Raise taxes to fix budget, Treasury advises Labor in accidentally published advice
The ABC can reveal the advice, written by the independent Treasury and offered after Labor's re-election, warns the government's signature pledge to build 1.2 million homes over five years to address the housing crisis "will not be met".
That declaration was one of several subheadings in a table of contents accidentally included in Treasury's response to an ABC freedom of information (FOI) request.
Other subheadings reveal Treasury told Treasurer Jim Chalmers he would need to find "additional revenue and spending reductions" to meet his objective of a "sustainable" budget.
The materials do not elaborate on which taxes could be raised, but suggest that Treasury canvassed "indirect taxes" and superannuation tax as possible targets, and that it appeared to favour lower taxes on companies and personal incomes.
The department also briefed Mr Chalmers on its assessment of the consequences for Australia if there is a global loss of confidence in the US dollar or the independence of the US Federal Reserve, along with a framework for a crisis response in such a scenario.
The materials come from Treasury's "incoming government" brief to the department's ministers, including Mr Chalmers and Housing Minister Clare O'Neil.
Those briefs are routinely prepared by all departments during election campaigns, with no input or visibility from the ministers, and with an alternative version drafted for the opposition.
They include the department's advice about how to implement and add to each party's agenda, and its assessment of looming challenges.
Journalists can request the briefing given to the winning party through the FOI process, but often receive a heavily redacted copy, as was the case in this instance.
But the document emailed to the ABC mistakenly included headings and subheadings from the redacted sections, revealing sensitive elements of Treasury's briefing which the department did not want to make public.
Treasury asked that the document be deleted after realising the error, but the ABC has decided to publish it because it provides a rare insight into how top advisers view the major economic and policy challenges facing the Albanese government as it begins its second term in power, and so is in the public interest.
Steven Kennedy, who was Treasury secretary when the briefs were prepared, now leads the prime minister's department.
Treasury advised that "improvements to the budget will need to come from economic growth, additional revenue and spending reductions" and that "tax should be raised as part of broader tax reform".
Mr Chalmers has since declared an appetite for tax reform reaching beyond Labor's election platform, and will hold a roundtable in August with tax on the agenda, saying proposals should improve the budget bottom line, or at least be budget neutral.
The government also plans to double the earnings tax on super balances above $3 million. The reforms were introduced to parliament last term but are yet to be legislated amid debate about indexation of the threshold and whether the tax should capture "unrealised" gains in asset value.
Under the heading "opportunities to build on your agenda", Treasury gave advice about "building on" Labor's superannuation tax changes, but the heading does not reveal what was advised.
Other headings suggest Treasury favours lower taxes on individual and company incomes, advising on "rebalancing" personal income tax "to increase workforce participation and give workers a fair go", and "modernising" business tax to boost investment.
It suggests reform to "support budget repair", consistent with Labor's agenda, could be implemented through "the indirect tax system", a broad group of taxes including fuel excise, cigarette tax, state and territory stamp duty and land tax, and the GST.
The treasurer and prime minister have both fielded questions about whether they plan to raise GST through the roundtable process, both signalling reluctance but adding they are happy for contributors, including business, unions and experts, to raise any idea.
The department also advised Mr Chalmers and Ms O'Neil that the 1.2 million homes target "would not be met" and floated changing it, advising the government to "build on [its] agenda" by crafting a "coherent and well-prioritised" housing agenda.
There has been substantial public commentary about the viability of the target, with housing completions so far well off track, and the ministers have described the target as "ambitious" but maintained it can be met.
Ms O'Neil was presented with a range of options to support the construction of more housing, including using the migration and skills system to boost the construction workforce, and using its existing policy of grants to state and territories to better "leverage" them to boost building rates.
Treasury also briefed the minister on the "dysfunctional" funding model for the infrastructure that "enables" the construction of new housing, such as pipes and sewers, which was a key Coalition election policy.
It also identified "challenges" with the "responsiveness… capability… [and] speed" of key housing agency Housing Australia and suggests "steps to improve oversight and re-set the relationship with the CEO and Board" of the body.
The headings did not name any specific issues with the agency or explicitly state that there were any, but suggested a "review".
The materials also reveal Treasury has modelled a variety of world crises originating in the United States, appearing to suggest concern about the actions of the Trump administration.
"The global economic outlook has rapidly deteriorated, with implications for Australia," the department advised Mr Chalmers.
Treasury presented scenarios including a loss of confidence in the US dollar as the global reserve currency and the independence of its central bank, the Federal Reserve.
The headings do not reveal the details or assessments about the likelihood of these scenarios, which range from a milder "escalating tariff scenario" to more serious "financial disruption" and "worst case" scenarios.
The financial disruption scenario includes an increase in US sovereign risk — the interest charged on US government borrowing, reflecting the market's assessment of the safety of the dollar — of two percentage points, proposing a tiered Australian response in the event of a "severe downturn".
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly insulted Fed chair Jerome Powell and vowed to replace him with someone who will cut interest rates when his term expires this year.
Treasury officials have previously discussed their assessment of the consequences of a trade war and warned of the risks of broader financial uncertainty, and Mr Chalmers released some trade-related modelling during the election campaign.
That modelling found only modest impact on the Australian economy from a trade war.
Treasury's modelling of more serious scenarios was accompanied by a proposed "framework" for a stimulus response, including "direct support" (e.g. cash payments) and "liquidity support" to calm financial markets — a similar response to those used during the 2008-09 Global Financial Crisis.
A spokesperson for Mr Chalmers said the government would not "go into the detail" of Treasury's briefings.
"Of course Treasury provides advice for incoming governments … We've already made it clear we'll need to do more to meet our housing goals and make our economy more productive and our budget sustainable," the spokesperson said.
"These issues were a focus of the treasurer's recent address to the National Press Club and we will grapple with some of them at the upcoming roundtable."
Mr Chalmers has also repeatedly highlighted global volatility as an economic risk, including in the context of the Trump administration's trade restrictions.
"The uncertainty, volatility and unpredictability in the global environment I think will be the biggest influence that will shape and constrain the government's choices in this term," he said in an interview on Sky News on Sunday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
39 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Queensland mum's generous act after $24m lotto win
A big-hearted Queensland mum is already making good on her dream of giving back, just days after winning an incredible $24.29m in the Lucky Lotteries Super Jackpot. The Darra woman scored the entire jackpot in draw 11027, drawn on July 11. Her winning entry, made up of six randomly selected numbers, was purchased via The Lott app. The jackpot had climbed to $24.29m after going unclaimed for 183 consecutive draws. 'This is a dream come true. I can't tell you how long I've dreamt of this moment,' she said. 'This is a beautiful day. I can't hold back the tears.' While the win opens the door to endless possibilities, the selfless mum said her first priority was donating to causes that matter deeply to her. 'There's a lot of things I could do, but donating to charity is the most important,' she said. 'I would like to donate to some cancer and domestic violence charities. These are the sort of charities that hold a special place in my heart.' She also said she wouldn't be quitting her job, and that helping her family was another key goal. 'I love my job, so I'll continue showing up to work. I'll also be able to help my kids out a lot.' The game is a raffle-style lottery where each ticket is unique, meaning prizes aren't shared. The Lucky Lotteries Super Jackpot now resets to $630,001 for draw 11029, while the Mega Jackpot stands at $7m. In 2024, Lucky Lotteries 1st Prize and Jackpot winners across Australia took home more than $52.2m. Australia's official lotteries contributed over $1.8bn last year to support hospitals, medical research, disaster relief, and education. The Lott also backs Play For Purpose, a charity raffle that helps over 500 causes across the country.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
China expert says Australia has 'serious and profound' problem as Beijing 'weaponises' expatriates to interfere in domestic elections
A leading expert on China has warned The Daily Telegraph that Australia has a 'serious and profound' problem as Beijing tightens its influence on local elections by 'weaponising' sections of the Australian Chinese diaspora. Senior fellow at the Hudson Institute Dr John Lee said the People's Republic of China (PLA) had spent 'enormous efforts' influencing and interfering with Australian domestic politics to advance its interests. Dr Lee, who was formerly a principal adviser on Asia to the Australian government, said the Labor Party may have benefitted from the interference, but insisted it 'creates problematic structural problems for social cohesion in Australian society and politics'. Dr Lee's comments to The Daily Telegraph come after the masthead revealed Taiwanese officials were briefed by DFAT that the CCP were attempting to influence Australian elections via the significant number of expatriated Chinese in Australia. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is on a six-day trip to China, where he is expected to meet President Xi Jinping on Tuesday. 'There is nothing wrong with Albanese visiting China in and of itself,' Dr Lee said. 'However, Beijing views relationships with regional countries in inherently competitive terms in that its primary aim is to encourage distance or division between the US and regional allies.' Dr Lee said Australia needed to impose 'non-negotiable anchor points' with countries like China to insulate it from harmful interference and to protect its ability to make its own decisions 'in our own best interests'. 'I don't think Albanese has done that,' he said. Dr Lee said Mr Albanese's apparent enthusiasm for 'narrowing differences' with China instead of the United States was a 'radical departure' from Australian governmental tradition in upholding the ANZUS alliance. Despite Mr Albanese's efforts, there has been no 'significant lessening' in China's interference, militarily or politically, Dr Lee said. Speaking to Sky News on Monday, Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge said President Xi wanted other economies to be 'much more dependent' on China's and wanted to use that economic dependence as a 'weapon'. 'Mr Albanese seems naively unaware of this and is over there trying to grow our dependency on China,' he said. Mr Shoebridge said the Prime Minister may think he had 'stabilised the relationship' with China, but as Beijing casts a shadow over Taiwan and sends three warships around Australia conducting live fire exercises, the relationship was not one 'based in reality'. 'There's growing concern and doubt about Australia as an ally and as a partner in collective deterrence of China in Washington and that doubt will be growing in other partner capitals too, like Seoul and Tokyo,' Mr Shoebridge said. 'Because while the Prime Minister talks about investing in relationships, the only relationship he's investing his personal time in is China.'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Liberal Party to launch legal action after losing Sydney seat of Bradfield at federal election
The NSW Liberal Party will challenge the federal election result in the Sydney seat of Bradfield after losing it to teal independent Nicolette Boel. In a statement on Monday night, Liberal Giselle Kapterian said the decision to go to the "umpire" was about ensuring the final outcome reflected the "true wishes of the voters". "While the second count resulted in a 26 vote lead for Ms Boele. Today's decision is taken to ensure the intentions of the voters of Bradfield are accurately reflected in the final count." She added that this step would "provide collective confidence" and "remove any remaining doubts created by the two conflicting counts". However, she also pointed out the move was not about casting doubt over the electoral system. "To be clear, there is no question regarding the integrity of our electoral system. "In fact, this process has only served to reaffirm my faith in Australia's democratic institution. "I am grateful for the AEC's [Australian Electoral Commission] tireless work in delivering the two very close counts." Ms Boele was declared the winner on June 4, more than a month after voters went to the polls. The challenge will be taken to the Court of Disputed Returns. The Chief Justice of the High Court would nominate a High Court or Federal Court judge to sit as the Court of Disputed Returns. After weeks of uncertainty, Ms Boele beat Ms Kapterian by just 26 votes, with each woman leading in the electorate at different points. Ms Kapterian released a statement a short time after her opponent declared victory and promised to "carefully review the two counts", leaving the door open for a legal challenge. The historically blue-ribbon seat was initially called for Ms Kapterian on May 12 by the ABC's chief election analyst Antony Green, when she was ahead by about 200 votes. But as the count continued, the number of votes between the pair shrank, and a week later Ms Boele took the lead as the provisional winner. Ms Boele remained ahead by 40 votes after the unofficial distribution of preferences, however as the counting entered its final stages, Ms Kapterien pulled ahead once more by eight ballots. Under the Australian Electoral Commission's policy, a recount was ordered, as is the case in all contests won by fewer than 100 votes. In an interview with ABC's Afternoon Briefing in June, Ms Kapterian said she was not rushing into a legal contest. "It's the two different outcomes that we're having look at now, taking a moment to breathe, taking advice … to really understand where the numbers lie and what might lie ahead," Ms Kapterian said.