AirTags, Beats, espresso machines: This weekend's best Amazon summer deals
Summer lingers on, readers. And so, too, do the Amazon deals.
Like every week this summer, we've spent this Friday compiling a list of deals to get you through the weekend. Compiling this list is getting to be our favorite part of the week, for the simple fact that, here at Post Wanted, we love deals. They're our vocation, after all.
In New York City, the weather is perfect. Not too hot, not too cold. Thus, we can think of no better way to while away the hours than shopping on the internet.
Below, we've rounded up our 13 favorite Amazon deals to shop this weekend, including options from Apple, HP, Shark, Bissell, and many more.
Happy shopping!
Amazon
Apple AirPods 4 enhance the wireless listening experience with advanced audio technology. Featuring effortless pairing, they offer rich sound quality and extended battery life. The sleek design ensures comfort during prolonged use, while compatibility with Siri provides hands-free convenience. Perfect for music lovers and casual listeners alike.
Amazon
The HP Stream 14 offers a lightweight, budget-friendly option ideal for students and casual users. With a vibrant 14-inch HD BrightView display, it supports everyday tasks like browsing, streaming, and word processing. It includes Windows 11 and Office 365, plus long battery life for all-day productivity and portability.
Amazon
Compact and rechargeable, the JISULIFE Handheld Mini Fan delivers powerful airflow in a pocket-sized design. Perfect for travel, outdoor activities, or daily commutes, it offers multiple speed settings and a long-lasting battery. Its quiet motor and foldable handle make it both convenient and stylish for cooling on the go.
Amazon
Brew barista-quality coffee at home with the Philips 3200 Series Espresso Machine. It features intuitive touch controls, customizable strength, and an integrated milk frother. Enjoy espresso, cappuccinos, and lattes with freshly ground beans, thanks to its built-in ceramic grinder. Easy to clean, it offers a truly effortless coffee experience.
Amazon
Beats Studio Pro headphones combine premium sound quality with active noise cancelling and spatial audio. Designed for comfort with plush ear cushions and long battery life, they support both wired and wireless use. Ideal for audiophiles and commuters alike, they deliver immersive listening and seamless integration with Apple and Android devices.
Amazon
Apple AirTag helps you keep track of your belongings effortlessly. This small, lightweight tracker utilizes the Find My network, allowing you to locate lost items quickly. Its precision finding feature uses Ultra Wideband technology for accuracy. The durable design and easy setup make it a practical solution for everyday organization.
Amazon
The Shark AI Ultra offers voice-activated cleaning via Alexa or Google Assistant and features precise 360° LiDAR navigation with Matrix Clean grid-based coverage. It tackles pet hair with powerful suction and a self-cleaning brushroll, and the self-emptying base holds up to 60 days of debris. With up to 120 minutes of runtime and auto Recharge‑and‑Resume, it's highly automated and pet‑friendly.
Amazon
Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones offer premium sound quality with exceptional noise cancellation, making them ideal for immersive listening. They feature a comfortable, lightweight design for extended wear and up to 24 hours of battery life. With intuitive touch controls, a built-in microphone, and multi-device pairing, they deliver a seamless wireless experience for music lovers and frequent travelers alike.
Amazon
Light, cordless, and pet‑optimize, the Bissell CleanView XR Pet 300W delivers serious performance at a stunning value. With LED headlights, tangle‑free brush roll, and a powerful FurBrush attachment certified Pet Proven, it tackles embedded hair, dust, and dander across hard floors and upholstery quickly. Convertible to a handheld model, this stick vac fits small spaces, offers about 35–40 minutes of runtime, and easily docks for charging. Pet mess? Gone.
Amazon
The VEAGASO dehumidifier covers up to 2,500 sq ft, removing up to 34 pints per day under 95 °F conditions. It offers adjustable humidity (30–80 % RH), three operating modes, auto/manual drainage, quiet operation (<40 dB), a digital touchscreen, 24‑hour timer, child lock, reusable filter, hidden handles, and rolling wheels for portability.
Amazon
The Powkey 200W Portable Power Station is a compact yet powerful backup battery for charging laptops, phones, CPAP machines, and small appliances. It features AC, DC, and USB outputs, perfect for travel, camping, and emergencies. Lightweight and easy to carry, it ensures reliable power wherever you go.
Amazon
The Dyson V8 Plus Cordless Vacuum offers powerful suction and up to 40 minutes of fade-free cleaning. Designed for homes with pets, it captures fine dust and allergens efficiently. Lightweight and easy to maneuver, it converts into a handheld vacuum for quick cleanups, making it perfect for versatile, daily use.
Amazon
Bliss Bright Idea Serum combines Vitamin C and tri-peptides to brighten skin, boost collagen, and reduce fine lines. Lightweight and fast-absorbing, it's ideal for daily use under makeup or sunscreen. Dermatologist-tested and cruelty-free, it promotes a radiant, even complexion while improving skin texture and tone over time.
This article was written by P.J. McCormick, New York Post Commerce Deals Writer/Reporter. P.J. is an expert deal-finder, sifting through endless brands and retailers to deliver only the best savings opportunities on truly worthwhile products. P.J. finds Prime Day-worthy deals all year long on some of our favorite products we've tested and our readers' beloved best-sellers, from Wayfair furniture sales to the lowest prices on Apple AirPods. P.J. has been scouring sales for Post Wanted shoppers since 2022 and previously held positions at Rolling Stone, Pitchfork and Hyperallergic. Please note that deals can expire, and all prices are subject to change.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
3 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Apple is preparing a Siri upgrade that could make Gemini users really jealous
Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR Apple is reportedly preparing a major overhaul for Siri. The updated Siri is likely to be able to control a variety of third-party apps, performing very specific actions inside those apps. The update is expected to roll out in Spring next year with the iOS 26.4 update. Back in 2024, Apple promised a significant Siri upgrade that would understand voice commands better, have a more intuitive model running underneath, and be 'deeply integrated' into the system. The upgraded version was delayed due to performance issues, and Apple integrated ChatGPT instead, so it doesn't appear far behind in the AI race, without actually upgrading Siri from the ground up. The newer version of Siri is now expected to launch sometime next year, and to make up for the long delay, Apple may be looking to add exceptional capabilities that will allow Siri to control all of your iPhone with just your voice, zipping ahead of Gemini by a long margin. Previously, when Apple showcased Siri's improved capabilities, they were limited to system apps and settings. However, this weekend's Power On newsletter (paywalled) by Bloomberg's Mark Gurman talks about an enhanced version that will also be able to control any third-party app. With this new version of Siri, Gurman says, you will be able to perform actions such as editing a photo, commenting on a social media post, or even purchasing particular items from any shopping app, using nothing but your voice. This improved version is powered by Apple's App Intents, a framework that allows Apple's interfaces, such as Spotlight or Siri, to perform actions using apps not made by Apple. This is analogous to Android's App Actions. Apple's implementation is intended to control your iPhone, iPad, or Mac the same way you would, but without any touch input. Gurman doesn't delve into the technical details but says Apple is actively testing the feature to iron out performance issues, especially in 'high-stakes' scenarios that may involve financial transactions. It is currently testing the upgraded Siri to work with a host of popular third-party apps, such as AllTrails, Amazon, Facebook, Temu, Threads, Uber, WhatsApp, and YouTube. However, the feature's success lies in App Intents working seamlessly with a wide variety of apps, which is why Apple's engineers are hard at work ensuring broad compatibility. Apple is likely to bring the overhauled Siri experience out in the Spring of 2026, possibly as part of iOS 26.4. If implemented well, it could open up an era of agentic mobile usage and hopefully inspire Google to do the same. The improved Siri could also set rumored Apple home products, including a smart display and a tabletop robot, apart from existing products from Amazon or Google. That is why Siri's delay has not only impacted mobile devices but also other categories in Apple's portfolio. Can Gemini compete with the new Siri? Meanwhile, while we have seen evidence about Google attempting to control third-party apps with Gemini, though functional controls have primarily been limited to Google's own handful of apps. A major leap for Google in this direction could be the rumored Magic Cue functionality, which is expected to read contents on your screen, capture a short history of your usage, and be prepared to help you with actions that might follow. We're still unsure of the exact functionality and how well it compares to the proposed Siri — or if it will even be able to control apps or just assist users with suggested actions. However, it could be limited to the Pixel 10 series at launch, instead of rolling out widely to all Android devices, which could disappoint those hoping to enjoy a more intelligent assistant on their phones. Follow
Business Insider
34 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The end of the mega-employer
In June, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had a blunt message for his 350,000 corporate employees: There were going to be fewer of them in the near future, thanks to the "efficiency gains" he expected from AI. The proclamation generated big headlines and an uproar from staff. But it struck me as merely honest. He was acknowledging something that pretty much every CEO who sits atop a large white-collar workforce is quietly hoping to achieve sooner or later. After all, Jassy hasn't been the only executive to hint at a future of lower headcount. The head of JPMorgan's consumer and community business predicted in May that AI will reduce the number of employees in its operations division by 10%. That same month, the CEO of Klarna said that the company's investments in AI has already driven the company's headcount to shrink by 40%. And the CEO of Ford — a company that employs tens of thousands of white-collar professionals — declared that AI will wipe out "literally half" of all white-collar jobs. Meanwhile, Kian Katanforoosh, the CEO and founder of the software startup Workera, tells me that he never wants to have much more than the 80 or so employees he has today, no matter how successful his business ends up becoming. "I truly believe we can go super super far without growing more," he says. "I'm an engineer. I don't want to have to manage so many people if I don't need to." It's not like CEOs ever enjoyed shelling out for the salaries or navigating the personnel headaches that come with the sprawling bureaucracies they employ. But for more than a century, armies of office workers were a necessary cost of doing business. To grow from tiny upstarts into titans of industry, companies needed an ever-multiplying number of HR reps, accountants, marketers, engineers, analysts, and project managers. In recent months, that 100-year-trend is starting to come undone. Everywhere you look, AI appears to be helping leaner teams take on work that used to require more people. And executives are talking about their large workforces — once their greatest competitive advantage — as if they're an unfortunate holdover from a bygone, bloated era. If today's corporate giants shrink their ranks, and if tomorrow's giants never need to bulk up in the first place, we may well be witnessing the end of a defining feature of corporate America: the mega-employer. That could give rise to a whole new generation of nimble companies that innovate faster — but also leave workers navigating a world of diminished career paths and fewer jobs. Before the Industrial Revolution, most Americans worked for themselves as farmers or craftsmen. And those who didn't worked for very small operations — say, a few journeymen training under a master shoemaker. The resulting economy was a patchwork of all these tiny businesses. That started to change with the advent of capital-intensive industries like textile manufacturing, which required organizing larger groups of people under a single employer. Then came railroads in the late 19th century. With projects that took many years to realize and stretched over thousands of miles, vast numbers of workers needed to be on the same page. "If you mess it up, there's a big explosion," says Louis Hyman, a historian of work and business at Cornell. "You needed to really coordinate your mechanisms and make sure that people are doing things exactly the same way." As mass production developed, Hyman says, many of the most consequential innovations during this time weren't so much technical breakthroughs: They were social inventions to coordinate the labor of all the people it took to get the most out of the new machines. The assembly line broke down complicated work into simple, repeatable, standardized tasks; scientific management emphasized the importance of monitoring, measuring, and optimizing everyone's performance; and the M-form corporate structure created a blueprint to manage sprawling bureaucracies through a clear chain of command. In the 1930s, about a tenth of the labor force worked for businesses that employed at least 10,000 people. By the end of World War II, that share had surged to about a third. By the 1970s, some of that bigger-is-better ideology started to change. A new management philosophy set in, normalizing layoffs that took aim at bloat. And as robots automated many blue-collar jobs, IBM mainframes and word processors eliminated a whole set of white-collar clerical roles as well. Still, there was plenty of work that technology couldn't automate, which meant that companies needed large teams of college-educated professionals to keep them going. Even the most tech-forward companies saw their people — especially their coders — as mission-critical to their success. "Hiring great people — especially engineers — is one of the biggest challenges that any technology company has," Mark Zuckerberg lamented in 2013. "Our country doesn't produce the volume of engineers that the companies would want to hire." Tech giants often hired more than they needed to make sure they had a steady supply of talent, and to attract and retain the best of the best, they treated their employees like gods. If you were to pinpoint one moment the gods turned mortal, it would probably be November 9, 2022 — the day Meta laid off more than 11,000 employees. From there, virtually every tech company followed suit, with employers across other industries close behind. At first, the cuts were chalked up to overhiring in the pandemic. But two and a half years later, the layoffs haven't stopped and hiring is still down. More and more, AI appears to be driving those austerity measures. In an industry that once hoarded talent like gold, the shift is striking. CEOs no longer seem to view the bulk of their workforce as indispensable, and they say as much: A common refrain among tech leaders from Mark Zuckerberg to Elon Musk to Dara Khosrowshahi now is some version of "If you don't like it here, you should leave." Companies like Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Salesforce had reliably increased their headcounts year after year. Now, according to the workforce analytics provider Live Data, all of them employ fewer people than they did at their 2022 peak. J. Scott Hamilton, Live Data's CEO, says this is probably just the beginning. To gauge how much deeper the cuts could go, his team recently analyzed the detailed responsibilities of most roles at Microsoft to estimate the share of tasks that could, in theory, be done by AI. Their conclusion: If Microsoft were to offload all of those automatable tasks to AI, it would eliminate 36% of the work currently done by employees. That would mean the company could lay off some 80,000 employees. On the one hand, that's an aggressive scenario: Companies are rarely able to overhaul their workflows to take full advantage of a new automation technology's capabilities. If they do, that transition takes a very long time. And besides, some work is simply too high-stakes to entrust to error-prone AI — even if it's technically possible. On the other, the estimate may prove conservative: Live Data's predictions assume that AI will remain at 2025-level capabilities. Given how much better the leading large language models have become over the last two years, the best tools will almost certainly be able to handle more than what they can today. "The optimists are saying that the good companies will simply redeploy the assets elsewhere now that they can be more efficient," Hamilton says. "But I think an equal argument can be made that they'll just say, 'We're going to do the same amount with fewer people.'" If Microsoft offloaded all automatable tasks to AI, it could eliminate some 80,000 jobs, Live Data found. If that sounds like a far-off hypothetical future, consider what's already happening today at startups. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says he's making bets with his friends on when we'll get the first "one-person billion-dollar company." And Arthur Kaneko, a general partner at Coreline Ventures, tells me he's noticed that early-stage founders are raising their initial rounds of funding with fewer employees than they would have had in the past — among the AI-fluent founders, perhaps with less than half. "The way companies are being built is just fundamentally changing right now because of AI," Kaneko says. "Through the use of AI coding, AI marketing, AI sales, people are able to do a lot more work with way fewer people." And he thinks these startups will stay lean as they scale into successful businesses. "They just won't hire the people that Meta and Microsoft had to hire to get to where they are," he says. "I do think per-company headcount will permanently be depressed in startups." There are reasons to be hopeful about a new era of smaller employers. If AI makes it cheaper and easier to launch companies, we'll probably see more of them — and that would be great for the long-term health of the economy in all kinds of ways. New businesses tend to employ people with less experience and fewer credentials who get passed up by the bigger companies. They're more willing to try new things, which drives innovation. And they create more competition for the established giants, which is good for consumers. Smaller companies may also be good for the workers inside them. There's a lot that people hate about working at big organizations: the constant turf wars, the endless layers of approval, the meetings before the meetings, the sense that you're just one tiny inconsequential cog in a giant machine. Smaller bureaucracies would minimize that, which is one reason why people often feel more motivated in leaner workplaces. According to Gallup, employees at small companies report the highest engagement, with scores dropping below the national average once organizations hit 500 employees. On the same stage where Altman made his one-person unicorn prediction, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian raved about the benefits of this possibility. "CEOs and founders are going to be so excited to get up and go to work with much smaller, much more performant, much more culturally strong teams," he said. But a world of shrunken employers could also rob workers of something essential: the long-term career paths that big companies used to offer. With so many roles under one roof, big companies made it possible for workers to try new things, move up, and build careers. Smaller firms don't offer the same range of opportunities, which means people will likely need to switch companies a lot more in the future. Smaller firms are also less likely to invest in on-the-job training — a shift that would hit early-career professionals hard, just as their roles face the greatest risk from AI. The big question is what this all means for college-educated workers. If enough startups emerge, they might create new jobs to offset the ones disappearing from big companies. But that would require an unprecedented boom in entrepreneurship — one enormous enough to make up for the retrenchment of the giants. In 2022, 29% of the American workforce worked for an organization that employed at least 10,000 people. Meanwhile, the country's education system is churning out ever more college grads, who studied hard with the expectation of a stable future in white-collar work. If big companies hire less, and small companies also hire less, where will they all go? The usual reassurance is that AI, like every disruptive technology before it, will eventually create more jobs than it destroys. That glosses over an important detail, according to Carl Benedikt Frey, an economist at Oxford. In the early stages of the Industrial Revolution, most innovations simply made existing work faster and cheaper — like the loom, which automated the work of skilled weavers but still produced more or less the same fabric. That made a handful of industrialists very rich, but for the average worker, wages barely budged for the first 80 or so years of industrialization. It was only later — with inventions like electricity and the automobile that gave rise to entirely novel industries — that economic growth surged and better, high-paying jobs emerged. Had that second wave never arrived, we'd remember the Industrial Revolution very differently. "Most productivity gains over the long run," Frey says, "come from doing new and previously inconceivable things." Right now, corporate America seems stuck in that first phase. So many executives are laser-focused on using AI to do the same work with fewer people, rather than applying it to problems we couldn't solve before — the kind of breakthroughs that would open up new lines of business and generate more demand for labor, not less. "A real risk is that we're getting leaner organizations, but they're not really creating that much new," Frey says. "That would be a bleak future, and I do worry we're moving in that direction."
Wall Street Journal
34 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast Recap: Apple's Investment, Fannie and Freddie's IPO, Crocs' Misstep
How did Apple avoid tariffs on its chips? And are mortgage lenders Fannie and Freddie set to go public? Plus, what caused Crocs' shares to plunge? Host Jack Pitcher discusses the biggest stock moves of last week and the news that drove them. 🎧 Listen to the What's News in Markets podcast.
