Europe: Shares end lower as Trump's tariff threats keep markets on edge
The pan-European Stoxx 600 index closed 0.1 per cent lower at 546.99. Most regional indexes also declined, except for the UK's FTSE 100, which rose 0.6 per cent to an all-time high.
A big boost for the FTSE was AstraZeneca, which gained 2 per cent after the drugmaker said its experimental drug baxdrostat significantly lowered blood pressure in a late-stage trial of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
Stand-out decliners in Europe were autos, with Germany's BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz all down around 2% each on the growing tariff worries.
The European Union accused Washington of resisting efforts to agree a trade deal and warned of countermeasures if no deal was struck to avoid the 'absolutely unacceptable' tariffs President Donald Trump has threatened to impose from Aug 1.
Trump stepped up his trade war on Saturday, saying he would impose a 30 per cent tariff on most imports from the EU next month.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Even if 30 per cent tariffs did take effect, we doubt it would be the last word on the subject, so the market and economic reaction will likely depend on how long a full 30% tariff would be expected to last,' said Simon Wells, chief European economist at HSBC.
Shares of US-exposed spirits makers Pernod Ricard and Remy Cointreau fell 1.2 per cent and 3.4 per cent, respectively.
Helping limit broader losses, euro zone banks climbed 0.5 per cent, with Italian lenders Banco BPM, BPER Banca and Banca Popolare di Sondrio (BPSO) jumping in the range of 5 per cent to 6 per cent.
Germany's Renk gained 4.3 per cent after brokerage Kepler Cheuvreux raised its rating on the defence contractor to 'buy' from 'hold'.
At the bottom of the Stoxx stood Sweden's Lifco, slumping 9.3 per cent after the consumer goods conglomerate missed second-quarter pre-tax profit estimates.
Looking ahead, European earnings season will kick off this week, with world's biggest supplier of computer chip-making equipment ASML set to report on Wednesday.
In the US, top banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are scheduled to report quarterly earnings throughout the week.
Monthly consumer prices data out of the US, UK and the broader euro zone are also due later in the week.
European bond markets saw losses on Monday with the yield on the German 30-year note hitting its highest since October 2023. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
32 minutes ago
- Business Times
Threats to the Fed go beyond firing Powell
A COUPLE of weeks ago, I swopped ideas about the Federal Reserve with Curtis Yarvin – the self-styled 'populist authoritarian' blogger who recently gave political advice to Elon Musk. His thoughts might make Fed watchers blanch. The issue is not just with President Donald Trump's ever-escalating threats to fire Fed chair Jerome Powell; Yarvin also wants Trump to smash the Fed's independence by putting it under the sway of the Treasury, so it can restructure America's US$37 trillion debt and 'unplug' its finance from the rest of the world. 'My audacious plan is to merge the Fed and Treasury, and revalue assets,' he explained. 'It is very incorrect to regard Treasury obligations as debt – they are restricted stock.' Is this mad? Most economists will howl 'yes'. So might the markets: When Trump indicated this week that he may fire Powell, the price of the US dollar and Treasuries gyrated. Not even Yarvin expects his ideas to fly soon. However, he also insists that if debt keeps surging, 'this will (eventually) look less ridiculous'. And while many will vehemently disagree, it would be a profound mistake to ignore him. After all, Musk is not Yarvin's only fan; figures such as Vice-President JD Vance have cited his ideas approvingly, and many mid-level Trump officials follow his blogs. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As a result, his 'crazy' concepts are seeping into the chatter around the administration. Just look, say, at the current speculation that if Trump does fire Powell, he might ask Scott Bessent, US Treasury secretary, to run both institutions. There is no sign that Powell will actually leave, or that Congress would accept a Bessent double act. But the so-called 'Overton window' (that is, the range of policies viewed as acceptable) is widening. Or as the political scientist Julian Waller wrote: 'American theorists of authoritarianism for now remain niche figures... Yet, the particularly open and entrepreneurial nature of these intellectual projects has found a growing audience among the discontented.' The left is also shifting the Overton window. Just look at the rise of Zohran Mamdani, a self-styled democratic socialist in New York – or a new poll from the right-wing Cato group showing that 62 and 34 per cent of 18 to 29-year-old voters like socialism and communism, respectively. Indeed, the political scientist Dennis Snower argues that while a 'left-right divide remains influential' in politics, it has 'morphed into a vicious battle between populists versus the 'elite' in many countries' – often played out on social media and Substack. So, how should investors respond? Firstly (and most obviously), it is crucial to expose yourself to the widest possible range of ideas, even if you hate them; hiding in a cosy echo chamber is dangerous. Although populist bloggers might seem fringe, they may still subtly shape future mainstream debates, be that around a wealth tax, rent controls and US debt restructuring – or a merger of the Fed and Treasury. If you want to understand where Musk's vision of Doge (the Department of Government Efficiency) came from, it is worth looking at Yarvin's 2012 posts and lectures about 'Rage' (Retire All Government Employees). Second, investors need to look at how populists have previously impacted asset prices. It is often presumed that left-wing populists create most market damage, because of their focus on redistribution and fiscal expansion. A 2021 study of financial history by Sebastian Stockl and Martin Rode argued that 'the success of populist parties has a direct impact on volatility in major domestic market indexes', and was worse under the left-wing variant. However, a more recent study by Manuel Funk, Moritz Schularick and Christoph Trebesch said the threat is not solely from the left. After studying 51 populist regimes since 1900, they concluded that 'after 15 years, GDP (gross domestic product) per capita is 10 per cent lower' under populists than otherwise. And while left-wing populists initially hurt asset prices more, after a few years their right-wing counterparts do as much (if not more) damage. The reason? Right-wing populists typically undermine the rule of law and meddle in markets (say, with tariffs). As the Nobel prize-winning economics trio of Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James Robinson have shown, authoritarian assaults on institutions are associated with lower growth. A separate study in the Harvard Business Review by Roberto Stefan Foa and Rachel Kleinfeld said that 'far from growing private-sector wealth, we find that equity returns under right-wing populists often prove dismal'. More specifically, they 'underperform benchmarks by around a quarter during a first term in office, and by half after a decade' – that is, right-wing leaders do more damage to the economy the longer they stay in power. Will this happen in the US? Maybe not: Yarvin thinks that Trump's populist 'revolution' is faltering now, as he backs away from some threats. 'Any administration is at its max power and energy as soon as it comes in. Now, it is losing momentum.' But the mere fact that wild ideas are circulating shows how institutions are being undermined. Or, to put it bluntly, the attacks on Powell are just one sign of a bigger assault on financial market norms. Do not expect this to stop at the Fed. FINANCIAL TIMES
CNA
44 minutes ago
- CNA
Bank of Japan may offer less gloomy view of US tariff hit in report, sources say
TOKYO :The Bank of Japan will warn of uncertainty over the impact of U.S. tariffs in a quarterly report due this month, but may offer a less gloomy view on the near-term hit to Japan's economy than three months ago, said three sources familiar with its thinking. With the BOJ set to keep interest rates steady at 0.5 per cent at its July 30-31 meeting, markets are focusing on how it will describe the growth and price outlook in a quarterly report due after the meeting. They are seeking clues on the timing of the next rate hike. In the upcoming report, the BOJ is likely to maintain its warning that uncertainty over the economic impact of U.S. tariffs remains very high, the sources, who declined to be identified, said. But the report may also reflect signs of resilience in U.S. and Chinese economies, as well as recent domestic data showing output and capital expenditure holding up, the sources said. "While the impact of tariffs will likely intensify, it's not showing up much in data so far," a factor that may affect the tone of BOJ's upcoming report, one of the sources said. "The BOJ must remain on high alert over risks from tariffs. But it also shouldn't be overly pessimistic either," another source said, a view echoed by a third source. The last report was compiled at the BOJ's previous rate review on April 30-May 1, when investors' pessimism was at its peak with markets still volatile after President Donald Trump's announcement of sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs. That report warns that uncertainty over U.S. tariffs will hit Japan's economy through various channels including by slowing global demand, weakening exports and souring business sentiment. But data released since then has not shown any clear evidence of damage from U.S. tariffs, or Japan's stalled trade talks with Washington, at least for now. The BOJ's "tankan" quarterly survey, released on April 1, showed business sentiment holding up. The bank's regional branch managers also gave a fairly sanguine view on the immediate hit from U.S. tariffs. Such data may be reflected in the next report's language on the economic outlook and risks, as well as in the board's growth projections, the sources said. In the last report, the BOJ expected the economy to grow 0.5 per cent in fiscal 2025, 0.7 per cent in 2026 and 1.0 per cent in 2027. The BOJ is likely to maintain its view that inflation will durably hit its 2 per cent target in the latter half of its three-year projection period running through fiscal 2027, the sources said. Domestic prices, on the other hand, have been moving higher than expected as steady rises in food costs keep consumer inflation well above the BOJ's 2 per cent target, the sources said. Some BOJ policymakers, such as hawkish board member Naoki Tamura, have warned of second-round effects from such cost-push price pressure, which may push up underlying inflation in a way that warrants resuming rate hikes. Sources have told Reuters the BOJ will consider revising up its inflation forecast for the current fiscal year reflecting persistent rises in rice and broader food costs.
CNA
44 minutes ago
- CNA
Philippines' Marcos to discuss trade and security during US visit as tariffs loom
MANILA: Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr will visit the United States next week with a clear message to President Donald Trump that the Philippines must become economically stronger if it is to serve as a truly robust partner, an official said on Friday (Jul 18). The visit, the first by an ASEAN head of state since Trump took office in January, will focus on economic cooperation, with Marcos expected to discuss concerns over proposed US tariffs on Philippine exports. "The President's official visit also aims to address the US tariff proposed to be levied on Philippine exports," Department of Foreign Affairs Assistant Secretary Raquel Solano told a media briefing. Trump raised reciprocal tariffs on Philippine exports to 20 per cent this month from the 17 per cent threatened in April. Talks between Philippine trade officials and their US counterparts are ongoing in Washington to hopefully seal a reciprocal deal that is "mutually acceptable and mutually beneficial" for both countries, Solano said. During the visit, the two leaders will also discuss closer cooperation in defence and security matters, including issues in the South China Sea where Manila and Beijing have had a series of maritime confrontations. Relations between Manila and Beijing have soured under Marcos, who has pivoted closer to the United States, granting it expanded access to Philippine military bases as both countries aim to counter what they have described as China's assertiveness in the South China Sea and towards Taiwan. "The purpose of this visit is to further strengthen the Philippines-United States Alliance, to proactively engage the US in all aspects of the relations and seize opportunities for greater security and economic cooperation," Solano said. The United States and the Philippines have a seven-decade old mutual defence treaty and hold dozens of annual exercises, which have included training with US Typhon missile system, and more recently with the NMESIS anti-ship missile system, angering China.
