Dan Sheehan handed four-match ban for dangerous clear-out on Tom Lynagh that went unpunished
According to a press release issued on Monday morning by World Rugby, Sheehan did not accept that foul play had occurred nor that the offence warranted a citing.
This extended his eventual ban, though it will be reduced by a week if the 27-year-old completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, widely known as 'tackle school'.
Sheehan, who appeared to hit Lynagh in the head with his elbow during the first half of the Lions' 22-12 loss on Saturday, was collared with charging into a ruck or a maul and a panel found his actions to be reckless.
Tom Lynagh flattened by elbow to the head. #AUSvBIL pic.twitter.com/RUtfCOGU4W
— Jobson Growthe (@electricBAU) August 2, 2025
The committee also found that he made head contact with Lynagh, who subsequently left the field and did not return, and that Sheehan's actions 'amounted to a high degree of danger and that no mitigation applied'.
There was minimal reaction to the clear-out from any players at the time, with Lynagh even staying on the field long enough to kick a penalty goal, which might have spared Sheehan from greater scrutiny.
Michael Lynagh, the former Wallabies fly-half and father of Tom, has used his X account to repost several questions of how the officials missed Sheehan's actions at the time. One of them derided the situation as 'utterly insane'.
Another, from Jack Quigley, said: 'So, just to be clear: This TMO will stop the game to check literally EVERYTHING except Dan Sheehan's hit that took Lynagh out. What are we doing here.'
Had referee Nika Amushakeli been alerted to Sheehan's actions, it is highly likely that a card would have resulted. Even though 20-minute red cards were in play during the series, allowing teams to replace the offending player after that amount of time, the bunker official would have had scope to send off Sheehan permanently.
Sheehan will now miss Leinster's pre-season game against Cardiff as well as their first two matches of the United Rugby Championship campaign against Stormers and Sharks.
Provided that he completes World Rugby's coaching intervention programme, he will be available to face Munster on October 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Footy star gets punished by NRL for giving fans the 'Arabic middle finger' - as a shock photos show why fans think the league has got it wrong
Wests Tigers star Brent Naden has been issued a breach notice by the NRL for giving Bulldogs fans the 'khod', which is often perceived as the 'Arabic middle finger.' Naden, 29, posted the gesture post-game - before adding f***ing dogs' - on social media via TikTok. The video was reportedly sent by Naden to a friend and then leaked publicly. Utility back Naden - who previously played for the Bulldogs in 2022 - will be fined. His teammates at the Tigers - Samuela Fainu, Sunia Turuva and Latu Fainu - all made the khod gesture towards Canterbury supporters at Commbank Stadium on August 3, but the trio have escaped sanction. On Wednesday morning, the NRL released a statement confirming the warning had been handed out. 'The NRL acknowledges that these actions caused, or had the potential to cause, offence to members of the NRL community,' the statement read. 'Separately, the NRL has issued a breach notice to Wests Tigers player Brent Naden. 'The notice alleges that Naden's conduct following the Wests Tigers match contravened the NRL Code of Conduct. The player will have five days to respond to the breach notice.' Adding to the confusion for fans is an image currently circulating online via NRL Photos from last weekend which shows Bulldogs fullback Jacob Kiraz giving Tigers halfback Adam Doueihi a 'friendly' khod pre-game. Both footy stars have Lebanese heritage. Other photos have shown Bulldogs fans using the gesture. Some footy supporters have been stunned at the backlash Naden and the Tigers have received, given the hand gesture can also be good-natured, as was the case with Kiraz. Even NRL CEO Andrew Abdo admitted this week he had to 'learn up' on the matter. The fans also were shocked to see Canterbury - who have a passionate Middle Eastern fan base - reach out to the NRL Integrity Unit, who then launched an investigation. 'Bunch of sooks (Bulldogs supporters) - well done Tigers for dishing it back in perfect style,' said one fan on X in response. 'Turn the focus on your own fan's behaviour before whinging,' suggested another. 'This is funny....I thought the Bulldogs were a tough club and their fans best in the NRL. Yet (they) cry over some banter! 'All of a sudden they get offended so easily. Harden up,' a third said. 'Every Bulldogs game I have been to their fans have been anything but welcoming.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Footy player confronts the cop who LIED during sexual assault case that almost ended his career
Jack De Belin has attended court on Tuesday as the police officer who perjured himself during the NRL star's sexual assault trial argued he should be spared from spending time in jail. Legal counsel for the police officer, who can only be referred to as Officer A due to a suppression order, argued in the Wollongong District Court that their client should be spared jail. Mr De Belin and Callan Sinclair - who was his co-accused during the sexual assault trial - were also in attendance for the hearing, with the officer now set to return to court for sentencing on September 12. Officer A had pleaded guilty to one count of perjury after he gave false evidence under oath during a pre-trial hearing in relation to the proceedings against the St George Illawarra player and his friend Sinclair. The charge relates to his handling of legally privileged text messages that were found on De Belin's mobile phone, which was seized as part of police investigations in 2019. De Belin and Sinclair were accused of sexually assaulting a 19-year-old woman in December 2018. The Director of Public Prosecutions later dropped the charges against both men. De Belin and Sinclair have maintained their innocence throughout, stating any sexual contact was consensual. Police had accessed 203 text messages on De Belin's phone as part of their investigations, with prosecutor Ciro Triscari telling the court on Tuesday that 190 of those messages contained 'privileged communications between Mr De Belin and his lawyer', Craig Osborne. Osborne, who is also a director at St George Illawarra Dragons, was labelled in De Belin's phone as 'Craig Lawyer' and had been representing him during the proceedings. During a pre-trial hearing in February 2020, counsel for De Belin and Sinclair argued that accessing this information on the seized mobile phone breached their clients' right to a fair trial. They subsequently issued a stay application for proceedings, which was rejected. The pair first appeared in the NSW District Court in 2020, but the trial ended without a verdict. A second trial took place in 2021, but the jury again failed to reach a verdict, with the charges against them eventually dropped. Officer A had been the subject of an internal three-year investigation by the NSW Police Professional Standards Command and was later charged with perjury relating to the evidence he gave at the pre-trial hearing. He had told the court that the correspondence on De Belin's phone with 'Craig Lawyer' related only to 'Dragons business'. But the police officer also admitted to knowing Mr Osborne was working for RMB Lawyers - the firm which was representing De Belin during the proceedings. Officer A has since pleaded guilty to perjuring himself by falsely claiming that the information in the messages pertained only to 'Dragons business'. Prosecutor Triscari told the court on Tuesday that Officer A had 'deliberately misled the court' when making that statement. The prosecutor said: 'This represents a serious example of perjury when one considers the position occupied by the offender in question. 'The proceedings are serious criminal proceedings where the liberty of individuals was at stake.' Officer A's barrister Peggy Dwyer SC told the court that her client had been suffering from complex post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive illnesses after being subjected to 'gruesome and disturbing incidents' during his employment as a police officer. 'There can be no doubt he was suffering from PTSD in February and that it impacted his capacity to give evidence,' Dwyer told the court. She argued that the perjury was 'an innocent mistake' that had been 'made in a moment of panic' and said Officer A was a 'man of great character'. Dwyer argued that the actions of Officer A had not impacted the eventual trial of De Belin or Sinclair. 'This was not a case where anything [Officer A] did or didn't do changed whether or not they were charged,' Dwyer said. Counsel for Officer A then urged the court not to impose a jail term on their client. Instead, Dwyer told the court that any custodial sentence that potentially might be handed down should be served in the community as part of an Intensive Corrective Order. Dwyer told the court that any jail term could be 'catastrophic' for Officer A's well-being. The police officer had been stood down from his role in August 2023 on medical grounds. Meanwhile, De Belin was sidelined from playing for the Dragons for three years under the NRL's no-fault stand-down rule while the legal proceedings took place.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Yahoo Serious still REFUSES to leave the multimillion-dollar beachside home he was accused of squatting in - despite being issued a court order
A defiant Yahoo Serious refuses to leave the multi-million dollar Sydney home he has been accused of squatting in. Serious, 72, appeared on A Current Affair this week when the landlord responsible for the property in Sydney's Palm Beach came to confront the former film star. He is said to be living illegally with his Jack Russell terrier in the multi-million-dollar home of Charles Phillip Porter, who is in his 90s and in a nursing home. The actor had been ordered to exit the multi-storey house on Barrenjoey Road by August 4. Margaret Charlton is the landlord and holds power of attorney for Charles Phillip Porter, the home's owner, who is currently in a nursing home. She told ACA she needed to sell the property to pay for Porter's mounting nursing home fees. Reading from a court order, Margaret said: 'The order for possession is suspended until the fourth of August... which means that I get the property back.' Margaret then entered the property, surprised to find Yahoo still inside. 'You've been living in this property while Margie's been trying to sell it to pay for Phillip's aged care,' reporter Pippa Bradshaw told the Young Einstein star. 'He's got dementia – he can sell the property,' Serious flippantly replied. When told that Charlton had been unable to sell the property while Serious was occupying it, he defiantly protested that he was not squatting and was 'sick.' 'I'm not squatting – [I'm] surviving,' Serious said. 'Look at the weather out there – it's really, really dangerous.' Removalists then arrived to begin stripping the property of belongings; however, Serious refused to budge. 'Yahoo is still refusing to go, even though we are taking all the old furniture out so the house can be sold,' Charlton said. She added that the situation would soon be escalated if Serious continued to flout the court order. 'We have booked a sheriff. As soon as the sheriff comes... if he refuses to go... the police will be called and he'll be physically removed from the property,' Charlton said. Speaking to Daily Mail in July, Serious denied that he was squatting at the property, despite a tribunal hearing having given him a deadline to vacate. 'You've got it all wrong,' he insisted. Charlton also told Daily Mail Australia the former star has cost the homeowner $70,000 in nursing home fees because he refused to move out. In March, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal heard that Serious used to live in the granny flat beneath the dilapidated property, which stands among the mansions overlooking picturesque Pittwater. The tribunal was told the owner had allowed Serious to move into the granny flat, as the former screen star was living rough in his ageing BMW sedan, but he moved into the main house when Mr Porter was put into care. On April 24, the tribunal initially gave Serious six weeks to move out, Charlton told Daily Mail. 'But his lawyer said he needed 12 weeks because he's a sick man with lymphoma,' she said. Serious – and his wild haircut at the time – became suddenly famous when he starred in 1988's Young Einstein movie and then 1993's Reckless Kelly. But he later fell on hard times and was taken in by Porter and Charlton several years ago. He was recently seen looking very gaunt, amid concerns for his health. Serious told the tribunal he should be allowed to remain in the home because he was Mr Porter's carer, which Ms Charlton strongly disputes. 'Phillip - we call him Phillip, not Charles, is a family friend, he has been for years and years,' she said. 'He's never been married, never had children, so he made me power of attorney and trustee. 'He was getting old and getting dementia, and was having trouble looking after himself, so I was doing all his cooking. 'It wasn't like Yahoo was his carer. He wasn't bathing him or dressing him. I was washing his clothes, we had a cleaner coming in.
