Cadillac, Chevrolet among over 100,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Car recalls: Why they happen and what buyers should know
Why do car recalls happen? Here's what to know if your car has an open recall.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued multiple recalls last week, including notices for over 90,000 General Motors vehicles.
Are you looking to see if any recalls were issued on your vehicle? If the car isn't listed below, owners can check USA TODAY's automotive recall database or search NHTSA's database for new recalls. The NHTSA website allows you to search for recalls based on your vehicle identification number, or VIN.
Here's what you need to know about the vehicle recalls published by NHTSA from March 10 to March 16.
General Motors recalls Cadillacs and Camaros
General Motors recalled certain Cadillac and Chevrolet cars equipped with a 10-speed transmission.
A transmission control valve in the recalled vehicles may be susceptible to excess wear over time. The excess wear may cause gradual loss of pressure within the valve that can cause harsh shifting or the wheels may experience a momentary lock up, according to the recall report.
The affected vehicles include:
2019 to 2020 Cadillac CT6
2020 to 2021 Cadillac CT4
2020 to 2021 Cadillac CT5
2020 to 2022 Chevrolet Camaro
Dealers are to install transmission control module monitoring software for free and notification letters are to be sent April 21.
Affected vehicles: 90,081
Range Rovers recalled for seat belt issue
Land Rover recalled certain 2025 Range Rover and Range Rover Sport vehicles for a potentially faulty seat belt.
The second-row center seat belt buckle may not latch correctly due to a manufacturing error, according to the NHTSA.
Dealers are to replace the seat belt free of charge and owner notification letters are to be sent May 2.
Affected vehicles: 7,276
Ineos recalls Grenadiers
Ineos Automotive Americas recalled certain 2024 Grenadier vehicles.
The door button mechanism on the recalled vehicles may have been assembled without a sufficient application of grease, preventing the door from fully latching, according to the NHTSA.
Ineos will replace the door button assemblies for free and owner notification letters are to be sent between March 31 and May 4.
Affected vehicles: 7,022
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Detroit Focuses On Driving Down EV Prices
Current Climate brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability every Monday. Sign up to get it in your inbox. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved F ord's $5 billion plan to get cheaper electric vehicles on the road by 2027 is intriguing not simply because it's happening as the Trump Administration works to hamper the EV industry's growth, but because it signals both it and General Motors, which make most of their money selling big gasoline-powered pickups and SUVs, seem to be getting serious about competing with Tesla and Chinese automakers that threaten their long-term health. There aren't a lot of specifics yet about Ford's $30,000 electric pickup that's due in a couple of years, but its new low-cost manufacturing process and a cheaper lithium-iron phosphate, or LFP, battery could help the company that standardized assembly-line production over a century ago become a key player as the global auto industry rapidly electrifies. GM, which has seen strong sales of its newest electric models this year, including the $35,000 Equinox SUV, is also introducing a restyled Bolt crossover this year that's likely to sell for about $30,000. That could be compelling to many carbuyers since the average new EV sold in the U.S. currently goes for $55,689, while the overall new car or light truck average transaction price is $48,841, according to Kelley Blue Book. Like Ford, GM plans to use new, cheaper battery chemistries, including LFP cells as well as a new lithium-manganese battery due in 2028, and has committed billions of dollars to electrifying its lineup. Both carmakers may be tempted to slow those efforts now that Trump has killed off federal EV rebates and manufacturing incentives. Weakened federal fuel-efficiency rules might entice them into relying more on gasoline-powered trucks, but doing so would threaten their sales outside the U.S., as low-cost Chinese EVs, particularly those from BYD, rapidly take market share from gasoline-powered models in Europe, South America and Oceania. And after a decade of EV dominance in the U.S. by Tesla, Elon Musk's fading popularity has done substantial damage to that brand, creating a new opportunity for traditional automakers like Ford and GM to gain sales from new buyers, particularly in EV-loving California. California High-Speed Rail Authority With the clawing back of $4 billion in federal grants to support it, the Trump Administration seems hell bent on ensuring that California's high-speed rail project ends up as precisely the 'train to nowhere' the President has lambasted it as. Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing to keep the money, but the train's new CEO has big ideas for saving the priciest U.S. infrastructure project. They include new long-term funding, private partnerships and even turning to one of California's newest 'natural' resources: The AI data center. Ian Choudri, who spent decades working on global mega-infrastructure projects for major engineering firms Bechtel, Alstom and Parsons before taking the high-speed rail job last September, is on a mission to convince skeptics that after years of slow progress, the Golden State's bullet train from San Francisco to Los Angeles can be built– perhaps for less than its $128 billion price tag and even without federal support. 'We'll show that it becomes less cumbersome on taxpayers because it's generating revenue,' he told Forbes, without providing financial details. In addition to future ride revenue, he thinks the system can make money by letting tech firms build data centers on its land, powering them with solar farms that will also propel its trains. Other ideas include selling the rights to telecom companies to lay fiber optic cable along the train's path, and promoting real-estate development projects on its route, particularly in the lower-priced Central Valley region. 'We're getting contacted by Silicon Valley investors now asking, 'Hey, can we move data centers into Fresno and plug into your power grid that's renewable?'' Choudri said. 'If I combine all those ancillary revenue sources, roughly it's going to be 30% to 40% of the farebox revenue.' Read more here Hot Topic Jiten Behl, partner at Eclipse Venture Equity, on key factors driving next-generation electric vehicle development Given headwinds in the U.S. for EVs coming from the Trump Administration, how do you see the market changing, based on your time as Rivian's chief strategy officer? Electrification as a trend is going to only go in one direction. The one single most valid data point is that anybody who drives an electric car is not going back to a gasoline or a diesel car. That's a fact more than just a prediction. The slope of the [EV market] curve … was actually fairly slow penetration, which is why it did not initially get the attention of the Fords and the GMs and all the big automakers. Then it accelerated, and they started taking it very seriously. Now what's happened in the last couple of years is that despite recent news we're seeing from automakers like GM and Ford, I don't share the same level of optimism that they're going to put the commensurate weight behind electrification as they would have a couple of years back. What that does is it's going to separate the guys who are serious about this trend, whose life depends on this trend, from the ones who have other cards in their pocket to survive this next phase. I think the EV trend continues. It is going to slow down. Incentives going away and the supply chains getting more expensive are a serious headwind for anybody who's building a product that's economically challenged relative to competition or competing powertrains. What's your advice to companies grappling with this situation? I think it's an opportunity to invest in automation, invest in removing labor hours through robotics and invest in autonomy. The world 10 years back, it was always about electrification; autonomy was a side project for most people. It's very clear that the world of electrification and autonomy has merged. That next level of merging is electrification, autonomy and distributed energy, which is not being talked about a lot. When things become electric and autonomous, you cannot just rely on fixed-grid infrastructure to power them and still maintain the uptime and the cost, the total cost of ownership. You need flexible energy solutions to enable electric, autonomous vehicles. If you ask me what, if I were at Rivian today, what would our executive sessions be like, it's: How do we make sure that we take cost out? We have to reorder our supply chains. It's going to take time. Let's invest in automation. Let's invest in robotics. Let's make sure that we are not reduced to being just a hardware player, so let's invest in the AI and the compute side of things and make a big play in autonomy. Let's make sure that we automate our plants as much as possible and do not take our eye off the ball when it comes to the energy side of things. Those to me are the four or five things I'm sure are on top of every automaker management team's mind. What Else We're Reading Installing heat pumps in factories could save $1.5 trillion–and 77,000 lives ( Grist ) PFAS 'forever' chemicals were found in 98% of U.S. waters tested, according to study ( Mongabay ) Scientists rush to bolster climate findings that the Trump administration aims to undo ( The Guardian ) A range of industrial innovations led to much cheaper solar panels. New research sees opportunities to similarly slash costs for renewable energy systems and batteries ( MIT News ) Trump administration reopens $5 billion EV charging program after losses in court. The Transportation Department had halted the Biden-era program ( Canary Media ) The UK asks people to delete emails as a water-saving step during a drought ( The Verge ) More From Forbes Forbes Three Most Egregious Fabrications In EPA's Climate Rollback Proposal By Margo T. Oge Forbes MAHA Movement Fracturing On Pesticides By Chloe Sorvino Forbes Climate Change Is A Public Health Crisis—But Most Plans Ignore It By Ken Silverstein Forbes Uber Freight CEO Joins Waabi As Robot Truck Startup Plans Commercial Launch By Alan Ohnsman
USA Today
10 hours ago
- USA Today
Range Rover, Ford, Nissan among over 300,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued multiple recalls last week, including notices for more than 120,000 Range Rover vehicles. Are you looking to see if recalls were issued on your vehicle? If the car isn't listed below, owners can check USA TODAY's automotive recall database or search NHTSA's database for new recalls. The NHTSA website allows you to search for recalls based on your vehicle identification number, or VIN. Here's what you need to know about the vehicle recalls published by NHTSA from Aug. 11 to Aug. 17. Range Rovers recalled for potentially damaged suspension knuckles Land Rover recalled certain 2014-2017 Range Rover and Range Rover Sport vehicles as they may have a suspension knuckle that can crack. If the suspension knuckle cracks the suspension arm may detach. The recall expands on a previous one that covered 16,759 vehicles that the NHTSA issued in 2024. Dealers are to inspect the front suspension knuckles and install a retaining bracket or replace the knuckle, as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed Sept. 30. Affected vehicles: 121,509 Ford F150s recalled for faulty bolt Ford recalled certain 2023-2025 F-150 trucks as they may have a rear axle hub bolt that can fatigue and break. The affected vehicles are equipped with the Trailer Tow Max Duty package and a 9.75-inch heavy duty axle with a 3/4 float axle design. A broken hub bolt may cause damage to the axle hub splines that can cause the vehicle to roll away – according to the recall notice. Dealers are replace the rear axle shaft assemblies in the affected vehicles for free. Notification letters are to be sent in phases, starting Aug. 18. Affected vehicles: 103,174 Lincoln Corsairs recalled for faulty rearview camera Ford recalled certian 2020-2022 Lincoln Corsair vehicles as the rearview camera display may show a distorted image or no image at all. Corrosion on the rearview camera harness and connector can cause the display to have an intermittent rearview video image, no rearview video image, or blurry, foggy or hazy image quality, according to the recall report. Dealers will replace the rearview camera harness and rearview camera for free. Letters notifying owners of the safety risk are to be mailed Aug. 18. A follow up letter will be sent when a remedy is available. Affected vehicles: 41,875 Ford recalls vehicles for headlight failure Ford recalled certain 2025 Mustang, Mustang Mach E and 2025 Lincoln Nautilus vechilces as the headlights in the vehicles may fail. The LED Driver Modules in the affected vehicles may contain a burnt diode, which can cause the low-beam and high-beam headlights, daytime running lights, front position lights and front turn signals to fail, according to the NHTSA. On Nautilus vehicles, the burnt diode may also cause the rear tail light, rear turn signal and rear position light to fail. Dealers will inspect and replace the LED Driver Modules as necessary, free of charge. Letters notifying owners of the safety risk are expected to be mailed Aug. 25, with a follow up sent when the remedy is available. Affected vehicles: 21,765 Nissan recalls Frontiers due to software error Nissan recalled certain 2025 Frontier vehicles due to a software logic error in the engine control module. The error can cause the daytime running lights may dim unexpectedly when the idle start-stop feature cycles the engine from off to on. The lamps dim for 0.3 seconds each time the error occurs, before returning to normal – according to the recall report. Dealers are update the engine control module software, free of charge. Notification letters are to be sent Sept. 17. Affected vehicles: 13,719
Digital Trends
19 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The week in EV tech: Glitz on the coast, grit from Detroit
Welcome to Digital Trends' weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. Monterey Car Week and its jewel event The Quail: A Motorsports Gathering have become the automotive world's most exclusive runway. Here, the richest of the rich—and the most daring of the designers—unveil concept cars that seem plucked from sci-fi dreams. Yet in the same week, a very different kind of revolution was also announced by Ford: a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, born from a new software‑designed, small‑battery platform meant to power a whole new 'family' of affordable electric vehicles. It's a reminder that while ultra‑luxury is dazzling, democratized EV tech isn't just possible—it's on the horizon. Recommended Videos Sculpted Innovations on the Lawn At The Quail, brands unleashed show‑stoppers resting somewhere between movie props and next‑gen vehicles. · Cadillac's Elevated Velocity concept redefined luxury and utility with flair: gullwing doors; bold 24‑inch wheels; and modes like Terra for off‑road, Elements Defy vibrating debris off the body, and Sand Vision for enhanced visibility in dust storms—all wrapped in cabin amenities like red‑light therapy and a 'waterfall' screen embedded in the steering wheel. · Karma Automotive impressed with its Kaveya super‑coupe and 'GT‑UV' study—complete with a production‑ready interior, carbon‑fiber structure, and a blistering 1,000 hp electric drivetrain. · A wave of ultra‑luxury and performance electrics also made their presence felt: from Rimac's 2,107‑hp Nevera Rhypercar (price: ~$2.5 million), to Acura's RSX prototype, powered by an in‑house EV architecture and showcasing Honda's e:Architecture, soon to reach production. Not to mention Mercedes‑AMG's futuristic Concept GT XX with 1,341 hp from triple axial‑flux motors, a radical performance blueprint. Set against this spectacle of excess, these vehicles illustrate the creative peak of EV tech: performance, luxury, radical design—yet firmly perched out of reach for most of us. Ford's 'Model‑T Moment' Hits Home Now look at the other end of the spectrum: Ford's bold announcement of a $30,000 midsize EV pickup, built on a software‑defined vehicle platform, sparked a collective intake of breath—not for its headline price, but for its implications. This 'universal EV Platform' is designed with a small, affordable LFP (lithium‑iron‑phosphate) battery, fewer parts, and an architecture structured to spawn a family of cost‑efficient models. More than just building a pickup, Ford is signaling the arrival of integrated EV tech where intelligent software, battery management, and production‑scale efficiency converge. Unsurprisingly, Ford CEO explicitly framed the move as a technological and price war with BYD—China's EV champion known for cost‑effective batteries and platform economies. Ford's plan is a direct challenge to the global dominance of affordable EVs emerging from Asia, blending scale, simplicity, and local battery production to undercut and compete. Ford's new generation of EVs will be built as software-defined vehicles, meaning their core systems—everything from performance tuning to infotainment and battery management—will be controlled by centralized software platforms. Much like a smartphone, they'll receive over-the-air (OTA) updates, enabling Ford to introduce new features, improve efficiency, enhance safety, and fix bugs without a trip to the dealership. This concept first became reality in 2012, when Tesla introduced OTA updates in its Model S, setting a new standard for connected vehicle technology. In the years that followed, Chinese EV startups NIO and XPeng adopted similar software-first architectures, launching their own OTA-capable vehicles around 2018. By 2021, American EV makers Lucid and Rivian als o embraced the software-defined model, reinforcing the shift away from the traditional, hardware-centric approach to vehicle design. Today, SDVs are becoming increasingly commonplace across the industry. For drivers, this means owning a more adaptable and future-ready vehicle—one that can evolve over time. Automakers can remotely update vehicle behavior, improve range estimates, refine infotainment interfaces, and even introduce entirely new capabilities after the car has been sold. This also paves the way for personalized experiences and subscription-based features, where owners can unlock upgrades or tailor their vehicle's digital environment on demand. Two Worlds. One Future. What's most compelling is the contrast—and the convergence—of these stories. On one side, Monterey's lawn dazzles with what's next-level bold: solar visions, luxury interiors, hyper‑performance, AI‑driven cabins, and exaggerated power figures. On the other, Ford offers a quieter, yet perhaps revolutionary pivot: EV tech embedded in affordability, not as an afterthought, but as its core. Software-defined platforms mean updates, performance, safety, and user features can be upgraded without hardware overhaul—a glimpse at how mass‑market EVs can evolve fast. This isn't just a tech fantasy. It signals that EV solutions for the mainstream are maturing. Deep integration of cost‑effective battery chemistry, lean parts architecture, and software-centric control are what make an attainable EV reality—not just for well‑heeled collectors, but for everyday families.
