SCRF: Experts call for community-led reform in early education
Moderated by broadcaster Abdulkarim Hanif, the conversation featured Pakistani education researcher and children's author Mariam Shah, and Muhammad Al-Hasan Al-Sajjad, Advisor to the Minister of Social Action, Childhood, and Family in Mauritania.
Drawing on two decades of experience in public education reform in Pakistan, Shah spoke candidly about the alarming findings of the 2024 Annual Status of Education Report (ASER). "Fifty percent of Pakistani children in grade five cannot read a grade two level text," she shared. 'This is not a statistic—it's a systemic failure.'
'We cannot change the nation by focusing only on elite private schools,' she said. 'Public schools must be the focus if we are serious about equity and quality in education.'
Offering a comparative lens, Al-Sajjad reflected on Mauritania's efforts to bridge traditional schooling with modern educational frameworks. 'Our challenge is twofold: to preserve the strengths of our indigenous education systems, while building formal structures that respond to today's socio-economic realities,' he said.
'We are working to harmonise our education system—one that includes language reform, community-led dialogue, and curriculum modernisation', Al-Sajjad further noted.
The power of stories
Beyond policies and statistics, the panelists made a compelling case for the power of storytelling as a pedagogical tool. 'Stories allow children to engage with complex topics like climate change, inclusion or emotional intelligence on their own terms,' said Shah, whose recent books address both environmental and social issues through child-friendly narratives.
She argued that developing local, relatable story characters is essential to counter the dominance of imported cultural archetypes. 'Instead of only looking up to Batman or Barbie, children should find heroes in characters who reflect their own culture, language and realities.'
Both Shah and Al-Sajjad stressed the importance of engaging parents from the earliest stages of a child's life.
Reimagining education for the digital age
Responding to audience concerns about screen time and digital distractions, both panellists agreed that technology can support but never replace human-centred, culturally sensitive education. 'It's not about choosing between screens and stories,' said Al-Sajjad. 'It's about choosing meaningful content, in the right language, at the right age, and through the right medium.'
The discussion concluded with a shared call for governments, educators, parents and civil society to collaborate on long-term solutions. 'Education is not just the job of one ministry or one teacher,' Al-Sajjad noted. 'It's a national responsibility.'
The free-to-attend festival runs until May 4 at Expo Centre Sharjah, and offers many more such meaningful conversations and discussions. For more information, visit, www.scrf.ae.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
16 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Bombing hospitals is a red line - unless Israel is doing it
On Thursday morning, Iranian missiles struck Soroka hospital in Beersheba, triggering expressions of outrage from Israeli officials. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir likened the Iranian regime to 'Nazis who fire missiles at hospitals, the elderly and children'. President Isaac Herzog evoked imagery of a baby in intensive care and a doctor rushing between beds. Culture Minister Miki Zohar declared on social media that 'only the scum of the earth fires missiles at hospitalized children and elderly people in their sick beds'. The chair of Israel's medical association, Zion Hagay, decried the strike as a war crime and urged the international medical community to condemn it. This swift and unified condemnation by Israeli political and medical leadership underscores a striking contradiction: these same actors not only ignored but openly justified the destruction of Gaza's hospitals over the past two years. Since 7 October 2023, Israeli air strikes and ground invasions have decimated Gaza's healthcare infrastructure. The World Health Organisation has recorded around 700 attacks on healthcare facilities. Major hospitals - al-Shifa, Nasser and the Indonesian hospital, among others - have been besieged, bombed and dismantled. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Israeli officials frame these hospitals as military targets and Hamas 'shields'. Shifa, the largest hospital in Gaza, was placed under siege and then invaded, with the attack hailed by Israeli media as a victory. Meanwhile, the Israeli Medical Association remained silent. In one of its rare statements after a year and a half of Israel's repeated and targeted attacks on hospitals and civilian infrastructure, the association echoed the state's narrative, stating that health facilities and personnel must not be targeted 'unless these are being used as a base for terrorist activities'. Selective moral outrage What is especially striking about this moment is the selective moral outrage from Israeli officials. The same ministers who justified the systematic dismantling of Gaza's healthcare system now describe an attack on an Israeli hospital as a red line, a war crime. Herzog's sentimental imagery of doctors rushing between beds evokes the stark reality in Gaza, where health workers have been shot and shelled in operating rooms, imprisoned, or forced to abandon their patients under fire. International medical voices have played along. While many doctors and health workers have spoken out, many others have remained silent, with no real actions taken to hold Israel accountable. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war It would be a mistake to treat these official statements as being detached from the public mood in Israel. Most Israelis have defended the destruction of Gaza's healthcare infrastructure. Public discourse has normalised the idea that Palestinian hospitals are legitimate military targets, even celebrating their destruction in some cases. This normalisation is not incidental. It is part of a broader dehumanisation of Palestinians, where even a child under anaesthesia in a Gaza operating room is not seen as a victim, but as collateral damage or a 'shield'. The outrage over Soroka thus reveals a deeper truth: in the eyes of many institutions and audiences, some lives are inherently more valuable than others. When Israeli hospitals are struck, the world responds with empathy and urgency. When Palestinian hospitals are dismantled - patients killed in their beds, doctors arrested mid-surgery - the world hesitates, rationalises or remains silent. How can Palestinian medics 'cooperate' with Israeli health bodies during a genocide? Read More » This is not simply a double standard; it reflects an entrenched hierarchy of whose suffering matters. Israeli leaders speak today of moral lines, of civilians and children, of hospitals as sanctuaries. Yet for nearly two years, those very values have been systematically violated in Gaza, with hardly a whisper of regret. This situation reveals not only hypocrisy but also the cynical confidence that comes with impunity. It reflects how the boundaries of Israeli grief and outrage are drawn narrowly around Jewish Israeli lives, grounded in the certainty that Israel will face no consequences. This moment puts the international system to the test. While some medical and humanitarian groups have expressed concern, most international stakeholders have remained silent in the face of the destruction of Gaza's entire health system. Will medical journals, international associations and UN bodies respond to the attack on an Israeli hospital with the kind of swift condemnation and concrete actions they failed to take when hospitals in Gaza were bombed? The world should have acted when the first operating room was hit in Gaza. It should not take an Israeli facility being targeted for them to remember that hospitals are meant to be protected spaces. If an attack on a hospital is a red line, this must be true for all hospitals, not just those serving Israelis. If international law is to mean anything, it must protect everyone, with the same standards applied to every violation. Anything less is not only hypocrisy; it is complicity. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Iraq's top Shia cleric warns of ‘dire consequences' if Iran's leaders are targeted
Iraq's top Shia cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, has warned that any attempt to target Iran's religious and political leadership would trigger 'dire consequences on the region.' In a statement, al-Sistani cautioned that such an act could unleash 'widespread chaos that would exacerbate the suffering of [the region's] people and severely harm everyone's interests.' The revered cleric, seen as the highest authority for millions of Shia Muslims in Iraq and beyond, urged world powers to act. He called on the international community to 'make every effort to end this unjust war and find a peaceful solution' to the ongoing conflict.
Dubai Eye
a day ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump says leaders of India and Pakistan 'decided' to end conflict
In a first, US President Donald Trump has admitted that "two very smart" leaders of India and Pakistan after they "decided" to end the conflict, without mentioning the US role in the mediation talks. It comes after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi dismissed the US role in ending conflict with Pakistan during a call with Trump on Tuesday. "PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-U.S. trade deal or U.S. mediation between India and Pakistan," Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, said in a statement. Trump was hosting Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House on Wednesday when he spoke about the ceasefire. "Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war," he told reporters. The lunch meeting was the first time a US president had hosted the head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as the most powerful figure in the country, at the White House unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Trump said he was honoured to meet Munir and that they had discussed Iran, which he said Pakistan knew better than most. Pakistan's military said in a statement that the two discussed trade, economic development, and cryptocurrency during the two-hour meeting and also exchanged views on tensions between Israel and Iran. "President Trump expressed keen interest in forging a mutually beneficial trade partnership with Pakistan based on long-term strategic convergence and shared interests," the army said. The meeting represented a major boost in US-Pakistan ties, which had largely languished under Trump and his predecessor Joe Biden. Asked earlier what he wanted to achieve from meeting Munir, Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war ... I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We're going to make a trade deal with Modi of India. "But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, Modi from the India side and others," he said. "They were going at it - and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped." The heaviest fighting in decades between India and Pakistan was sparked by an April 22 attack in Indian Kashmir that killed 26 people. New Delhi blamed "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies. Pakistan has previously said the ceasefire happened after its military returned a call the Indian military initiated.
