
Here's How Tariffs Are Impacting Real Manufacturers Today
How are tariffs impacting manufacturers today?
There's plenty of available commentary from economists and thought leaders about how tariffs will impact manufacturers and the larger economy. Missing is the voice of the manufacturers working through these changes today. How are tariffs impacting their sales? What are they doing to prepare? Which ones are struggling? Which are benefiting?
In an effort to get to some ground-floor truth, I chatted with four manufacturing leaders to hear about how tariffs are impacting them. The reality that emerged is nuanced, but reveals that already supply and demand is recalibrating, that there is upside and downside to tariffs even within individual companies, and that your perspective on the future depends a lot on where you sit in the supply chain. Here are four stories of real companies navigating tariffs.
Early Signals and Optimism
Based in Ohio, DECA Manufacturing sources components for its wire harnesses—which serve as the nervous system of complex equipment—from a variety of distributors. While the company gets materials like copper wire from the U.S. and tries to source here first, several of the components their customers request have parts that originate overseas. So, a lot of the company's suppliers are also in low-cost countries, although not necessarily China.
DECA competes with those low-cost countries for contracts, as well, and in a few cases, tariff pressures have led to wins that President Cameron Haring says may or may not have fallen the company's way without them. 'Just the whiff of uncertainty,' he says, has impacted the market.
Haring says he'll become concerned if 'a $3 part becomes a $6 part and really starts to eat into margins …. And we're in a fight with our customer.' But he's also cautiously hopeful and sees opportunities for manufacturers to move operations back to the U.S., and then to optimize costs through design improvements and automation. He says it's too soon to say if tariffs are a net win, but there's one clear benefit. 'I think it's important to change the dialog around manufacturing,' he says. 'And I do think that's changing.'
A Boost In Business
The tariff impact at Snyder Manufacturing has been clear. They are working in Snyder's favor, leading to increased sales over the last few months, and the company is optimistic that additional increased sales could come if tariffs stay in place as they are now.
That's because the maker of a PVC vinyl laminate and PVC-coated mesh is in direct competition with cheaper, China-made options. 'We can't compete pricewise,' says Jolene Meese, president at Synder. '[Sometimes]
But even for Meese and Snyder, uncertainty looms. The company has some available capacity in-house, but expansion and equipment investments would require a deeper belief in the extended tariff picture. Meese believes that while some customers will stick with Snyder Manufacturing due to quality and service, others would likely return to importing if prices on imported goods drop again. To increase the chances that the increased sales stick, Meese believes that consistency and focus on fair competition with China over time is key. 'The uncertainty has made it really difficult for people to go ahead and make that decision to switch to a U.S. company,' she says.
A Shift To Local Supply Only Goes So Far
A wholesale distributor and manufacturer of aluminum building products, Shapes Unlimited started last year diversifying its supplier base to shield itself from possible heightened tariffs under the new administration. Long reliant on imports from Southeast Asia, the company added five new suppliers—three offshore and two domestic—to 'mitigate the risk of having too few eggs in too few baskets,' says CEO Doug Rende. 'We bet on the fact that tariffs would not be unilaterally deployed across every country on the planet. Oops.'
Even with additional domestic suppliers, tariffs have created new cost pressures and unpredictability. 'We ultimately pass it on,' Rende says. 'You have no choice.' In 2025, sales are up 25% year-to-date. The company stockpiled inventory, but that lower, tariff-imposed stock is now dwindling, lead times have lengthened, and costs are climbing. The deeper, long-term challenge is structural. He points to a massive shortfall in domestic aluminum production. 'You're not going to make up that shortfall in any sort of reasonable timeframe,' he says. 'It will take a decade, at least.'
Rende says reinvigorating American manufacturing will take coordinated investment—not just policy—but it's difficult for companies to make investments in this 'whack-a-mole' environment. 'Over the last several decades in particular, as it relates to steel and aluminum production, those who've been progressive have invested aggressively in new automation, new equipment, new procedures, to speed the process and lower the total costs,' he says. 'The lead times for the sophisticated equipment alone are 24-plus months between production, shipment, and installation.'
The Advantages Of Being In The 'Middle Of The Dog's Tail'
As a service provider to the metals industry, Uniserv services its customers' need to slit to width. They have, therefore, benefited from the fact they don't buy steel directly.
Some of their customers, however, buy from other countries like Canada, and Uniserv Vice President Jeremy Kerola has seen those customers re-assessing how much steel they're bringing across the border. 'Uncertainty leads to volatility,' he says. 'Volatility leads to a lack of confidence. And that lack of confidence, yeah, makes it challenging to tread these waters.'
Uniserv's domestic demand and its position within the supply chain has insulated the company and kept business steady for now. 'We're in the middle of the dog's tail,' he says. 'The base starts to swing, and then the tip is going to have a hard reaction. We find ourselves in the middle where everybody needs value-added manufacturing, which is what we are.'
Still, Kerola is realistic about the road ahead and the timeline that reshoring would require. 'You're talking four to five years' to rebuild domestic capacity, he says, with some equipment alone coming with a two-year lead time. But he's also optimistic that the industry's short-term pain could lead to long-term gain. 'When people go to work, there's a lot of money to be put back in Americans' pockets,' Kerola says.
Optimism Through Uncertain Times
For the companies seeing upticks in orders or anticipating them like Snyder and Deca, tariffs can be a real boon. At MAGNET, the manufacturing consulting firm I run in Northeast Ohio, we've seen some companies use tariffs as an opportunity to make meaningful investments in automation and other Industry 4.0 technologies. Even if tariffs go away, these companies could retain their competitive edge over the long haul and permanently reshore product.
But not all manufacturers are comfortable enough to make those investments, as tariff uncertainty paints a blurry picture of future supply and demand. Recent history proves that cost drives the ship—after the pandemic, when offshore pricing and availability rebalanced, the locally made (and, often, heroically reinvented) alternatives were dropped overnight. There is real fear that tariffs could go away for geopolitical reasons and eliminate the benefits of reshoring.
As the stories above show, small and medium-sized companies are hesitant to risk it with the significant investments in automation that would enable them to compete with overseas production long-term. Until they are, these companies will remain on a roller coaster.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Chicago mayor says Trump's America looks like Confederacy won, suggests ICE are 'terrorists'
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Trump attends bill signing ceremony at the White House


Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Treasury Yields Fall Amid Concerning Labor Data, Mild Inflation
0900 ET – U.S. labor and inflation data deepen a decline in Treasury yields. Weekly jobless claims were unchanged from the previous week's upwardly revised pace, at 248,000. Economists surveyed by WSJ expected 246,000. Continuing claims, a measure of the unemployed population, was 1.96 million, the highest level since November 2021. May's wholesale price inflation was 0.1%, accelerating from April's 0.2% deflation and below consensus of a positive 0.2%. The combination of slower-than-expected inflation and concerning labor data underscores bets that the Fed may need to change its hawkish position. Yields were already declining and fell further after the data. The 10-year Treasury yield is at 4.360% and the two-year at 3.891%. ( @ptrevisani) 0614 GMT – A downside surprise in U.S. CPI data gave only a small boost to Treasurys, probably because tariff-driven price hikes still look imminent, says Capital Economics' James Reilly in a note. That said, these price hikes look discounted in markets, shielding Treasury yields from rising pressure, the senior markets economist says. 'We don't expect much upwards pressure on Treasury yields even as the inflationary impact of tariffs eventually feeds into U.S. consumer prices,' he says. Capital Economics expects core inflation to rise in coming months but it thinks that investors are already braced for a broadly similar outcome on tariffs, he says. (


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
L.A. Immigration Crackdown Sparks Concerns About Possible Martial Law
TOPSHOT - Demonstrators holding signs and flags face California National Guard members standing ... More guard outside the Federal Building as they protest in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, on June 9, 2025. US President Donald Trump on June 9 ordered active-duty Marines into Los Angeles, vowing those protesting immigration arrests would be "hit harder" than ever. Protests in Los Angeles, home to a large Latino population, broke out on June 6, triggered by immigration raids that resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. (Photo by Apu GOMES / AFP) (Photo by APU GOMES/AFP via Getty Images) In recent weeks, the Los Angeles immigration crackdown has become the epicentre of a dangerous national experiment—one in which immigration enforcement is serving as the pretext for something far more ominous: a steady descent into possible martial law. The deployment of U.S. military forces into California without the governor's consent, the violent sweep of immigration raids, and the weaponization of emergency powers all signal that the constitutional order is under siege. President Donald Trump's decision to send 4,000 National Guard troops and Marines into California was met with outrage from state leaders and legal experts alike. California Governor Gavin Newsom has called the action 'an illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional act,' and the state has filed suit against the federal government, citing violations of the U.S. Federal Code, which prohibit federalizing state militias except in cases of invasion, rebellion, or when a state cannot enforce its own laws. None of those conditions apply in this case. Yet the justification offered by the administration—that Los Angeles was on the brink of collapse due to immigrant protests—is as false and inflammatory as was demonstrated on a recent episode of Jimmy Kimmel, which showed footage of quiet Los Angeles streets. Following a series of ICE raids that detained over 100 people, protests erupted across the city. While the Los Angeles Police Department stated that the demonstrations were largely peaceful, federal officials framed them as acts of rebellion. In televised comments, President Trump, without evidence, declared that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without military intervention. However, some legal scholars point out that such claims are disturbingly reminiscent of how autocrats have historically manufactured crises to seize power. For instance, in comments made recently by Yale historian Timothy Snyder, he warned, 'Be wary of paramilitaries. When the men with guns claim to be against the system, the system is under threat.' These warning signs are increasing. Earlier this year, President Trump re-declared a national emergency at the southern border, significantly intensifying deportation efforts, particularly in sanctuary jurisdictions. His Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem, asserts that these efforts are crucial to national security. However, critics contend that the raids are politically motivated, intended to incite chaos and test the boundaries of presidential authority. This is not mere conjecture. There have been calls to arrest Governor Newsom for defying the troop deployment—an idea that would equate to criminalizing political opposition. The implications are chilling. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Republicans are racing to pass what Trump has dubbed his 'big, beautiful bill,' a sprawling legislative package that, among other things, includes over $46 billion for the border wall and ICE funding. The administration is leveraging the unrest in Los Angeles to push hesitant GOP senators to fall in line. The proposed bill also imposes a $1,000 asylum application fee—an unprecedented barrier to legal refuge—and earmarks billions more for new Border Patrol and customs agents. These aren't merely policy choices; they are tools of exclusion and intimidation. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), a leading voice for the legislation, is actively urging his colleagues to use the Los Angeles protests as proof of why ICE and the border crackdown require even more support. Beyond Capitol Hill, the cultural symbolism of this shift is equally revealing. Trump has announced a massive military parade in Washington, D.C., timed to coincide with the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary—and his own birthday. With tanks, howitzers, and cruise missile launchers on display, the spectacle is designed to evoke strength. But it also mirrors the authoritarian aesthetics of regimes like Russia and North Korea. The question is, where is this all heading? During his first term, Trump was dissuaded from invoking the Insurrection Act during the George Floyd protests only after senior military officials objected. This time, with loyalists appointed to key positions, those checks seem to be absent. Historically, there exists a dangerous precedent for all this. In 1933, Adolf Hitler used the Reichstag Fire to suspend civil liberties and consolidate power. Legal analysts are increasingly drawing comparisons between that moment and today's ongoing use of emergency powers in the name of immigration control. 'If you saw all this in any other country — soldiers sent to crush dissent, union leaders arrested, opposition politicians threatened — it would be clear that autocracy had arrived,' said constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe. Even tech magnates are playing a role. Elon Musk, who now owns X (formerly Twitter), has eliminated most content moderation, amplifying polarizing rhetoric and misinformation. His platform has become a megaphone for conspiracy theories that portray immigrants as invaders and critics as traitors. Beneath all these disturbing developments in the crackdown on immigrants lies a core question: Is the United States still a democracy governed by civilian law, or is it becoming a militarized state ruled by executive whim? The courts may still provide a line of defense. California's lawsuit regarding the unauthorized deployment of federal troops will test the judiciary's willingness to uphold the Constitution. However, history teaches us that legal battles alone cannot protect democracy when institutions are co-opted or eroded. What is unfolding is more than a dispute over immigration policy; it is a stress test of America's democratic fabric. The use of immigration raids to justify military actions, the demonization of peaceful protests, and the consolidation of emergency powers—these are not isolated events. They form a pattern. While Americans seem divided on the issue of military use in the Los Angeles immigration crackdown, with half in favour and the other half, particularly Californians, opposed, June 14th, 2025, the 'No Kings National Day of Action,' promises to be a pivotal day for America as immigration protests, which have spread to other cities, will likely reach their peak on that day. While this unfolds, Trump will head to Canada to attend the G-7 meeting while keeping a watchful eye on events back home. Meanwhile, the fate of the Republic may hinge not on whether Trump builds a wall, but on whether Americans permit him to dismantle the walls of constitutional restraint in the name of constructing it.