Bird calls or dog whistles: What Iowa's attorney general is doing
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird again tried to put herself in the national spotlight last week as leader of a group of Republican attorneys general who fixed their sights on Costco over the warehouse retailer's DEI policies.
The state attorneys sent a stern warning letter telling the company, 'We … urge Costco to end all unlawful discrimination imposed by the company through diversity, equity and inclusion ('DEI') policies. … Costco should treat every person equally and based on their merit, rather than based on divisive and discriminatory DEI practices.'
The letter came about the same time as 98% of Costco's shareholders voted against a proposal to cut the company's DEI statements. The vote puts Costco executives in a tight spot of serving the wishes of shareholders or acquiescing to Bird and her friends.
Bird's office issued a press release with the letter, quoting her saying, 'It's time to ditch DEI. While other companies right the ship and abandon their illegal, woke policies, Costco has doubled down. I'm putting Costco on notice to do the right thing and eliminate discriminatory DEI. No American should be denied an opportunity because they don't fit the woke mold.'
Bird continued, 'Costco needs to show us the proof that they are following the law because they have public statements that cause us great concern. Many other big retailers have changed their policies and are now following federal law, just like President Trump is doing with his executive orders rooting out DEI.'
Irony abounds considering this comes from a lawyer who touts her prosecutorial experience, where those accused of wrongdoing are presumed innocent. And it comes from an administrator who should know the burden of proving non-compliance with employment laws rests on the government, not the employer.
Even so, Bird said Costco executives and directors 'need to make sure they're actually doing the right thing here. That's what we're keeping an eye on, and if they don't, we'll look at all available options.'
You do not need a bunch of red MAGA caps hanging in your closet to know what 'all available options' means in Bird's eyes. But not all legal scholars share the conclusions asserted by these attorneys general.
Plus, those not wearing MAGA caps might wonder if Iowa's attorney general has bigger issues closer to home, considering Costco only has four stores in Iowa, in Ankeny, Coralville, Davenport and West Des Moines. Some in Iowa might wonder when we can expect Bird to issue similar 'we expect you to follow the law — or else' warnings to businesses with a larger presence in our state and demand they send her proof of their compliance.
Those warnings might include putting companies like CRST or Heartland Express on notice that Bird will 'look at all available options' if their trucks break the speed limit or exceed weight limits.
Or a warning might go to Iowa Select Farms, putting the hog confinement company on notice that Bird will 'look at all available options' if its animals end up polluting Iowa rivers, lakes and drinking water.
Will Bird put the fear of God into the owners of Iowa nursing homes, such as Care Initiatives and Aspire/Beacon Health, that she and her staff will bring down the wrath of state government on them if they do not fully comply with government regulations designed to protect their residents?
Although Bird professes to be fair-minded, it is hard to imagine politics will not influence her demands that certain corporations abandon policies and practices she chooses to target.
Since taking office in 2023, Bird filed or joined other states in at least nine lawsuits challenging policies of the Biden administration. Now, with Biden gone and time on her hands, it appears she is turning her attention to businesses whose actions or internal policies do not square with the agenda she is taking from our new president.
Yet, anyone who steps into Iowa courtrooms knows passionate litigators present two or more sides to an issue. Just look at President Trump's attempted executive order to cancel the constitutional amendment granting 'birthright citizenship.'
It is the same with his and Bird's attempt to stamp out diversity, equity and inclusion policies in business, not just government — even though these policies on their face seek equal treatment, rather than command discrimination, in hiring, pay, advancement or retention.
Husch Blackwell LLP, a Kansas City law firm with offices across the United States, sent a client alert last week to help employers stay on the right side of the dividing line between legal and unlawful corporate DEI policies.
The firm advised, 'The vast majority of DEI programs and policies currently utilized by most employers — which include employee resource groups, optional DEI and bias trainings, and strategies for diversifying candidate pools for recruiting purposes — would appear to fall well outside the definition of 'illegal' practices under existing law.'
The alert added, 'Indeed, the former chair of the EEOC [the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] made clear in a 2023 press release that it 'remains lawful for employers to implement diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility programs that seek to ensure workers of all backgrounds are afford(ed) equal opportunity in the workplace.'
Husch Blackwell told employers they can use lawful DEI programs so long as they avoid quotas and focus their workplace initiatives on promoting inclusion without implementing discriminatory practices. Employers, it said, should use a broad definition of diversity that includes such characteristics as veteran status and life experience, not race, gender or other characteristics.
That brings us back to Bird, who seemingly wants it both ways.
To hear her, Costco should drop statements confirming a desire to have its workforce reflect the breadth of its communities, including the four in Iowa.
Meanwhile, on job postings on Bird's Iowa attorney general website, this notation appears with a listing for a 'farm and freedom lawyer:' 'The State of Iowa is an Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified individuals are encouraged to apply.'
Do you suppose Bird intends to follow affirmative action guidelines, even if her friends think they are woke?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laird Superfood Expands Distribution with New Costco Availability Across Key U.S. Regions
Strategic Product Expansion Targets New Markets and Growing Demand for Clean, Adaptogenic Beverages BOULDER, Colo., Aug. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Laird Superfood, Inc. (NYSE: LSF), a leader in functional coffee, creamers, and superfood products made with simple, minimally processed ingredients, is proud to announce expanded availability of its fan-favorite products at Costco locations across key U.S. regions. This milestone marks a significant step forward in the company's mission to make clean, functional and delicious superfood products more accessible nationwide. Effective July 2025: Sweet and Creamy Superfood Creamer is now available every day in Costco warehouses throughout Los Angeles, San Diego, Hawaii, Arizona & Colorado and across the Southeast North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida & Puerto Rico. This top-selling, dairy-free creamer is crafted from real coconut milk that is a natural source of MCT's and offers a smooth, subtly sweet taste that turns your everyday coffee into an experience your body craves. Perform Superfood Coffee, designed to fuel sustained energy and mental focus, is now available at Costco for a limited time in Los Angeles and Hawaii. With a proprietary blend of functional mushrooms and premium, organic, high altitude coffee Perform Coffee supports energy and cognitive performance with every sip. "Our retail expansion at Costco represents a key growth milestone for Laird Superfood," said Jason Vieth, CEO of Laird Superfood. "We're thrilled to bring our clean, functional products to even more Costco members, especially in regions where demand for functional, better-for-you beverages is booming." Laird Superfood continues to deepen its retail presence through strategic partnerships that align with its values of health, sustainability, and innovation. These new placements further solidify the company's position as a go-to brand in the functional food and beverage space. To find the nearest Costco carrying Laird Superfood products, visit or check your local warehouse for availability. About Laird Superfood®Laird Superfood is a minimally processed food brand dedicated to fueling active lifestyles with superfood products that support energy, endurance, and overall well-being. Founded in 2015 by world-renowned big wave surfer Laird Hamilton, the brand was born from his personal mission to find a better morning routine that could improve and sustain his performance while out catching waves. Alongside his wife, former professional beach volleyball legend, bestselling author and fitness icon Gabby Reece, the brand has expanded from superfood creamers to offer instant lattes, coffees, bars, prebiotic daily greens, and more. Laird Superfood is committed to offering simple ingredients and minimally processed foods that can help fuel people from sunrise to sunset. PRESS CONTACTAlafair Hallalafair@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Laird Superfood


The Intercept
28 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Veterans Are 'Guinea Pigs' in Trump's First National Abortion Ban Experiment
Ash Wallis knows she likely wouldn't survive another pregnancy. Doctors said as much years earlier after she suffered a pulmonary embolism following a miscarriage, and got a second blood clot. Getting pregnant again isn't a risk she is willing or able to take. 'I have two sons,' said Wallis. 'I don't want to leave them motherless.' Wallis, 40, begged her health care provider to give her an IUD — her best chance at preventing another pregnancy and protecting her life. But her provider, the Department of Veterans Affairs, refused to cover the procedure. Despite three years of service in the Army, Wallis was forced to pay out of pocket at a local clinic. 'The risks of me getting pregnant and there being a significant health issue were too much risk for me to gamble on,' she said. Access to reproductive care and abortion has long been a problem for those who rely on VA care. But a policy change by the Trump administration stands to make reproductive health for service members and veterans even worse. Last week, the administration posted a proposed rule for VA facilities that would severely narrow access to abortion — eliminating exceptions for health, rape, and incest, and only allowing the procedure in situations deemed to threaten the life of the mother. The rule would also ban any counseling for abortion through the VA. The proposed policy now enters a mandatory 30-day comment period, after which it can go into effect. Experts told The Intercept that the rule change will have devastating consequences for the millions of service members and veterans reliant on health care through the VA, as well as their families. 'It's the worst-case scenario,' said Rachel Fey, vice president of policy and strategic partnerships at Power to Decide, a nonprofit focused on reproductive and sexual health. The Department of Veterans Affairs has long excluded abortion care and abortion counseling from its medical benefits package, with a narrow exception for the 'life of the mother.' That changed in 2022 when the Biden administration, recognizing the danger posed to veterans and service members by the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, instituted a new rule allowing for abortion counseling and abortion care in an expanded list of circumstances. It's this Biden-era change that is under attack by the Trump administration. The administration describes the proposed policy shift as a return to form. 'Prior to the Biden Administration's politically motivated change in 2022, federal law and longstanding precedent across Democrat and Republican administrations prevented VA from providing abortions and abortion counseling,' wrote Gary Kunich, a Veterans Affairs spokesperson, in a statement to the Intercept. Fey and other reproductive health experts had anticipated the Trump administration would institute an abortion ban at the VA. But they told The Intercept that this version is particularly draconian considering the dramatic fall-off in abortion access following the Dobbs decision. 'This new policy would be one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, and for veterans living in the 12 states that ban abortion, it would further close off what may be their only opportunity to access urgently needed abortion care,' said Liz McCaman Taylor, senior federal policy counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights, in a statement. 'For veterans living in these states, they may now be forced to carry pregnancies to term even if they were raped or the pregnancy puts their health in jeopardy.' The proposed rule would 'reinstate the full exclusion on abortions and abortion counseling.' Unlike under the Biden rule, which allowed for abortion counseling and abortion care to protect the health of the mother or in cases of rape and incest, the new proposed rule only includes a vague, narrow exception for 'life of the mother.' 'For the avoidance of doubt, the proposed rule would make clear that the exclusion for abortion does not apply 'when a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,'' wrote the administration in a summary of the draft proposal. However, in a potentially complicating line, the administration wrote: 'Taken together, claims in the prior administration's rule that abortions throughout pregnancy are needed to save the lives of pregnant women are incorrect.' Jaclyn Dean, director of congressional relations, reproductive health, at the National Partnership for Women & Families, said that the lack of medical clarity around when doctors are allowed to intervene is going to cost lives. 'If I'm a doctor for the VA,' said Dean, 'I'm very confused about what I'm legally allowed to do.' Fey said her organization, Power to Decide, was 'not aware of any circumstances' where the VA covered abortion care under the life exception in place before the Biden rule. 'There was always sort of supposed to be this very, very narrow life exception, but similar to what's happening now in the post-Dobbs world, we're seeing that those life exceptions don't work in practice,' she said. Lindsay Church, executive director of Minority Veterans of America, said the counseling ban adds another layer of risk because providers are prevented from even discussing the option of abortion until it may be too late. 'Good luck if you get to a place where you're dying,' said Church, 'because you can't get abortion counseling before that. And that, to me, is insulting. Not only that, but it could have deadly consequences.' Read Our Complete Coverage The counseling ban also means veterans or active-duty service members referred to the Veterans Affairs administration for care after being sexually assaulted can't discuss abortion as an option with their provider. 'We already know that women veterans experience Military Sexual Trauma at alarming rates, and many of us continue to fight battles long after our service ends,' said Stephanie Gattas, founder of the Pink Berets, which offers support for women veterans struggling with PTSD, military sexual assault, and other mental health issues. Over 8,000 service members, who can also be referred to the VA for care, reported being sexually assaulted last year. And nearly 500 people reported being sexually assaulted while on a VA campus last year, according to Church. Both numbers are likely a severe undercount. 'The military community is wrought with sexual violence,' said Church. 'Now, if you get raped and become pregnant … because of assault at the Department of Veterans Affairs, they won't help you.' Sylvia Andersh, a former service member who worked at Veterans Affairs hospitals as a nurse, called the lack of exceptions for rape 'cruel.' 'My faith in humanity has been quite tested with the fact that they're willing to blatantly hurt women,' said Andersh. For Wallis, who was sexually assaulted while serving in the military, the lack of rape exceptions is especially troubling. 'It feels like being spit in my face,' she said. 'I wrote a check up to and including my life for this country, and I'm not provided equal access to care,' Wallis said. Wallis also worries that this new policy could increase suicidal ideation among service members. 'An unexpected pregnancy, whether it's due to rape, incest, or contraceptive failure, doesn't matter what the cause is,' she said, 'it increases suicidal ideation, and in the lack of access to care, you add that in, and that risk increases further.' The biggest impact is going to fall on veterans and service members living in states with abortion bans, experts told The Intercept. The Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest integrated health care system in the United States, serving 2 million women veterans, over 400,000 of whom live in states with abortion bans. 'We were living in a much different world the last time this total ban was in effect.' Though the Trump administration insists the policy change would be a return to standard VA practice, Taylor, of Center for Reproductive Rights, points out that the landscape has changed following the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision. 'We were living in a much different world the last time this total ban was in effect. This is the first time there has been a total abortion ban in VA health care facilities since Roe v. Wade was overturned,' said Taylor. 'Before Roe fell, if a veteran couldn't get an abortion at a VA health care facility, they could seek one elsewhere in their state. Now, abortion is banned in many states, and over 100 clinics have closed, meaning veterans living in those states will be totally out of options.' Wallis said she feels as if the administration is testing how far it can restrict access to care, pointing to the abortion ban and new restrictions on gender-affirming care at the VA. 'We're the guinea pigs they want to test what they're able to do to the general public,' she said. 'I truly feel like they're testing what they want to do with the rest of the country on us, and it's scary to me.'


USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Are stimulus checks coming? What to know after Trump proposed tariff rebate
Last month, President Donald Trump teased that a potential rebate could be attached to the worldwide tariffs he announced earlier this year. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate,' Trump said on July 25 ahead of his trip to Scotland, where he planned to iron out the details of a United Kingdom trade agreement. The White House has announced that some of the tariffs, which were disclosed on April 2, have raised $100 billion in revenue. Trump didn't provide further details on the potential rebates, which are unlikely to pass in Congress, except to say they would only be available to people from certain income levels. The president would need congressional approval to authorize the rebates. While details are scarce, here's what you need to know about a potential tariff rebate. Previous story: Trump considers 'rebates' to US taxpayers from tariff income Sen. Josh Hawley introduces rebate bill Shortly after Trump's July comments, Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, introduced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025. The proposed legislation would send rebate checks of at least $600 per individual to U.S. residents. A family of four could receive up to $2,400. The legislation allows the credit to increase if tariff revenues exceed 2025 projections. 'My legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country,' said Hawley in a news release announcing the bill. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said tariff revenue is expected to reach $300 billion annually. Yet, economists have said the policies could increase inflation and cost taxpayers thousands of dollars per year, especially if Trump doesn't reach trade deals with key partners like Canada and Mexico. For joint filers with an adjusted gross income of over $150,000 and people filing single who earn more than $75,000, the benefit would be reduced by 5%. The legislation has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee. It would need to pass both the Senate and the House of Representatives to become law. What are some of the hurdles facing the rebate? Republican lawmakers are unlikely to be excited about increasing federal spending. The stimulus checks issued during the COVID-19 pandemic cost the government about $164 billion. If checks were issued, it would mean a significant percentage of tariff revenue would be going back to taxpayers at a time when Trump himself has said his priority is paying down $37 trillion in debt. "The big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said in July. 'But we're thinking about rebates.' In an interview with Semafor, one conservative lawmaker shot down the idea. "People love spending money and granting new tax cuts when we can't afford it," Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, told the outlet. 'We're $37 trillion in debt and running $2 trillion a year deficits – some time, this madness just has to end.' How is a tax rebate different from a stimulus check? A tax rebate is a reimbursement made to a taxpayer for an excess amount paid in taxes during the year, while a stimulus check is a direct payment from the federal government to households. Tax rebates can be issued at any point during the year. Hawley's news release states that the parameters for the tax rebate would be similar to the stimulus checks issued in 2020 during the economic slowdown caused by the pandemic. When could a tax rebate be implemented? Hawley's bill has until the end of the current congressional calendar to pass through both chambers of Congress, or it will be considered dead and would need to be introduced again if lawmakers want to move forward with it. Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at mdelrey@