Georgian-Russian artist Zurab Tsereteli dies aged 91
Georgian-Russian artist Zurab Tsereteli, known for his gigantic and often controversial monuments, has died aged 91.The Tbilisi-born sculptor, painter and architect divided opinion with a series of large-scale projects in Moscow, including a massive 98m (321ft) monument to Tsar Peter the Great, who famously detested the city.Rising to fame during the Soviet era, Tsereteli led the team of designers for Moscow's 1980 Olympic Games, and later built large sculptures in cities across the world. He was also known for his closeness to the Russian political elite, once saying that Vladimir Putin's "healthy soul" had inspired him to make a bronze study of the Russian president.
Tsereteli was a close friend of Moscow's mayor Yuri Luzhkov, and his position as part of the Soviet Union's upper crust allowed him to travel outside of the country, where he met Pablo Picasso in Paris.Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Tsereteli was "an artist of world renown, a public figure who knew no boundaries or obstacles in strengthening peace and supporting creativity" in a social media post after his death."He will live not only in our hearts, but also in his works," she added.
During a row over the Peter the Great monument's future in 2010, several Moscow residents told the BBC they hated the sculpture, which at 98m is slightly taller than the Statue of Liberty. Despite the sometimes frosty reception his works received, Tsereteli was widely respected throughout the art world, and served as the president of the Russian Academy of Arts.His enormous constructions can be found in cities around the globe, including a monument to Christopher Columbus in Seville, Spain, and the Chronicle of Georgia monument in his hometown of Tbilisi.They also include the ten-storey Tear of Grief monument, commemorating victims of the 11 September 2001 attacks, which stands in New Jersey. It was presented to the US by the Russian government.
Another sculpture, Good Defeats Evil, sits at the UN Headquarters in New York. It depicts St George slaying a dragon, which lies among broken fragments of US and Soviet missiles.The work represents "the vanquishing of nuclear war through the historic treaty between the Soviet Union and the United States", according to the UN website.In 2006, Tsereteli caused controversy in a small French town, which erected his huge 8.75m-tall (29 ft) bronze statue of Pope John Paul II. Opponents said the statue violated France's secularity laws.
At 110m (360ft), Tsereteli's colossal monument to Christopher Columbus's first voyage, Birth of the New World, is one of the tallest sculptures on earth. It was eventually constructed in Puerto Rico, after several US cities rejected it.He also made smaller bronze studies of major figures including Princess Diana and Putin.Tsereteli was also a painter - notably of flowers - and an architect who took a key role in reconstructing Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Saviour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say
According to Kalt, Trump -- who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree -- would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
The UK's silence on Gaza will haunt generations to come
You could be mistaken for thinking I am describing some Second World War scenario, but depressingly, this is the reality in Gaza today. Despite repeated promises of a ceasefire, and a commitment to lift the siege of Gaza and allow aid to enter, Israel is still blocking food from reaching starving Palestinians. A UN spokesperson recently announced that only five trucks of aid had reached more than two million people trapped in Gaza, and even then, aid workers were not given permission to distribute that tiny amount. READ MORE: How much has your MP claimed in expenses? See the full Scottish list here According to The New York Times, over the past year, Israel has been in talks with private US security contractors, namely former CIA veteran Philip Reilly, to create an Israeli-backed food distribution programme. In February of this year, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was established with the backing of the Trump administration. United Nations aid expert Tom Fletcher said that the GHF makes aid conditional on Israel's political and military aims, and 'makes starvation a bargaining chip'. The former head of GHF resigned last week citing the foundation's inability to uphold the core humanitarian principles of 'neutrality, impartiality and independence'. According to The New York Times, the GHF emerged from 'private meetings of like-minded officials, military officers and businesspeople with close ties to the Israeli government'. It is therefore very convenient that the GHF, supported by Israel, uses biometric screening, including facial recognition, to vet who receives aid. Critics also warn that the GHF's decision to concentrate aid in southern Gaza serves as a further attempt to depopulate northern Gaza, as planned by the Israeli military. The GHF's lack of experience and capacity to deliver aid to more than two million Palestinians was laid bare on its very first day of operation. We saw images of thousands of starving Palestinians rushing to try to reach food, after three months of Israeli-imposed starvation. Those lucky enough to access food went on to discover there was only enough for a couple of days at most. What began as a retaliatory campaign, after Hamas killed around 1200 Israelis and kidnapped 250 more, has since turned to genocide. As it stands, Israel has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians – of which nearly 20,000 were children. Almost all of Gaza's homes have been damaged or destroyed, alongside 80% of facilities, 88% of school buildings and 70% of road networks and cropland. 222 journalists have been killed since the October 7 attack, of which 217 were Palestinian. The disproportionate response from Israel and the continual breaking of international law means it is beyond doubt that Israeli actions are a deliberate military attempt to seize more Palestinian land. Israel places evacuation orders on areas it plans to bomb, only to issue further evacuation orders to the places people have been displaced to. READ MORE: MSP demands answers from Police Scotland over Kneecap 'security concerns' Most people in Gaza have moved repeatedly in attempts to escape Israeli airstrikes, though no part of Gaza has been spared attacks. The Israeli military has issued more than 65 evacuation orders since October 7, 2023, leaving about 80% of the Gaza Strip under active evacuation orders. Following this, Israel has authorised 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank. This is despite the International Court of Justice ruling that Israel's settlement policy is a direct breach of international law. Israel Katz, the country's defence minister, said the decision to expand these illegal settlements 'strengthens our hold on Judea and Samaria', using the biblical term for the West Bank, which is Palestinian territory. Israel's far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said: 'We have not taken foreign land, but rather the inheritance of our forefathers.' Breaking international law in the name of religion is exactly the kind of behaviour we would describe as extremism. Bombing innocent civilians who are sheltering in hospitals and schools, to the point of obliteration, can only be described as terrorism. READ MORE: 'Do something!': Question Time audience member in fiery row with Labour MP on Israel This Labour Government has contorted itself into knots trying to be everything to everyone. One week, the Foreign Secretary David Lammy suspended talks on further trade deals with Israel, only for the British trade envoy, Lord Ian Austin, to visit Israel the next week to 'promote trade'. The UK Government's continual reticence to speak out against this genocide will haunt us for generations to come, especially when compared to how quick off the mark it has been to condemn the Irish band Kneecap. The duplicity of this Labour Government's failure to act efficiently and proportionately in speaking out against this genocide cannot be forgotten. History will certainly never let us forget.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Why the UK media 180 on Gaza is too little, too late
The problem is that there remains an equally deafening sound, one that can't be drowned out, nor easily forgotten: The thunderous silence that the mainstream British press and broadcast ecosystem clung to as Israel systematically slaughtered, besieged, starved and annihilated Gaza. And that was if their coverage wasn't white-washing, diluting and actively deceiving the public about the reality of Israel's 20-month pummelling of two million Palestinians in an open-air prison. A switch has now been collectively flicked: "End the deafening silence", demanded the Independent's editorial, followed by an extensive report a fortnight later by the paper's international correspondent about how exactly we ever got to this point, including, notably, the genocidal intent expressed by Israeli ministers, a context rarely acknowledged in previous coverage. In trying to explain how we got here, the Independent inadvertently showed exactly why we did. READ MORE: Activists read names of 15,000 Gaza children killed by Israel outside Parliament One newspaper this spring outlined the "horror in Gaza", centring the crippling siege Israel imposed and the resulting engineered famine. It was penned by a journalist who repeated IDF claims about a beheaded Israeli baby in October 2023, a claim still live on the same website. The Financial Times and The Economist followed suit: The latter's leader now unambiguously stating the war "must" end. On November 8, 2023, its leader said Israel "must" fight on. Broadcast presenters have rushed to defend their record — eager, perhaps, to prove they offered impartial, thorough coverage and didn't manufacture consent for crimes committed on an industrial scale. When paediatrician Dr Tanya Haj Hassan slammed the BBC for parroting Israeli talking points, the presenter — who had just defended the network's output as fair and balanced — followed up with the usual uncritical amplification of Israeli genocide denial. It's a pattern all too familiar from that very presenter. This is the same BBC that interrupted Palestinian guests listing the names of relatives killed by Israeli bombs — to ask whether they condemn Hamas. The script read complicity and distraction. And the mainstream media seemed to have rehearsed it to perfection. That does not appear to be something the public will forget. Channel 4's Krishnan Guru-Murthy was asked by a social media user why it took so long, in response to his promotion of the network's report on five-year-old Ward in Gaza who survived an Israeli strike but harrowingly witnessed her family burn to death. "You just haven't been watching, clearly," was the retort. Except that thousands had been watching closely. Waiting for the Palestinians to be humanised. Waiting, for example, for Channel 4 presenters to interject when Israeli reservists amplify military propaganda that justifies mass slaughter and collective punishment. Waiting for Guru-Murthy to interrogate Israel's intent and actions, not grill Palestinians on whether 'from the river to the sea' is antisemitic. In turn, the archives were updated, the records carefully adjusted. The shift is shameless, but the gall to defend it even more so. However, they won't be rehabilitated. Not that easily. Whilst independent and alternative media worked tirelessly to document, to platform and capture the depth of Israel's barbarity with a fraction of the resources, the mainstream media, with greater infrastructure, reach and a moral obligation – did the precise opposite. It's not courage to write a column, as one Guardian contributor did, that agonises performatively over the plight of Palestinian children in this "terrible conflict", yet fails across more than 1000 words to name the state mercilessly targeting them. READ MORE: Kneecap correct BBC headline after TRNSMT show cancelled Nor is it brave for the paper's editorial to now highlight the reality of the engineered horror, while its reporters resort to business as usual and include Israeli military justifications in their coverage — trawling through press releases, or recycling old ones when none are ready to hand. All to avoid framing the ongoing Palestinian suffering as a deliberate, systematic decimation, and instead present it as part of a tragic, two-sided military strategy – all of which is most certainly unrelated to the secret meetings The Guardian's editor held with a former Israeli general tasked with cultivating support for Israel. None of that is courageous, principled journalism. Nor is it an awakening or an ethical reckoning that must be applauded. It's cynical hand-wringing — the kind that might win nods in the sophisticated newsroom culture of Fleet Street but will collapse under the weight of history. In the all-encompassing court of public memory, this theatre won't hold up. When British Palestinian reconstructive surgeon Ghassan Abu-Sittah says that in the future genocide museum, there will be a section reserved for the journalists who enabled the horrors, I can't help but have sympathy for the architects and engineers tasked with the herculean challenge of designing a room vast enough to hold them all. Hamza Yusuf is a British-Palestinian writer and journalist whose work focuses on Palestine
