorie than stuff that's full of sugar and fat. Government calculations show that cauliflower and broccoli might cost almost 2p per calorie; for cheap biscuits it's less than half as much. Obesity means more sickness — diabetes and heart disease, in particular — and shorter lives. It means misery for individuals and mounting costs to taxpayers. My back-of-an-envelope calculations suggest that just a one percentage point increase in the obesity rate (roughly 550,000 more people getting too fat) costs the state more than £3 billion over ten years in higher NHS and care costs. We must make good food cheaper for poorer people, but that's far easier said than done. Continuing education to overcome ignorance about nutrition helps but new ideas are needed. What about Nutrition Impact Bonds? Building on NHS 'social prescribing' models, public and private investors could pay upfront for subsidised or even free healthy food for poorer households, then be paid back from the savings the state makes from lower obesity spending. The causes of higher food prices are big, complicated and long-term. Likewise the public health challenge of obesity and poor diets. It follows that fixing them will be a long-term project, the sort of job that no government, especially an unpopular one worrying about its next election, rushes to tackle. • Eating home-cooked food 'helps you lose twice as much weight' But Labour should lift food prices and obesity up its agenda, because they interact with the government's emerging economic focus. Ministers are planning an autumn drive on productivity, correctly identifying Britain's basic economic effectiveness — how much stuff do we generate from each hour of work we do? — as a national priority. Helping business to finance and deploy technology and training to make workers more effective is a key part of productivity, but so too is ensuring the availability of a healthy workforce. And our fatter, sicker population is emerging as a drag on productivity, as more and more people go off sick or leave work outright. Last month a paper by Nesta, a think tank, and Frontier Economics put the cost of productivity lost to obesity at £31 billion a year. The study shows that obesity doesn't just drag on the economy by taking people out of the workforce through sickness. Boldly, it says that obese people just aren't as effective at work as healthy colleagues and cost the economy almost £10 billion a year, it estimates. The government rightly wants to increase productivity but the fact is that Britain is simply too fat and ill to be fully productive. And in large part that's because of bad and increasingly expensive diets. Sadly, the cost of food is even higher than you think. James Kirkup is a senior fellow of the Social Market Foundation
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Farming Today 20/08/2025 Funding for rural councils, spinach, bioethanol
County councils say major changes to the way the government calculates funding for local authorities will penalise rural areas. The government says the new system will mean fairer funding and more stability which will help deliver better public services. However the County Councils Network says rural council tax payers will 'shoulder the burden' of redistributing hundreds of millions of pounds to urban areas and warn some councils will face deep cuts to their services. Growing spinach in the soaring heat - a seasonal look at producing salad. The Vivergo bioethanol plant on the Humber near Hull has now stopped production and started laying off staff after the government said it wouldn't provide support for the plant. The future of the business had been in doubt since tariffs were removed on bioethanol imports from the US in the recent trade agreement with Donald Trump. The company, owned by Associated British Foods, bought in locally grown wheat, around a million tonnes a year, and distilled it into bioethanol which is added to petrol to reduce emissions, and also produced large quantities of cattle feed. It's one of two plants in the UK. We speak to a renewable energy expert Dr Michael Short from the University of Surrey. Presenter = Caz Graham Producer = Rebecca Rooney
