
Jamie Beaton's new venture Concord Visa aims to simplify US visa pathways for Kiwis
The price is pitched as being around 40% the rate charged by a law firm specialising in immigration (the traditional route). The US$10,000 tier offers more assistance 'building your profile'.
Chance meeting
As with Crimson, Concord was born in part out of Beaton's own experience, after earning the first of his (now half dozen) US post-graduate degrees at Princeton.
'When I first came to the US, I was on the F1, the student visa. And I wasn't really sure how one stays in the US post-degree for an extended period of time,' Beaton said.
'Getting an O-1 visa was totally random. I bumped into a fellow Kiwi entrepreneur, Divya Dhar, who mentioned she's secured a green card through this mystical process. After going through the application, I managed to land my visa, enabling me to build Crimson at full speed."
Beaton said even with the serendipity of meeting Dhar, it was a slog, with around 200 pages of paperwork, and, as with trying to penetrate the Ivy League, it can be hard for a novice to navigate the best path.
He sees a 'massive information barrier', now compounded by a growing AI slop of misinformation online.
The New Zealander still has an O-1, today, which he's renewed several times. He says once you've secured it, the visa is relatively straightforward to renew.
Beaton co-founded Concord with Kevin Park, a fellow Auckland University grad who is familiar with the ins and outs of immigration through his former role as Crimson's shock trooper, setting up beachheads in a series of countries during the firm's early days.
"Trump is throwing visa bombs left, right and centre,' says Jamie Beaton (left), here with Concord Visa co-founder Kevin Park.
'Crimson went from one country to 20 really fast, with plenty of messy chaos, with Kevin and many other great folks leading the charge to go through that baptism by fire.'
'Trump throwing visa bombs'
There's plenty of messy chaos in the US now, of course – though these days it's more likely to emanate from the White House.
Beaton says Concord recently helped a crypto entrepreneur from China gain a visa to build his firm in the US.
'It's really exciting to see cases like this, especially as Trump is throwing visa bombs left, right and centre,' Beaton says.
'A lot of our families are very keen to have clarity as to what a multi-year journey looks like in America or other countries, and this is really designed to be that next step in the Crimson journey for them.'
Park says it's important to get all your paperwork correct. But, as with trying to get into Harvard or Yale, it's also a matter of putting together the right 'narrative' for the talent-based O-1, which is often restricted to around 10,000 people each year.
Park says Concord offers more than 10 types of visas, including those in various skills shortage categories, and will match a candidate to the best type.
His pitch is that traditional immigration advisers are often used to dealing with the requirements of big corporates.
He and Beaton are more savvy about the potential quirks and complications of smaller firms, like Silicon Valley startups, where a funding round or change of ownership can pull the rug out from under an E2 visa (a business investment and employee transfer visa that has been another traditionally popular way for Kiwis to set up shop in the US).
A venture capital round that brings in a range of international investors would see a US-based firm majority-owned offshore, and an E2 visa holder suddenly asked to leave the country within 60 days, Park says.
The firm also helps with immigration into Australia, Britain and New Zealand.
Beaton says the business is a natural extension of Crimson, which has helped 'several thousand' students secure F1 visas.
Although only up and running for a few months, Concord has already helped more than 100 people secure US visas, Beaton and Park say.
Their hero client is Auckland brand-tracking start-up Tracksuit, which has been pushing into the US after a $42 million raise this year.
Inside help
It also helped the East Auckland-raised Wayne Zhou secure an O-1 visa for his move from Australia to the US as his Silicon Valley-based startup staged a US$20m Series A raise.
Macleans College old boy Zhou has quite the backstory.
He enrolled at the University of Sydney but was only two years into a seven-year path to a Doctor of Dentistry ('my immigrant parents' dream') before he dropped out. Zhou had been running a recruitment consultancy as a side hustle.
'I was basically helping my friends get jobs in the best industries; in finance, investment banking and professional services,' he says.
'Ruler', as he called his careers platform, blossomed during his second year, as the 2020 Covid lockdown hit – to the point where he left university.
Crimson acquired Ruler in 2022, and Zhou stayed on until mid-2023, until striking out on his own again to form a fintech called Verve.
'It flopped,' he says.
A year ago, he founded Paraform, 'a recruiting marketplace that connects companies with a network of specialised recruiters to fill their hardest roles'.
With backing from the founders of Canva, among others, his start-up quickly grew to 40 staff, with plans for 100 by year's end.
It's a roller-coaster story, especially for someone yet to hit 30. But how should it be framed in a bid for an O-1 talent visa?
Zhou says the Concord consultant assigned to him had previously worked on the other side of the fence, where she had conducted more than 10,000 visa interviews while with the US Embassy in Australia.
Chris Keall is an Auckland-based member of the Herald's business team. He joined the Herald in 2018 and is the technology editor and a senior business writer.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Rate-cut reality check - too little, too late: Nick Stewart
Higher starting debt, unfavourable interest rates, adverse growth trends and long-term pressures from aging and climate change are converging into a perfect storm. Despite claims of $44 billion in savings, the Government has reallocated spending rather than shrinking it. It's hard for hope not to fade when our government appears to lack the mettle to take the bull by the horns. The 'price of butter' facade may have fooled some, but not many. Butter is a product that hasn't changed in eons – full cream milk, add salt and churn. No smoke and mirrors or PR spin, just butter. Yet politicians obsess over its retail pricing while avoiding hard decisions on fiscal consolidation that might actually address underlying inflation pressures. The great capital migration Capital flows as freely as people in an interconnected world. Just as 230,000 Kiwis have voted with their feet over two years seeking better opportunities offshore, smart money increasingly looks beyond our borders for superior returns. The recent emigration shows a damning verdict on New Zealand's economic trajectory. These are productive citizens, who see limited prospects in a country determined to tax productivity whilst subsidising speculation. Human capital flight and financial capital mobility share parallels –both respond to incentives and seek the best risk-adjusted returns. Housing market dysfunction remains Our housing market remains in purgatory, with prices stubbornly elevated while transaction volumes are sluggish. Latest data shows 'days to sell' extending and prices slipping nationally for six of the past seven months. Wednesday's modest rate cut is unlikely to break this deadlock. Young Kiwis are emigrating, recognising their homeownership prospects have been systematically destroyed by policies prioritising incumbent wealth over economic dynamism. The social contract promising hard work would lead to homeownership has been broken: 72% of Kiwis without a home believe buying a property is beyond their reach. Yet, many Kiwis remain dangerously over-exposed to residential real estate. Rethinking investment The traditional Kiwi approach of leveraging into property and hoping for the best is dangerous where house prices may stagnate while debt service costs remain higher. Global equity markets continue to climb, with the S&P 500 delivering 5-year annualised returns of 15.71%. Meanwhile, New Zealand's NZX50 has delivered a dismal 1.8% annualised return over the same period. The performance gap is devastating. A $100,000 investment in the S&P 500 over five years would have grown to $208,000, versus approximately $109,000 in the NZX50. This $99,000 difference is a documented reality for investors who remained domestically focused while global opportunities compounded wealth at dramatically higher rates. Complexity extends beyond simple asset allocation. Tax implications vary dramatically between domestic and international investments. Currency hedging decisions can make or break returns. Liquidity needs must account for potential emigration scenarios – a consideration rational investors now embrace. Economic crossroads ahead New Zealand stands at an economic crossroads between fiscal irresponsibility leading to Japanese-style stagnation, or making hard decisions to restore economic dynamism. Next Wednesday's timid rate cut suggests we're choosing the former. For investors, the message is clear: adapt or suffer consequences. Capital, like talent, flows to where it's best treated. The 230,000 Kiwis who've recognised this reality are canaries in the coal mine. Smart investors should ensure their wealth enjoys the same mobility their fellow citizens have embraced. The coming rate cut won't be cause for celebration – it will be a symptom of deeper malaise and policy impotence facing structural decline. - Nick Stewart's iwi affiliations are Ngāi Tahu, Ngāti Huirapa, Ngāti Māmoe, Ngāti Waitaha).


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Best Artificial Grass Suppliers In New Zealand: Our Top 3
Press Release: Looking for the best artificial grass in New Zealand but not sure who to trust? This guide breaks down what matters, who does it well, and how to choose the right turf for your space. We focus on suppliers with proven results in Auckland and New Zealand wide, so you can skip the guesswork and get straight to a better lawn. Start by thinking about how the area will be used. For family backyards, look for soft fibres, good drainage, and UV stabilised yarns that handle New Zealand's weather. For pets, choose perforated backing and infill that controls odour. For sport and play, impact layers and line markings improve safety and performance. Installation quality is just as important as the product. The best suppliers specify base prep, edging, and joins properly, then stand behind their work with clear warranties and aftercare. We also suggest checking sample pieces in natural light, asking about pile height and stitch rate, and confirming that the product is tested for UV stability. You will see terms like polyethylene, polypropylene, and nylon. Each yarn type behaves differently for softness, resilience, and heat. A good team will match the product to your use case rather than pushing a one-size-fits-all fake grass. Below are the three suppliers we rate highly for quality, reliability, and service. The top spot goes to Urban Turf Solutions, our best overall choice and by far the strongest option for residential projects across Auckland and New Zealand. Top 3 Artificial Grass Suppliers in New Zealand 1) Urban Turf Solutions — Best Overall, Best for Residential Address: 42b Porana Road, Wairau Valley, Auckland 0627 Phone: 0508 872 268 Email: info@ Website: Why Choose Urban Turf Solutions? Urban Turf Solutions is a New Zealand owned and operated supplier with manufacturing on the Gold Coast. The range covers landscaping lawns, sports fields, playgrounds, rooftops, and commercial spaces, with products designed for local conditions. They are the standout pick for home projects thanks to realistic appearance, dependable installs, and a large approved installer network. From family backyards to Maraetai Tennis Club and even Eden Park, their track record is broad and proven. 2) TigerTurf NZ Ltd Address: 384 Neilson Street, Penrose (Onehunga), Auckland 1061 Phone: 0800 804 134 or +64 9 634 4134 Email: NZinfo@ Why Choose TigerTurf NZ? TigerTurf brings decades of experience across sports, playgrounds, and landscaping. They deliver consistent quality for residential and large commercial projects, with strong technical support and proven systems. 3) SmartGrass NZ Phone: 0800 887 369 Email: hello@ Why Choose SmartGrass NZ? SmartGrass focuses on ultra-realistic landscaping turf that suits Kiwi homes. It is pet friendly, kid safe, and weather ready. With national coverage and solid warranties, they are a reliable pick for tidy, low-maintenance spaces. How to Choose the Right Artificial Grass in NZ Match the turf to the use. For everyday family lawns, a medium pile height, soft polyethylene fibres, and a dense stitch rate feel great underfoot. Busy entertaining areas near decks or pools benefit from shorter, firmer piles that brush up easily and dry fast. For high-traffic paths, look for resilience ratings and consider a shockpad if you want extra comfort. Ask for samples and see them outside. Colours shift in sunlight. Place samples next to natural planting and paving, and check pile direction. A quick brush with a stiff broom will show how the fibres recover. Check UV stabilisation and backing. New Zealand sun is harsh, so UV stabilised yarns are essential. Perforated backings and the right sub-base prevent puddling. For pets, a free-draining base and appropriate infill help manage odour. Installation quality matters. A good installer will confirm base depth and compaction, screed levels for drainage, neat edging, and tight joins. Ask to see recent jobs in Auckland or in a similar climate. Request written warranties for both product and workmanship. Maintenance is simple but important. Artificial lawns are low maintenance, not no maintenance. Plan for periodic brushing to lift fibres, leaf blowing to keep debris off, and occasional rinsing. High-use areas may need infill top ups over time. Environmental notes. Choose suppliers that source high quality, long lasting yarns. Longevity reduces replacement frequency. Some systems support organic or TPE infills. Collecting runoff during cleaning helps keep gardens tidy. Budgeting without surprises. Final cost depends on access, base preparation, edges, and the turf you choose. Ask for an itemised quote that covers excavation, base layers, edging, turf, joins, infill, and clean-up. Comparing like-for-like stops cheap quotes hiding thin bases or light products. Why Urban Turf often wins for homes. For residential work, you want a lawn that looks natural, feels soft, drains quickly, and holds up to everyday life. Urban Turf Solutions pairs a broad product range with local knowledge and an extensive approved installer network New Zealand wide, which makes getting a consistent finish much easier. Their experience across everything from small courtyards to premium sports venues shows in the details that homeowners notice every day. Quick checklist before you buy Have you seen real-world installs, ideally nearby in Auckland or your region Do you have samples viewed in natural light and brushed in both directions Is the product UV stabilised and backed by clear warranty terms Has the installer specified base depth, edging, and joins in writing Do you understand the aftercare plan and maintenance schedule Choosing well means you get a lawn that looks great year round, stays tidy through wet winters and hot summers, and frees up your weekends. If you want the safest pick for homes and rentals, Urban Turf Solutions is our first call. For sport, schools, and large commercial projects, TigerTurf and SmartGrass round out a strong New Zealand wide lineup of artificial grass experts.


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Trump's answer to numbers he doesn't like is to change them or throw them away
The President's manipulation of government data threatens to erode public trust in facts that leaders of both parties have long relied on to guide policy decisions. A breakdown in official government statistics could also create economic instability, restrain lifesaving healthcare and limit forecasts of natural disasters. Trump has routinely spread misinformation since the start of his political career, but his efforts in his second term to bend data to support his agenda have invited comparisons to information control in autocratic countries. 'What he's trying to do is to present the best possible picture of what he's doing, even if that means he has to cook the numbers, even if that means he has to distort the data,' said Robert Cropf, a political science professor at St Louis University. 'It's basically a page from the authoritarian playbook.' Trump has also tried to use his social media megaphone to influence data produced by private companies. On Tuesday, he called for Goldman Sachs to replace a veteran economist who produced reports that warned that tariffs could cause inflation. But he may find himself in a game of whack-a-mole. Today, a benchmark that measures the prices producers get for goods and services showed hotter-than-expected inflation, partly because of tariffs. Trump has not commented yet on the report. Risk of undermining stats Other countries have demonstrated the risk of undermining statistics, which can erode citizens' trust in their government and nations' standing in the international community. China has been widely accused of inflating economic figures, prompting other countries to seek alternative data sources for a more trustworthy picture of the nation's financial situation. In Greece, the government produced false deficit numbers for years, and the government repeatedly sought to criminally prosecute the statistician who produced accurate budget figures. Argentina manipulated economic statistics for years to minimise the extent of inflation, even as consumers paid for significantly more expensive groceries and goods. The false deficit numbers in Greece contributed to the country's debt crisis. The cooked numbers in Argentina made it more difficult for the government to enact policies that could limit inflation, and citizens lost faith in the ability to trust the government data to inform major purchases. Need for accurate picture White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said that the President's actions are intended to 'restore' Americans' trust in data so they can make their own decisions. 'President Trump is preserving – not eroding – democracy by ensuring that the American people can rely on Government data that actually reflects reality,' Rogers said in a statement. Government statistics have traditionally been considered more reliable and comprehensive than those collected by private sector companies motivated by profits, said Paul Schroeder, the executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics. The data is needed to provide an accurate picture of what is happening. Without it, governments, corporations and individuals lack information that can inform decisions about everything from mortgage rates to weight loss. 'It's almost like an airline pilot losing his instrument panel when driving the plane,' Schroeder said of the erosion. Trump's decision to fire Bureau of Labour Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer was widely condemned by statisticians and economists, who warned that the move could have a chilling effect on the work of federal number crunchers who produce reports the President doesn't like. Trump claimed without evidence that the nation's job statistics were 'rigged', following a revision to the May and June jobs figures that showed the labour market was weaker than previously known. Revisions to job reports are common, but many economists have acknowledged falling response rates to government surveys, and long-standing budget strains have made it harder for economic agencies to collect and analyse reliable data. 'President Trump believes that businesses, households, and policymakers deserve accurate data to inform their decision-making, and he will restore America's trust in the BLS,' Rogers said. US President Donald Trump throws pens to the crowd after signing executive orders during the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena, in Washington, DC, on January 20, 2025. Photo / Jim Watson, AFP Plan to overhaul census Trump's attempts to change how the Government collects data have invited backlash, especially his proposal to overhaul the census amid a fight over redistricting. Civil liberties groups have said they would challenge any attempt to change the census, warning that the President's proposal to eliminate undocumented immigrants from the count could erode the political power and financial resources of diverse communities. The census is used not only to determine congressional seats but also to distribute federal funding and decide where to build schools. Washington DC crime Trump justified his decision to deploy federal law enforcement and the National Guard on DC streets with claims that crime is surging in Washington, but violent crime in DC has been on the decline since 2023. The White House has cast doubt on the accuracy of local statistics, citing a July NBC News report that said that the District suspended a police commander accused of manipulating crime numbers in his district. Rogers added that the data 'doesn't change the on-the-ground reality that many DC residents and visitors have experienced on our streets'. In other instances, the Administration has halted the collection of data that advocates and experts warn is essential for Americans' wellbeing and safety. Collection of health data At the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, scientists are now forbidden to collect gender data on any programmes. That includes abortion data and information for sexually transmitted disease prevention, violence prevention and mental health programmes. The lack of data could undermine efforts to prevent the spread of STDs and prevent school shootings and suicides. Federal collection of abortion data stopped on April 1 following widespread layoffs across the Department of Health and Human Services. Most states put out their own abortion data, but no other federal agency collects abortion data, according to a former CDC employee familiar with those programmes. The Government uses the data to predict birth rates, a crucial statistic that governments and businesses use to make decisions about the health system, education and the economy. CDC staff members are also no longer collecting concussion data for the creation of a concussion surveillance system, which has had strong bipartisan congressional support. The agency is also no longer analysing data to prevent drowning – the leading cause of death in children aged 1 to 4 – because all of those staff members were laid off. Tracking the drug crisis Researchers have warned about the diminishing of data programmes that are key to understanding the ever-evolving drug crisis in the US – and to building the best prevention and treatment programmes. In June, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration stopped updating the Drug Abuse Warning Network, a nationwide surveillance system of drug use trends and insights drawn from emergency department visits. The loss of that data will make it more difficult for researchers such as Daniel Ciccarone, a professor at the University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, to track street drugs and overdoses. Ciccarone studies trends in the fentanyl supply, which kills tens of thousands of Americans each year, as well as new synthetic drugs seeping into regional supplies. 'We need surveillance data at a historic time of an undulating drug supply – we don't know what's going to happen next,' Ciccarone said. Vaping might seem safer than smoking, but the long-term risks are starting to show. Photo / 123RF Stats on smoking, vaping Public health advocates have raised concerns about the future of the National Youth Tobacco Survey, an annual report that measures how young people are using nicotine products. The report helped alert the country to the epidemic of teen vaping and led to stricter controls on the industry. The programme has long been run through the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC's Office on Smoking and Health, which was shut down in the northern spring. An HHS spokesperson did not respond when asked about the future of the survey, saying only that the CDC 'remains deeply committed to tobacco prevention and control and … continues to support this critical public health priority through a range of efforts, including outreach, education, and surveillance'. Research on climate The Trump Administration has also discontinued dozens of climate databases and government-funded studies, including efforts to quantify the damage caused by natural disasters and to understand how the heaviest rainfall will intensify as the planet warms. Officials have removed key climate data and reports from the internet. The Administration took down the website of the US Global Change Research Programme, which shared congressionally mandated reports about climate change impacts across the country. And it deleted a repository for research and forecasts, though it said such information would continue to be posted on a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration website. Trump's budget proposal for Noaa would eliminate nearly all of the agency's labs focused on climate, weather and oceans – institutions whose studies are key to weather and climate forecasting and improving our understanding of everything from summer thunderstorms to the El Nino climate pattern. Businesses rely on this data to inform plans for tourism, fisheries and shipping. Education staff cuts The changes reflect the Administration's commitment to 'eliminating bias and producing Gold Standard Science research driven by verifiable data,' Rogers said in a statement. As the Trump Administration attempts to shut the Education Department, its ability to publish accurate and timely data was thrown into question after deep cuts to the department's staff. Virtually the entire staff of the National Centre for Education Statistics was laid off, and while much of the work is done by contractors, researchers worry that there are no longer enough government workers to check and disseminate collected data. The centre's work is critical to researchers, policymakers and journalists, with a wide range of data including the demographics of students and schools, courses offered, crime on campuses, and school spending. Already, the Education Department missed its June deadline to publish the annual Condition of Education report, the authoritative source for education data from preschool through into university. The agency has continued to publish some data tables, but far fewer than in past years. Information on race The Trump Administration has also called for more information about the consideration of applicants' race in college admissions. 'Greater transparency is essential to exposing unlawful practices and ultimately ridding society of shameful, dangerous racial hierarchies,' Trump said in a memorandum issued last week, as he ordered the Education Department to begin collecting detailed data from all colleges that receive federal financial aid. That includes grades and test scores for both applicants and students, broken down by race. The White House has argued that a lack of data has hindered enforcement of a 2023 Supreme Court ruling that the use of race-conscious admissions is unconstitutional. A higher education leader argued that the information requested won't provide good data: applicants don't disclose their race, and while colleges do survey students who enrol, participation is voluntary, and even those who respond may choose not to disclose their race. 'They're going to gather a bunch of information and try to make sense of it,' said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education. 'I worry that they're not going to be able to make much sense of it.' Legacy of changes The impact of these changes could affect the nation long after Trump leaves office, Cropf said. Even if the Government resumes collecting data, there will be gaps from the Trump era, and the public may view the figures as more politicised. 'It taints the waters,' he said. 'It seriously undermines faith in our institutions if we can't have any guarantees the institutions are providing us with reliable data or that they're making decisions based on reliable data.'