The pitfalls of overhasty business deregulation
JOHN F Kennedy was fond of the expression 'don't ever take a fence down until you know the reason why it was put up'. First laid out by English writer GK Chesterton, it is a reminder not to rush reforms through without considering the consequences. There are few better examples of how Donald Trump and his supporters are ignoring this principle than Republicans' plan to scrap the US audit regulator, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
Under the proposal, included as part of the vast tax and spending bill before Congress, the PCAOB's responsibilities, which include ensuring and policing audit quality, would be folded into the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The plan may yet fall foul of procedural hurdles. But it is of a piece with other chainsaw-first reforms set in motion since Trump's return, powered by a belief that all deregulation must be good for business.
They include Trump's pausing of enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prevents Americans bribing foreign government officials to win business, and the gutting of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which protects citizens against bank fraud. Then there is the 'reining in' by executive order of independent agencies including the SEC, Federal Reserve and Federal Trade Commission, whose two Democratic commissioners have been fired.
These moves raise a question: what is business regulation for? In the case of the PCAOB, the answer is clear. Before the audit regulator came into being, US auditors and audit standards were largely self-regulated. The smug assumption that this was good for the profession and investors was shattered in 2001 when energy company Enron collapsed. Its auditor Andersen, riven with conflicts of interest, disintegrated.
Commenting on changes in audit regulation in 2003, Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's then-business partner and vice-chair of Berkshire Hathaway, said accounting standards had 'deteriorated faster than morality in investment banking – and I hate the first more than the second because I expected more of the accountants'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Having at first resisted the change, big firms mostly see the value of a regulator that prevents a free-for-all and a race to the bottom in audit quality, even though they may carp occasionally about the activism of the board's current chair, Erica Williams. She said this week she was 'deeply troubled' by the draft legislation.
Governments everywhere should submit regulation to regular review, pruning onerous and unreasonable rules. It is also legitimate to examine where regulators sit on a spectrum between encouraging growth and ensuring safety, as is happening in the UK.
In the US, mechanisms already exist to redirect or reform regulation. When an administration changes, a change in leadership of agencies is also expected. The new SEC chair, Paul Atkins, is a conventional Republican choice, who seems set to push through a more incremental shift to lighter-touch regulation. Bigger reforms, such as abolishing the PCAOB, deserve debate in Congress, rather than be forced through as a line item.
The Financial Times has outlined the dangers to financial markets posed by reckless financial deregulation in the US. Recent history shows the deeper consequences of lax supervision: after Enron's collapse, and the US and global corporate scandals uncovered in its wake, came the financial crisis of 2008 – which, incidentally, spawned the formation of the CFPB. By hacking wildly at the fences erected after those disasters, Trump and the Republicans could prompt an answer to the 'why regulate?' question, by destroying the effective competition that proportionate protection from corporate and financial malfeasance provides. FINANCIAL TIMES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
15 minutes ago
- Business Times
Police make 'mass arrests' in LA during nighttime curfew
[LOS ANGELES] Los Angeles police began arresting people in the city's downtown late Tuesday (Jun 10), as groups gathered in violation of an overnight curfew after a fifth day of protests against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Looting and vandalism in the second-biggest US city have marred the largely peaceful protests over ramped-up arrests by immigration authorities. The demonstrations, which began on Friday, and isolated acts of violence prompted Trump to take the extraordinary step of sending in troops, over the objection of the state governor. The protests again turned ugly after dark on Tuesday, but an hour into the overnight curfew only a handful of protesters were left downtown, with police making several arrests as they warned stragglers to leave. 'Multiple groups continue to congregate on 1st St between Spring and Alameda' within the designated downtown curfew area, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) wrote on X late Tuesday. 'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Police arrested 25 people on suspicion of violating the curfew as of Tuesday evening, the Los Angeles Times reported, citing an LAPD spokesperson. The number of arrests was likely to rise as law enforcement worked to remove the remaining protesters from the area, the newspaper said. Earlier, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said she had issued the curfew 'to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting.' One square mile (2.5 square kilometers) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area will be off-limits from 8:00 pm and 6:00 am (0300 to 1300 GMT) for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large immigrant and Latino populations was the root of the unrest. 'I think that obviously they're doing it for safety,' she said of the curfew. 'But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence.' At their largest, the protests have included a few thousand people taking to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows. Overnight, Monday 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days. Protests against immigration arrests by federal law enforcement have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco and Austin. Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control – despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters. A military spokeswoman said the Marines were expected to be on the streets by Wednesday. Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany 'federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection.' Demonstrators told AFP the soldiers 'should be respected' because they had not chosen to be in Los Angeles, but Lisa Orman blasted it as 'ridiculous.' 'I was here for the Dodger parade,' she said, referring to the LA team's World Series victory. 'It was 100 times bigger,' she said, branding the idea that Marines were necessary as 'a big show' that Trump wanted. The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers US$134 million. Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. Late Tuesday, Texas Governor Greg Abbott said his state would deploy its National Guard 'to locations across the state to ensure peace & order' after solidarity protests. 'Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest,' Abbott wrote on X. The Texas National Guard 'will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.' In sprawling Los Angeles on Tuesday, it was largely a typical day: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, celebrities attended red carpet premieres, tens of thousands of children went to school and commuter traffic choked the streets. But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture. 'What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty,' the Republican told troops at Fort Bragg. 'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behaviour of 'a tyrant, not a president.' In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force – absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump has mused. The president 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines,' said law professor Frank Bowman. AFP
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
Bessent emerging as a contender to succeed Fed's Powell
[NEW YORK] A growing chorus of advisers inside and outside the Trump administration are pushing another name to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would name a successor 'very soon' to replace Jerome Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. The small list of candidates under consideration has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump interviewed for the Treasury secretary role in November, according to people familiar with the matter. But Bessent – who is leading Trump's effort to kickstart the US economy with sweeping changes to trade, taxes and regulation – is also now one of the contenders for the job, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Formal interviews for the position have not begun, two of the people said. 'I have the best job in Washington,' Bessent said in response to a request for comment. 'The president will decide who's best for the economy and the American people.' A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, disputed the reporting without providing further specifics. As Treasury chief, Bessent would traditionally play a key role in the search and interview process for the next Fed chair. It's unclear if he would recuse himself as Trump begins to make his decision. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Given the amount of trust and confidence that the global financial community has in Scott Bessent, he's an obvious candidate,' said Tim Adams, president and CEO of the Institute of International Finance (IIF). 'He's a dark horse candidate,' Adams said, adding that Warsh – who served as a governor on the Fed board from 2006 to 2011 – would also be a good choice. Asked specifically about Warsh on Friday, Trump said: 'He's very highly thought of.' Bessent has been at the forefront of negotiations on a US-China trade deal, arguably the most important of the pacts the president is seeking to forge as part of his effort to reshape the global trade landscape. 'Scott Bessent proved he could implement President Trump's agenda during an incredibly turbulent first six months,' said Steve Bannon, former chief White House strategist and outside adviser to the president. 'He's not just the star of the cabinet, but a safe pair of hands for global capital markets.' The president, who first nominated Powell to the job in 2017, has regularly complained that the Fed chief has been too reluctant to cut borrowing costs. Trump pushed Powell to lower interest rates in a White House meeting last month. Powell and Fed officials have held interest rates steady in 2025, arguing a patient approach to policy is appropriate amid economic uncertainty caused by Trump's expanded and evolving use of tariffs. Fed policymakers have said they expect the announced tariffs to weigh on economic growth and boost inflation. Whoever the Senate confirms for the post will have to prove to the world that the Fed's independence from political meddling remains intact. Trump has said many times that Powell is making a mistake by not lowering rates, and has previously said that he should have a say on rate decisions, raising questions over whether markets would see the next pick as beholden to him. Bessent or Warsh 'would be given the benefit of the doubt from the financial community' that they would preserve the independence of the Fed's rate-setting authority, IIF's Adams said. Economist and Trump ally Arthur Laffer said Bessent 'is wonderful, but he already has a job. And his specialty is not monetary policy.' 'As I told the president, I think Kevin Warsh is just perfect for the job,' he said. Other candidates whose names have previously been floated for Fed chair include Kevin Hassett, the White House's National Economic Council director, Christopher Waller, a Fed governor, and former World Bank President David Malpass. BLOOMBERG
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Musk says he regrets some posts he made about Trump
Billionaire Elon Musk said on Wednesday (Jun 11) he regrets some of the posts he made last week about US President Donald Trump as they went "too far". Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". Trump said on Saturday their relationship was over but has since said that he would not have a problem if Musk called and wished him well. "I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. He did not say which specific posts he was talking about.
