Australia's great leap forward: China opportunity makes Trump tariffs look like ‘a pimple on the bum of the iron ore trade'
Albanese's meeting in Shanghai represents this chance. The eminent economist Ross Garnaut puts it into perspective: 'This trip is as important as Bob Hawke's trip to China in 1984 that set up the iron ore trade,' which went from a trickle to become Australia's single biggest export, worth $116 billion in the financial year just ended. 'It's the future of the Australian economy.' Garnaut was Hawke's economic adviser at the time.
The high drama of Donald Trump's tariffs on Australian exports are 'as a pimple on the bum of the iron ore trade,' Garnaut says. Trump's tariffs are high-risk but for another reason beyond Australia's direct trade with the US – they threaten to destabilise the world economy.
Bob Hawke's 1984 trip was important for China, too. The high-quality Australian grades of ore, replacing China's low grade domestic ore, were the feedstock that allowed China to become the world's dominant steel maker.
Today, China stands at a similar threshold. Beijing has decided that it will achieve net zero by 2060. The other big customers for Australian ore – Japan, South Korea and Taiwan – have their own deadlines. 'They all know,' says Garnaut, 'that they have to get to green iron pretty quickly, or they won't get to net zero in time.'
Loading
So why not make their own green iron? Because they don't have enough renewable energy of their own to achieve decarbonisation, and the cheapest and most feasible way of decarbonising their metals is to have it done in Australia. In China's case, the unfolding prospect is to import green iron from Australia, and then process it into green steel in China.
'There's not a snowflake's chance in hell that China won't send its cities green and its skies blue,' Fortescue Metals' founder, Andrew 'Twiggy' Forrest, who's travelling with Albanese this week, said recently. 'They are determined. And that means that its fuel industry has to go green now,' Forrest told The Australian.
'And that's when I became really clearly determined – we've got to get a green metal industry off the ground in Australia. We've got to break through the cynicism.' Garnaut agrees: 'In a zero carbon world, we have to get beyond Hawke's 1984 breakthrough. Today shows that the necessary support is there from China.' Fortescue has pledged to produce green iron in Australia. BHP, Rio and Hancock will now have to decide whether they will do the same.
Because it's not just a matter of the bright prospect of Australia selling value-added iron ore, in the form of green iron, to China. It's whether Australia can keep its existing iron ore business: 'We will lose the trade if we can't export the iron as metal,' warns Garnaut.
Beyond the Australian economy, the stakes are high for planetary conditions, too, according to Garnaut, author of the Garnaut Climate Change Review: 'This will determine whether the world will deal with climate change and whether it can achieve net zero greenhouse emissions.'
And Australia has so much cheap renewable energy that it could supply China with its green iron needs by devoting just half of 1 per cent of its surface area to solar panels, and another half a per cent to wind turbines, according to a paper by The Superpower Institute, which was co-founded by Garnaut. And, by replacing conventional iron smelting in China with renewables smelting in Australia, we'd cut total global carbon emissions by 4 per cent, according to the institute.
This is why, 10 years ago, Garnaut seized on the vision of Australia's low-carbon 'superpower' opportunity. Today it's considerably closer than it was a week ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Albanese's response to blistering personal attack struck the right tone
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese found himself standing precipitously in the path of a potentially disastrous international storm blasting in from Israel overnight when his counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu called him a 'weak' apologist for Hamas. In a blistering letter sent in response to Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state and a diplomatic tit-for-tat visa row, the conservative Israeli leader did not hold back. 'History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews,' Netanyahu wrote. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this antisemitic fire,' the letter reads. 'It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement. It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas' refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets.' Loading It doesn't get much more personal or damning than that, and there was a collective holding of breath as the nation waited to see how the Australian leader would respond as Australian-Israeli relations hit a new low. When he broke his silence about noon, Albanese was measured in tone. Speaking from South Australia, he said he treated foreign leaders 'with respect' and didn't take the description of him as 'weak' personally. 'I treat leaders of other countries with respect, I engage with them in a diplomatic way,' Albanese said, declining to descend into an ugly verbal exchange with his Israeli counterpart. The Herald supports this measured tone. There is no upside for Australia getting drawn into a personal slanging match between nations. The latest flare-up in tensions came when Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke's department cancelled a visa this week for far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, based on his views and comments that included calling Gazan children 'enemies' of Israel. While Albanese played a straight bat, he used Burke as his attack dog. 'Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry,' Burke told ABC radio. While many conservative commentators are appalled at the actions of the Albanese government and would back the overall sentiment of Netanyahu, if not his exact language, this is by no means universal. Some sections of the Jewish community in Australia called out Netanyahu for overstepping the mark. Zionist Federation of Australia President Jeremy Leibler described Netanyahu's comments as 'entirely unhelpful and unproductive', while Alex Ryvchin of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry said the Jewish community had 'never felt abandoned by this government'. So clearly, there is a view that Netanyahu was out of line, and while there is room for debate on Labor's actions on Palestine, the reaction by the Israeli leader was disproportionate. For now, Albanese is correct to focus on the more substantive issues, such as an immediate end to the conflict in Gaza that has dragged on for far too long, rather than play personal politics. But he must also keep pressure on the Palestinian side to uphold its end of the bargain and help ensure any future state rejects terrorism, turns away from Hamas and commits to a peaceful co-existence with its neighbour.

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Call for ‘desirable' spare bedrooms to be taxed to help fix housing
More than a quarter of Australian households only contain one person, but only six per cent of homes are one-bedroom apartments or studios, leaving some households with few affordable housing options. The most common household type is two-person households, at a third of all households, but the most common dwelling size is a three-bedroom home, Cotality research found. More than 60 per cent of Australian households have only one or two people, in contrast to the popular idea of the nuclear family. But most homes are family-sized – three-quarters of homes have at least three bedrooms. Cotality Australia head of research Eliza Owen said there is a mismatch between the number of people per household and the number of bedrooms per house. 'Households have evolved over time, so that housing stock probably was once really suited to households, but over time as children have flown the nest and average household size has declined, households have more bedrooms than they might utilise just for sleeping,' she said. 'It's hard for developers to take risk in different housing types because that three-, four-bedroom model has worked for so long … it might be hard for risk-averse lenders to assess demand for this kind of housing, especially in context of the off-the-plan apartment boom in the 2010s, which is housing that has not performed well.' Owen emphasised that there is nothing inherently wrong with a home having more bedrooms than people, and space for a home office, future children, visitors or hobbies. But she wondered if there was some inefficiency in the way the housing stock is allocated, and what might happen if those extra bedrooms were taxed.

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
ASX set to edge up, Wall Street falls as AI darlings extend slump
Nvidia, Palantir and other superstar stocks that had surged in the mania surrounding artificial-intelligence technology are dragging Wall Street lower again on Wednesday. The S&P 500 fell 0.5 per cent and was heading for a fourth straight loss after setting an all-time high last week. The Dow Jones was down 61 points, or 0.1 per cent, in mid-afternoon trade, and the Nasdaq composite was 1 per cent lower. The Australian sharemarket is set to advance, with futures at 4.53am AEST pointing to a rise of 13 points, or 0.2 per cent, at the open. The ASX added 0.3 per cent on Wednesday. Reporting season continues with Whitehaven Coal and Xero among those reporting. The Australian dollar was 0.3 per ent lower to US64.34¢ at 5.10am. Nvidia, whose chips are powering much of the world's move into AI, dropped 1.4 per cent and was on track to be one of the heaviest weights on Wall Street for a second straight day following its 3.5 per cent fall on Tuesday. Palantir Technologies, another AI darling, sank 2.2 per cent to add to its 9.4 per cent loss from the day before. Trading was shaky, and Nvidia pared a loss from earlier in the morning that got as bad as 3.9 per cent, which helped indexes also mute their losses. Loading One possible contributor to the swoon was a study from MIT's Nanda Initiative that warned most corporations are not yet seeing any measurable return from their generative AI investments, according to Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management. But the larger factor may be the criticism that such companies have been getting for a while that their stock prices simply shot too high, too fast amid the furor around AI and became too expensive. Nvidia, whose profit report scheduled for next week is one of Wall Street's next major events, had soared 35.5 per cent for the year so far heading into Tuesday. Palantir had surged even more, more than doubling. The tech stocks still have supporters, though, who say AI will bring the next generational revolution in business.