logo
Yes, Scotland owned slaves, but don't just blame us

Yes, Scotland owned slaves, but don't just blame us

But this also means comprehensively, rather than partially and selectively, and recognising in the words of the novelist L. P. Hartley that 'the past is another country'.
Goring asserts that 'even' the Picts traded in slaves.
Why 'even'?
All tribes and societies throughout history probably did, and we can all agree that Britain's part in the Atlantic trade and the plantations was brutal and appalling, but could not have happened, at least to the extent it did, without the enthusiastic and enriching supply role of the West African kings and tribal chiefs.
She might also have mentioned the North African Barbary slavers who for centuries kidnapped and enslaved an estimated one million Europeans from Mediterranean countries, plus England, Wales, Ireland, Scotland and Iceland.
She praises Edinburgh University, but its 'cancellation' of David Hume, based largely on one brief and understandable reference (if untypically poorly researched) among all his numerous writings, was unwise and simplistic.
Sir Peter Mathieson, the principal, says 'we cannot have a selective memory about our past', but as Ms Goring writes, he seems selective about the present (Re China).
Likewise, Edinburgh City Council is selective in its Melville Monument plaque in St Andrew Square. I admired the late Professor of Brewing, Sir Geoff Palmer, but he and his panel did not apply a historian's rigour to their choice of wording, which is certainly not comprehensive or impartial, but gives a misleading, distorted and false view of history to its readers, both locals and tourists, about Melville's role in the slave trade's abolition – as many historians have asserted. But the university leadership's silence lends it regrettable credence.
Finally, the Race Review, overseen also by Sir Geoff for the university, refers to Britain's 'genocide' of colonised people, and condemns former PM and Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour for his role in creating today's Palestine and the Middle East.
Both these points are partial and misleading. Balfour was maybe naive, but his 1917 Declaration was clear that a national home for the Jews in Palestine must not prejudice the rights of its existing non-Jews.
Arguably, Germany set the scene for modern Palestine by bringing the Ottoman Empire into the First World War as its ally, leading to the defeat of both, and by the Nazi atrocities in the Second World War.
John Birkett, St Andrews.
Letters: Racism and prejudice are rapidly becoming the norm
Letters: Middle East arms sales morally wrong
Letters: Salmond and Sturgeon have torn the nation apart
Oliver's army
I RECENTLY predicted the collapse of the UK economy and society, and the hope that some benevolent, omniscient Cromwell-type figure would take over, sort everything out, then hand it back to Parliament.
The nearest thing we have to this is what President Trump is doing in the US, and on the world stage.
Toby Young, the founder of the Free Speech Union, suggested Trump should become a UK Citizen, take over Reform UK and stand against Keir Starmer's Labour in the next general election.
Clearly he was making a point rather than a serious proposal, but apart from his opposition to Net Zero and woke ideology, Nigel Farage has neither the policies, people around him, nor guile and ruthlessness to remake the UK.
So it will take someone like Trump to withstand what Young referred to as a radical, reforming government being "met on day one by an institutional intifada" and "seen off by the closed ranks of the Establishment".
Even a year ago I wouldn't have imagined writing the above, but you only have to look at the surreal rearguard action against UK gender laws taking place in NHS Fife and elsewhere, Ed Miliband, Anas Sarwar and John Swinney's trashing of oil and gas, and the windmill obsession.
Also, the impossibility of controlling both legitimate and illegal immigration, and the benefits bill that is engulfing our finances to realise the enormity of the challenge and the need for leadership and brutal reality that doesn't currently exist in the UK
Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven.
Gold-hearted rich
AS a postscript to my letter responding to Neil Mackay's recent opinion piece ('Us vs them: why the rich like Musk and Bezos are destroying our world', The Herald, August 7), I would like to add a thought that suggests that there is another side to this coin, of which, perhaps, a lot of the population are unaware.
First, Bill Gates has created a philanthropical foundation that supports many causes throughout the world.
Second, in Britain there is the Patriotic Millionaires network, who lobby the government about accepting a nominal percentage of their wealth as a form of taxation; the object being to redistribute this to where it would benefit the country.
There may well be others who do much more than is known; this may be where the problem lies.
Perhaps a form of 'quiet' publicity would raise awareness and challenge the incumbent government to acknowledge that this cohort does in fact do more than many are aware of.
If we, the public, and Neil Mackay, draw conclusions that are wrong, who is to blame?
However, the present available information leads to the conclusion drawn by myself, Mr Mackay, and many others .
A balance of the scales is needed, otherwise the perception of the need for a 21st century 'Robin Hood' will remain, and actions be demanded from our politicians.
There is no doubt that something needs to be done, and to be see to be done.
Ian Gray, Croftamie.
Keeping economy afloat
What an inspiring sight I saw from Kirkcaldy Esplanade the other day.
Seven large ships all headed up the Forth.
Whether they were bound for Leith or Rosyth, Hound Point, Braefoot Bay, or even Grangemouth, they represent the trade on which we all depend.
Wouldn't it be something to have a Scottish government that focused on growing our economy, so that there were twice, or three times as many ships in the Forth?
Reform UK, perhaps?
Otto Inglis, Fife.
Pipe dreams
ELLE Duffy's weekly log from Rum is enthusiastically read every Saturday.
My memories of the island date from a trip there in 1975, on a tandem laden with wife, three-year-old son and even bagpipes.
Elle's writing would be more easily digested, however, if she would rid her copy of such ghastly Americanisms as 'gotten' and trees 'laying' down.
Gordon Casely, Kincardineshire.
Dynamism and tight deadlines are the key to solving a crossword, it seems.
Fast times
I JOIN Ian McNair (Letters, August 8) in being irritated by Scottish Government spokespersons claiming to be working 'at pace'.
I am leaving no stone unturned and attempting to be dynamic and resilient under the tight deadline I have set myself for completion of the Wee Stinker.
In my determination and resolution, I shall stop at nothing.
David Miller, Milngavie.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles
Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Trump made a much-teased announcement on Monday that he would invoke a never-before-used presidential authority to seize control of Washington, D.C.'s police department from local control to his Attorney General Pam Bondi. The president also announced he would deploy the National Guard on the streets of the nation's capital as a plan to 'rescue' the city from rampant crime, despite the fact that crime dropped in Washington by 35 percent last year after it spiked during the Covid-19 pandemic. Trump had teased a federal takeover of Washington and has decried homelessness and graffiti in the city. Republicans have encroached on Washington, D.C's home rule for decades. The fact it is a majority Black city with a Black political establishment has also made it easy to attack the same way Trump has attacked Baltimore and other cities run by Black mayors. Of course, this is not the first time that Trump has taken control of a major American city. Earlier this year, after protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles without the consent of the governor of California or the city's mayor. Trump may be hoping his actions will boost his approval ratings, which have been sagging in recent months. But a simple look at the numbers shows that it might backfire precipitously. First, let's get to the kernel of truth in Trump's idea. Voters in Democratic cities did vote against their leaders partially because of crime. New York City elected Eric Adams, a former police officer, as mayor in 2021. Voters in San Francisco kicked out mayor London Breed and voters in Los Angeles and Alameda beat back progressive prosecutors for lax policies toward crime. While almost no Democratic presidential candidate has supported defunding the police it became a tagline for Republicans use to hit at Democrats. That being said, it's fairly clear that Trump's approval ratings took a hit after he dispatched troops and the National Guard to Los Angeles. When Trump first came into office this year, and even after he began his tariff regime, Americans continued to support him on immigration. In February, according to an Economist/YouGov poll, he only cracked 50 percent approval on immigration. That number began to dip in April, after Trump sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the immigrant based in Maryland, to El Salvador. In April, Trump's approval number on immigration went to 45 percent. But by May, the same poll showed his approval on immigration started to rebound to 48 percent. That would go 'poof' in June once Trump began to send troops to Los Angeles. By the middle of June, a plurality of Americans thought that his response to the anti-ICE protests was too aggressive and 52 percent disapproved of his policies on immigration. By the end of June, 50 percent of Americans opposed Trump's policies on immigration. and his number has stubbornly stayed there. Not only that, as The Independent reported last month, polling from CBS News and CNN bore that out as well. The CNN poll also found that 59 percent of Americans opposed the deployment of National Guard troops without the consent of the governor and 55 percent of respondents said it was justified. While much of the attention when it comes to Trump's approval tends to focus on Jeffrey Epstein, it's clear that his approval began to collapse long before that scandal, when he began to deploy troops into the second-largest city in the United States. Trump may be trying to bait protesters by having troops roving throughout Washington in hopes that it will create the type of unrest that happened in 2020 and in Los Angeles. But the numbers show he might come to regret that. Voters may not like disorder and crime but they dislike overzealous responses from the government even more.

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years
AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising its prices for the first time in almost 30 years

AriZona Iced Tea is considering raising the price of its signature "Big Cans" for the first time in nearly 30 years. The potential price increase is a direct result of Donald Trump 's 50 percent tariff on aluminum imports. Co-founder Don Vultaggio expressed strong reluctance to abandon the $0.99 price point, which has been maintained since 1997, emphasizing customer loyalty. The company imports 20 percent of its aluminum from Canada, and the tariffs are expected to drive up costs for both imported and domestic materials. Industry groups and political figures have criticized the tariffs, warning of their detrimental impact on American manufacturers and consumers.

Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks
Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks

Daily Mirror

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Ukraine prepared to give up territory ahead of Trump-Putin peace talks

Volodymyr Zelensky has told European leaders they must reject any settlement proposed by Donald Trump in which Ukraine gives up further territory - but with a condition Ukraine could agree to stop fighting and give up territory already held by Russia as part of a European-backed plan for peace, it has tonight emerged. ‌ European leaders have been told by Volodymyr Zelensky they must reject any settlement proposed by Donald Trump in which Ukraine cedes further land - but that Russia could be allowed to retain some of the territory it has taken. ‌ But this would mean freezing the frontline where it is and handing Russia de facto control of the territory it occupies in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. It comes after Vladimir Putin warned of nuclear war when he unleashed another night of hell on Ukraine. ‌ Mr Trump and Mr Putin are set to hold talks in Alaska on Friday. Ukraine and Europe have become increasingly concerned Mr Trump and Mr Putin could negotiate an end to the long-running war over Mr Zelensky's head. But the latest development - the European-backed plan for peace - softens the negotiating position. Characterising a frantic weekend of diplomacy between Kyiv and its allies, a Western official said: "The plan can only be related to the current positions held by the militaries." ‌ It is believed US officials have pledged to consult European leaders ahead of the face-to-face talks between Mr Trump and Mr Putin. Speaking today, Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister, said: "I have many fears and a lot of hope." Chief among European concerns was a purported peace plan endorsed by Moscow, which included freezing the frontlines in south-eastern Ukraine if Kyiv agreed to withdraw from areas of Donetsk and Luhansk that it controls. European diplomats say there has been no notable change in Mr Putin's overall war aims, which seek to topple Ukraine's Western-facing government and replace it with a Moscow-friendly proxy. Russia is still aiming for the "full capitulation" of Kyiv, including blocking any prospect of Nato membership and demilitarisation, according to a report by the Institute for the Study of War, the Washington-based think tank. On Monday evening, Mr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, said there were no signs Russia was preparing to bring an end to the war despite the looming peace talks. Citing a report from Ukraine's intelligence, Mr Zelensky said: "On the contrary, they are moving their troops and forces in such a way as to launch new offensive operations." While seemingly content with ceding some territory, it is thought Ukraine will only agree to a peace settlement that offers robust security guarantees in the form of weapons deliveries and a path to Nato membership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store