
UK hoping to work with China to counteract Trump's climate-hostile policies
The UK is hoping to shape a new global axis in favour of climate action along with China and a host of developing countries, to offset the impact of Donald Trump's abandonment of green policies and his sharp veer towards climate-hostile countries such as Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Ed Miliband, the UK's energy and net zero secretary, arrived in Beijing on Friday for three days of talks with top Chinese officials, including discussions on green technology supply chains, coal and the critical minerals needed for clean energy. The UK's green economy is growing three times faster than the rest of the economy, but access to components and materials will be crucial for that to continue.
He said: 'We can only keep future generations safe from climate change if all major emitters act. It is simply an act of negligence to today's and future generations not to engage China on how it can play its part in taking action on climate.'
Writing in the Guardian, he added: 'Climate action at home without pushing other, larger countries to do their fair share would not protect current and future generations. We will only protect our farmers, our pensioners and our children if we get other countries of the world to play their part.'
China is facing a barrage of tariffs from Trump on its exports to the US, and the potential that the EU will start levying green tariffs on imports of high-carbon Chinese goods such as steel.
The world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter is profiting from record exports of electric vehicles, solar panels and other low-carbon goods. But it is still highly dependent on coal, and though the upward march of its emissions appears to have paused, whether China reduces its carbon output or returns to fossil fuels may depend largely on the government's response to Trump's trade war.
Many experts believe the only prospect of staving off climate breakdown is for China, the EU, the UK and other major economies to form a pro-climate bloc alongside vulnerable developing countries, to counter the weight of Trump's US, Russia, Saudi Arabia and petrostates pushing for the continued expansion of fossil fuels.
Miliband's visit to Beijing is the first by a UK energy secretary in eight years. He also visited India last month, on a similar mission, and travelled to Brazil last year, as well as holding meetings with many minsters of developing countries at the Cop29 climate summit last November.
Catherine Abreu, director of the International Climate Politics Hub, said: 'It's really important to see this happening – there is no way to fulfil the Paris agreement without China. And China has made clear it is willing to be more vocal on these issues, to boost climate action. We see an openness in China to band together with Europe, Canada, the UK on climate issues.'
But the prospects of agreement on the sharp emissions cuts needed globally to limit temperature rises to 1.5C, in line with the Paris agreement, are increasingly remote. Brazil will host this year's UN climate summit, Cop30, in the Amazon in November, amid the worst geopolitical tensions in decades, and as many governments prepare to pour money into rearmament.
Only a handful of countries, including the UK, have so far submitted the national plans on emissions cuts for the next decade as required under the 2015 Paris agreement, despite the deadline passing last month. China is unlikely to produce its plan until much closer to the Cop30 conference, and will be keenly watched, as its current carbon targets are much too weak to stay within the 1.5C limit.
Miliband may also find he needs to adapt his plans for a booming green economy in the UK in the face of China's economic dominance of the low-carbon technology market, in electric vehicles, solar panels, batteries and other key components, according to Li Shuo, director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
'We need to be honest about the economic reality,' he said. 'All countries in the world are hoping for a share of the green pie. But that is not aligned with the economic reality … that they can't outcompete China.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
21 minutes ago
- Sky News
Boos and cheers for Trump as he visits Kennedy Center for Les Mis
Les Miserables, what else. The hit musical about anti-government protest is now showing at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC. Donald Trump was in the audience for Wednesday's performance for what amounts to a busman's holiday. The narrative explores issues of social justice, love, and the enduring power of human compassion amidst a backdrop of poverty and revolution. Not everyone shares the president's vision of those themes. Indeed his presence drew what can only be described as mixed reviews from his fellow theatre goers - cheers and boos in equal measure as he waved from the front row of the circle. The script of Les Miserables barely presents a break from the day job - Trump won't be the only one getting a sense of art imitating life, as the real thing plays out on the streets of LA. It is the first show the president has chosen to attend since he made sweeping changes at the iconic venue, prompting an outcry and accusations that he was politicising art and 'MAGAfying' the venerated institution. According to CNN, a number of Les Miserables cast members had planned to sit out the performance in protest. The Kennedy Center is a prestigious venue that showcases the best of American performance art. More than 2,000 shows per year include the famous honours ceremony, an annual event that celebrates artists who have made a significant contribution to US culture. Honourees through the years have included Joni Mitchell, Aretha Franklin, the Grateful Dead and Francis Ford Coppola. Following his election in November, Trump made himself chairman of the Kennedy Center's board and replaced members with political loyalists. Traditionally, the board has been made up of individuals from across the political spectrum; after his election, Trump got rid of 18 members and replaced them with political soulmates, including his chief of staff Susie Wiles and Fox presenters Laura Ingraham and Maria Bartiromo. Donald Trump signalled a change in artistic direction at the Kennedy Center when he wrote on social media of "Drag shows specifically targeting our youth", and said of its production schedule: "We didn't like what they were showing, we're going to make sure it's good and it's not going to be woke." His changes prompted a number of acts to cancel shows at the venue in protest. The touring production of Broadway hit Hamilton cancelled dates, as did actor and producer Issa Rae, writer Louise Penny and Pulitzer Prize-winning folk musician Rhiannon Giddens. 👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈 Trump's attendance at the Les Mis performance was designed to boost fundraising, with donors paying up to $2m to attend a reception with the president. Ticket sales and subscriptions have, reportedly, slumped since Trump's changes although the centre's management points out its campaign to renew subscriptions has been launched later this year than last. Trump watched the performance of Les Miserables from the presidential box, in the company of his wife, Melania. Vice president JD Vance was also there. When he attended a performance by the National Symphony Orchestra in March with his wife, he was booed by members of the audience.


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration hit with second lawsuit over restrictions on asylum access
Immigration advocates filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday over the Trump administration's use of a proclamation that effectively put an end to being able to seek asylum at ports of entry to the United States. The civil lawsuit was filed in a Southern California federal court by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, the American Immigration Council, Democracy Forward, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. The lawsuit is asking the court to find the proclamation unlawful, set aside the policy ending asylum at ports of entry and restore access to the asylum process at ports of entry, including for those who had appointments that were canceled when President Donald Trump took office. Unlike a similar lawsuit filed in February in a Washington, D.C., federal court representing people who had already reached U.S. soil and sought asylum after crossing between ports of entry, Wednesday's lawsuit focuses on people who are not on U.S. soil and are seeking asylum at ports of entry. No response was immediately issued by the Department of Homeland Security or Customs and Border Protection, which were both among the defendants listed. Trump's sweeping proclamation issued on his first day in office changed asylum policies, effectively ending asylum at the border. The proclamation said the screening process created by Congress under the Immigration and Nationality Act 'can be wholly ineffective in the border environment' and was 'leading to the unauthorized entry of innumerable illegal aliens into the United States.' Immigrant advocates said that under the proclamation noncitizens seeking asylum at a port of entry are asked to present medical and criminal histories, a requirement for the visa process but not for migrants who are often fleeing from immediate danger. 'Nothing in the INA or any other source of law permits Defendants' actions,' the immigrant advocates wrote in their complaint. Thousands of people who sought asylum through the CBP One app, a system developed under President Joe Biden, had their appointments at ports of entry canceled on Trump's first day in office as part of the proclamation that declared an invasion at the border. 'The Trump administration has taken drastic steps to block access to the asylum process, in flagrant violation of U.S. law,' the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies stated in a news release Wednesday.


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump gives ominous warning as Pete Hegseth authorizes major military move in the Middle East
President Donald Trump delivered an ominous warning on Wednesday as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth authorized a major military move in the Middle East amid rising tensions in the area. The Defense Department has announced it has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from bases in the Middle East ahead of continued negotiations with Iranian officials over its rapidly advancing nuclear program It affects bases in Iraq, Syria, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates - but primarily affects military spouses and their children in Bahrain near the US Navy base, according to Fox News. When asked why family members are being evacuated, Trump simply said: 'You'll have to see.' He then headed off to the Kennedy Center to watch Les Miserables. Trump later explained the dependents 'are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place.' He again warned, 'We'll see what happens.' When Trump was then asked what would diffuse tensions in the region, Trump said Iran 'can't have a nuclear weapon, very simply, they can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that.' In the meantime, the State Department has said it has ordered the departure of all nonessential personnel from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad as part of its commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies,' a State Department official told The Hill. 'Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our Mission in Iraq.' The embassy has been on limited staffing for years in part due to security concerns, as the surrounding area has previously been targeted by rockets and mortar during previous confrontations between Washington DC and Tehran, the Wall Street Journal reports. But the State Department took its efforts a step further on Wednesday, as it also authorized the departure of nonessential personnel and family members from Bahrain and Kuwait - giving them the option of leaving those countries at the government's expense and with government assistance. The Defense Department also added that 'the safety and security of our service members and their families remains our highest priority and US Central Command is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East.' No US uniformed service members will be evacuating, however, two unidentified defense officials told Fox. The moves to reduce military personnel in the Middle East comes as talks between the US and Iran seeking to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the US lifting some of its sanctions have hit an impasse. Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear accord to replace the deal that US Trump overturned during his first term in 2018. Iranian officials are now set to present a counterproposal on a nuclear deal with the United States at a scheduled meeting over the weekend, after previously describing Washington's offer as containing 'ambiguities'. Iran's parliament speaker has also claimed that the US proposal failed to include the lifting of sanctions - a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. Now, Trump says he is 'less confident' of reaching a deal to shut down the nuclear program. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that´s a shame,' the president told the New York Post's Pod Force One podcast in an interview Monday. 'I´m less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them,' he claimed in the interview, which was released Wednesday. Meanwhile, Iranian Defense Minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh told journalists that Tehran is ready to respond if the negotiations fail. 'If conflict is imposed on us, the opponent´s casualties will certainly be more than ours, and in that case, America must leave the region, because all its bases are within our reach,' he said. 'We have access to them, and we will target all of them in the host countries without hesitation.' The country has repeatedly insisted that its nuclear program is peaceful. 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and U.S. militarism only fuels instability,' the Iranian mission to the United Nations reiterated on social media. 'CENTCOM's legacy of fueling regional instability, through arming aggressors and enabling Israeli crimes, strips it of any credibility to speak on peace or nonproliferation. 'Diplomacy - not militarism - is the only path forward,' it argued. Yet the United States is not the only one cracking down on Iran's nuclear program, as the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency is considering censuring the country. Rafael Grossi, the director-general of the IAEA, warned on Tuesday that Iran's growing stockpile of highly enriched uranium and unresolved questions about its program are serious issues. 'Unless and until Iran assists the agency in resolving the outstanding safeguards issues, the Agency will not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful,' he said. At the end of May, the IAEA published a damning report that claimed Iran had carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the U.N. nuclear watchdog at three locations long under investigation. A censure by the international agency could now mean the United Nations reimposes its sanctions on Iran via a measure in Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers that remains active until October. Trump withdrew from that agreement in his first term.