logo
Unless the Government axe the racing tax rise it will be goodbye Glorious Goodwood

Unless the Government axe the racing tax rise it will be goodbye Glorious Goodwood

The Sun6 days ago
LATE July is one of the most exciting times in our horse racing calendar.
And next week we will celebrate one of the sport's most iconic meetings — Glorious Goodwood.
2
2
Few events capture the sport's history and tradition, its excitement and buzz, more than this glorious spectacle of racing on the South Downs.
Thousands will go to the racecourse and millions more will watch it on TV — not just here at home but around the world.
Like Royal Ascot before it, Glorious Goodwood is more than just five days of brilliant racing.
It is a mix of world-leading sport, fashion and society and a vital soft power lever — as demonstrated by those attending from governments around the world — promoting the best of Britain on a global stage.
Tearing the heart out
As the MP for West Suffolk, and with Newmarket at the heart of my constituency, I know how these meetings, along with all the others which take place at the country's 59 racecourses throughout the year, showcase racing's vital role in Britain's economy, communities, culture and international reputation.
But racing today faces the most serious threat to its future in generations, and if the Government has its way, we risk losing the likes of Glorious Goodwood forever.
The Government is currently considering hammering British racing with a tax bombshell.
It wants to bring the rate of tax on online horse race betting level with the rate placed on online games of chance — despite there being a huge difference between the two products.
Yesterday, the Government closed its 12-week consultation period during which it sought the views of the sport and other interested parties over its so-called harmonisation plan.
Racing's governing body, the British Horseracing Authority, led the sport's response in robustly opposing this unwelcome tax smash-and-grab, and hundreds more have made clear their objections to the Treasury officials who came up with this daft proposal.
Winning jockey banned after 'extremely unusual' incident during controversial finish at Bath races
And as they start wading through the responses which spell out in no uncertain terms the damage their reckless tax proposal could cause to racing, they should understand the strength of feeling shared by millions of people across Britain.
According to the Treasury, its proposed Remote Betting and Gaming Duty is designed to simplify betting taxes.
But in doing so, it would scrap the special treatment for betting on British racing that successive governments have recognised is needed due to the jobs it creates and its contribution to the economy.
Betting on racing is currently taxed at 15 per cent while online slots are taxed at 21 per cent.
The Treasury wants to harmonise those rates which means, more than likely, a tax raid on the sport.
Racing is part of who we are. It is an essential part of our national sporting story. It is vital that the Government recognises that
As many Sun readers who like to bet on the horses after studying the form will know, it is a different type of betting compared to online slot machines.
And the current tax regime is designed to reflect both the higher costs borne by the sport — compared with online gaming — and racing's significant economic and social contribution to our country.
In purely financial terms, harmonising the duty rates at even 21 per cent will hit racing's finances by £66million. Any higher and thousands of jobs will be lost across Britain.
In a worst-case scenario, racecourses may be forced to close, tearing the heart out of their communities.
Racing is part of who we are. It is an essential part of our national sporting story. It is vital that the Government recognises that.
Without an exemption for horse racing from the harmonisation plans, Britain's second-largest spectator sport and a cherished part of the social fabric of our communities will suffer great harm.
The Government, and the Treasury in particular, should take note and axe the racing tax
That harm will be both economic and social.
Let's start with the economics.
Racing employs 85,000 people nationwide and adds over £4billion a year to our national income.
Millions of pounds of international investment are drawn in from key trading markets by the world-leading standards of care, science and animal welfare found at British stud farms and training yards.
Those in the local supply chain around those farms and yards and our racecourses will see their businesses affected if racing takes a financial hit.
Just as important as the boost racing provides to the local and national economy is the way it knits itself into the social fabric of our communities.
It helps to make up the identity and sense of place in racing towns. It brings together people from all backgrounds, unites families across generations, and is a way of life for communities around racecourses.
Hammer blows
And you, the voters, agree. A majority of Britons (68 per cent of Conservatives, 63 per cent of Reform voters, and 61 per cent of Labour voters) say horse racing is an important part of British culture, while two-thirds see racing as an important part of the identity of towns like Newmarket, Doncaster and Cheltenham.
This damaging tax hike would be the third leg of a 'triple whammy' of challenges that represent an existential threat to the sport.
Alongside the Government's failure to review the Horserace Betting Levy which funds the sport, and intrusive affordability checks placed on everyday punters, these financial hammer blows could tip racing into terminal decline.
As they analyse the responses to their consultation, ministers and officials should understand just how many people's lives they will hurt by imposing a swingeing tax rise.
It is millions of people in every corner of the country who enjoy attending race meetings and having a flutter on the horses.
It is the people whose businesses and jobs depend on racing. It is the people whose civic pride derives from the local racecourse or their area's reputation as a centre of excellence for the rearing and welfare of horses.
The Government, and the Treasury in particular, should take note and axe the racing tax.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs
Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs

Scotsman

time15 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs

We must unlock the investment that would deliver new housing, says ​​Colin Brown Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In May 2024, the Scottish Parliament declared a national 'housing emergency' with some councils also declaring a housing emergency in their areas. The announcement of the emergency came two months after the Scottish Government laid the Housing (Scotland) Bill before the Scottish Parliament. The Bill continues to work its way through Holyrood and is expected to come into force later this year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Observers in the world of institutional investment and those working in the sector have been watching the progress of the Bill with interest. Of particular concern to investors are proposals around rent controls. ​Colin Brown is a Partner at TLT To give one example that has occurred recently – a London-based investment firm, was about to commit many millions of pounds to its first Scottish investment before discovering that a committee considering the Bill had voted to include purpose-built student accommodation as subject to statutory rent controls. All of the financial appraisals the firm had undertaken in making the decision to invest in Scotland were potentially being ripped up by MSPs and they had no power to do anything about this. In this situation, the Scottish Government moved quickly to make clear it would not support rent control for purpose-built student accommodation. Whilst the project is now starting to come out of the ground it remains to be seen whether they consider Scotland a safe haven for future investment. The rental income which institutional investors derive from their investments in bricks and mortar helps to fund many individuals' pensions. The investors need to understand that in exchange for making their money available they will get a return on their investment and this return has generally been left to market forces – the law of supply and demand. The housing emergency should make investment in new build housing in Scotland a win-win. The country gets much-needed new housing to alleviate the emergency, and the investment funds get to deploy their capital to deliver housing and make a return on their investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the UK in the first quarter of this year £1.2 billion was invested in private rental accommodation with the potential for £6bn to be invested by the end of the year. 76 per cent of this investment is being directed outside London, with Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds leading the way. Every penny of this investment creates new housing and sustains and creates job opportunities. The fact that Scotland has not been able to open the investment tap when cities in England are seeing private rental accommodation expand, could be seen as a missed opportunity. In launching the latest consultation, the Social Justice Secretary acknowledges that rental properties are a crucial element of the efforts to tackle the housing emergency. Government policy has slowed investment into the sector in recent years and resulted in lower investor confidence in providing much-needed housing. Rent caps and controls are of course not universally despised and a balance must be struck between protecting tenants and unlocking the investment that delivers the new housing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The latest consultation on exemptions for certain types of properties from rent control closed earlier this month. There will be investors with capital looking for a home waiting to see if the legislative and political environment in Scotland means they should be deploying more of this in Scotland or continuing to explore opportunities which guarantee a better return elsewhere.

Swinney: New work for bus maker Alexander Dennis being explored
Swinney: New work for bus maker Alexander Dennis being explored

Scotsman

time15 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Swinney: New work for bus maker Alexander Dennis being explored

The First Minister said details remain commercially sensitive Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scottish Government is actively exploring a package which could deliver new work to the troubled Alexander Dennis bus maker, John Swinney has said. The First Minister said he could not provide further details due to 'commercial sensitivity'. He has asked the company to consider an extension to its consultation period while the package is developed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad General view of the Alexander Dennis site at Camelon, near Falkirk | PA Last month, Alexander Dennis announced it was proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Mr Swinney said: 'Scottish ministers place the utmost importance on the presence of Alexander Dennis in Scotland and the retention of its highly skilled manufacturing workers. 'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring any and all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain its skilled employees and manufacturing and production facilities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'While I cannot provide details due to commercial sensitivity at this time, I hope this update provides the workforce and local community with further assurance that the Scottish Government remains wholly committed to supporting the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland. 'We will undertake this work in tandem with every other short, medium and long-term opportunity we continue to explore in close collaboration with the company, Unite, GMB, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes will meet with the unions GMB and Unite today to update them on the proposal. Labour previously accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China. Mr Swinney argued state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Speaking to The Scotsman last month, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: "They [the Scottish Government] have to look themselves in the mirror. But they should be leaving no stone unturned about how we can keep this bus company open."

‘Climateflation' could push up UK food prices by more than a third by 2050, report says
‘Climateflation' could push up UK food prices by more than a third by 2050, report says

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Climateflation' could push up UK food prices by more than a third by 2050, report says

Britain is at risk of a worsening 'climateflation' crisis amid the fallout from increasingly extreme weather that could drive up food prices by more than a third by 2050. Sounding the alarm over the financial impact for UK households, the Autonomy Institute thinktank said that climate-induced price increases for everyday food items risked pushing almost 1 million people into poverty without urgent government intervention. It said the UK was at elevated risk – particularly from heatwaves and droughts – of food production and supply chains abroad and at home being disrupted, which would have a knock-on impact for consumers through higher prices in the shops. Official figures earlier this month showed the UK's headline inflation rate rose by more than expected to 3.6% in June, as fuel and food prices added to the pressure on households. Britain's largest retailers have warned hot, dry weather had reduced fruit and vegetable harvest yields, adding to last month's inflation rate. The price of chocolate on UK supermarket shelves has also been pushed up by poor harvests linked to extreme temperatures in west Africa, while coffee prices have been pumped up by bad weather hitting production in Brazil and Vietnam. Drawing together climate data, analysis of international and domestic trade flows, and economic modelling, the Autonomy researchers said that increasing numbers of heatwaves and droughts would imperil staple crops, disrupt supply chains and intensify inflationary pressures. Scientists say climate breakdown caused by the burning of fossil fuels means more frequent floods and droughts are likely in the UK. Food prices worldwide have also been affected by poor harvests, conflict and Donald Trump's trade wars. With almost half of food consumed in the UK imported from overseas, British households are highly vulnerable to climate shocks hitting the price of groceries from key producers in countries including Spain, France and Brazil. Domestic farming is also under pressure, with storms and floods slashing UK vegetable production by 12% in 2023. Warning that rising temperatures affecting major food producers in Europe and beyond stood as a major risk to household finances, the report said by 2050, under a high-emission 'worst-case' scenario, food prices could rise by 34%. Under a 'best-case' scenario, whereby global heating would be limited to 1.5C by 2100 rather than 4C in the worst-case, it warned that cumulative food price inflation could still reach 25% by 2050. Lower-income households would be disproportionately hit because they spend a larger share of their monthly budgets on essential items such as bread, rice and meat. It said heatwaves in the UK, as one of several drivers of climateflation, could cost an average household between £917 and £1,247 by 2050. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Without government efforts to soften the blow for households from a 34% rise in prices, the leftwing thinktank warned as many as 951,383 more people could fall into poverty. Will Stronge, the chief executive of the Autonomy Institute, urged ministers to consider a range of measures to protect families; including the introduction of public diners to mitigate the impact of food price volatility for vulnerable groups. Price controls could also be considered, while the UK could look at introducing 'buffer stocks' of key goods to ensure availability during supply chain disruptions. 'Climateflation is no longer a distant risk; it's a present reality,' Stronge said. 'We need to build real economic resilience – and that means rethinking what public service provision can and should provide in the face of climate disruption: from delivery of basic essentials to publicly funded diners and a national buffer stock.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store