Letters to The Editor — August 13, 2025
In India, the word 'election' is one that evokes immense civic pride in a citizen. Therefore, it is the duty of the Election Commission of India (ECI) to ensure that the entire election system ensures a fair poll as the running of a democracy rests on this. But why is the ECI not responding to the Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's allegations of 'vote theft' if it has nothing to hide? And why is Mr. Gandhi not submitting his claims in writing? The ECI seems more intent on condemning the messenger than confronting wrong-doing.
Baani Bhabha,
Ambala, Punjab
Human-elephant conflict
The report, 'World Elephant to be celebrated in Coimbatore today' (August 12), is perhaps the right moment to highlight how tourists harass elephants. Video footage of a tusker nearly trampling a tourist in Bandipur on August 10 is an example of unchecked tourism and tourists not following the rules. The 'selfie craze' is to blame. There are videos on YouTube of local people harassing elephants in the tea gardens of West Bengal and Assam. These clips show youngsters running behind herds and teasing the animals and the 'mass entertainment' it gives them when the angry animals react. What are the State Forest Departments doing?
Samriddhi Boppiah,
Valparai, Tamil Nadu
Community participation
Medicine has the speciality called 'community medicine' that specifically focuses on community engagement and empowerment to achieve 'community health'.
The fact is that there are a number of public health specialists in India with a Masters in Public Health (MPH). Such community physicians and public health specialists should actively seek out major roles so that national health programmes have meaningful community engagement.
Dr. Kavuru Ravindra,
Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
The SIR controversy
The controversy of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls carried out in Bihar seems to be a never-ending political battle. It would be beneficial for all to remember that India thrives on perceptions and controversies. False or half-truth narratives built by vested interests are a potent tool for our politicians to sway voters. Sometimes these false narratives are also created at the behest of anti-national elements, both within and outside the country. Therefore, at some point, such controversies must be dealt with decisively before they can harm the nation. The EC prepares and maintains the electoral rolls as mandated by the Constitution of India. These lists are updated continually due to various reasons, including deaths, new voter additions, migration, among others. Therefore, any apprehensions that the EC does so under pressure from the government are misplaced. Normally, the onus should be on citizens themselves to inform the local authorities if a name has to be deleted or added. Unfortunately, as a society, we lack such civic responsibilities. Therefore, the responsibility to do so rests with the EC. In the country's over-packed election calendar, such exercises will have to be conducted intensively during the short free periods available. Much has been written and said about Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar over the last six weeks. Charges, counter-charges, allegations, and explanations are being traded between the EC, opposition parties, and the government. Unfortunately, the controversy rages on. The opposition is accusing the EC of manipulating the voter lists in Bihar before the next elections to favour the NDA. In his press conference on 07 August 2025, the LOP claimed that the NDA and EC had played similar dirty tricks in the last elections in Karnataka and Maharashtra. He backed these claims with some data from his party's internal investigation. The question that arises here is, if the LOP has convincing data of such a fraud, why has he not submitted it to the EC formally? Is it not incumbent on him to do so as he holds a constitutional post equivalent to a cabinet minister? Given his position in the parliament, the EC will always be ready to give him a patient hearing. But the problem is with the Gandhi scion himself. He refuses to sit formally with the EC and instead makes declarations of all kinds on the streets or in front of the media. His aim is clear. He wishes to incite the public and build a public opinion against the government. He has no genuine interest in resolving any issue through the correct channels in the public interest. Mr Sharad Pawar, the NC (P) founder and a member of the Rajya Sabha, made a statement in Nagpur on Saturday, 09 August 2025, where he said, 'Last year, before the Maharashtra assembly polls were declared, two people came to meet me in Delhi. They told me that of 288 assembly seats in Maharashtra, they can guarantee victory for us in 160.' He further stated, 'I did not have any reason to suspect EC. I also thought during polls, we run into such people, and so I ignored them.' He confirmed that the same people also met Rahul Gandhi. Taking the high pedestal, Mr Pawar concluded by saying that he and Rahul Gandhi decided not to pursue the matter further and allow fate to decide their fortunes. Yet, he maintains that the claims of LOP must be investigated. Maharashtra was a state that Mr. Pawar and Rahul Gandhi wanted to win at any cost. While they may be lauded for their righteous approach, it is hard to believe that they passed the opportunity. But if they did because they neither suspected the EC nor believed in the possibility of manipulation by the people who approached them, then why are they making such a hue and cry about possible frauds in electoral rolls? Mr. Gandhi, in his press conference, admitted that there were serious issues of duplicate, fake, invalid, and multiple entries of voters at the same address. If he is so convinced, then he should welcome the SIR in Bihar before the next elections, rather than seeing it as a fraud against the opposition. Mr. Gandhi's reluctance to discuss the issue with the EC in a formal manner and Mr. Pawar's belated claims give the impression that they are neither serious nor convinced. The EC does not carry out such revisions in isolation. In Bihar, there were nearly 150,000 Booth-level Agents (BLA) of different parties who were part of the SIR exercise with Block Level Officers (BLO). Surprisingly, no representations have been filed against any wrong deletions by the EC by any of the BLAs. The irony is that Mr Tejasvi Yadav, leader of RJD, was himself exposed for having two entries in the electoral rolls with separate unique numbers. The one he flashed to reporters, claiming his voter card's unique number had been deleted, turned out to be bogus. A simple check revealed that he had contested the 2020 elections using another voter card with a different unique number. He used the same card in the 2024 elections. If a senior leader like Mr. Yadav has two voter identities, imagine the state of affairs in the entire state. In this regard, this is what Congress's senior minister K N Rajanna had to say to the media about Rahul Gandhi's charges in Karnataka, 'One should remember that voter lists were revised when our government was at the helm. Why did our party turn a blind eye then? It is true that there are irregularities, but it is insulting for us that it happened right under our noses.' Perhaps in Karnataka, the discrepancies favoured Congress at that time. Within a couple of hours of this statement, Mr. Rajanna was stripped of his cabinet rank and suspended from the party. This is the internal democracy in Congress where no internal dissent is permitted. In the current environment, there is a strong possibility that this false narrative may raise questions about the credibility of the government, EC, and, in turn, the nation's democratic credentials. Notably, it also harms the image of the world's largest democracy. The onus to prevent all this lies squarely on the government. Therefore, it is time to act and take the bull by the horns. The starting point will be the claims by Mr Gandhi in his press conference and Mr. Pawar's statement. It is immaterial if either of them has not approached the government formally. It is time for the government to take the initiative, either through the EC or the Supreme Court, by filing a suitable case. These leaders cannot be allowed to present their cases only on the streets or in the media without accepting any responsibility. National interests demand that they be asked to substantiate their claims formally, and the matter be investigated to settle it one way or the other. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rahul Gandhi takes dig at PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana: ' ₹1 crore ka jumla'
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Friday took a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi announcing the launch of PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana, calling it " ₹1 lakh crore jumla - Season 2". In a post in Hindi on X, Gandhi said, " ₹ 1 lakh crore jumla - Season 2! Even after 11 years, Modi ji's same old jumlas, same memorized figures."(ANI/AICC) Modi on Friday announced the launch of the scheme which is expected to create 3.5 crore jobs in the next two years. "Today is August 15 and we are launching ₹1 lakh crore scheme for the youth of this country. It is good news for you that PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana is being rolled out from Today," Modi said in his Independence Day speech. In a post in Hindi on X, Gandhi said, " ₹1 lakh crore jumla - Season 2! Even after 11 years, Modi ji's same old jumlas, same memorized figures." "Last year, ₹1 lakh crore to 1 crore internships promise, this year again ₹1 lakh crore job scheme! What is the truth? On my question in the Parliament, the government admitted - less than 10,000 internships. The stipend is so low that 90% of the youth refused," the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha said. "Modi ji has no new idea left now. The youth will not get employment from this government, they will only get jumlas," Gandhi said. The former Congress president also shared the screenshot of his question in the Lok Sabha last month and the answer by the Minister of State in the Corporate Affairs Ministry Harsh Malhotra. On July 1, 2025, the Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Modi had approved the scheme aimed at incentivising job creation in the country. In his address, Modi said that under this scheme the youth getting first job in the private sector will get ₹15,000 and the companies (employing them) will get incentive amounts. With an outlay of ₹99,446 crore, the PM Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana aims to incentivise the creation of more than 3.5 crore jobs over two years. Of these, 1.92 crore beneficiaries will be first timers, entering the workforce. The benefits of the scheme would be applicable to jobs created between August 1, 2025, and July 31, 2027.
Hans India
41 minutes ago
- Hans India
Fanaticism creating communal divisions in India, says Sanjay Raut
Nashik: Shiv Sena(UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Friday accused the BJP of making the country 'fanatical' about religion after it came to power in 2014, and said that this is creating communal divisions, which is very dangerous for the country's independence. Raut also took a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his call for Swadeshi and self-reliance, reminding him that the slogan of Swadeshi was a gift from the Congress party. The Shiv Sena(UBT) leader spoke to reporters after PM Modi's Independence Day speech from the ramparts of Red Fort, on a range of issues, including Operation Sindoor, Indus Water Treaty, Pakistan-sponsored terror activities and Swadeshi. Raut argued that when PM Modi keeps on asking what the Congress party has given, he should understand that the slogan of Swadeshi was given in this country by the Congress party. 'Mahatma Gandhi, Lokmanya Tilak, and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru gave it. That is why Khadi came to the country, the Gandhi cap came. One day, Narendra Modi will give a speech wearing a Gandhi cap. Modi has become a Congressman today. He has become a Nehruvian and a Gandhian,' he claimed. Referring to PM Modi's subtle warning to the US and Pakistan, Raut said that PM Modi does not warn anyone by taking anyone's name, as he does not have that much courage. 'PM Modi should name the US President Trump (after his retaliatory tariff) or Pakistan. Take the name of the enemy. Trump is sitting there and repeatedly issuing threats and ultimatums. He is abusing the country every day. He is abusing and insulting the PM, so he should name him. Why is he ashamed and afraid to take the name?' he asked. He added that instead of blaming former PM Jawaharlal Nehru, an architect of India's development, PM Modi should directly name the US, China and Pakistan. 'It is very easy to warn Pakistan. But China is behind Pakistan. How can PM Modi forget that Trump is behind General Munir? He should not make false speeches from the Red Fort. Pakistan's Army Chief Munir threatens us. Trump invited Munir to a dinner at the White House. Did Trump invite the Indian Army Chief? PM Modi should take on Trump. It is not enough to just warn Pakistan but also China,' said Raut. He criticised several policies of the Modi government, alleging that the country has gone into a pit after 2014. He slammed the government's foreign policy, saying that it is easy to curse Pakistan.
