
Huge planet discovered orbiting tiny star puzzles scientists
PARIS: Astronomers announced Wednesday they have discovered a massive planet orbiting a tiny star, a bizarre pairing that has stumped scientists.
Most of the stars across the Milky Way are small red dwarfs like TOI-6894, which has only 20 percent the mass of our Sun.
It had not been thought possible that such puny, weak stars could provide the conditions needed to form and host huge planets.
But an international team of astronomers have detected the unmistakable signature of a gas giant planet orbiting the undersized TOI-6894, according to a study in the journal Nature Astronomy.
This makes the star the smallest star yet known to host a gas giant.
The planet has a slightly larger radius than Saturn, but only half its mass. It orbits its star in a little over three days.
The astronomers discovered the planet when searching through more than 91,000 low-mass red dwarfs observed by NASA's TESS space telescope.
Its existence was then confirmed by ground-based telescopes, including Chile's Very Large Telescope.
'The fact that this star hosts a giant planet has big implications for the total number of giant planets we estimate exist in our galaxy,' study co-author Daniel Bayliss of the UK's Warwick University said in a statement.
Another co-author, Vincent Van Eylen, of University College London, said it was an 'intriguing discovery'.
'We don't really understand how a star with so little mass can form such a massive planet!' he said.
'This is one of the goals of the search for more exoplanets. By finding planetary systems different from our solar system, we can test our models and better understand how our own solar system formed.'
- How do you make a planet? -
The most prominent theory for how planets form is called core accretion.
The process begins when a ring of gas and dust -- called a protoplanetary disc -- which surrounds a newly formed star builds up into a planetary core. This core attracts more gas that forms an atmosphere, eventually snowballing into a gas giant.
Under this theory, it is difficult for low-mass stars to host giant planets because there is not enough gas and dust to begin building a core in the first place.
A rival theory proposes that these planets instead form when their protoplanetary disc becomes gravitationally unstable and breaks up, with the collapsing gas and dust forming a planet.
However neither theory seems to explain the existence of the newly discovered planet, TOI-6894b, the researchers said.
The planet also interests scientists because it is strangely cold.
Most of the gas giants discovered outside our Solar System so far have been what are known as 'hot Jupiters', where temperatures soar well over 1,000 degrees Celsius.
But the newly discovered planet appears to be under 150C, the researchers said.
'Temperatures are low enough that atmospheric observations could even show us ammonia, which would be the first time it is found in an exoplanet atmosphere,' said study co-author Amaury Triaud of Birmingham University.
The James Webb space telescope is scheduled to turn its powerful gaze towards the planet in the next year, which could help uncover some more mysteries of this strange planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars
WASHINGTON, June 6 — A crewed mission to Mars would rank among the most complex and costly undertakings in human history—and US President Donald Trump has vowed to make it a national priority. That political momentum, coupled with SpaceX chief Elon Musk's zeal, has breathed new life into a cause long championed by Red Planet advocates—even as major obstacles remain, including Trump and Musk's latest feud. Why go? As Nasa writes in its Moon to Mars blueprint, 'exploration of the cosmos remains a great calling for humanity.' A mission to Mars would pursue scientific objectives like determining whether Mars ever hosted life and charting the evolution of its surface, as well as answering broader space physics questions—such as the history of the Sun through studying Martian soil. Geopolitics also looms large, as Trump has pledged to 'plant the American flag on the planet Mars and even far beyond,' invoking the 'unlimited promise of the American dream.' Critics, however, say cuts to Nasa's science budget and the cancellation of key projects—including the return of rock samples collected by the Perseverance rover—are undermining the research mission. 'The purpose of exploration is not just to go somewhere,' Nobel-winning astrophysicist John Mather told AFP. 'This is not a tourist thing. This is a fundamental knowledge thing.' Getting there Musk is betting SpaceX's future on Starship, the largest rocket ever built, despite fiery failures in its nine test flights. He's aiming for an uncrewed launch by late 2026, timed with the next favorable Earth-Mars alignment. But the timeline is widely seen as optimistic: Starship has yet to land its upper stage or demonstrate in-orbit refueling—both essential for deep space travel. Some experts believe the system is fundamentally sound, while others say it's too soon to judge. 'A lot of the pertinent and relevant technical information... is not known to us,' Kurt Polzin, chief engineer for Nasa's space nuclear propulsion project, told AFP. He backs Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP), which uses fission to heat hydrogen and generate thrust. NTP delivers 'a lot of power in a very small package,' Polzin said, eliminating the need for orbital refueling or fuel production on Mars. Astronauts would spend seven to nine months in a cramped spacecraft, exposed to intense space radiation beyond Earth's magnetosphere. Ideas to improve radiation shielding range from passive methods, like using dense materials, to active concepts such as plasma fields that deflect radiation, while drugs are being developed to reduce cell damage. Without a system to simulate gravity—such as rotational spin—crews would also need grueling exercise routines to counteract muscle and bone loss. Mental health is another concern. Growing plants aboard—more for morale than sustenance—has proved beneficial on the ISS. Communication delays further complicate matters. On the station, real-time data has helped prevent an average of 1.7 potentially fatal incidents per year, said Erik Antonsen, chair of NASA's human systems risk board—but such communication will not be possible en route to Mars. Life on Mars Once on the surface, the uncertainties grow. Probes and rovers have found hints—organic molecules, seasonal methane—but no definitive signs of life. If it ever existed, it likely died out long ago. Still, Earth's own 'extremophiles' offer intriguing clues—from fungi that harness Chernobyl's radiation for energy, to microbes that survived 500,000 years in frozen stasis. 'If they can survive here in extreme environments, we have every reason to suspect they can be on Mars,' said NASA astrobiologist Jennifer Eigenbrode at the recent Humans to the Moon and Mars Summit. And while NASA has decided nuclear fission will power surface operations, other choices—from crop selection to habitat design—remain open. 'Mars has a 24-hour, 39-minute day—that small difference creates strain, increases stress, and reduces sleep quality,' said Phnam Bagley, a space architect who designs for comfort and crew well-being—critical factors in preventing conflict. The first trip would be around 500 days on the surface, but long-term colonization raises deeper questions. For instance, scientists don't yet know whether mammalian embryos can develop in low gravity—or what childbirth on Mars would entail. 'I think it's really important to take that seriously,' said NASA's Antonsen. 'Even if you don't plan on it happening, people are still going to have sex, and somebody might get pregnant. Then it becomes a medical issue.' — AFP


Borneo Post
15 hours ago
- Borneo Post
In row with Trump, Musk says will end critical US spaceship programme
Trump and Musk's nearly year-long political alliance imploded in spectacular fashion, with the two trading public insults on social media. – AFP photo WASHINGTON (June 6): SpaceX chief Elon Musk said Thursday he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft — vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station — after US President Donald Trump threatened to terminate his government contracts. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk wrote on X. The comments — which the mercurial billionaire later appeared to walk back — came after Trump and Musk's nearly year-long political alliance imploded in spectacular fashion, with the two trading public insults on social media. SpaceX's Crew Dragon — a gumdrop-shaped capsule that flies atop a Falcon 9 rocket and splashes down in the ocean — is currently the only US spacecraft certified to carry crew to the ISS under a contract worth more than $4.9 billion. A variant, Cargo Dragon, delivers supplies, as the name suggests. Following Musk's announcement, NASA spokeswoman Bethany Stevens said on X that the government space agency would 'continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space.' 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met,' she said. NASA had hoped to certify Boeing's Starliner for crewed missions, but that program has faced severe delays. Its most recent test flight last year ended in failure after the spacecraft experienced propulsion issues en route to the orbital lab with its first astronaut crew. The Starliner ultimately returned to Earth empty, while the two astronauts were brought home by SpaceX earlier this year. Crew Dragon's certification in 2020 ended nearly a decade of US reliance on Russian Soyuz rockets to transport astronauts following the retirement of the Space Shuttle program in 2011. American astronauts still fly aboard Soyuz rockets, while Russian cosmonauts ride on Crew Dragons under a longstanding seat-swap agreement. In addition to NASA missions, Crew Dragon also flies private missions — most recently Fram2, which carried tourists over the Earth's poles. The next scheduled crew launch is Tuesday's Axiom-4 mission, which will see a Crew Dragon transport astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary to the ISS. – AFP donald trump Dragon spacecraft elon musk SpaceX


New Straits Times
16 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Musk-Trump breakup puts billions in SpaceX contracts at risk
WASHINGTON: About US$22 billion worth of SpaceX's government contracts is at risk and multiple US space programmes could face dramatic changes in the fallout of Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's explosive feud on Thursday. The disagreement, rooted in Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation that began last week, quickly spiraled out of control. Trump lashed out at Musk when the president spoke in the Oval Office. Then in a series of X posts, Musk launched barbs at Trump, who threatened to terminate government contracts with Musk's companies. Taking the threat seriously, Musk said he would begin "decommissioning" SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA. Under a roughly US$5 billion contract, the craft has been the agency's only US vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the US space programme. The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government. If the president prioritised political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars worth of SpaceX contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, it could slow US space progress. NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: "We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." Musk and Trump's tussle ruptured an unprecedented relationship between a US president and industry titan that had yielded some key favors for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of NASA's moon programme into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defense shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favoured SpaceX in a contract award. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. NASA uses Russia's Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS. SPACEX'S RISE SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. "It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities," said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. Under Trump in recent months, the U.S. space industry and NASA's workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programmes, while the US space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Trump's nominee for NASA administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk's rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency. Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was "totally Democrat." Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from NASA's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions. But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least US$1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power. SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won US$15 billion worth of contracts from NASA for the company's Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX's Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land NASA astronauts on the moon this decade. The company has also won billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon's national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a U.S. intelligence agency. In addition to not being in US interests, former NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said canceling SpaceX's contracts would probably not be legal.