logo
Details of new payment scheme for farmers unveiled

Details of new payment scheme for farmers unveiled

Yahoo15-07-2025
Major changes to the financial support available for agriculture marks "a new relationship between the people of Wales and farmers", the Welsh government has said.
Its protest-hit plan for greener farm subsidy payments - known as the Sustainable Farming Scheme (SFS) - has been seven years in the making.
Industry leaders have described the publication of a final set of proposals as "a once in a generation event".
But wildlife groups warned the new plan fell "far short" of helping farmers to successfully tackle climate change and nature loss.
New farming subsidy absolutely right, minister says
Devastating loss of wildlife in Wales, says report
Farmers leave thousands of wellies outside Senedd
The SFS will replace EU-era subsidies, which farmers had received for decades based largely on how much land they had.
Most rely on these payments - an average of 67% of Welsh farm income - came from subsidies in 2020-21.
The new approach aims to reward sustainable farming practices and the delivery of "public goods" like wildlife habitat and soaking up carbon in the land.
For their initial "universal" payment, farmers will have to agree to carry out 12 actions ranging from soil health planning and habitat maintenance, to online courses to enhance knowledge and skills related to sustainable farming.
The sums also include funding to recognise "social value" - something farmers had called for - and which aims to recognise what are described as the wider benefits that sustainable agriculture provides to society, from food production to sustaining rural communities.
There will also be an extra £1,000 for smaller farms in 2026 as a one-off stability payment to acknowledge the uncertain period of transition.
The scheme's optional layer is intended to top up farm incomes for further environmental work, including woodland creation, improved public access to the countryside and support to go organic.
A collaborative payment will also be available in future to support farmers working together on landscape-scale projects.
The Welsh government has said it will commit £238m in 2026 for the universal payments - equivalent to the current, main subsidy farms receive, known as the Basic Payment Scheme (BPS).
"Significant" funding for optional and collaborative work is also promised - with an overall budget similar to the £340m currently designated to farming.
But farming unions and environmental groups alike said far more was required - closer to £500m, to account for rising costs in agriculture and the scale of what was now being asked of farmers to deliver.
CLA Cymru said it was frustrating the total budget remained static, but the Farmers' Union of Wales (FUW) said the plan proposed "workable payment rates" and provided "much needed stability for the sector".
Rhodri Lloyd-Williams, who farms sheep and cattle across 750 acres of hillside near Talybont, Ceredigion, said this was "a massive moment", after "years of uncertainty" following the Brexit vote in 2016.
As an organic farmer and member of the Nature Friendly Farming Network, his is exactly the sort of farming system ministers want to support, from rotational grazing of livestock to boost soil health, to planting hedges and trees.
He said he would glad to see the new scheme include "a bit more encouragement" for this sort of work, which he said could deliver "multiple benefits" for both the farming business and environment.
But "first and foremost we need to keep Welsh farmers farming," he said.
Debate over the years has focused on how to make the scheme workable for farmers while ambitious enough to deliver against Wales' environmental goals.
The government had already made some major concessions - such as scrapping a requirement for farms to have 10% tree cover to qualify for funding, after widespread farmer protests in 2024.
Today's plan outlines a new approach to encouraging tree-planting.
All farmers entering the scheme will need to complete an opportunity plan for woodland and hedgerow creation in the first year and demonstrate progress towards it by 2028.
The government said it was asking farmers to plant at least 0.1 hectares - or 250 trees by the end of 2028.
There would be "generous support for tree and hedgerow planting" in the optional layer, including a higher payment rate for tree planting during the first three years of the scheme.
The aim is for the scheme to deliver at least 17,000 hectares of new tree planting across Wales by 2030, with an aspiration of achieving 21,500 hectares.
The government's also targeting 1,500km (932 miles) of hedgerow extension by 2030, with an aspiration of achieving 2,000km (1,243 miles).
But wildlife groups said they felt much of the scheme has been watered down to placate protesting farmers.
Rachel Sharp, director of Wildlife Trusts Wales, said the organisation was "deeply concerned" the SFS would not "adequately address the climate and nature crises".
"Welsh farming is in crisis - fewer farms, fewer jobs, and increasing environmental damage.
"We need to see an increased budget for the SFS, specifically for the optional and collaborative tiers, to help farmers transition to nature-friendly farming practices," she urged.
Alexander Phillips, Policy and Advocacy Manager at WWF Cymru said it appeared the SFS was now "sustainable in name only".
"Today's proposals for the first year fall far short of what's needed to deliver change quickly, and in part risks recreating bits of the old schemes with exaggerated area-based payment rates for little apparent public good," he said.
The announcement comes ahead of the start of the annual Royal Welsh Agricultural Show next week, where politicians of all colours will be setting out their own vision for the future of farming and the countryside with less than a year to a Senedd election.
By then, the government promises a tool will be ready on their website for farmers to be able to calculate an indicative SFS payment for their farm.
Deputy first minister with responsibility for climate change and rural affairs, Huw Irranca-Davies, said the government had "listened carefully to farmers across Wales and revised our approach to ensure it works for the agricultural industry and meets our shared responsibilities to the natural world around us".
"With this in mind, the scheme represents a new relationship between the people of Wales and our farmers.
"This is not just a scheme for farmers, this is a scheme for the whole of Wales – a whole farm, whole nation approach," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kneat Announces Record Revenue for Second Quarter 2025
Kneat Announces Record Revenue for Second Quarter 2025

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kneat Announces Record Revenue for Second Quarter 2025

LIMERICK, Ireland, Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- inc. (TSX: KSI) (OTC: KSIOF) ('Kneat' or the 'Company') a leader in digitizing and automating validation and quality processes, today announced financial results for the three-month period ended June 30, 2025. All dollar amounts are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. Second-quarter 2025 total revenue reaches $15.4 million, an increase of 32% year over year Gross margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 reaches 75% Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)1 at June 30, 2025, grows 43% year over year to $64.8 million. 'We continue on our trajectory towards profitability. New customer wins in the past quarter reached new highs, proving Kneat Gx is the platform of choice. We welcomed new leadership in finance, product and engineering and continued the unrelenting development of our platform.' - Eddie Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of Kneat. Q2 2025 Highlights Total revenues increased 32% to $15.4 million in the second quarter of 2025, compared to $11.7 million for the second quarter of 2024. SaaS revenue for the second quarter of 2025 grew 31% to $14.1 million, versus $10.8 million for the second quarter of 2024. Second-quarter 2025 gross profit was $11.6 million, up 34% from $8.7 million in gross profit for the second quarter of 2024. Gross margin in the second quarter of 2025 was 75%, compared to 74% for the second quarter of 2024. EBITDA1 in the second quarter of 2025 was $3.8 million, compared with $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA1 in the second quarter of 2025 was $0.4 million, compared with $1.6 million for the second quarter of 2024. Net loss for the second quarter of 2025 was $0.4 million, compared with a net loss of $3.1 million for the second quarter of 2024. Total ARR1, which includes SaaS license and recurring maintenance fees, was $64.8 million at June 30, 2025, an increase of 43% from $45.4 million at June 30, 2024. [1] ARR is a supplementary measure. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-IFRS measures and are not recognized, defined or standardized measures under IFRS. These measures are defined in the 'Supplementary and Non-IFRS Measures' section of this news release. First Half of 2025 Financial Highlights Total revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025 increased 34% to $30.2 million, compared to $22.4 million for the comparable six-month period in 2024. SaaS revenue grew 36% to $28.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, versus $20.6 million for the comparable period in 2024. Gross profit was $22.6 million, up 36% from $16.6 million in gross profit for the first half of 2024. Gross margin for the first half of 2025 was 75%, compared to 74% for the first half of 2024. EBITDA1 for the first half of 2025 was $9.7 million, compared with $0.0 million for the first half of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA1 for the first half of 2025 was $2.7 million, compared with $2.2 million for the first half of 2024. Net income for the first half of 2025 was $1.8 million, compared with ($6.4) million for the first half of 2024. Recent Business Highlights In April 2025, Kneat announced that it signed a Services Agreement with a multinational producer of generic pharmaceuticals. The Company, which operates more than a dozen manufacturing facilities around the world and employs more than 20,000 people, will initially use Kneat to digitize its drawing management process. In early May 2025, Kneat saw record attendance at VALIDATE, its annual event convening validation and quality professionals from around the world. One of the world's largest events for validation experts to discover, share and apply validation technologies, regulations, and best practices, VALIDATE enabled participants to witness the power of the Kneat Gx platform. In May 2025, Kneat announced that it signed a three-year Master Services Agreement with a leading manufacturer of clinical diagnostics for the healthcare industry. The Company, which operates in more than 40 countries and employs over 14,000 people, will use Kneat Gx initially to digitize its equipment validation process. Also in May 2025, Kneat announced the expansion of its executive leadership team with the addition of a Chief Innovation Officer Role. Co-founder and Chief Product Officer Kevin Fitzgerald transitioned out of his current role and into the Chief Innovation Officer role on June 9th. Donal O'Sullivan, an executive with extensive software development and product management leadership, joined Kneat at that time as Chief Product Officer. In June 2025, Kneat announced that it signed a multi-year Master Services Agreement with a leading global healthcare technology company. The Company, which employs over 50,000 people and manufactures in more than a dozen countries worldwide, will use the Kneat Gx platform initially to digitize its Commissioning, Qualification and Validation workflows for facilities, equipment and computer systems at several lead manufacturing sites. Also in June 2025, Kneat announced the retirement of its CFO Hugh Kavanagh. The role will be filled by Dave O'Reilly, who joined Kneat in July. Dave served most recently as CFO of Ekco, a leading European managed security service provider, which he helped scale from startup to a business with $200 million in annual revenue. Prior to his time at Ekco he led the international finance function for a $4 billion-SaaS business, Consensus Cloud Solutions/Ziff Davis Inc., formerly J2 Global. In July, Kneat launched Kneat Gx 9.5, which advances the data management capabilities of our platform. New features include greater management and control over discrete datasets; deeper functionality for defining, regulating and tracing datasets to align with risk-based validation; and more advanced filtering and visibility for Requirements, Risks and Test evidence, critical pillars of effective and efficient validation. These features enable users to save time by leveraging data across more projects than ever before; empowering risk-based validation processes such as Computer Software Assurance; and exerting greater control over traceability that adapts to any workflow. 'Kneat's long history of solid execution is extended with the results reported today. I look forward to continuing the disciplined financial stewardship that precedes me in this role, and with it, Kneat's continuous scaling of the value we deliver to the Life Sciences industry." - Dave O'Reilly, Chief Financial Officer of Kneat. Quarterly Conference Call Eddie Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of Kneat and Dave O' Reilly, Chief Financial Officer of Kneat, along with outgoing Chief Financial Officer, Hugh Kavanagh, will host a conference call to discuss Kneat's second-quarter results and hold a Q&A for analysts and investors via webcast on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. ET. Interested parties can register for the live webcast via the following link: Register Here. About Kneat Kneat Solutions provides leading companies in highly regulated industries with unparalleled efficiency in validation and compliance through its digital validation platform Kneat Gx. As an industry leader in customer satisfaction, Kneat boasts an excellent record for implementation, powered by our user-friendly design, expert support, and on-demand training academy. Kneat Gx is an industry-leading digital validation platform that enables highly regulated companies to manage any validation discipline from end-to-end. Kneat Gx is fully ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 certified, fully validated, and 21 CFR Part 11/Annex 11 compliant. Multiple independent customer studies show up to 40% reduction in documentation cycle times, up to 20% faster speed to market, and a higher compliance standard. For more information visit Supplementary and Non-IFRS Financial Measures The Company uses supplementary financial measures as key performance indicators in its MD&A and other communications. Management uses both IFRS measures and supplementary, non-IFRS financial measures as key performance indicators when planning, monitoring and evaluating the Company's performance. Annual Recurring Revenue ('ARR') Kneat management use ARR to evaluate and assess the Company's performance, identify trends affecting its business, formulate financial projections and make financial decisions. The Company believes that ARR is a useful metric for investors as it provides a measure of the value of the recurring revenue at a point in time (end date of the relevant quarter). ARR is based on signed agreements and indicates the level of recurring revenue that the Company would anticipate reporting in a 12-month period based on the full annual SaaS and maintenance fees for existing customers. In specific circumstances, the Company may utilize pricing incentives for limited contract periods. These incentives are not included in the calculation of ARR. ARR is used by Kneat to assess the expected recurring revenues from the customers that are live on the Kneat Gx platform at the end of the period. ARR is calculated using the licenses delivered to customers at the period end, multiplied by the expected customer retention rate of 100% and multiplied by the full agreed annual SaaS license or maintenance fee. Since many of the customer contracts are in currencies other than the Canadian dollar, the Canadian dollar equivalent is calculated using the related period end exchange rate multiplied by the contracted currency amount. Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ('EBITDA') EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) attributable to excluding interest income (expense), provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We provide and use this non-IFRS measure of our operating performance to highlight trends in our core business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on IFRS financial measures and to inform financial comparisons with other companies. A reconciliation of EBITDA to IFRS financial measures is provided in the financial statements accompanying this press release. Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ('Adjusted EBITDA') Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as net income (loss) attributable to excluding interest income (expense), provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, foreign exchange gain and stock-based compensation expense. We provide and use this non-IFRS measure of our operating performance to highlight trends in our core business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on IFRS financial measures and to inform financial comparisons with other companies. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to IFRS financial measures is provided in the financial statements accompanying this press release. Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements Except for the statements of historical fact contained herein, certain information presented constitutes 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Such forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, the relationship between Kneat and the customer, Kneat's business development activities, the use and implementation timelines of Kneat's software within the customer's validation processes, the ability and intent of the customer to scale the use of Kneat's software within the customer's organization, our ability to win business from new customers and expand business from existing customers, our expected use of the net proceeds from the IPF Facility and the public equity financing completed in both February and October 2024 and the anticipated effects thereof on the business and operations of the company, and the compliance of Kneat's platform under regulatory audit and inspection. These and other assumptions, risks and uncertainties may cause Kneat's actual results, performance, achievements and developments to differ materially from the results, performance, achievements or developments expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Material risks and uncertainties relating to our business are described under the headings 'Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Information' and 'Risk Factors' in our MD&A dated August 5, 2025, under the heading 'Risk Factors' in our Annual Information Form dated February 26, 2025 and in our other public documents filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities, which are available at Forward-looking statements are provided to help readers understand management's expectations as at the date of this release and may not be suitable for other purposes. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Kneat assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as expressly required by law. Investors should not assume that any lack of update to a previously issued forward-looking statement constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Continued reliance on forward-looking statements is at an investor's own risk. For further information: Katie Keita, Kneat Investor RelationsP: + 1-902-450-2660E: Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Income/(Loss) and Comprehensive Loss Three-monthperiod ended June 30, 2025 Three-monthperiod ended June 30, 2024 Six-monthperiod ended June 30, 2025 Six-monthperiod ended June 30, 2024 $ $ $ $ Revenue 15,405,109 11,675,734 30,152,750 22,442,735 Cost of revenue (3,777,809 ) (2,982,094 ) (7,600,954 ) (5,816,109 ) Gross profit 11,627,300 8,693,640 22,551,796 16,626,626 Expenses Research and development (5,702,497 ) (4,761,889 ) (10,401,162 ) (8,807,437 ) Sales and marketing (6,129,942 ) (4,368,485 ) (11,246,419 ) (8,400,169 ) General and administrative (3,792,405 ) (2,194,999 ) (6,304,034 ) (4,300,588 ) Operating loss (3,997,544 ) (2,631,733 ) (5,399,819 ) (4,881,568 ) Finance expense (877,545 ) (870,905 ) (1,766,090 ) (1,738,356 ) Interest income 151,053 172,999 349,692 208,075 Foreign exchange gain 4,429,193 258,049 8,691,793 19,286 (Loss) income before income taxes (294,843 ) (3,071,590 ) 1,875,576 (6,392,563 ) Income tax expense (84,299 ) (28,553 ) (108,729 ) (44,440 ) Net (loss) income for the period (379,142 ) (3,100,143 ) 1,766,847 (6,437,003 ) Other comprehensive loss Foreign currency translation adjustment to presentation currency (1,833,771 ) (234,170 ) (3,832,292 ) (43,276 ) Comprehensive loss for the period (2,212,913 ) (3,334,313 ) (2,065,445 ) (6,480,279 ) (Loss)/Earnings per share - Basic and diluted (0.00 ) (0.04 ) 0.02 (0.08 ) Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: Basic 94,728,598 85,581,420 94,469,559 83,293,224 Diluted 94,728,598 85,581,420 97,985,267 83,293,224 Reconciliation: Net (loss) income for the period (379,142 ) (3,100,143 ) 1,766,847 (6,437,003 ) Finance expense 877,545 870,905 1,766,090 1,738,356 Interest income (151,053 ) (172,999 ) (349,692 ) (208,075 ) Income tax expense 84,299 28,553 108,729 44,440 Depreciation charge 181,718 190,394 358,719 381,615 Amortization of intangible assets charge 3,155,635 2,688,851 6,002,381 4,523,062 EBITDA 3,769,002 505,561 9,653,074 42,395 Adjustments to EBITDA Foreign exchange gain (4,429,193 ) (258,049 ) (8,691,793 ) (19,286 ) Stock based compensation 1,090,175 1,338,990 1,787,193 2,151,163 Adjusted EBITDA 429,984 1,586,502 2,748,474 2,174,272 Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position June 30,2025 December 31, 2024 $ $ Assets Current assets Cash 66,771,997 58,889,572 Amounts receivable 11,176,423 18,377,009 Prepayments 1,861,908 1,870,095 79,810,328 79,136,676 Non-current assets Amounts receivable 4,798,361 2,368,006 Property and equipment 8,057,345 6,782,179 Intangible asset 41,999,419 36,290,869 Total Assets 134,665,453 124,577,730 Liabilities Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 11,071,328 8,580,104 Contract liabilities 26,550,906 21,631,416 Loan payable 6,012,075 4,116,723 Lease liabilities 401,739 434,096 44,036,048 34,762,339 Non-current liabilities Contract liabilities 3,063 33,393 Loan payable and accrued interest 17,338,181 19,038,203 Lease liabilities 6,911,364 5,671,952 Total Liabilities 68,288,656 59,505,887 Equity Shareholders' equity 66,376,797 65,071,843 Total Liabilities and Equity 134,665,453 124,577, Condensed Interim Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Six-monthperiod ended June 30, 2025 Six-monthperiod ended June 30, 2024 Operating activities $ $ Net income (loss) for the period 1,766,847 (6,437,003 ) Charges to income (loss) not involving cash: Depreciation of property and equipment 358,719 381,615 Share-based compensation 1,787,193 2,151,163 Interest expense 1,672,870 1,738,356 Tax expense 108,729 44,440 Amortization of the intangible asset 6,002,381 4,523,062 Amortization of loan issuance costs 93,220 76,194 Foreign exchange gain (8,691,793 ) (19,286 ) (Decrease)/increase in non-current contract liabilities (31,359 ) 38,241 Net change in non-cash operating working capital related to operations 12,481,190 7,533,596 Net cash provided by operating activities 15,547,997 10,030,378 Financing activities Proceeds received from public equity financing - 20,000,110 Share issuance costs associated with public equity financing - (1,626,257 ) Payment of principal and interest on loans payable (3,154,648 ) (1,232,889 ) Proceeds from the exercise of stock options 989,061 1,051,787 Repayment of lease liabilities (394,650 ) (364,423 ) Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (2,560,237 ) 17,828,328 Investing activities Additions to the intangible asset (10,599,886 ) (9,675,371 ) Additions to property and equipment (96,462 ) (50,397 ) Collection of research and development tax credits 1,887,789 2,336,619 Net cash used in investing activities (8,808,559 ) (7,389,149 ) Effects of exchange rates on cash 3,703,224 170,762 Net change in cash during the period 7,882,425 20,640,319 Cash – Beginning of period 58,889,572 15,252,526 Cash – End of period 66,771,997 35,892,845 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why Did God Favor France?
Why Did God Favor France?

New York Times

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Why Did God Favor France?

Scott Alexander, the noted rationalist blogger, has a feature where guest writers pen book reviews and essays for his site, and this week an anonymous writer reviewed the historical literature on Joan of Arc. The results resemble past encounters between skeptical authors (Mark Twain is a notable example) and the historical record around the Maid of Orleans: Her story is one of the most extensively documented cases of a miraculous-seeming intervention into secular history, calculated to baffle, fascinate and even charm like almost nothing else in Western history. Everything in the story sounds like a pious legend confabulated centuries after the fact. A peasant girl with zero political or military experience shows up at a royal court, announces a divine mission and makes a series of prophecies about what God wants for France that she consistently fulfills — a fulfillment that requires not merely some fortunate happenstance, but her taking command of a medieval army and winning an immediate series of victories over an intimidating adversary with Alexandrine or Napoleonic skill. Then after the mission is accomplished (with some miracles thrown in), some of the prophetic and military capacity seems to be withdrawn and she is captured and dies a martyr's death — but not before undergoing a religious trial with a bravura performance that likewise looks like the invention of a theologically trained novelist. And through it all she appears to be extraordinarily lovable, displaying piety and kindliness without any of the fanaticism or delusions of personal grandeur that normally shadow people who think they're supposed to take up arms on God's behalf. The review essay considers some of the more persuasive non-supernatural explanations for all these strange events. But the reviewer's strongest reaction is an understandable one, I think, for any reader who approaches the evidence with an open mind: I talk about 'God stretching down His hand to alter history,' and I'm really not sure I believe it happened, but Joan feels like a giant middle finger to all the people who talk about history being deterministic. Sometimes you get a Great Woman and then history does something really weird. I also kind of feel called out by God. 'So, you say you're a rationalist? You're dismissing all the historical evidence for miracles as insufficient? You won't consider the evidence for Jesus Christ persuasive due to a mere two eyewitness and five contemporary reports? You won't believe in anything without evidence more than sufficient to convince a court? Okay, have 115 witnesses to miracles that nobody could avoid recording because they altered the course of European history. Now, what were you saying about how you're not a Christian because you're a rationalist?' But if Joan challenges skeptics to explain how a career like hers could be possible without supernatural aid, she also challenges Christians and her other religiously inclined fans to explain why, exactly, God sent her to save France. Indeed, the best skeptic's argument probably rests there: not in trying to deny the miraculous-seeming record, but in challenging the believer to explain why God wanted or needed these specific events to happen. Assume, for the sake of argument, that some version of the Catholic theory of miracles is correct. In that case history seems to yield three broad categories of supernatural happenings. First, the 'big miracles' of the Old and New Testaments, associated with major events in the history of God's plan for humanity, from the crossing of the Red Sea to the Resurrection. Second, the signs and wonders associated with the special holiness of specific saints — healings, visions, stigmata, the remarkably well-documented Reformation-era levitations discussed in Carlos Eire's recent book, 'They Flew: A History of the Impossible.' Finally, the miracles and signs and supernatural encounters that happen on a personal level, to ordinary people, as answers to their prayers rather than as manifestations of their sanctity. The story of Joan of Arc doesn't fit neatly into any of these categories. The strange events of her life are clearly more than just a personal sign of God's presence, since all of France is implicated in the drama. They're also clearly more than just a manifestation of her holiness, since the effect isn't just to convert people in her orbit to a deeper Christian faith; it's also to change the outcome of a major war. But was that military outcome, then, somehow a major event in God's unfolding plan? One analogue to Joan's career might be the stories in the Old Testament where God takes an active part in Israel's military conflicts; another might be Constantine's vision at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge that supposedly inspired his conversion to Christianity. But in those cases the alleged divine help was being supplied for an obvious spiritual purpose — the survival of God's chosen people, the conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity. Whereas in Joan's case, the divine help turned the tide in a war where both sides were Christian and Roman Catholic, and where the resolution had no major religious consequences. It was a dynastic triumph for the French kings and a national triumph for their people, but it's not obvious how it was a spiritual one. So why did God raise up a saint to save the French from defeat? No theory seems all that satisfying, but let's consider a few candidates. Because God showed mercy on the French people. A hundred years of war is a lot of war. Undoubtedly a lot of people were praying for relief, and maybe Joan was just the divinely anointed answer to their prayer. Why didn't God send a similar figure to expedite the Thirty Years' War or World War I or any other mass-casualty disaster in human history? Well, maybe he did send saints in some of those cases and people didn't listen to them. (Joan's miraculous career did require a lot of political cooperation.) Or maybe it's just the usual divine inscrutability: Just as most sick people who pray for help don't receive miraculous healing but some people do, most wars don't end by divine fiat but once in a while (once in 2,000 years?) God puts an obvious finger on the scale. Because God wanted to teach Christians what a just war looks like. There is no Joan of Arc figure in Christendom's wars of conquest, no miraculous figure who made the difference in the First Crusade or the Spanish Reconquista or the conquest of the Americas. (The story of Our Lady of Guadalupe involves the divine manifesting itself to the conquered, not to the conquistadores.) Instead, a martial and miraculous saint shows up only in a situation where she's ending a foreign occupation and vindicating a beleaguered nation against an invader. So the fact that she does appear, armed and militant, suggests that maybe God was teaching a lesson in just war theory — giving the faithful a clear example of a saint-soldier to prove the pacifists wrong, while making sure that her example can be legitimately invoked only in wars waged in self-defense. Because the Reformation was coming and it was necessary that France remain Catholic. In the timeline where Joan doesn't appear and the Hundred Years' War ends with England retaining a strong hold on France, maybe the English Reformation still happens, France as well as England flips to Protestantism, and suddenly you have a Protestant Anglo-French bloc with command of the seas and soon the world. In which case you could suggest that Joan was necessary either because of specific divine protection for Catholicism or, more subtly, because it was important that neither Catholicism nor Protestantism win a final victory in the 17th century, given each side's un-Christian crimes against the other. Because modernity was coming and it was necessary that France and England exist as rivals and competing poles. This is essentially an extension of the last argument, in which an Anglo-French balance of power, a persistent dualism between London and Paris, is essential not just to balance Protestants and Catholics but also for the healthy development of the entire modern world. How? Well, maybe by preventing not just one but a whole series of undesirable outcomes: the total victory of one side in the Reformation, the total victory of just one version of the Enlightenment, the total victory of 20th century totalitarianism, even the total victory of the American empire or the total victory of the European Union — who can say? And since the French part of that story isn't finished yet, the last possibility remains open as well: Because God loves the French in a special way, and they have a cosmic destiny that still waits to be fulfilled. C'est certainement possible! Breviary Matthew Milliner on Jungians and Christians. Robert Bellafiore on capitalism and its undertakers. Nina Power on the religion of William Blake. Adam Ozimek reviews a century of American automaking. U.S.A.I.D.'s former chief economist on fixing foreign aid. Ingrid Rowland on the painter of the serene republic.

Cboe Global Markets Reports Trading Volume for July 2025
Cboe Global Markets Reports Trading Volume for July 2025

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cboe Global Markets Reports Trading Volume for July 2025

CHICAGO, Aug. 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (Cboe: CBOE), the world's leading derivatives and securities exchange network, today reported July monthly trading volume statistics across its global business lines. The data sheet "Cboe Global Markets Monthly Volume & RPC/Net Revenue Capture Report" contains an overview of certain July trading statistics and market share by business segment, volume in select index products, and RPC/net capture, which is reported on a one-month lag, across business lines. Average Daily Trading Volume (ADV) by Month Year-To-Date Jul 2025 Jul 2024 % Chg Jun 2025 % Chg Jul 2025 Jul 2024 % Chg Multiply-listed options (contracts, k) 12,215 11,145 9.6 % 11,836 3.2 % 12,886 10,642 21.1 % Index options (contracts, k) 4,469 4,140 8.0 % 4,639 -3.7 % 4,688 4,065 15.3 % Futures (contracts, k)1 178 267 -33.3 % 185 -3.8 % 226 242 -6.3 % U.S. Equities - On-Exchange (matched shares, mn) 1,790 1,280 39.9 % 1,780 0.6 % 1,785 1,404 27.2 % U.S. Equities - Off-Exchange (matched shares, mn) 141 76 84.8 % 123 14.4 % 113 78 45.2 % Canadian Equities (matched shares, k) 150,096 122,608 22.4 % 146,058 2.8 % 154,298 144,633 6.7 % European Equities (€, mn) 12,490 9,229 35.3 % 11,811 5.7 % 13,560 9,665 40.3 % Cboe Clear Europe Cleared Trades (k) 122,973 105,831 16.2 % 110,623 11.2 % 935,981 699,176 33.9 % Cboe Clear Europe Net Settlements (k) 1,236 1,022 20.9 % 1,090 13.4 % 7,726 6,311 22.4 % Australian Equities (AUD, mn) 870 771 12.8 % 951 -8.5 % 884 764 15.7 % Global FX ($, mn) 48,514 45,586 6.4 % 51,222 -5.3 % 53,135 46,340 14.7 % 1 In the second quarter of 2025, Digital futures products were transitioned to Cboe Futures Exchange. Futures metrics prior to the second quarter of 2025 exclude Digital futures products. July 2025 Trading Volume Highlights U.S. Options Cboe's S&P 500 Index (SPX) and Mini-SPX Index (XSP) options set monthly volume records in zero-days-to-expiry (0DTE) trading, with 0DTE ADVs of 2.2 million and 60 thousand contracts, respectively. SPX options recorded its third most active trading day of all time on July 31 with 4.8 million contracts traded. European Equities Cboe Europe Equities hit record market shares in July for both overall trading (26.6%) and continuous trading (34.7%). About Cboe Global MarketsCboe Global Markets (Cboe: CBOE), the world's leading derivatives and securities exchange network, delivers cutting-edge trading, clearing and investment solutions to people around the world. Cboe provides trading solutions and products in multiple asset classes, including equities, derivatives and FX across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. Above all, we are committed to building a trusted, inclusive global marketplace that enables people to pursue a sustainable financial future. To learn more about the Exchange for the World Stage, visit Cboe Media ContactsCboe Analyst Contact Angela Tu Tim CaveKenneth Hill, CFA +1-917-985-1496 +44 (0) 7593-506-719+1-312-786-7559 atu@ tcave@ CBOE-V Cboe®, Cboe Global Markets®, Cboe Volatility Index®, and VIX® are registered trademarks of Cboe Exchange, Inc. or its affiliates. Standard & Poor's®, S&P®, SPX®, and S&P 500® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC, and have been licensed for use by Cboe Exchange, Inc. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. Any products that have the S&P Index or Indexes as their underlying interest are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Standard & Poor's or Cboe and neither Standard & Poor's nor Cboe make any representations or recommendations concerning the advisability of investing in products that have S&P indexes as their underlying interests. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and its affiliates do not recommend or make any representation as to possible benefits from any securities, futures or investments, or third-party products or services. Cboe Global Markets, Inc. is not affiliated with S&P. Investors should undertake their own due diligence regarding their securities, futures, and investment practices. This press release speaks only as of this date. Cboe Global Markets, Inc. disclaims any duty to update the information herein. Nothing in this announcement should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell any securities or futures in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the laws of such jurisdiction. Nothing contained in this communication constitutes tax, legal or investment advice. Investors must consult their tax adviser or legal counsel for advice and information concerning their particular situation. Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and its affiliates make no warranty, expressed or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties as of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, completeness or timeliness, the results to be obtained by recipients of the products and services described herein, or as to the ability of the indices referenced in this press release to track the performance of their respective securities, generally, or the performance of the indices referenced in this press release or any subset of their respective securities, and shall not in any way be liable for any inaccuracies, errors. Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and its affiliates have not calculated, composed or determined the constituents or weightings of the securities that comprise the third-party indices referenced in this press release and shall not in any way be liable for any inaccuracies or errors in any of the indices referenced in this press release. There are important risks associated with transacting in any of the Cboe Company products discussed here. Before engaging in any transactions in those products, it is important for market participants to carefully review the disclosures and disclaimers contained at: Options involve risk and are not suitable for all market participants. Prior to buying or selling an option, a person should review the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options (ODD), which is required to be provided to all such persons. Copies of the ODD are available from your broker or from The Options Clearing Corporation, 125 S. Franklin Street, Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60606. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store