Judge rules Newport Beach did not have to put housing element compliance to a vote
Orange County Superior Court Judge Melissa R. McCormick on Wednesday determined Newport Beach officials acted within the parameters of local laws in July 2024, when they approved a series of general plan and zoning code amendments needed to implement the city's housing element.
Two lawsuits — one filed in August by the nonprofit Still Protecting Our Newport and a second one month later from the Newport Beach Stewardship Assn. — sought to overturn the city's actions and put them to a vote of the people. McCormick applied her determination to both cases.
Plaintiffs separately cited Section 423 of the city charter, which states voter approval is required for any amendments to the Newport Beach General Plan, and indicated city officials promised a vote but later reneged.
'The city made numerous statements recognizing that a Section 423 vote was required to amend other portions of the general plan to align with the housing element,' SPON's Aug. 8 legal complaint reads.
'[But] despite these numerous promises and representations to local residents, the city council abruptly reversed course and declined to submit the proposed amendments to the city's general plan to the local residents for a vote.'
City officials maintained the same section of the charter indicates the voter mandate would not apply if state or federal laws were to conflict with, and therefore preclude, local law.
Judge McCormick agreed, stating Section 423 conflicted with a state law requiring Newport Beach officials to adopt and implement a housing plan to comply with a mandate to accommodate, through rezoning, 4,845 residential units inside city limits.
'Section 423 contradicted and was inimical to the implementation requirements of the housing element law. [That] statute provides the city no discretion whether to comply,' she wrote, adding that it's not up to the discretion of local voters to decide whether a city should follow state law.
Newport Beach City Atty. Aaron Harp said city officials analyzed the local charter and determined state housing mandates precluded an election so went ahead with implementing the necessary general plan amendments.
'We're very happy with the decision,' Harp said Thursday of the ruling. 'We'll now be moving forward with considering housing projects — we actually have one [the Irvine Co.'s Newport Center project] going forward on Tuesday.'
In a city statement issued Thursday, Mayor Joe Stapleton reflected on the win.
'In what has been a difficult set of policy decisions in light of state mandates, we have stood on firm legal grounds. The decision yesterday affirms that,' he said. 'We move forward today and everyday doing what is right for our residents.'
SPON President Charles Klobe said Friday members were meeting that day to consider their options, including whether to appeal McCormick's ruling. In a statement provided to the Pilot, members called it a 'sad week for Newport Beach residents.'
'We are profoundly disappointed in the ruling, but it was not unexpected,' it read, decrying that the city's rezoning plan would impact a total of 8,174 parcels, a number far greater than the state mandate.
'SPON has been fighting to keep Newport Newport for over 50 years. We will continue to pursue justice for the residents and businesses of Newport Beach.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
7 days ago
- New York Times
Where New India Tariffs Could Hit? Your Kitchen Cabinet.
A dash of this and a pinch of that could cost more in American kitchens with new tariffs on goods from India. Many spices used by home chefs, restaurants and large manufacturers are imported from India, and the 50 percent tariffs on the country imposed by President Trump could drive costs higher, a trade association warned on Wednesday. Last year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Several essential spices, including cinnamon, pepper, nutmeg and cloves, require tropical climates and, therefore, cannot be grown in the United States on a large enough scale to meet demand, Laura Shumow, executive director of the American Spice Trade Association, said in a statement. The spice industry is one of many sectors that are tallying up the potential costs of Mr. Trump's trade wars with various partners, warning that the fallout could hit either profits at American companies or consumers' wallets. In late June, executives at McCormick warned that Mr. Trump's tariff policy could cost the spice company $90 million a year. 'Tariffs on these products — including additional new tariffs announced this week — do not incentivize U.S. production or create American jobs,' Ms. Shumow said. 'Instead, they place an undue financial burden on U.S. food manufacturers, restaurants and, ultimately, American consumers.' The spice association noted that in the framework of a trade deal with Indonesia, the Trump administration had created the potential for exemptions or reductions in tariffs for commodities not naturally available or produced in the United States. The trade group said it hoped a similar framework could be put into agreements with other nations. 'We firmly believe that smart, targeted trade policies can support the U.S. spice industry and other American businesses,' Ms. Shumow said, 'while helping to keep grocery costs down for families.'
Miami Herald
18-07-2025
- Miami Herald
Florida Democrats file bill to block federal funds to Alligator Alcatraz
Florida's Democratic congressional delegation has introduced legislation aimed at shutting down the controversial immigration detention center in the Everglades. Dubbed the 'No Cages in the Everglades Act,' the six-page bill is led by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Weston. It aims to ban the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement from operating or funding the detention center known as Alligator Alcatraz, or any other 'immigration detention facility located within or adjacent to the Everglades ecosystem.' The bill also seeks to increase transparency and federal oversight of immigration detention centers nationwide. 'Trump and Ron DeSantis have exploited legal ambiguity around this Everglades internment camp to avoid any scrutiny of abuses there,' said Wasserman Schultz in an statement. 'Our bill would shut down this atrocity, strengthen oversight of detention facilities nationwide, and mandate public reporting on costs, conditions, and the treatment of detainees, as well as report on any harms to the environment and nearby tribal lands.' Wasserman Schultz is joined by fellow Florida Democrats Reps. Kathy Castor, Frederica Wilson, Lois Frankel, Darren Soto, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Maxwell Frost and Jared Moskowitz. The bill is unlikely to gain traction in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. The facility — operated and funded by Florida's state government, with the expectation of federal reimbursement — has drawn sharp criticism from environmental advocates, Miccosukee tribal leaders and human rights groups, who call it both inhumane and ecologically disastrous. Multiple reports allege detainees are being held in unsafe, unsanitary conditions without access to clean water, medical care or legal support. Florida's Division of Emergency Management, which is overseeing the detention center, says those stories are false. READ MORE: Miccosukee Tribe moves to join environmental lawsuit against Alligator Alcatraz The detention center sits on an airstrip on the edge of the Big Cypress National Preserve, a protected wilderness area that is home to endangered species. The bill coincides with a rapidly growing MoveOn Civic Action petition demanding the immediate closure of the Everglades detention camp. The petition has now surpassed 43,000 signatures, amplifying public pressure on state and federal officials. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick emphasized the broader moral stakes of the legislation. 'No one should be subjected to unsafe, degrading treatment, and we cannot meet these injustices with silence or symbolic gestures. We have a moral responsibility to act decisively,' Cherfilus-McCormick said. 'Every person in our custody deserves dignity, safety, and basic human rights.' The legislation has garnered support from major human rights and immigration organizations, including the ACLU, Detention Watch Network, Church World Service and the National Immigration Law Center. The bill comes just days after Wasserman Schultz, Moskowitz and Frost visited the facility alongside Florida state representatives. The visit followed complaints by detainees and attorneys about conditions inside and a lack of transparency. During the visit, Frost said they were denied permission to speak with any detainees, without explanation. Republicans who took the tour said the facility was clean and properly run. The Florida Division of Emergency Management and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not respond to requests for comment.
USA Today
15-07-2025
- USA Today
Trump to unveil $90 billion in AI investments during Pennsylvania trip
President Trump has long expressed his desire to see America dominate the global market in artificial intelligence innovation. In fact, one of the first executive orders he signed was aimed at removing barriers to American leadership in the fast-growing field. On July 15, Trump will travel to Pennsylvania to tout more than $90 billion in private sector investment in the state, including in data centers, energy, power infrastructure and personnel needed to fuel the country's AI ambitions, according to the office of Sen. Dave McCormick, a Pennsylvania Republican. It also happens to be a battleground state, which was crucial to Trump's victory in 2024. The first Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit was organized by McCormick, a former hedge fund CEO, who brought together industry titans from the finance and tech world who had made major commitments to the state. Blackstone, for instance, announced a $25 billion investment in data center and energy infrastructure development in northeastern Pennsylvania. The investment is expected to create 6,000 construction jobs along with 3,000 new permanent jobs, according to McCormick's office. First Energy will invest $15 billion to expand power distribution, strengthen grid infrastructure, and operate the enhanced grid, supporting 56 of the 67 Pennsylvania counties. 'As the nation's second largest energy producer and a global nuclear power leader, Pennsylvania is uniquely positioned to deliver the abundant, affordable energy that growing AI and advanced manufacturing sectors demand,' said McCormick in a statement.
