
Akbar misrepresented in textbooks? JNU scholar takes on NCERT over jizya claim
Dr. Ruchika Sharma, a historian specializing in medieval India, has raised questions about the recent revisions in NCERT history textbooks, particularly concerning the portrayal of Emperor Akbar and the tax system known as jizya.
Sharma has announced her intention to file a Right to Information (RTI) request against NCERT, challenging the accuracy and completeness of the content related to this period.
During a televised debate on a private channel, Dr. Sharma criticized the depiction of the Mughal era in the textbooks, calling out what she described as factual discrepancies and biased evaluations of historical figures. She specifically contested the claim that jizya was imposed as a means to pressure non-Muslims into converting to Islam, a point she says lacks credible historical backing.
Historian challenges textbook narrative on jizya
During the televised discussion, Dr Sharma stated that the textbooks misrepresent the timeline of Akbar's abolition of the jizya tax. According to her, the revised content suggests that Akbar abolished the tax only after consolidating his rule. Sharma contested this, asserting that Akbar began his reign in 1560 and abolished jizya by 1562, a time when he was still a young ruler and had not fully established control over the empire.
Dr Sharma cited the Ain-i-Akbari, a contemporary administrative document, as evidence that Akbar removed the jizya tax early in his rule due to its discriminatory nature. She said this decision had moral significance and was not simply a political strategy taken after gaining complete power.
Questions over conversion claims and demand for sources
Dr Sharma also raised concerns about the textbook's explanation of the purpose behind the jizya tax.
The textbook reportedly states that the tax was imposed to pressure non-Muslims to convert to Islam to avoid paying it. She refuted this claim, asking where it is documented in historical records that jizya served as an incentive for conversion.
'If NCERT is presenting this claim, I would like to file an RTI asking for the source,' she said during the debate. Dr Sharma emphasised the need for academic transparency and demanded that NCERT provide the original references for the content presented in the revised material.
Criticism of selective portrayal and terminology
In the same debate, Dr Sharma questioned the use of the term 'dark period' in describing certain historical eras. She called the label historically irrelevant and pointed to what she described as double standards in how different rulers are evaluated in the textbook content.
She further alleged factual discrepancies and incomplete narratives in several textbook sections.
'A lot of what has been written is simply false, and I can point out the facts to prove it. The portrayal of history is incomplete in many places,' she said.
Remarks on Shivaji draw political response
Dr Sharma also made a remark involving Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, which prompted a response from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Amit Malviya, head of the BJP's IT cell, responded on social media platform X, stating that 'Comparing Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj to Mughal tyrants is not only a historical distortion but also a grave insult to the nation.'
He added that there is no historical evidence that Shivaji Maharaj looted or plundered Chikka Devaraja Wodeyar, who ruled Mysore from 1673 to 1704.
Scholar's background and public presence
Dr Ruchika Sharma holds a PhD in History from JNU and is known for her work on medieval Indian history. She regularly appears in national media debates on historical representation in education. She also runs a YouTube channel titled Eyeshadow & Etihaas, where she combines historical discussions with makeup tutorials.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
All efforts went in vain: Mallikarjun Kharge on Karnataka Chief Minister snub
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge on Sunday said he was not given his due by the party high command after the 1999 Karnataka Assembly polls, when SM Krishna was chosen for the state's top post, despite joining the party four months that his hopes of rising to the top office in the state suffered a setback, Kharge said he worked tirelessly as the Congress Legislative Party (CLP) leader for five years, but all his efforts went in ]became the CLP leader and worked hard to bring the party to power. Eventually, our government did come to power, but SM Krishna, who had joined the party just four months earlier at the time, became the chief minister," the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha said at an event in Vijayapura. "All our efforts felt like they went in vain. I had worked tirelessly for five years. He (Krishna) walked in just four months prior and became chief minister," he Congress veteran maintained that there have been many such instances, but it would not be appropriate to talk about all of them at Krishna was the 16th Chief Minister of Karnataka and assumed office in October 1999 after the Congress won 132 of 224 seats in the Assembly served as a minister in the Cabinet of SM Krishna and succeeding Congress chief ministers, until he contested the 2009 Lok Sabha elections and was appointed as the Union Minister for Labour and Employment. He also served as the Union Minister for Railways and Social Justice and Empowerment for nearly a year AS CONGRESS PRESIDENTKharge became the Congress president after he defeated Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor in a landslide victory in emerged as the clear winner with 7,987 votes, while Tharoor managed to secure 1,072 in his favour, underlining the fact that he had strong backing from the party high command and supporters. Over 9,000 Congress delegates across India voted to choose their party chief on October his victory, Kharge became the first non-Gandhi family party chief in almost 24 his tenure as the Congress national president, the party won 99 seats in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, a nearly 50-seat rise as compared to the 2019 the party lost key Assembly elections in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Haryana and Maharashtra.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Karnataka


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Industry welcomes India-UK trade pact
Ludhiana: The recently signed India-UK FTA, officially known as the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), has been welcomed as a transformative development for Punjab's industrial landscape by key industry leaders in the region. Upkar Singh Ahuja, president of the Chamber of Industrial and Commercial Undertakings, said, "This agreement is a transformative opportunity for Punjab's industrial and economic landscape." He emphasised that it will allow Punjab-based exporters to gain a competitive edge through reduced tariffs and improved market access, leading to a significant increase in exports. "It paves the way for technology exchange, skill development, and joint ventures, particularly MSMEs," he said. Echoing similar sentiments, Pankaj Sharma, president of the Association of Trade & Industrial Undertakings, hailed the pact as a "historic development" that will reshape India-UK trade relations over the next five years. "This landmark pact will double India-UK trade by eliminating tariffs on 99% of Indian exports," Sharma said, adding that labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, garments, footwear, and jewellery would gain the most. Pointing out the implications for Punjab specifically, Sharma said cities like Ludhiana, home to a vast network of textile and hosiery units, and Jalandhar renowned for its sports goods industry, stand to benefit directly. "Zero tariffs on textile exports will allow our manufacturers to compete on equal footing with countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Cambodia," he added. The agreement also grants tariff exemptions on exports of basmati rice, fruits, and cotton, major agricultural commodities from Punjab, thus promising a boost for farmers and agro-industries. Sharma further added that the FTA would open up new horizons for young entrepreneurs, especially those working in emerging sectors and advanced manufacturing technologies. BOX BOOST TO BIZ TIES By providing duty-free access to the UK market for key products such as textiles, auto components, tractor parts, and sports goods, including soccer balls, cricket gear, and non-electronic toys, as well as packaged food and vegetables, the FTA will strengthen our manufacturing sectors, known globally for quality and innovation Upkar Singh Ahuja, president, Chamber of Industrial and Commercial Undertakings This landmark pact will double India-UK trade by eliminating tariffs on 99% of Indian exports. Labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, garments, footwear, and jewellery will gain the most Pankaj Sharma, president, Association of Trade & Industrial Undertakings


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bandi takes dig at BC declaration, calls it ‘Muslim Declaration'
Hyderabad: Union minister of state (home) and Karimnagar MP Bandi Sanjay on Sunday dubbed Congress' BC declaration at Kamareddy during the 2023 election campaign as a 'Muslim Declaration', stating that it prioritises the interests of the community over those of the Backward Classes (BC). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Speaking to the media after inaugurating a hospital in Karimnagar, the minister stated, "Congress is giving a false impression to BCs. They are only offering an additional 5% reservations. BCs already have 27% reservations, and if the 10% reservations for Muslims are removed, then BCs would only receive 5% extra as part of the 42% reservations." He emphasized that what was being presented was not BC reservation, but rather reservation allocated to Muslims. Bandi Sanjay vowed to block the BC reservation bill, accusing Rahul Gandhi of mocking Hindus and asserting that he was threatening Hinduism. "We don't have a problem with the BC reservation bill if they exclue Muslims in it, otherwise we will stop this. If we don't stop this here, it will become a template across India," he stated. He also mentioned that Hindu organisations across Telangana were expressing anguish over demolition of the Banjara Hills Peddamma Temple. He questioned whether the govt was trying to appease a community that constitutes 30% in Jubilee Hills for the sake of by-election votes. Bandi Sanjay pointed out that many temples, mosques, and churches were located on roads in Hyderabad and Telangana, questioning the necessity of demolishing the Banjara Hills temple. He demanded the immediate suspension of the officials responsible for the demolition of the temple.