Govt claims 1.73 lakh hectares forest land diverted for infra projects from 2014 to 2024
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Over 1.73 lakh hectares of forest land have been approved for diversion for non-forestry purposes across India from 2014 to 2024, with mining and hydropower projects emerging as the leading contributors, the environment ministry informed Parliament on Monday.Responding to a question in the Lok Sabha , Minister of State for Environment Kirti Vardhan Singh said that 1,73,984.3 hectares of forest land were approved for various non-forestry purposes between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2024, under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, now amended and renamed as Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980.The highest diversion of forest land during this period was for mining and quarrying activities, which were allowed to use 40,096.17 hectares.These included a wide range of extractive activities that continue to remain one of the biggest drivers of forest clearance across mineral-rich regions, especially in central and eastern India.Hydropower and irrigation projects together accounted for the second-highest diversion, with 40,138.31 hectares of forest land approved for such purposes. These include large and small dams, canals, reservoirs and associated infrastructure.According to the government data, linear infrastructure projects such as road construction and power transmission lines were also among the top contributors.Forest land diverted for road development amounted to 30,605.69 hectares, while transmission lines used up 17,232.69 hectares.The information was provided in response to a question by Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat, who referred to the 2023 State of India's Environment Report by think tank Centre for Science and Environment.The report claimed that forest clearances for infrastructure and industrial projects increased by more than 150 per cent between 2014 and 2023.Defence projects involving security infrastructure and border-related development works accounted for 14,968.14 hectares of diverted forest land.The category listed as "Others", which includes miscellaneous or unclassified uses not covered in standard categories, accounted for 9,669.85 hectares. Railway projects were sanctioned 7,998.65 hectares of forest land, making it another significant sector of diversion, particularly for expansion and electrification works.Projects involving the conversion of forest villages into revenue villages, a longstanding demand under the Forest Rights Act and other policies, used 3,250 hectares of land.Thermal power projects were approved on 2,644.02 hectares of forest land, while rehabilitation and resettlement schemes received clearance on 1,580.55 hectares.Projects related to drinking water supply, including pipeline networks and treatment plants, accounted for 1,282.21 hectares.Optical fibre cable laying, which generally involves underground or shallow surface work along road or railway alignments, led to the diversion of 437.63 hectares.Pipeline projects were approved on 543.57 hectares, while industry-related clearances, including those for industrial estates or standalone units, covered 405.82 hectares.Wind power installations accounted for 346.84 hectares, and village electrification initiatives used 551.13 hectares of forest land.Dispensaries and hospitals were allocated 113.31 hectares, and educational institutions, including schools and colleges, were constructed on 83.46 hectares of forest land.Substations took up 76.14 ha of forest land, solar power 1.57 ha, encroachments regularised under certain policies 9.63 ha, and communication posts 6.54 ha.A marginal amount of land (0.11 ha) was approved for rainwater harvesting structures, and 0.59 hectares was used for telecommunication lines.The minister said the process of forest land diversion is continuous and permitted only in "unavoidable circumstances" with adequate mitigation measures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
TOI impact: NGT puts Chandigarh MC, CPCC on notice over Dadumajra crisis
1 2 Chandigarh: Taking suo motu cognisance of the TOI report, published on July 23, about a public health emergency due to missed deadlines to remove legacy waste at Dadumajra, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued notices to the Chandigarh municipal corporation and Chandigarh Pollution Control Committee (CPCC). The NGT noted, "The news item relates to a major environmental and public health emergency at the Dadumajra dumping site in Chandigarh. The article mentions that the heavy monsoon rains are aggravating the crisis. The article highlights that due to continuous heavy rains, overflowing leachate, contaminated liquid runoff mixed with solid waste, is spreading into nearby fields and even seeping into the Patiala Ki Rao Choe. " According to TOI report, initially, the authorities promised to clear the waste by May 31, but on the same day, a massive fire erupted at the dumping ground, requiring 1.25 lakh litres of water to extinguish the flame. The deadline was then pushed to July, but the garbage is still there. Residents said the situation has deteriorated into a severe public health emergency. They reported a rise in respiratory illnesses, skin diseases, and serious conditions like tuberculosis and cancer. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better Grammarly Install Now Undo The foul odour from the leachate has made it difficult to breathe, and many allege that constant exposure to the stench is affecting their health. Residents have also raised concerns about safety, stating that the leachate flowing onto roads has made them slippery and dangerous. Despite repeated demands from residents for urgent action, they claim that no effective measures have been taken so far. The tribunal, in its order, said, "The news item indicates violation of the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The news item raises substantial issues relating to compliance with the environmental norms and implementation of the provisions of scheduled enactment. "
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Mathru Mandali to celebrate 90th anniv on Aug 9
Mysuru: Mathru Mandali, a pioneer institution for girls' education and women empowerment , will celebrate its 90th anniversary on Aug 9. Former minister and Congress MLC Umashree will launch the event. IPS officer and writer Dharanidevi Malagatti will release a souvenir. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Mathru Mandali secretary Vani Prasad said the organisation began its journey in 1935 in VV Mohalla, where there were no exclusive schools for girls at the time. It was founded by four visionary women—Kameshwaramma Kuppuswamy, Soundaryamma Venkatesan, Sunandamma, and Kaballi Nagarathnamma— with the goal of empowering women through education and skill-building. The institution started with kindergarten, tailoring, and dance classes, laying a strong foundation for both academic and cultural development. In 1939, under the able leadership of Soundaryamma, the school moved to a rented space on Adipampa Road and later acquired land for its permanent campus. The school gradually expanded to offer education in both Kannada and English mediums and now serves over 250 students. A pre-university college offering arts and commerce streams was added in 1968, now catering to 200 students. In 1995, as part of its diamond jubilee, Mathru Mandali opened a special school for intellectually challenged children in Gokulam. "We are proud to be a cradle of dreams for underprivileged students. With committed staff and community support, we aim to continue this legacy of empowerment," said Vani Prasad. Due to a lack of teachers to teach special schoolchildren, Mathru Mandali is also planning to start a one-year Diploma in Special Education and a six-month teachers training for kindergarten. Rameshwari Verma, honorary president, Vijayalakshmi Urs, president, Hema Balachandran, assistant secretary, and Vijayalakshmi Muralidhar, treasurer, were also present.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
What is Telangana's Kaleshwaram project? What is the controversy around it?
The story so far: The much-hyped Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP), billed as the lifeline of Telangana by the previous BRS government, is mired in controversies over the manner in which it has been conceived and executed. A barrage forming a major component of the project suffered damages within three years of its inauguration, while two others constructed upstream reportedly developed cracks resulting in the charge that the KLIP was a colossal waste of public money burdening the State exchequer for years to come. What is Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project? KLIP is a multi-purpose irrigation project on Godavari river in Kaleshwaram of Bhupalpally in Telangana. Billed as the world's largest multi-stage irrigation project and the lifeline of Telangana by the then BRS government, Kaleshwaram's upstream influence is at the confluence of Pranahita and Godavari. It utilises a canal network of more than 1,800 km. Why was it constructed? The project was conceived by the BRS government, headed by K. Chandrasekhar Rao, to provide irrigation facilities to over 16 lakh acres in 13 districts of Telangana, besides stabilising the existing ayacut. It aims at storing and distributing 240 tmc ft of Godavari water of which 169 tmc ft is proposed to be allocated for irrigation, 30 tmc ft for drinking water to Hyderabad, 16 tmc ft for miscellaneous and industrial uses and another 10 tmc ft for drinking water supply to villages en route. Where was it built? The government has constructed barrages across Godavari at Ramadugu, Medigadda, Sundilla and Annaram. The water is stored there for lifting to needy areas to cater to the drinking water and irrigation needs. What was the cost of constructing KLIP? The project was conceived at a cost of ₹71,000 crore initially. The cost escalated to close to over ₹1 lakh crore over a period of time. Finishing works, including canals and lining along with pumping facilities in some more parts, is likely to take few more thousands of crores. What is the controversy around KLIP? The project has been mired in controversies right from the beginning as the then government shifted the location from Tummidihatti to Medigadda even after reportedly receiving hydrology clearance for the former location. The shifting of the site was made on the pretext of non availability of water at Tummidihatti, but the inquiry conducted by Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose revealed that the Central Water Commission has estimated the water availability at Tummidihatti to be over 200 tmcft. Who is at fault? A major allegation that has surfaced in the construction of the project was that the barrages were constructed on permeable foundations rather than strong foundations that can withstand the inflow of heavy quantum of water. The shifting of location — from Tumidihatti to Medigadda — too came under criticism as the almost 30% of the works at Pranahita Chevella Sujala Sravanti (PCSS) project — started by Congress government in united Andhra Pradesh in 2008 — at Tummidihatti costing over Rs. 11,000 crore were completed by then. Another major charge against the BRS Government was that the decision to go ahead with the project works was taken solely by Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao and not the one taken by the Government amid charges that the then dispensation did not obtain the consent of the State Cabinet before launching the works. How was this found? The faults in Kaleshwaram project were exposed during the BRS regime when the piers of the Sundilla barrage sunk substantiating the claims that the barrage was constructed on permeable foundation. Two other barrages Annaram and Sundilla too developed cracks as the government impounded and stored huge quantities of water against the technical advise. Why was an Inquiry Commission formed? Constitution of a judicial commission to probe the lapses in Kaleshwaram was an election promise of the Congress which included the issue in its manifesto. Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy Government constituted the one-man judicial commission headed by Justice Ghose for a thorough inquiry into the processes that went into the construction of the much-publicised project. How did the Commission inquire? Justice Ghose examined over 110 witnesses during the course of his 15 month inquiry and those examined included former CM K. Chandrasekhar Rao, former Ministers T. Harish Rao (Irrigation) and Eatala Rajender (Finance) of BRS government, the latter especially for releasing funds adopting 'negligent and indifferent attitude'. Mr. Harish Rao was accused of insisting the officials and construction agencies on the completion of the project at the behest of KCR. What is the Telangana government doing about the report? After ordering an inquiry by the judicial commission, which submitted its report on July 31, the Telangana government has decided to take up a discussion on Kaleshwaram project in the legislature during the monsoon session. The government plans to explain about the lapses to the people in detail and to elicit views of all political parties, including the BRS, on the future course of action on the revelations of the Justice Ghose commission. What does BRS have to say about the accusations and judicial commission report? The BRS on its part appears to be guarded in response to the accusations. Mr. Harish Rao, however, defended the project claiming that the project received approvals from several statutory bodies, including the CWC. It also had the approval of the Cabinet, the papers of which were not being revealed by the government. The project was also ratified by the Assembly where Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao has made a power point presentation, the first of its kind, on Kaleshwaram explaining the members about the salient features of the project.
