
Fed chief Powell's stubborn defiance on interest rates risks an avoidable downturn, says ALEX BRUMMER
The Federal Reserve's interest rate hold should come as no surprise.
Chairman Jay Powell is determined to preserve the US central bank's independence, Trump's tariffs are a threat to domestic prices and the ramping up of American pressure on Iran is nerve-racking.
One needs no reminder of how Russia's war on Ukraine caused a major inflation shock as energy costs soared.
If it were not for these factors, the Fed, and for that matter the Bank of England, would be wise to get on the front foot by cutting borrowing costs.
Former World Bank boss David Malpass, writing in the Wall Street Journal, argues the Fed is behind the curve in lowering rates as the US economy weakens.
He points to the loss of 700,000 jobs, strain among small businesses and argues that the prime borrowing rate of 7.5 per cent and credit card costs at 20 per cent are too high.
The bunker-buster in the room is the Middle East. The Ukraine war demonstrated how speedily geopolitics can spin off into an economic and fiscal crisis.
The reason why so many Western democracies are sitting on unacceptable debt piles, inhibiting capacity for growth, is unmet costs and subsidies which came after energy prices spiralled.
Nevertheless, 2025 is not 1973 when an Arab oil embargo started an economic catastrophe which saw inflation rocket, interest rates soar, recession and Britain forced to the IMF for a bail-out.
Oil-induced inflation also drove Jimmy Carter out of the White House. Energy production is robust and diversified enough to deal with anything less than a cataclysm which causes energy taps across the Arabian Gulf to be turned off.
Saudi Arabia is stepping up production, Guyana has become an oil gusher, Brazil and Canada are major drillers, and US production hit a record 13.5m barrels in March.
It has long been a concern that the Fed and the Bank of England would make the same error as inflation tumbles from its peaks as they did when it mounted, and assume the decline is 'transitory'.
By holding rates higher than they need to be, they are punishing business, consumers and home-buyers, and risking an avoidable downturn.
Should the tumult in the Middle East retreat, interest rate-setters must be alert to the need for bold rate cuts.
Drill, baby, drill
The hike in Brent crude prices, since Israel's attack on Iran, will come as something of a relief to BP.
As it pivots back to oil and gas, after backing a green future, the higher the oil price, the stronger the cashflow.
Moreover, with aggressive activist investor Elliott on its case, a volatile oil price offers the opportunity to ramp up trading – a key money-spinner.
Fossil fuels are disparaged by green campaigners. But one shouldn't lose sight of the contribution that BP, which began life as the Anglo-Persian oil company, makes to the British economy.
As reported today, BP analysis shows that the oil giant made a £7.4billion contribution to UK plc last year.
It paid £1.2billion in corporation tax and bolstered the exchequer by a further £2.2billion indirectly in the shape of excise duties, employees' income tax, National Insurance and VAT.
There has been speculation that a weakened BP could be swallowed by London-listed Shell or one of the US majors like Chevron or Exxon.
Britain would be much better served if it maintained its independence. BP's global reach into markets such as India and Indonesia is invaluable.
Given the current dislocation in the Middle East, the Government would be wise to end the daft embargo on new North Sea oil licences.
To do so would provide a much-needed fillip to drillers and Aberdeen-based engineering services.
Spanish lift
Tracking Ocado's business model is tricky as its topsy-turvy share price, 24 per cent down this year, shows.
It struggles to be viewed as the Amazon of global grocery, as once hoped.
Yet it is encouraging to see that the company's first international customer in 2017, the Catalan supermarket group Bon Preu, is coming back for more of the UK group's robotic systems with a new warehouse in Barcelona.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Goldman estimates geopolitical risk premium of around $10 per barrel for Brent after prices rise
June 18 (Reuters) - Following the rise in Brent prices to $76-77 per barrel, Goldman Sachs estimates a geopolitical risk premium of around $10 per barrel, the bank said in a note on Wednesday. While its base case is that Brent declines to around $60/bbl in Q4 assuming no supply disruptions, Goldman said the $10/bbl premium appears justified in light of its lower Iran supply scenario where Brent spikes just above $90, and tail scenarios where broad regional oil production or shipping is negatively affected. The Iran-Israel conflict has raised fears of potential supply disruptions in the Middle East, a key oil-producing region, pushing crude prices higher as traders react to the growing geopolitical risk. President Donald Trump kept the world guessing on Wednesday whether the U.S. will join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear and missile sites, as residents of Iran's capital streamed out of the city on the sixth day of the air assault. Iran is OPEC's third-largest producer, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. Brent crude futures settled 25 cents higher at $76.70 a barrel on Wednesday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose 30 cents at $75.14. Separately, Barclays said on Wednesday that if Iranian exports are reduced by half, crude prices could rise to $85 per barrel and that prices could move past $100 in the "worst-case" scenario of a wider conflagration. Goldman said that the 45% decline in oil flows through the Bab-El-Mandeb Strait -- which connects the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean -- in 2025 versus 2023 illustrates the vulnerability of shipping to attacks from Iran-controlled Houthis.


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iran's supreme leader defies Trump with ‘never surrender' vow
Iran's supreme leader vowed he would not surrender despite a wave of fresh Israeli air strikes on Wednesday. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei struck a defiant tone in a low-resolution video message aired on Iranian state TV, after missiles destroyed his regime's national security headquarters. The supreme leader said: 'Wise individuals who know Iran, its people, and its history never speak to this nation with the language of threats, because the Iranian nation is not one to surrender,' the Supreme Leader said. 'Americans should know that any military involvement by the US will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them.' The national address, his second since the war began last Friday, followed threats by Donald Trump that the US might join the war, unless there was 'total surrender' from Tehran. On Wednesday, the US president remained evasive, telling reporters at the White House: ' Nobody knows what I'm going to do. ' 'Next week will be decisive regarding Iran, and it may happen before the end of the week,' Mr Trump added. After Wednesday's strikes, Israel Katz, the Israeli defence minister, said: 'Air Force jets have just destroyed the internal security headquarters of the Iranian regime – the main arm of repression of the Iranian dictator.' Mr Katz did not name the security organisation in his statement, but may have been referring to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Intelligence Organisation, IRGC-IO, the main internal security agency established in 2009. He added that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would continue to 'strike symbols of governance and hit the Ayatollah regime wherever it may be'. Fars, the semi-official Iranian news agency, reported that Israeli jets targeted Payam International Airport on Wednesday. Emergency rescue teams were working at the scene, in north-west Tehran, it added. Iranian officials have admitted the loss of an important radar system that supports Iran's air defence network. Fars and Isna, another Iranian news agency, reported that the Soubashi radar facility in Hamedan province had to be fitted with a replacement system. Earlier on Wednesday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that Israel had struck two centrifuge production sites in Tehran and in the north-western city of Karaj. Iran's centrifuges are key to its nuclear programme as they are used to enrich uranium, but many of them are understood to be deep underground and difficult to reach with air strikes. According to the IAEA, Israel struck 'centrifuge production facilities' at the Tesa Karaj workshop and the Tehran Research Centre. 'Both sites were previously under IAEA monitoring and verification as part of the JCPOA,' it said, referring to the now-defunct Iran nuclear deal which eased sanctions on Tehran in return for curbs on its nuclear programme. A building used to develop and test advanced rotors for centrifuges was hit at the site in Tehran, while in Karaj two buildings used to store centrifuge components were destroyed, it said. Iranian state television later aired footage that appeared to show the remnants of an Israeli Hermes drone that crashed near the central city of Isfahan. Israeli officials confirmed that one of its drones 'fell' in Iran, but said there were no injuries involved and 'no risk of an information breach'. As some Iranians flee Tehran, relatives of those languishing in the regime's prisons fear for their safety. According to the Iran Press News Agency, an Israeli strike on a missile depot in the central city of Kermanshah caused damage to a nearby prison, Dizelabad. The explosion caused panic and a riot as prisoners tried to escape from their cells, the agency said. A source in Iran told the Telegraph: 'We are only hoping that this madness will finish as soon as possible and we can return to a normal life, even though normalcy has long lost its meaning in this country.' Hundreds of Pakistanis living in Tehran sought to leave the country via the Taftan crossing, situated on a 560-mile land border controlled by smugglers and armed groups. 'We left everything behind and carried just one bag containing some necessities and food items,' Mr Ijaz said. 'We are five family members, but we carried just one bag. We just left, and left everything else there.' Pakistan has closed some of its border crossings with Iran, but those at Taftan and Gabd-Rimdan in south-west Balochistan were still open as of Wednesday for citizens fleeing back into Pakistan. On Wednesday evening, several Iranian government planes flew from Iran to Muscat, in Oman, according to online aircraft tracking data. Iranian officials denied that the planes were carrying negotiators and it was not clear who was on board. Iran appeared to be trying to cut off internet access in large swathes of the country on Wednesday night. The country was 'in the midst of a near-total national internet blackout', the UK-based internet tracking website NetlBlocks said in a post on X.


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘I may do it, I may not': Why Trump's unpredictability on Iran could be his biggest asset
Donald Trump made a dramatic exit from the G7 summit in Canada and then hunkered down with his National Security Council in the White House situation room to plot his next moves on Iran. Then on Wednesday he was asked by reporters whether he was about to send his bombers into action. 'I may do it. I may not do it,' he said on the South Lawn after chatting with construction workers putting up a 27-metre flagpole. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble.' It is a familiar playbook. In a recent analysis of Mr Trump's leadership style, Julius Kirimi Sindi, an expert in business strategy said the president was not so much governing as running a non-stop negotiation. 'This uncertainty forces people to constantly second-guess their positions, giving Trump the upper hand in any negotiation or political battle,' he wrote. 'The strategy keeps both allies and enemies in a perpetual state of anxiety, which in turn, solidifies his control.' Not for the first time, the president has deployed intentional ambiguity as he keeps friends and foes guessing about his intentions. And once again, he is seeking to gain the upper hand by deploying a trusted 'art of the deal' technique to a tricky geopolitical challenge. His final decision could be the most consequential of his presidency. Join with Israel in attacking Iran with B2 warplanes armed with bunker busting bombs and it could prevent Tehran from ever building a nuclear weapon. But it might also unleash attacks on American interests in the Middle East, and tear apart his Maga coalition at home. urging him not to become entangled in another foreign war. Mr Trump was keeping his options open for now, according to Robert Shapiro, professor of political science, in the hope that something would turn up. 'I think in the best of all worlds for him, he would be perfectly fine with a negotiated settlement, which would give him the prospects of winning the Nobel Peace Prize, which is something he's always talked about,' he said. 'On the other hand, he likes the idea of clean military victory by dropping a bomb and claiming credit for that.' The strategy of unpredictability has been at the heart of this White House. It was how he handled his trade war, for example. A week after 'liberation day,' a day before his steep tariffs were due to go into effect and one hour before the stock market was due to close, journalists peppered the president with questions about his levies and the turmoil they had unleashed. Were they a bargaining chip to secure better deals? Or were they here to stay as part of an attempt to reshape the entire global economy? 'It can both be true,' he said. 'There can be permanent tariffs, and there can also be negotiations.' And he has repeatedly fended off questions about his Ukraine strategy, punting questions about Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and his desire for peace into the future. 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office,' he said seven weeks ago. The idea may be to keep adversaries on their toes, but it is just as awkward for allies. The G7 summit came and went without a joint statement on Ukraine in part because no one is sure where Mr Trump stands. On Wednesday evening, standing in front of reporters in the Oval Office, Mr Trump once again parried questions about whether he was about to launch strikes on Iran or allow more time to begin negotiations. Is he for real or is it all a monumental bluff? 'I have ideas as to what to do,' he said. 'I like to make a final decision one second before it's due.'