
Working from home? It's so much nicer if you're a man
This stopped me in my tracks. Not because it's my experience: my husband and I are lucky enough to have an office each, and mine is bigger and objectively nicer. I get the garden view; he has the ballet of Openreach and Amazon vans. (See – not all men.) It's not Stanley's experience either: she uses the spare bedroom; her husband has half the living room, she told the Cut's Book Gossip newsletter.
Rather, I was struck because having just read the Australian writer Helen Garner's recently published diaries, How to End a Story, this is exactly the irreconcilable, constantly rehashed point of contention between her and her ex-husband, anonymised in the diaries as 'V'.
V, also a writer, insists not only on appropriating the available room in their shared apartment for his office, but on Garner leaving while he works, her presence incompatible with his sacred need for silent isolation. Garner describes the quotidian pain of this situation (she wants to potter, play music, cook, see friends; her creativity is fuelled by these ordinary kinds of life), and the growing realisation of what it said about their relationship with shocking, powerful eloquence. V is aware of, but apparently unmoved by, her distress. They argue about it regularly.
Garner's experience was so egregious as to be eye-poppingly enraging, but this happens more often in quieter, easier-to-overlook ways. I read and enjoyed Consider Yourself Kissed too – it's a romance, but it also subtly builds a picture of the insidious sidelining of women's work as expressed through domestic space. Set between 2013 and 2023, it's particularly good on how this was amplified by Covid: the heroine's political journalist husband sees his career go stratospheric and their spare room 'somehow' becomes his study. He's a nice man; he loves her; it just … happens.
This rang true because it is: it did just happen. Structural pay equalities meant men – habitually the higher earners – staked the more obvious primary claim on working space in locked-down homes. Research shows women experienced more non-work interruptions, compounded when they didn't have a 'dedicated unshared workspace' – their emotional wellbeing suffered, but so did their professional lives. 'My husband locks the room from the inside when he needs to concentrate,' a participant in an Indian study on pandemic working habits reported. 'I don't have that liberty. I have no room of my own.'
In 1929, Virginia Woolf wrote A Room of One's Own as a riposte to the physical and economic exclusion of women from intellectual and professional spaces. In 2025, they can't bar us from libraries, but intimate domestic spaces have proved stubbornly intractable. Back when men had inviolable studies and smoking rooms, there was an assumption that the domestic sphere was feminine, so they 'needed' to escape the noise and mess of childrearing and homemaking. Now we're ostensibly all in it together, doing conference calls in our slippers, but there are still more man caves than women's. Because Risbridger is right: the recently released UK 2024 Skills and Employment survey found 60% of men had a dedicated room for work at home and only 40% of women. We still can't manage to meet Woolf's prescription.
There are not-all-men exceptions and happy endings. Garner escaped, thank God, eventually; and, without spoilers, Stanley's heroine reclaims some space. But in real life, generally, women's work is still given less and worse space, while the gender pay gap narrows agonisingly slowly. The two are surely related. When do we get that room of our own?
Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Major update in Sydney Harbour Bridge protest battle as police reveal why they're so against pro-Palestine march
NSW Police have challenged plans for a pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge, arguing in court the rally could cause crowd crush if it goes ahead. Up to 100,000 protesters could descend on the bridge on Sunday as part of the 'March for Humanity', the court heard. NSW Police lodged a prohibition order in the Supreme Court against the planned rally organised by Palestine Action Group. Authorities argued the event posed a risk to public safety due to crowd crush and could even lead to clashes and hostility from competing protests. A previously planned counter-protest in the harbour tunnel has already been cancelled. Pro-Israel group Never Again is Now applied for permission to hold its protest at the same time as the Palestine Action Group's rally but has since withdrawn its application. The group wanted permission to block the harbour tunnel in recognition of the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. NSW Police's barrister Lachlan Gyles, SC, said violent clashes and crowd crush were highly likely if both protests were to have gone ahead. Mr Gyles argued police could not ensure the safety of up to 100,000 protesters crossing the bridge in such a short time frame. 'This is really unprecedented … in terms of scale, level of risk, lack of time to prepare, and of course location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world,' Mr Gyles told the court. Mr Gyles told Justice Belinda Rigg the court needed to be 'concerned about being seen to condone' the rally if there were violent scenes or if ambulances were blocked from reaching patients. He added the prohibition order was 'necessary' otherwise police would not have the powers that they would normally have to control such a massive crowd. Court proceedings were further stalled on Friday after 100 pro-Palestine supporters packed into the courtroom and sat on the floor. Justice Rigg said she would reserve her decision until 10am on Saturday - just one day before the rally is set to take place. The planned march would lead protesters across the Harbour Bridge from Lang Park near Wynyard towards the US consulate in North Sydney. It has been scheduled to begin at 1pm. If police succeed in barring this from happening, the protest would simply be rescheduled, activists have said. Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said his concerns would not rest even if the courts allowed the march to continue. 'Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risk, crowd crush,' he said under cross-examination. 'I'm personally concerned about that.' Palestine Action Group and protest organiser Joshua Lees told the court the march was 'unstoppable'. Mr Lees argued the group did not seek 'confrontation with police' but rather, wanted to work with authorities to ensure the success of the protest. 'We want to work with them to make this a successful event,' Mr Lees told the court. 'What we don't want to see but is a real, real possibility, which is that if we lose in the case here today.' 'If [the protest] is unauthorised, that opens up the ability for the police to use extra powers to make arrests against peaceful protesters … an outcome we absolutely do not want to see.' Mr Lees added the rushed planning of the event was necessary to produce a maximum effect while the Israel-Gaza war was still making global headlines. Palestine Action Group had offered to postpone the protest until August 24 - an offer Mr Lees said was still on the table and which police have yet to accept. Any prohibition order would not prevent the protest from going forward but would make it illegal for protesters to block roads. Barrister Felicity Graham represented the group and told the court that people turning up to protest was a foregone conclusion Instead of trying to frivolously prevent the march, police should instead focus on trying to make it safe, she said. 'It would create a very fluid, dangerous and unstable situation if the court grants this application,' Ms Graham said. 'It's unclear exactly what would unfold, but it's clear police wish to have powers to arrest people simply for being on a road.' Five Labor MPs have already vowed to attend the rally despite Premier Chris Minns urging them not to. Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Linda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine have said they will all march across the bridge. Other politicians including Greens and independent crossbenchers have also confirmed their attendance. Despite gaining momentum, Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna previously told 2GB the protest was still 'stoppable'. He also accused its organisers of sending out mixed messages to the public which has created confusion about what exactly is happening. Justice Belinda Rigg will reveal her judgment at 10am on Saturday.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sorry America, but it's not Australia's fault that your healthcare system is failing you
If I were president of the United States, I would certainly be concerned about the cost and performance of the country's healthcare system. The grim statistics are well known. As of 2022, the US spent $12,555 per person on healthcare, almost twice as much as other wealthy countries, including Australia. That gap alone cancels out about half of the difference in income per person between the US and Australia, according to World Bank estimates. Higher expenditure on healthcare would not be a problem if it delivered a healthier population. But this is not the case. The US has one of the lowest life expectancies of any rich country. And even though more Americans die young, those who survive have worse health than elsewhere. Americans suffer from chronic diseases like diabetes, asthma and depression at around twice the (age-adjusted) rate of other rich countries. This gap is too large to be accounted for by specific causes like gun violence or drug overdoses, or even unequal income distribution. The US has worse health outcomes at every point on the income distribution scale than other rich countries, even though those at the upper end have much higher incomes. Sign up: AU Breaking News email And the problem is getting worse. The US saw declining life expectancy in the years after 2014 and, unlike other countries, saw a late, limited recovery from the increased death rate after the onset of the Covid pandemic. There's not much hope for rapid progress in US health outcomes. The destruction of US public health infrastructure through budget cuts, the gutting of key agencies such as the Center for Disease Control and the appointment of notorious anti-vaxxer RFK Jr as secretary of health and human services will only make matters worse. It's unsurprising then that President Donald Trump is looking at the cost side of the equation. As might be expected he has raised, again, the perennial grievances of US health policy. This is the fact that Americans pay far more for prescription medicines than do citizens of other countries where prices are controlled through mechanisms like Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). And, given his grievance-based approach to the world in general, it is no surprise that his latest statement on the topic describes Australia and other countries as 'freeloaders' on the US. The US government is, of course, entirely within its rights to set its own policy regarding the pricing of prescription drugs. The US Department of Veterans Affairs already has a program similar to the PBS, under which it pays about half as much of the typical US price. There is no reason this couldn't be extended to the entire US Medicare system, except that the result would be to close down 1,000 or more private plans, each with their own lobbyists. And with a bit more effort, the US could establish its own version of the PBS, covering all Americans. Quite possibly, faced with lower prices in the US, pharmaceutical companies might demand higher returns from other countries including Australia. But a systematic reform of this kind is beyond the capacity of the Trump administration. Instead we have seen the typical Trumpian claim that other countries are benefiting unfairly from medical research done in the US. This was arguably true in the second half of the 20th century when the US was the undoubted centre of global medical research, most notably through the National Institutes of Health. But funding for the NIH (adjusted for inflation) peaked in 2004, and has suffered from decades of financial stringency. Meanwhile, the US share of genuine innovations, measured by 'new molecular entities' has declined and is no longer notably larger (relative to GDP) than that of leading European innovators. The development of semaglutide (Ozempic and Wegovy) treatments for obesity and diabetes by Danish firm Novo Nordisk is a notable example of a drug of particular importance to the US being developed in Europe. More generally, if Trump wants to import ideas like the PBS into the US system, Australia has plenty to offer. Australia's Medicare system, combining a single-payer universal scheme for standard healthcare with private insurance and fee-for-service medicine as an upper tier, could provide a politically palatable way of delivering the US demand for 'Medicare for all' without destroying the private sector. But of course, this isn't the Trump way. What we will doubtless see, as in the recent tariff negotiations, is a series of bullying demands, resulting in triumphant announcements of magnificent deals, which turn out, on closer inspection, to be largely illusory. The bigger lesson for Australia in all of this is that, as with China, we need to treat the US not as an ally or friend but as a trading partner which will seek to push us around whenever possible. The correct response, again as with China, is to stand our ground until the other side sees the pointlessness of bullying and the mutual benefits of free exchange. John Quiggin is a professor at the University of Queensland's school of economics


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Pro-Palestine fundraising gig in Newcastle cancelled after police said ‘credible threat' made against venue
A pro-Palestine fundraising gig planned at a Newcastle pub on Friday night was cancelled after police warned a 'credible threat' had been made against the venue – but organisers say they have been left in the dark. The Palestine Action Group Muloobinba (PAGM) has accused police of 'bullying tactics' after the cancellation of the Make Some Noise charity event at the Hamilton Station hotel, from which all proceeds were meant to go towards aid for Gaza. The hotel announced the cancellation on Facebook on Thursday, saying it was 'disappointed', but 'NSW police have advised us of credible threats made against the venue, and we must proceed in the interest of the safety of our staff and customers'. The pub's licensee, Dan Southam, told Guardian Australia the venue was 'approached by multiple police' on Thursday 'with a credible threat to the venue in direct relation to the event on Friday'. 'Advice from police was cancel the event,' he said. 'The safety of our staff and patrons is our priority.' Police had said earlier on Friday they spoke with the operators 'in light of online comments' but insisted any decision about a private event lay with the venue and not the police. One of the fundraiser's organisers, Regan Dubois, said the venue contacted the PAGM on Thursday to say they had been visited by the police officer they regularly dealt with for licensing matters. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'The police apparently said they had received a report of a credible threat if the event was to go ahead and they were suggesting that for safety reasons they cancel the event,' Dubois said. 'The threat was that someone was going to mow down someone with a vehicle.' Dubois claimed this was the PAGM's second event in a week that police had played a role in shutting down. She said the group had planned to host a film screening on 26 July at a local church, but police had contacted its owners and said 'they couldn't be sure it was legal to show a documentary'. 'They're trying to shut down the event, without even notifying organisers that the threat even exists,' she said. 'It's a pattern.' Dubois said the PAGM had not directly received any threats and Hamilton Station hotel staff had said the venue hadn't either. 'We clarified with the venue … it's coming via police,' she said. 'It's completely unprofessional and inappropriate that, if the threat is credible, [the police] haven't contacted the community that is being threatened.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In a post to Facebook, the PAGM said it believed the police were using 'bullying tactics', alleging a 'precedent' with similarly cancelled pro-Palestine events. Police declined to comment further when asked about Dubois' concerns. Dubois said she understood why the hotel, as a small business, would be wary about any safety risks, but she questioned the police's actions. 'I assume they could do more. I don't know what they're doing because I've had no contact with police,' she said. 'If it is a serious threat, it should be under serious investigation. 'Police could also be doing a different thing – instead of shutting down the event, they could be protecting the event.' Dubois said the organisers were working to move the event to another venue but had been worried about advertising it because 'we don't understand the nature of the threat to us'. 'Is it anti-Palestinian? Is it Islamophobic? The main speaker for the night is Jewish,' she said.