It's a back-to-school shopping spree as families rush to beat tariffs
Two-thirds of Americans with school-aged children started shopping for the upcoming school year in July, the earliest on record, according to a new survey from the National Retail Federation. Families, concerned that President Donald Trump's tariffs could drive prices even higher, are looking for deals and pulling back on spending.
'Consumers are being mindful of the potential impacts of tariffs and inflation on back-to-school items, and have turned to early shopping, discount stores and summer sales for savings on school essentials,' said Katherine Cullen, vice president of industry and consumer insights at the NRF, in a statement.
Half of back-to-school shoppers say they are hitting stores earlier this year compared to last year specifically because they are worried tariffs will increase prices, the NRF's survey found. Many school essentials like backpacks, clothing, and electronics are imported into the United States.
Tariffs on most of America's trading partners are set to rise on August 1, unless they can make a trade deal with the United States before then. On Tuesday, Trump announced a trade agreement with Japan, his sixth such announcement, setting a 15% tariff on Japanese imports. Most countries are operating under a 10% universal tariff, while China faces a 30% tariff until August 12.
'Many shoppers are looking to buy now because of the promotional deals offered by many retailers in July, along with the desire to get ahead of possible price increases and inventory issues from tariff uncertainty,' said Adam Davis, managing director of Wells Fargo retail finance.
Not only are Americans shopping earlier for school essentials — they are also pulling back on spending. Shoppers are expected to spend about $858 per family on clothes, school supplies and electronics this year, down 2% from last year, according to the NRF.
'Shoppers are also weighing value and necessity more carefully. We continue to see a trend of trading down — from branded to private-label products — as consumers look to stretch their budgets,' said Davis.
With shoppers spending less, retailers are competing for every dollar. Target's back-to-school event advertises savings of 30%, promising to not raises prices on 20 of the most popular school supplies and backpacks. Walmart says 14 of their most popular school supplies cost less than last year. Seventy percent of Walmart shoppers told the company in a survey they plan to spend more time looking for discounts this year.
'We can see retailers maximizing on summer sales to offer discounts and get budget-conscious shoppers in stores, especially with specific promotions and discounts tied to school necessities,' said Davis.
Consumers spent $24.1 billion during Amazon's four-day prime event in July, up 30% from the year before, according to data from Adobe. Competitive discounts drove demand, with back-to-school supply sales up a whopping 175%, Adobe said.
But price increases from tariffs will catch up with consumers soon, as retailers start to run through the inventory they imported before tariffs took effect, according to John Zoldis, a retail analyst at Quo Vadis Capital, an investment advisory.
That should happen this month, he said, with American consumers feeling the impact in about 2 to 4 weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be ‘Unthinkable a Decade Ago'
The MSNBC anchors and commentators warn Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics data chief will lead to further distrust of U.S. job reports The 'Morning Joe' crew on Monday warned that Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer will raise further scrutiny into the employment numbers released under the new leadership. The president fired McEntarfer on Friday after suggesting that weaker-than-expected jobs report was 'rigged.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video Wondery CEO Jen Sargent to Exit as Amazon Restructures Podcasting Studio Jacob Soboroff to Join MSNBC as Senior Political Correspondent Ahead of Comcast Spinoff 'Scamanda' Creator Charlie Webster Returns With New Scammer Podcast, 'Unicorn Girl' | Exclusive 'When the numbers are good, he praises them,' Jonathan Lemire said on 'Morning Joe' Monday. 'When the numbers are bad, he gets angry, and he fires the person in charge.' Earlier this year, Trump praised the bureau's job reports – but after Friday's numbers were released he said they were rigged in favor of Democrats, noting that he is looking for 'an exceptional replacement' after he deemed the numbers subpar. 'This would have been unthinkable a decade ago before Trump came on the scene,' NYT Opinion writer Mara Gay told Lemire.'This is another example of American exceptionalism out the window.' She said that the implications of this decision will affect the credibility of the United States as a democracy. She pointed to other examples in modern history of Greece, Argentina and China, stating that their leaders fudged the numbers to appease their world leaders. Gay added that inflating publicly reported numbers will not affect the American economy – it will only cause more unrest internally. 'What Americans can expect is to see the United States lose its sense of confidence in facts and also just excellence … the political reality will catch up with him,' Gay said of Trump's refusal to accept that the economy is weakening because of his tariffs. Andrew Ross Sorkin warned that Trump's decision will stir greater distrust of facts amongst world leaders. 'Invariably when those numbers [reported by the Chinese government] come out, there are conversations about what are the real numbers,' Sorkin said. 'Nobody believes the numbers that the Chinese government provides. That is the fear about what's about to happen here in the United States.' Senior writer at 'The Dispatch' David Drucker rebutted Trump's claim that the numbers are in favor of Democrats, pointing specifically to what he called a 'horrendous' job report from President Joe Biden's administration ahead of the 2024 election. 'When the president talks about rigged numbers and that it was rigged in favor of the Democrats right before the last election, it's just flatly untrue,' David Drucker said. He said the September report ahead of the election reported worse employment numbers than Friday's report that caused Trump to fire the data chief. 'Morning Joe' anchor Joe Scarborough added that there are several examples in modern history of the practical impacts of misconstruing numbers in favor of the individual in power. 'You don't have to go to the Soviet Union to just look at the practical impacts of when leaders start to fudge the numbers,' Scarborough said. The post 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio urges Trump to reveal why he fired top labor official
(Reuters) -Investor Ray Dalio said on Monday he, too, would likely have fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because he "believes the data is not good", but urged U.S. President Donald Trump to disclose the reasoning behind her removal. In a post on social media platform X, Dalio - founder of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates - said leaders "manipulating numbers" to suit their political objectives could be a big problem, echoing growing concern around the quality of economic data. Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer last week, accusing her of rigging the jobs figures, but did not provide evidence of the alleged manipulation. "It would be good if President Trump made his thinking clear," Dalio said. Critics have warned Trump's move could erode trust in official U.S. economic data, with chief U.S. economist Michael Feroli saying the risks of politicizing the data collection process should not be overlooked. Trump said on Sunday he would announce a new BLS commissioner within three or four days. Dalio said the method of calculating estimates for employment numbers was "obsolete and error-prone" and called for big changes to the way government assesses what is going on with the economy. "The huge revisions in Friday's employment numbers are symptomatic of this, especially because the revisions brought the numbers toward private estimates that were in fact much better," he said in his post. Dalio handed over control of Bridgewater to a new generation of investors in 2022 and has sold his remaining stake in the firm. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Why you're getting debanked, and how lawmakers can stop it happening
For two decades, I have worked with policymakers and law enforcement in North America and Europe to strengthen the financial safeguards that keep state sponsors of terrorism, violent extremist groups, weapons proliferators and criminal networks from exploiting the U.S. banking system. I have supported tough sanctions. I have pushed to close loopholes that hindered enforcement. And I have worked to hold those who enable illicit finance and trade, wittingly or not, to account. From the beginning, banks have been essential partners in these efforts. Through 'Know Your Customer' procedures and the anti-money laundering laws that followed the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, financial institutions have supplied the data and intelligence that help law enforcement uncover illegal activities such as human-trafficking rings, fentanyl supply chains and terror-financing networks. These frameworks played a critical role in safeguarding the country. Unfortunately, some of the tools intended to identity and stop criminal activity are now targeting and unjustly driving lawful customers lawful customers out of the financial system — a phenomenon widely known as 'debanking.' Most Americans are unaware that any cash transaction over $10,000 triggers the creation of a Currency Transaction Report that is filed with the federal government. That dollar amount threshold was set when Lyndon Johnson was in the White House and, incredibly, has never been updated to account for inflation. In today's economy, $10,000 might barely cover the cost of a used car. Yet banks are still required to flag such transactions, regardless of context, producing millions of reports every year that offer little value to law enforcement. Suspicious Activity Reports are yet another layer of government scrutiny. Banks filed more than 4 million Suspicious Activity Reports just last year, according to the Treasury Department. Former officials concede this avalanche of paperwork does little to improve public safety. In fact, it can create a burden for investigators seeking to identify and separate the truly suspicious activity from the mundane. When enforcement cannot separate the signal from the noise, it becomes dangerous. Meanwhile, regulators continue to pressure banks to apply broad risk labels to entire industries simply because they involve cash-heavy businesses, serve overseas clients or operate in unfavored sectors — all in the name of keeping our financial system 'safe and sound.' This isn't theoretical. Religious charities, international aid organizations and countless immigrant-owned businesses have all faced the threat of debanking. They are not terrorists or criminals. They are fellow Americans being pushed to the financial margins by a system that confuses bureaucracy with vigilance. Congress is beginning to address the problem through the Financial Institution Regulatory Modernization Act. This legislation would increase transparency and accountability in how agencies issue guidance and conduct examinations of financial institutions and their customers. It would help ensure that banks are not penalized for serving lawful customers in politically sensitive sectors. It's an encouraging start, but it will not be enough by itself. The single most effective step policymakers could take today to address the unintended debanking of lawful citizens is to modernize the anti-money laundering framework. Modernization should ensure banks provide relevant and actionable information that truly helps investigators and allows financial institutions to replace box-ticking alerts and reporting with data analysis that spots real patterns of abuse. Banks would still verify identities, monitor accounts and file reports the moment they see suspicious activity. These reforms would sharpen these responsibilities and make our country and the banking industry safer. Further, clear standards would let financial institutions maintain relationships with lawful customers while giving authorities faster access to data when real dangers emerge. The U.S. led the world in building a financial system hostile to terrorist financing and illicit finance. That leadership depends on a financial system that is both secure, credible and widely accessible. When honest actors are pushed out incorrectly, arbitrarily, and without transparency, and financial access is treated as a privilege rather than a right, the foundation of that leadership begins to erode. Policymakers do not need to choose between security and fairness. A modernized anti-money laundering regime would strengthen both. It would allow regulators and institutions to focus attention on those posing a real risk and reduce the burden on both law-abiding financial institutions and their customers I have spent much of my life trying to make America safer by making our financial system harder to exploit. That mission still matters. But the tools we built decades ago are not suited to today's challenges. Without reform, the anti-money laundering regime will continue to fail in its most basic duty: distinguishing between friend and foe. Congress and the administration should act now. The stakes are too high to allow inertia to carry the day. regulations.
