'Pahalgam terror attack result of Centre's callousness': Mamata Banerjee in assembly
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on 10 June claimed that the Pahalgam terror attack was a result of the Centre's callousness. The Trinamool Congress chief also accused the Bharatiya Janata Party, in power at the Centre, of trying to politicise valour of the armed forces.
'Why security personnel were absent at the terror attack site in Pahalgam,' Mamata Banerjee asked, speaking in the state assembly, news agency PTI reported.
"Where did the terrorists comes from? How did they get the arms and where have they disappeared? Why hasn't anyone caught as yet?,' she asked.
Banerjee stressed that there was a need to teach terrorists a lesson. 'We salute bravery of armed forces,' she said, adding that terrorism has no religion.
Why security personnel were absent at the terror attack site in Pahalgam?
The ruling TMC also passed a resolution lauding the armed forces in the state assembly.
As many as 26 people were killed and several others injured in the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on 22 April. Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor on 7 May, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
31 minutes ago
- India Today
US reaffirms support to India in fight against terror after Op Sindoor outreach
The US reaffirmed its strong support for India's fight against terrorism and the bilateral strategic partnership during the visit of an Indian all-party parliamentary delegation last week, the State Department multi-party delegation led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor met the US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau last week in Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said at a press briefing on Tuesday that Landau reaffirmed the US' strong support of India in the fight against terrorism and the strategic partnership between the two The delegation visited the US as part of the government's global outreach efforts after Operation Sindoor. India launched the operation in retaliation to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 to a question, Bruce said that a Pakistani parliamentary delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari met officials of the State Department, including Under Secretary for Political Affairs Allison Hooker, during its visit to Washington last reiterated US support for the ongoing cessation of on-ground hostilities '– as you might imagine, thank God – between India and Pakistan', Bruce said, adding that they also discussed important issues about the US-Pakistan bilateral relationship, including counterterrorism cooperation. 'So that meeting occurred.'When asked if the US received any assurance from Pakistan that it will take action against terrorists, Bruce said she was not going to discuss the details of those response to a question about President Donald Trump offering to 'mediate' on the issue of Kashmir, Bruce said, 'Well, I – obviously, I can't speak to what's on my mind or the plans of the President. What I do know is that I think we all recognise that President Trump, in each step that he takes, is made to solve generational differences between countries, generational war."Bruce added that it should not "surprise" anyone that he would want to "manage" something like that.'So, while I can't speak to his plans, the world knows his nature, and I can't speak to any details of what he might have in that regard, but it is an exciting time if we can get to a point in that particular conflict." Bruce said, adding that it is a "very interesting time.'India has rejected any mediation related to the dispute on Jammu and Kashmir with Pakistan and maintains that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are and will always remain an "integral" part of the InMust Watch
NDTV
39 minutes ago
- NDTV
Couple Loses Rs 4.79 Crore With Digital Arrest, Scamster Visits Sri Lankan Casino
Bengaluru: A retired engineer and his wife in Bengaluru lost Rs 4.79 crore to cyber fraudsters, who placed them under "digital arrest" over their alleged involvement in a money laundering case and non-payment of credit card bills. The two accused - Eshwar Singh and Narayan Singh Chaudhary - have been arrested and a detailed probe is underway, Bengaluru Southeast Deputy Commissioner of Police Sarah Fatima said. Providing details, Ms Fatima said the retired engineer and his wife were targeted and placed under "digital arrest" by the scamsters for two-and-a-half-months. "The couple was forced to pay Rs 4.79 crore on the pretext of credit card dues and their purported involvement in money laundering. The accused threatened the couple with action from the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate. Fake arrest warrants were also issued to the couple," she said. The retired engineer earlier worked in Nigeria, the officer added. "Following an investigation, Singha and Chaudhary were arrested. Rs 10 lakh was recovered from Singh and Rs 1.08 crore from Chaudhary's bank accounts," she said. One of the accused allegedly travelled to a Sri Lankan casino with the stolen money. "A Look Out Circular was issued against him and he was arrested on his return to India," Ms Fatima said. According to cyber law expert and advocate Pawan Duggal, "digital arrest" is the phenomenon of trying to put somebody in a sense of fear and panic and thereafter, going ahead and extorting money from the said person under some mistaken notion so as to make the said person a victim of a cybercrime." There have been several advisories warning people that there is no provision for 'digital arrest' or online investigation in Indian law enforcement and yet, several people have fallen prey to such scams, losing crores in the process. The Centre has also warned about a widespread cyber scam targeting individuals across the country. It said the scam involved fraudulent letters threatening people with 'digital arrest' unless they comply with the scammers' demands. In October, Prime Minister Narendra Modi drew attention to 'digital arrests' and warned people against such activities. "Beware of digital arrest frauds. There is no system like digital arrest under the law. No government agency will ever contact you via phone or video call for such an investigation," he said.
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Community forest rights can end Naxalism. Gadchiroli is an example
Home Minister Amit Shah has declared that this government would end Naxalism by 31 March 2026. The Centre has also urged Naxal-affected states to expedite local infrastructure development programmes and provide the best possible rehabilitation packages to surrendered Naxals, while simultaneously continuing operations. These strategies have led to mixed results. Gadchiroli district in Maharashtra, in addition to the above strategies, has pushed for the recognition of customary and traditional rights of forest-dwelling communities over forest resources as a strategy to end Naxalism. Gadchiroli district's recognition of community forest rights (CFRs) is among the most advanced in the country. Forest-dwelling communities of the district collectively own 5,110.07 sq km of the district's 9,902.8 sq km of forest. This is unparalleled in comparison to any other part of the country, especially in a district where the Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste populations constitute 38.17 per cent and 11.25 per cent, respectively. All of this began with the recognition of the first community forest rights in India in August 2009, for the village of Mendha Lekha in Gadchiroli under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, recognises the pre-existing rights of forest-dwelling communities over forest resources irrespective of the classification of forests. These rights, in addition to several customary rights, grant exclusive control to these communities over all types of minor forest produce, including rights to bamboo and tendu leaves, and management rights through the Gram Sabha. While states across the country remain reluctant to recognise community forest rights and tend to deregulate colonial and post-colonial regulations on minor forest produce, Gadchiroli has witnessed significant developments. The first transit pass to sell bamboo by the Gram Sabha to contractors of their choice was handed over to the Gram Sabha of Mendha Lekha by the then Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan and the then Union Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh. The process of deregulation and recognition of CFRs continued thereafter, despite the shift in political power. The current Chief Minister, Devendra Fadnavis, during his first tenure (2014–2019), introduced a series of schemes, including financial support of Rs 1.78 lakh, to support the recognised CFR villages. Similarly, the Governor's Office of Maharashtra directed the state to modify its minor forest produce regulations and allowed the Gram Sabhas of Fifth Schedule areas to own, auction, and dispose of their collected minor forest produce to anyone who offers them a better price. Today, 1,109 CFR-recognised villages in the district are exercising these rights and have benefited enormously. The households in CFR-recognised villages earn a minimum of Rs 7,000 per month from forest resources. More importantly, a democratic, decentralised, and transparent process governs the forest resources. CFRs have provided livelihood security to thousands of forest-dwelling communities, protected tribal autonomy, and ensured the sustainable use of forest resources. Our research shows that forests managed by Gram Sabhas in Gadchiroli have experienced less deforestation than forest areas regulated by the Forest Department, where logging continues in an unsustainable and uncontrolled fashion. Economic outcomes have also been particularly remarkable: reduction in migration, less dependence on middlemen, creation of forest-based employment opportunities, and investment in education and health sectors. Many CFR-recognised Gram Sabhas have reinvested incomes from the forest into improving their recognised CFR areas. They have adopted forest plantation programmes and regularly patrolled the forest to protect it from both internal and external threats. A combination of factors explains these phenomenal achievements. First is the long history of collective action and grassroots movements initiated by local tribal leaders. They did not depend on external agencies or NGOs for their forest rights. While across the country the implementation of the FRA is largely NGO-driven, the case of Gadchiroli has been unique — driven by organic local initiatives. Also vital has been the district leadership and administration's genuine commitment to the decentralisation of decision-making over forests, irrespective of political alignment. The District Collector's office has initiated a series of activities, making policies at the Gram Sabha level more responsive to sustainable tribal livelihood and forest conservation. To date, the administration has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with 728 Gram Sabhas to provide necessary technical and financial support in the development, management, and implementation of the recognised CFR areas. Nevertheless, numerous challenges continue for forest-dwelling communities, especially in South Gadchiroli. Many villagers are afraid of displacement due to recent mining proposals. The Maharashtra government needs to ensure that its proposed development model—including steel plants, and mining proposals in tribal-populated areas—does not inhibit the exercise of recognised rights and safeguards under PESA (Provisions of the Panchayats [Extension to Scheduled Areas] Act) and FRA. It also needs to streamline its progressive district and block-level convergence schemes, implement them in a concerted manner, and provide communities with greater support to ensure their well-being and local development. Gadchiroli's community forest rights have been a success. The district administration's strategy — combining rehabilitation packages, local infrastructure development, and decentralisation of power — is worth replicating in other Naxal-affected areas in the country. The writer is a Professor at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai
