logo
Why Iran 'cannot turn back time' on public hijab rule – DW – 05/21/2025

Why Iran 'cannot turn back time' on public hijab rule – DW – 05/21/2025

DW21-05-2025
"The state's current policy on the issue of the hijab is not to follow strict rules," Ali Motahari, a conservative Iranian politician, told journalists last week on the fringes of the International Book Fair in Tehran.
He added that the police should only intervene in the event of gross violations.
"You have to know that even at the time of the Shah, before the 1979 revolution, women were arrested if they did not dress decently in public," he said. Wearing a hijab, or headscarf, remains mandatory in Iran.
However, even before the nationwide protests following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in police custody in September 2022, Motahari was one of those conservative politicians who repeatedly called for a crackdown on women who dared to deviate even slightly from the strict dress code.
In 2014, he asked, "Why are women allowed to wear trousers under their coats?" He called on the authorities to take more rigorous action against the women concerned.
'A changed country'
"What we have achieved in the last three years can no longer be taken away by the state," a gender researcher and journalist from Tehran told DW. She asked DW not to publish her name as the authorities regularly reprimand her for her stance, and she even receives death threats from anonymous callers.
She is one of the women who not only refuse to wear a headscarf in public, but also encourages other women to decide for themselves whether they want to.
"They can no longer force us to follow their rules and automatically wear a headscarf every time we leave the house," she says.
She also emphasizes that Iran has changed after the death of Jina Mahsa Amini. For example, on May 12, the coffin of Shiva Aristoui, an Iranian writer and poet, was carried by women without the mandatory hijab. Traditionally, carrying the coffin has long been a matter for men in accordance with religious and social norms. However, since the "Women, Life, Freedom" movement, more and more women attend funerals without the compulsory hijab and carry the coffins of their loved ones.
Yet, many women deliberately stay away from international media and avoid public attention to continue on their path without additional repression. Any exchange with international media could be considered "propaganda against the system," "cooperation with a hostile government" or could be prosecuted as following an "order from abroad."
The journalists Niloofar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi were first arrested, then sentenced but eventually pardoned by Iran's Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Image: Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images
Niloufar Hamedi, an award-winning journalist, is a recent example of the state's crackdown. Her reporting on the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in 2022 brought her international fame.
Among other pieces, she published a photo of Amini's grieving parents. It quickly went viral on social media and became a symbol of the nationwide protests, which became the largest protest movement in Iran since the Islamic Revolution in 1979.
Hamedi was arrested and charged with alleged "collaboration with an enemy government," "propaganda against the system" among other charges. She was sentenced to a total of 13 years in prison. However, after 17 months, she was released on bail in January 2024. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei then pardoned her and her colleague Elaheh Mohammadi in February 2025.
On May 11, 2,800 days after the report that changed the country, an article under her name appeared once more in the country's major daily Persian newspaper Shargh. Niloofar Hamedi is allowed to work as a journalist in Iran again.
The protests after the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in September 2022 turned into the biggest demonstration since the Iranian Revolution 1979 Image: Allison Bailey/NurPhoto/picture alliance
'The state lacks the power to stop change'
Does this indicate that the state has capitulated to women? "No," Sedigheh Vasmaghi, women's rights activist and theologian, told DW.
"The political system has not accepted the resistance the women have shown," she said. "The state does not have the power to stop or even reverse this change either."
Vasmaghi, who joined protesters against the compulsory headscarf rule, no longer wears a headscarf in public.
In April 2023, Vasmaghi wrote an open letter to Khamenei in which she criticized his decree on the hijab requirement and emphasized that the Quran does not stipulate such an obligation.
In March 2024, she was arrested for "propaganda against the system" and "public appearance without a Sharia-compliant hijab." Due to her health problems, she was sent on parole.
Still, she could be arrested again at any time. But she has no fear of that. "The state in Iran is facing massive domestic and foreign policy problems and is currently not in a position to deal with women across the country, especially teenagers and young women, who no longer want to wear headscarves," she told DW.
"However, any measure that appears to be effective will be reviewed and attempted to be enforced," Vasmaghi continued, referring to the ongoing debate on the introduction of a controversial lawto monitor women in public in Iran. The law provides for a series of punitive measures for women who refuse to wear the required hijab in public.
"The political system can no longer turn back time," Vasmaghi said.
This article was originally published in German.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Solomon Islands Says China Not Influencing Diplomatic Decisions
Solomon Islands Says China Not Influencing Diplomatic Decisions

Int'l Business Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Solomon Islands Says China Not Influencing Diplomatic Decisions

Solomon Islands defended its move to bar some partners from an influential summit of South Pacific leaders, brushing aside claims on Thursday of a looming split or that China is influencing its decisions. China, the United States and Taiwan have all been barred from the annual Pacific Islands Forum in Honiara next month, an event they usually attend. China counts the Solomon Islands among its closest partners in the South Pacific and signed a secretive security pact with Honiara in 2022. It has been accused of agitating behind the scenes to see Taiwan excluded from attending the Forum as an observer. The Pacific bloc's top diplomats met in Fiji on Thursday to discuss the Forum's agenda, and Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Peter Shanel Agovaka said his nation was not influenced by China. "Our focus is not on China or Taiwan. Our focus is on the (Pacific) region," Agovaka told AFP. He expressed frustration and blamed the Forum secretariat for the ban because it was yet to agree on "dialogue partners". Agovaka added that the Forum was "all over the place". New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters had earlier warned that "outsiders" interfering with Forum decisions threatened to split the bloc. Peters did not mention China by name, but said the issue would be raised during the foreign ministers' meeting. "We've got to make sure that every outsider comes here with respect for those of us who are inside the organisation," he said. Agovaka defended the presence of such observers at Forum meetings. "They enhance our meetings," he said. Communist China has never ruled Taiwan, but Beijing insists the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. China and Taiwan have long vied for diplomatic influence in the South Pacific and elsewhere, with Beijing spending hundreds of millions of dollars building sports stadiums, presidential palaces, hospitals and roads in Pacific island nations. Peters later described Agovaka's comments as "very perplexing". "At this point in time, when aid from another source or other countries is desperately needed and we're out there trying to get it, if the message is we're not interested in seeing you, how's this going to fall?" he said. Chinese officials described accusations they were agitating behind the scenes as "misinformation". "China has participated in every Forum dialogue, and remains committed and looks forward to continuing such engagement," a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the New Zealand capital said. The annual pre-Forum meeting of foreign ministers is typically a light-hearted affair, although the gathering in Suva on Thursday was noticeably more tense. Several countries did send ministers and others did not engage fully. Nauru's representative left, smoking a cigar, after only one morning session. "We're going to sort things out... we'll get things back on an even keel," Peters said. The Forum will be held in Honiara from September 8-12.

Afghanistan: Are the Taliban still isolated after 4 years? – DW – 08/14/2025
Afghanistan: Are the Taliban still isolated after 4 years? – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

Afghanistan: Are the Taliban still isolated after 4 years? – DW – 08/14/2025

The fall of Kabul four years ago marked the return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan. The country is still in a deep humanitarian crisis, but the militants have found ways to use this to their advantage. In August 2021, the government in Kabul collapsed and gave way to the Taliban in wake of the US pulling its forces out of Afghanistan. Four year later, the Taliban seem to have a firm grip on power. So firm, in fact, that some governments, including the one in Germany, are stealthily building ties to the de-facto government in Kabul. Russia became the first country to officially recognize the Taliban in early July. "In this way, Russia is taking over the US role in Afghanistan, which the US gave up voluntarily with the withdrawal of its troops four years ago," says Sardar Rahimi, international relations researcher from the Inalco University in Paris. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video China is also maintaining close economic and political ties to the Taliban regime. Beijing has not officially recognized the Taliban government, but President Xi Jinping notably accepted the Taliban ambassador's letters of credentials with full honors prescribed by diplomatic protocol in January 2024. China needs Afghanistan and its raw materials for its global infrastructure project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). According to Rahimi, the West must face the fact that the Taliban control every aspect of public life in Afghanistan. "This is also the foundation of ties between other countries and the Taliban regime," he told DW. Germany has organized two deportation flights to Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover in August 2021. A total of 109 Afghan nationals were sent to their home country — over half of them were convicted felons. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For this to happen, the Taliban authorities needs to confirm the migrants' citizenship — usually by issuing a passport or a similar travel document. This has made it necessary for German officials to hold intensive talks with the regime. In July, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has confirmed there was communication with the Taliban on a technical level. Speaking with the RedaktionsNetzwerk media group, he said this was strictly a practical matter without political or legal implications. "The German government needs to communicate with many regimes and government whose opinions and acts we do not approve. Still, sometimes our interests demand that we stay in some sort of contact. Everything else would be a denial of reality," he said at the time. Human rights groups such as Pro Asyl decry the deportation flights as "a blatant violation of international law." The European Convention on Human Rights, an international treaty, prohibits deportations to countries where there is a danger of inhumane treatment. The number of deportees from Europe, however, fades in comparison to the mass deportations from Afghanistan's neighbors Iran and Pakistan. The UN's refugee agency UNHCR has registered over 2.1 million deportations from those two countries just in the first seven months of 2025. Half of the repatriations were conducted forcefully, according to the agency. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The massive influx of returnees poses an immense challenge for the Taliban regime, as the ex-migrants return to the country without accommodation, work, or income. However, this humanitarian disaster is playing into the Taiban hands. The extremist group is using the crisis to ensure maximum control and they feel the West is humiliated by seeking to communicate with Kabul. The Taliban do not provide extensive information on what happens to the returnees once they are in the country. Independent watchdog groups report sustained and systematic violations of human rights in Afghanistan. Women's rights especially are being used as a bargaining chip, says Shukria Barakzai, a former Afghani diplomat. "The Taliban use women for their own goals," she told DW. "They increase pressure on women with new limitations in order to legitimize their rule." Women have been fully removed from public life in Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover. Some 1.4 million girls aged 12 and above are no longer allowed to attend school, and young women have been banned from high schools and universities. Human rights organizations are seeing gender-based violence towards women and girls all over the country. At the same time, government critics and journalists fear persecution from the Islamist regime. According to Reporters without Borders (RSF) at least 12 journalists were shot in 2024, and the Taliban are known to raid media outlets, detain or persecute media employees and censor their reports. The country is ranked as 175 out 180 nations on press freedom. With poverty rampant in Afghanistan, nearly 23 million people are dependent on foreign aid, according to EU Commission data. This is roughly half of the country's population. The UN's World Food Programme estimates that every fourth Afghan faces food insecurity, and every third child is malnourished. The humanitarian crisis escalated last month when the US dissolved USAID, causing three million people to lose access to medical care and 420 clinics to close. Germany has paid €551 million ($644 million) in development aid for Afghanistan since 2021. The Taliban have no influence on projects funded by German tax payers, according to Germany's Economic Development and Cooperation Ministry, with the funds directed to the World Bank, the UN agencies and NGOs. However, the new German government has halted the relocation program for Afghans who worked for Germany in Afghanistan before 2021. Up to 2,400 of these people currently have permission to relocate to Germany, but are not able to obtain a visa that would allow them to actually make the trip. They are stuck in legal limbo and forced to remain in Iran or Pakistan, facing acute danger of being deported. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In early July, a Berlin court ruled that an Afghan woman and her family need to be given German visas after waiting in Pakistan for over year. The Afghans face "danger to life and limb" in Pakistan, according to the German judge. However, the German government has refused to comply and instead asked a higher court to review the decision.

Ukraine updates: Zelenskyy, Starmer meet in London – DW – 08/14/2025
Ukraine updates: Zelenskyy, Starmer meet in London – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine updates: Zelenskyy, Starmer meet in London – DW – 08/14/2025

The two leaders are following up on a virtual meeting hosted by Germany, which they attended with President Trump. He warned of 'very severe' consequences if Putin does not end the war. Follow DW for the latest updates. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London to meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as European leaders prepare a unified stance on Ukraine ahead of US President Donald Trump's Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has warned his Russian counterpart of "very severe consequences" if the latter fails to agree to stop the war in Ukraine after their Friday summit in Alaska. Meanwhile, Russian forces said they intercepted and destroyed 44 Ukrainian drones summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will be held at a US military base in the Alaskan city of Anchorage. The venue has symbolism for both countries, with a shared history and strategic proximity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London on Thursday to meet British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as European leaders work to present a unified stance on Ukraine ahead of the summit. Starmer greeted Zelenskyy with a hug and handshake on the steps of 10 Downing Street. Zelenskyy arrived in the British capital from Germany, where he took part in a Berlin-hosted virtual meeting Wednesday with European and NATO leaders and Trump Trump said his talks with Putin would aim to "set the table" for a timely follow-up that would include Zelenskyy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskyy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Starmer on Wednesday called the summit "hugely important." He said there was finally a chance for a solution to the conflict "because of the work that the president [Trump] has put in." The British prime minister added that he was prepared to support further sanctions on Russia if the Kremlin fails to engage. US President Donald Trump has warned his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, of "very severe consequences" if he fails to agree to end the war in Ukraine following their summit Friday in Alaska. Trump stopped short of specifying what those consequences might be. His remarks came after a virtual meeting hosted by Germany that included leaders from Ukraine, the United Kingdom and France. During the meeting, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Putin was "bluffing" about seeking peace. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is in London this morning, meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. European leaders are working to present a united front in support of Kyiv ahead of Friday's much-anticipated summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. We expect to get more details of that meeting today. Zelenskyy, for his part, has accused Putin of 'bluffing.' Stay with this blog for the latest on summit preparations and updates from the battlefield in Ukraine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store