logo
FUN Investors Have Opportunity to Join Six Flags Entertainment Corporation Fraud Investigation With the Schall Law Firm

FUN Investors Have Opportunity to Join Six Flags Entertainment Corporation Fraud Investigation With the Schall Law Firm

Globe and Mail14 hours ago
The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Six Flags Entertainment Corporation ('Six Flags' or 'the Company') (NYSE: FUN) for violations of the securities laws.
The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. Six Flags announced its Q2 2025 financial results on August 6, 2025. The Company swung from a profit to a $100 million dollar loss for the quarter, and cut its full year guidance. The Company blamed bad weather for the downturn but also indicated lower sales of season passes contributed to poor results. Finally, the Company's CEO will step down at the end of the year.
If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.
We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at bschall@schallfirm.com.
The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air Canada to restart flights Sunday after Ottawa intervenes in strike
Air Canada to restart flights Sunday after Ottawa intervenes in strike

Global News

time27 minutes ago

  • Global News

Air Canada to restart flights Sunday after Ottawa intervenes in strike

Air Canada says it plans to resume flights today after the federal government stepped in and ordered binding arbitration to end a flight attendants' strike Saturday. The Montreal-based airline says the first flights will resume this evening, but that it will take several days before its operations return to normal. Air Canada says it has been directed by the Canada Industrial Relations Board to resume operations and have flight attendants continue their duties by 2 p.m. ET. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The federal government ordered the airline and its flight attendants back to work Saturday, ending a strike and lockout after less than 12 hours. The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the flight attendants, has accused federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu of caving to Air Canada's demands. The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, announced its members were heading to the picket lines after being unable to reach an eleventh-hour deal with the airline, while Air Canada locked out its agents about 30 minutes later due to the strike action.

Christine Van Geyn: Letting safety override freedom makes us all 'pre-criminals'
Christine Van Geyn: Letting safety override freedom makes us all 'pre-criminals'

National Post

time2 hours ago

  • National Post

Christine Van Geyn: Letting safety override freedom makes us all 'pre-criminals'

In Steven Spielberg's Minority Report, set in 2054, crime has been eliminated thanks to psychics who predict wrongdoing before it happens. 'Pre-criminals' are arrested for 'Pre-crimes' they haven't committed. But the visions are flawed and open to manipulation. The dark side of 'pre-crime' is totalitarianism disguised as public safety. The film is a timeless warning about the tension between liberty and security. Article content Article content That warning is increasingly relevant. In recent years, governments and institutions have embraced what's been called safetyism: the belief that safety, especially from physical or emotional harm, should override all other values, including freedom, autonomy and open debate. When safety becomes the highest good, risk becomes intolerable, state control is normalized 'for your own good,' and dissent is cast as dangerous. Article content Article content Consider the uproar over American Christian worship singer Sean Feucht's performances in Canada. Several cities cancelled or denied his permits under the guise of ' health and safety,' not just physical safety, but protecting people from ideas or language they might find upsetting. Article content Or take Nova Scotia's sweeping ban on all forest activity this summer without a permit, accompanied by $25,000 fines (plus tax and a victim's surcharge). Concerned about fire risk, the provincial government issued a proclamation under the Forests Act to prohibit far more than what is needed to prevent fires, including fishing from barren rock, walking a dog on a trail, or having a picnic. Its reasoning: anyone in the woods might do something dangerous, like lighting a campfire or committing arson. Article content Punishing people who violate burn bans is reasonable. Treating every nature lover as a potential criminal is Minority Report logic, incompatible with a free society. Some defenders of the forest lockdown have even argued that hikers could cause fires by dropping water bottles that might, in a remote theoretical scenario, focus sunlight like a magnifying glass. By that standard, we could justify banning almost anything: driving, swimming, or stepping outside. Such fears say more about an individual's risk tolerance than actual danger. Article content Article content This 'safety above all else' mindset has been used repeatedly to justify government overreach. It was cited in 2022 to invoke the Emergencies Act against the non-violent Freedom Convoy protests. It underpinned the Trudeau government's decision to list all plastic manufactured items, from straws and bags to hard hats and medical equipment, as 'toxic' under federal environmental law. It drives 'bubble zone' laws that prioritize emotional comfort for some while stripping others of constitutionally protected free speech and assembly rights.

UPS vs. Whirlpool: 2 High-Yield Stocks That Crashed, but Only one Is a Buy
UPS vs. Whirlpool: 2 High-Yield Stocks That Crashed, but Only one Is a Buy

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

UPS vs. Whirlpool: 2 High-Yield Stocks That Crashed, but Only one Is a Buy

Key Points Both UPS and Whirlpool's stocks are on multiyear downtrends, raising their yields. Whirlpool has cut its dividend in response, but UPS hasn't. However, UPS will likely feel a bigger negative impact from tariffs. 10 stocks we like better than United Parcel Service › Do you like bargain-priced stocks? How about bargain-priced dividend stocks? How about bargain-priced dividend stocks that you've actually heard of? Well, you're in luck! The stocks of two iconic American brands are currently sitting in the bargain bin. The companies are shipping behemoth UPS (NYSE: UPS) and appliance maker Whirlpool (NYSE: WHR). Both stocks have been slowly sinking for years, with share prices now down more than 60% from their all-time highs! Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Both stocks fell again -- by more than 15% -- after their recent second-quarter earnings reports, but one looks more likely to recover. Only one cut its dividend Both UPS and Whirlpool have long histories of paying and regularly increasing their dividends. By July, their share-price slumps had pushed both of their dividend yields above 7%. A yield that high is tempting, but neither company was on track to generate enough free cash flow to cover it. When a company can't cover its dividend with free cash flow, it has to dip into the cash on its balance sheet, take on additional debt, or find some other way to fund the payout. UPS is going to try to make it work somehow, according to CEO Carol Tome on the Q2 earnings call. She told investors, "You have our commitment to a stable and growing dividend." That means the company will be on the hook for at least $5.5 billion in dividend payouts this year, which seems almost certain to exceed its free cash flow for the year. That keeps UPS's yield high for now, but investors should remember that there's no guarantee the company's position won't change without warning, resulting in a surprise dividend cut. Whirlpool, on the other hand, cut its annual payout in half from $7 per share to $3.50 per share. That means its yield is now much lower than UPS's (4% vs. 7.5%), but its $190 million total payout is also much more manageable, making its dividend more sustainable over the long term. It also means the dividend cut is baked into the company's current share price, whereas if UPS makes a cut, its stock price will probably sink even lower in response. The ups and downs of tariffs UPS and Whirlpool are both bracing for the impact of tariffs, but in different ways. For UPS, the tariffs are a huge risk. They will likely cause imports to decline, resulting in lower shipping volumes. With some tariffs kicking in just as the labor market shows signs of weakness, they could negatively impact overall consumer spending (and thus, shipping) during the critical holiday shopping season. On the other hand, the tariffs may actually help Whirlpool by hurting its foreign competitors like LG, Samsung, and Haier. The Trump administration has proposed high tariffs on countries that happen to export lots of large appliances to the U.S. These include South Korea (25%), Thailand (36%), Vietnam (46%), and China (as high as 145%). Many of these rates are in flux, but even if they end up at 10% or 15%, it will still give Whirlpool, which manufactures more than 80% of its products in the U.S., a big pricing advantage. Although UPS's yield may now be higher than Whirlpool's, its prospects are looking dimmer thanks to economic factors outside of its control. Meanwhile, even after its dividend cut, Whirlpool still offers a decent yield and a compelling valuation. If I were to pick one, I'd go with Whirlpool hands down. Should you invest $1,000 in United Parcel Service right now? Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store