
Is Perrier as pure as it claims? The bottled water scandal gripping France
"This really is our Water-gate," says Stéphane Mandard, who has led investigations at Le Monde newspaper. "It's a combination of industrial fraud and state collusion.""And now there is a real Sword of Damocles hanging over the head of Perrier."According to hydrologist Emma Haziza, "the commercial model of the big producers has worked very well. But it is absolutely not sustainable at a time of global climate change"."When you have big brands that feel they have no choice but to treat their water – that means they know there is a problem with the quality."
The story hit the headlines a year ago in France after an investigation by Le Monde and Radio France revealed that at least a third of mineral water sold in France had been illegally treated, either with ultra-violet light, carbon filters or ultra-fine micro-meshes commonly used to screen out bacteria.The issue was not one of public health. The treated water was by definition safe to drink.The problem was that under EU law, "natural mineral water" – which sells at a huge premium over tap water – is supposed to be unaltered between the underground source and the bottle. That is the whole point of it.If brands like Evian, Vichy and Perrier have been so successful in France and around the world, it is thanks to an appealing image of mountain-sides, rushing streams, purity and health-giving minerals.Admit filtering the water, and the industry risks breaking the market spell. Consumers might begin to ask what they'd been paying for.Complicating matters for Perrier and its parent company Nestlé – as well as President Emmanuel Macron's government – is the charge that executives and ministers conspired to keep the affair quiet, covered up reports of contamination, and re-wrote the rules so that Perrier could continue using micro-filtration.In their investigations, Le Monde and Radio France alleged that the government considered the mineral water industry so strategic that it agreed to suppress damaging information. A senate inquiry into the affair accused the government of a "deliberate strategy" of "dissimulation".Responding to the allegations, the government has asked the European Commission to rule on what level of micro-filtration is permissible for "natural mineral water". Aurelien Rousseau, who was head of Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne's cabinet at the time, admitted there had been an "error of appreciation" but insisted there was never any risk to public health.
Earlier this year, at the senate hearing into the industry, Nestlé's CEO Laurent Freixe admitted that Perrier had indeed used illicit methods to treat its water.But he also had another admission: that an official hydrologists' report into the company's historic site in the Gard department in southern France had recommended against renewing "natural mineral water" status for the company's output.It raises the possibility that for the first time in its 160-year history, Perrier water may soon not be labelled as what people assume it to be.According to the hydrologist Emma Haziza, "the link to climate change and global warming is absolutely established". And if Perrier is feeling the impact ahead of other companies, it is probably because its geographical location sets it apart.Far from the remote mountain landscape you might imagine, Perrier's water is pumped from deep aquifers in the coastal plain between Nîmes and Montpellier, a short drive from the Mediterranean. The area is populous, heavily-farmed, and very hot."There has been a big climatic shift since 2017," says Haziza. "For five years there was a succession of droughts, which were particularly badly felt in the south."
"All the aquifers were affected. This means not just the upper water-table, which is where everyday tap water comes from. We can now see that the deeper aquifers – which the companies thought were protected – are also being hit."The unforeseen is taking place. We are moving from a period in which companies could draw water from the deep aquifers and be sure they would be replenished, to a period in which it's obvious the whole system cannot go on."The analysis made by Haziza and other hydrologists is that there is now a clear link between deeper and surface aquifers. Contaminants (farm chemicals or human waste) that drain off the land in the increasingly frequent flash floods, can now make their way into the lower aquifers.At the same time, the effects of long-term drought and over-pumping mean these lower aquifers contain less volume, so any contamination will be more concentrated, the experts say."We can foresee that what has happened first at Perrier's site will happen to other producers in the years to come. That's why we need to move away from our current model of consumption," says Haziza.
Last year at the Perrier site, three million bottles had to be destroyed because of a contamination. But the company insists that any problems are swiftly detected; and it disputes the claim that contaminants are entering the deep aquifers."We are pumping water from 130 metres underground, beneath layers of limestone," says Perrier hydrologist Jérémie Pralong. "We are 100% convinced of the purity of the water. And its mineral make-up is constant."Perrier says there is no EU ruling that specifically bans micro-filtration. The relevant text simply says that nothing must be done to disinfect or alter the mineral make-up of the water. The argument is over at what measure of micro-filtration alteration begins.The original Perrier source was first tapped by a local doctor in the 1860s, but it was under British management that the brand took off 50 years later.St John Harmsworth – brother of newspaper magnates Lords Northcliffe and Rothermere – made Perrier a byword for mineral water across the British empire.According to company lore, Harmsworth took inspiration for the bottles' bulbous shape from the Indian clubs he used for exercise following a crippling car accident.Today the bottling plant at Vergèze is still next to Harmsworth's residence and the original source. The plant has been heavily automated. A rail track connects with the SNCF network to bring hundreds of millions of cans and bottles every year to Marseille for export.
The focus for the last year has been on a new brand: Maison Perrier. These energy and flavoured drinks are proving highly successful in France and around the world.The advantage for Perrier is that the new beverages do not claim to be "natural mineral water". They can be treated and filtered without difficulty.Perrier says the new brand is part of the mix, and that it has no intention of abandoning its original Source Perrier natural mineral water. It has stopped the ultra-fine (0.2 micron) microfiltration, and now uses a 0.45 micron system which has been agreed with government.It has applied for "natural mineral water" status for just two out of the five drilling wells it was using for Perrier mineral water. A decision is due later this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Welsh Rugby Union set to confirm radical club plans as part of restructure of the game
The Welsh Rugby Union is set to propose reducing the number of Wales' professional clubs from four to two as part of radical plans to restructure the country's national game. Chief executive Abi Tierney, chairman Richard Collier-Keywood and director of rugby Dave Reddin are set to officially confirm the news on Wednesday. However, they will not be finalised as definite because a six-week consultation period will then follow where the WRU will seek the opinions of the Welsh game's stakeholders. Dragons, Cardiff, Ospreys and Scarlets are Wales' domestic sides as things stand. But at least two of those organisations will be at risk moving forward with any halving of teams set to officially come into operation for the 2026/27 season. Cutting from four to two is one of a number of different options being considered by the WRU but the governing body's preferred direction of travel. It remains unclear at this stage whether the two sides the WRU wants to have moving forward will be teams which already exist or new entities altogether. Either way, the plans represent the most seismic moment in Welsh rugby history since Wales moved from a club-based system to what were initially five regions in 2003. The WRU is doing so in reaction to more than two years of struggles in which their men's national side lost 18 straight Test matches. Wales' four current clubs have also struggled to compete for success in the United Rugby Championship and in Europe. In the coming years, the WRU plans for its two teams to have squads of 50 players apiece and have annual playing budgets of £7.8million. It is hoped that will improve their chances of domestic trophies. In time, the WRU also plans to build a new national centre of excellence at which their two domestic sides will be based. Both will also have a women's counterpart. However, the introduction of such plans is unlikely to be straightforward. The WRU owns Cardiff after it fell into administration earlier this year, but the other three teams are all independent businesses and are likely to launch legal action if they're put at risk. The URC is looking at the option of replacing the loss of Welsh sides by adding two teams from the USA to its cross-border competition.


Times
27 minutes ago
- Times
Is a pub's service charge on beer at the bar a rip-off?
The pint is ordered. The tap handle is pulled down firmly, from completely closed to completely open. Having pulled several thousand of these things myself, once upon a time, I can see it's a textbook start, and it only improves. The glass is held at 45 degrees and raised high against the tap, limiting, but not entirely restricting the drop height of the liquid. Then, as the level rises, the angle is slowly opened and the glass is lowered, ensuring consistency of drop height all the way through the pour, agitating the carbon dioxide within to the optimum level required for a solid 2cm of foamy head. It's perfect. I mean, it's not very hard. Anyone can master it in about five minutes, as I once did, aged 18. But it's still perfect. It's only at this point that things get a bit lively. Drinkers at the Well & Boot in London's Waterloo station, with its panoramic view over surely the nation's single ugliest concourse, must now ask themselves a difficult question. Was that short moment of perfection worth an extra 31p? Or does the existing £7.65 for the pint itself adequately cover the act of pouring it out? The reason they must ask it themselves is because no one else is going to. The pint they've just ordered is about to have a 4 per cent service charge added to it, even though it's been ordered at the bar and paid for at the bar. It won't, in fairness, be drunk at the bar, as there is no bar to speak of, not one with seats anyway, or an actual bar top, and that's the real scandal here, which we'll get on to shortly. The Well & Boot has hit the headlines over the past 48 hours, for its not-so-obvious 4 per cent service charge on drinks at the bar. Two days of newspaper coverage have not been sufficient to compel the bar staff to mention it. It's in the small print on the bottom of the menu, but who looks at that? It's on the receipt if you happen to ask for one, but who gets a receipt for a pint of beer (apart from journalists, obviously)? When you see it printed out and written down, it's a bit irksome. If, back in the year 2000, I'd been paid 31p for every pint I'd poured, I'd have ended the Friday night shift with several hundred quid to show for it, not £15.85 and, I realise now, severe PTSD from over-exposure to Dancing In The Moonlight by Toploader. • 9 of the best pubs in London — chosen by our beer expert The Well & Boot is banking on customers not noticing the difference between £7.65 for a pint of beer and £7.96 for a pint of beer, and it's a safe bet. Once you've paid £7.65 for a pint your subconscious is already doing everything it can to suppress the pain, just to allow you to enjoy it. You can, if you like, ask for it to be removed, and, having done the job myself, I simply couldn't face hassling a bar worker to go through the necessary rigmarole on the till just to do themselves out of 31p. Is it a rip-off? I don't know. Pint number two — all in the name of research, obviously, was a Guinness — and that one was brought to the table, at which point a 4 per cent charge for table service is quite good value. All the other customers were having a lunchtime meal, ordered and brought to the table, so 4 per cent for that sort of service is extremely cheap. What really irks is that it is a calculated effort to strip out the entire purpose of tipping culture. Having lived in New York for a bit, I am a passionate believer in tipping culture, which British holidaymakers to the United States rarely understand. There, it is routine to hand over a dollar bill for every drink (an amount which has not gone up in at least 20 years, even while the cost of the drink itself has doubled). But — and here comes the whole point — should you stay for four or five drinks, you are likely to receive a drink on the house in return for your generosity, which has cost you in tips a lot less than the cost of the drink itself. It is a virtuous circle of conviviality. Decent wages for service workers in return for cheap drinks for loyal punters, the purposeful nurturing of a good atmosphere, and all of it done off the books. A few dollars are handed over in cash, a bit of liquid goes missing, no need to worry about the spreadsheets or the taxman. Proper tipping culture is the same double victory as paying the plumber in cash, except there's also booze involved. • Pubs must wake up and smell the coffee: morning money is the future It doesn't work if it's all done on card (the Well & Boot does not take cash), and it certainly doesn't work if it's done in secret. Of course, what's actually going on here is yet another case of long pub Covid. Pubs with no discernible bar, where you shout over the taps and then are cajoled into having your drinks brought to a table you haven't even found yet. Where people still order and pay over app, or queue in single file, and no one truly understands what the point of it all is. At least, I think that's what's going on here. I might be wrong. Perhaps if I'd racked up £7.65's worth of 31p tips, my 25th pint would have been on the house. I might, however, have missed my train.


BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Actor son of 'murder-suicide' victim issues stepdad funeral plea
An actor whose mother was the victim of a murder-suicide in France has urged her friends not to attend his stepdad's Kerr, who appeared in Hollyoaks and Netflix's Virgin River, said it would be "inappropriate" for the memory of his mother, Dawn Searle, to be associated with her husband Andrew couple's bodies were discovered by a neighbour at their country home in the Aveyron region on 6 prosecutor in charge of the case previously told the BBC it was murder followed by suicide and there was no evidence that another person was involved. The statement, issued on Kerr's Instagram account on behalf of the actor and his sister Amanda, comes more than six months after the couple were found is unclear why it has taken so long for Mr Searle's body to be released or when his funeral is scheduled to take place. Mr Kerr, who is also a country singer in the US, and his sister said that while the investigation into the deaths was ongoing they "cannot ignore the circumstances as they stand".The statement continued: "For this reason, we must respectfully but firmly request that our mother not be included in any way in the funeral arrangements being made for Andrew."They urged friends of their mother's not to attend the ceremony and asked people not to share photographs of Mr and Mrs Searle statement concluded: "It would be inappropriate for her memory to be associated with a service honouring the man who, based on all available evidence, may have been responsible for her death. "We ask for understanding, privacy and respect as we continue to grieve and seek justice for our mum." Mrs Searle's body was found in the garden of the couple's property in the hamlet of Les Pesquiès, with severe wounds to her Searle's body was found inside their home, about an hour north of were alerted to the incident by a neighbour who had gone to check on them when they failed to turn up for a planned dog examinations confirmed Mrs Searle suffered "multiple blows to the head with a blunt and sharp-edged object" while Mr Searle died from Searle, 56, grew up in Eyemouth in the Scottish Borders, and Mr Searle, 62, was originally from previously lived in Musselburgh, near Edinburgh, and married in France in said they had lived in the Aveyron region for five to his LinkedIn page, Mr Searle previously worked in financial crime prevention at companies including Standard Life and Barclays Bank.