Veronafiere and the Italian Trade Agency Convene U.S. Wine Industry Leaders to Tackle Tariffs and Market Challenges in Washington, D.C. Roundtable
WASHINGTON, May 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Veronafiere, organizer of Vinitaly, and the Italian Trade Agency (ITA) hosted a high-level roundtable entitled, 'Inside Italian Wine's Next Move in America' at Cafe Milano in Washington, D.C. on Thursday of last week. In anticipation of Vinitaly.USA (taking place in Chicago on October 5–6), the event gathered leading figures from the U.S. wine trade, Italian institutions, policymakers, and the media to discuss strategies for navigating the evolving American wine market.
At a time of renewed tariff uncertainty and shifting consumer trends, the roundtable created space for candid dialogue on how to protect and grow Italian wine's presence in the U.S.—Italy's most valuable export market, accounting for 24% of total Italian wine exports. Italian wine remains the #1 imported wine category in the U.S., holding a 33% market share.
Key Speakers and Guests
Notable attendees included Federico Bricolo, President of Veronafiere; Matteo Zoppas, President of the Italian Trade Agency (ITA); Adolfo Rebughini, General Manager of Veronafiere; Robert Tobiassen, President of the National Association of Beverage Importers (NABI); Robert Allegrini, President of the National Italian American Foundation (NIAF); and representatives from Akin Gump, lobbying on behalf of the U.S. Wine Trade Alliance. Also present were key industry leaders such as Tara Empson, CEO of Empson USA and recipient of the 2025 Vinitaly International Award; Dina Opici, Chairwoman of the Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA) and President of Opici Family Distributing; Francis Creighton, CEO and President of WSWA; Federico Veronesi, CEO of Oniwines Group; Charles Lazzara, CEO of Volio Imports; and Amanda Page, Director of Tolaini Distribution. Guest of honor was Mariangela Zappia, Italy's Ambassador to the United States.
Discussion Highlights
Federico Bricolo addressed the urgency of the moment:
'Even modest tariffs can have a significant ripple effect in a highly competitive market like the United States. In today's climate of geopolitical tension, direct engagement is more critical than ever. Strengthening ties with U.S. trade partners now can help mitigate future risks. A well-established relationship between producer and importer is more likely to withstand cost pressures or policy shifts, enabling both sides to adapt rather than retreat.''Events like Vinitaly.USA are essential platforms to reinforce relationships, build visibility, and strengthen resilience across the trade.'
Matteo Zoppas echoed the concern over tariffs:
'Until there is greater clarity on implementation, it's difficult to fully gauge the impact on exports. What we do know is that tariffs are damaging in any scenario—just their announcement can destabilize the market.'He continued:'According to the U.S. Wine Trade Alliance, for every dollar earned by an Italian wine producer, U.S. businesses earn $4.52. This is a result of the three-tier distribution system, where American importers, distributors, retailers, and restaurants apply margins at every stage.'
Adolfo Rebughini emphasized the consumer impact:
'Tariffs will inevitably raise prices. A mid-range bottle of Prosecco that once retailed at $10.99 may soon cost $12.99. That's why initiatives like Vinitaly.USA are so important. These events not only promote Italian wine but also help strengthen the producer–importer relationship, giving both sides the tools to navigate challenges and ensure long-term success in the U.S. market.'
The discussion underscored the need for ongoing collaboration, renewed investment by Italian producers in the U.S., and market diversification into regions like Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Asia.
Next Steps: White Paper to Follow
To ensure the insights and recommendations shared during the roundtable have lasting impact, a white paper will be drafted based on the discussion and made available to the broader wine industry in the coming weeks. The document will be published on the official Vinitaly and Vinitaly.USA websites and shared with stakeholders across the international wine trade.
About Vinitaly.USA
Vinitaly.USA, returning for its second edition in October 2025, is the largest and most comprehensive Italian wine trade show outside of Italy—and the only event officially licensed to carry the Vinitaly name beyond Verona.Launched in 2024, the inaugural edition featured 230 producers and more than 1,650 wines, attracting over 1,500 qualified trade and media professionals. The 2025 edition is expected to surpass 300 producers and expand its reach, further solidifying its position as a premier destination for the North American wine trade.
Media Contact
Morgana Germanetto, Colangelo & Partners, +1 646 624-2885, mgermanetto@colangelopr.com, https://www.colangelopr.com/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
28 minutes ago
- The Star
Milei meets Pope Leo, confirms visit to Argentina
Pope Leo XIV meets with Argentina's President Javier Milei at the Vatican, June 7, 2025. Vatican Media/Mario Tomassetti/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) -Argentina's President Javier Milei held his first official audience with Pope Leo at the Vatican on Saturday where he confirmed that the pontiff will visit the South American country, according to the presidential spokesman. No further details of the planned visit were disclosed on Saturday. Milei had a tense relationship with Pope Francis, the late Argentine pope who never returned to his native country during his 12-year papacy, potentially signaling the start of a new diplomatic chapter. "The Pope confirmed to the President during our recent meeting that he will visit Argentina," Manuel Adorni, the presidential spokesperson wrote via social media. The papal visit could take place as soon as next year, according to Argentina's daily newspaper La Nación, as part of a tour that would include stops in Uruguay and Peru, where Leo, the first U.S. pope,resided for nearly 20 years. Milei, a libertarian and ally of U.S. President Donald Trump, was not present at the inauguration ceremony of the new head of the Catholic Church due to local legislative elections he was required to attend. Discussions between the two parties on Saturday were described as "cordial" and addressed issues of "common interest such as socioeconomic progress, the fight against poverty, and the commitment to social cohesion, in addition to addressing ongoing conflicts," the Vatican later said in a statement. Milei met Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on Friday in Rome as part of his visit, where an agreement between Italian energy group Eni and Argentina's state-owned energy firm YPF was signed. (Reporting by Lucila Sigal in Buenos Aires. Writing by Lucinda Elliott. Editing by Louise Heavens)
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Hong Kong's still ‘over' but Stephen Roach says city a surprise trade war winner
American economist Stephen Roach has said that Hong Kong has benefited from the US-China trade war despite last year having declared the city to be 'over', even as he claimed that other aspects of the financial hub had worsened. The former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman sparked debate last year after he penned an opinion piece which argued, in part, that Hong Kong would be caught in the 'crossfire' of the worsening US-China rivalry. 'The word caught is the word that, if I had to write the piece again, I would probably change, because I think, ironically, Hong Kong has benefited from the crossfire between the US and China,' he told the Post in a recent interview. Despite worsening ties between the two superpowers since US President Donald Trump began levying his so-called reciprocal tariffs on China and the rest of the world, Hong Kong's stock market has seen solid gains. The benchmark Hang Seng Index is up by around 50 per cent since Roach made his original claim, while Hong Kong has rocketed to the top of the global fundraising table following a string of high-profile initial public offerings last month, including from mainland Chinese battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology. Roach, who is now a faculty member at Yale University, said the 'sell America' trade had become a 'global mantra' and Hong Kong was a beneficiary. But asked whether he felt his initial assessment of the city being 'over' was premature, he noted he would say the same again. 'No economy or city state is over ... but this image of a dynamic, powerful system as part of the 'one country, two systems' model, I think that's just as close to being over today as it was when I originally wrote the piece,' he said, referring to the city's governing principle. 'The governance story is still, I think, very much working against this notion of Hong Kong as a free, independent, autonomous city state. If anything, it's gotten worse.' Roach added that the strong performance of the city's stock market had 'instilled sort of a new swagger in Hong Kong bordering on denial'. He said there were 'questions that could be raised' about the city's independent rule of law, pointing to the departure of foreign non-permanent judges. He also raised concerns about the fast-tracking of the domestic national security law last year and what he described as continuing efforts to 'quash dissent'. While the Hong Kong government had 'risen to the challenge' to demonstrate to the world that the city should be considered 'special', American investors in particular had developed an 'unwillingness' to distinguish it from the rest of China, he said. 'Where I've come out, reluctantly, is that as great a city as Hong Kong is, it's just another big Chinese city,' he said. 'I think it's increasingly a one country, one system model with a solid financial capital raising infrastructure embedded in Hong Kong.' Executive Council convenor Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, who previously hit back at Roach over his 'Hong Kong is over' remarks, maintained that the American economist did not understand the city. She said the 'pessimistic views' Roach expressed last year 'were primarily based on the Hong Kong stock market's poor performance'. 'He overlooked China's strength in technological innovations and Hong Kong's unique advantages based on its separate systems. We are the only part of China that can invest, manage and provide trading platforms for digital assets.' She cited the city's recently passed law on stablecoins, which she said would help Hong Kong be the country's 'testing ground' for cryptocurrencies. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency token that maintain a fixed value by being pegged to a reference asset, typically fiat currencies such as the US dollar. The law, which was passed last month and is set to take effect later this year, establishes a regulatory regime for stablecoins, paving the way for issuers to obtain licences and sell the digital assets to the public. 'Despite ongoing US-China tensions, Hong Kong will continue to have an important role to play in building bridges between China and the West,' Ip said. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
The lesson Asean must draw from the Trump-Musk quarrel
THE public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk should be viewed with detached clarity by Asean policymakers and observers. It is neither a signal of a shift in American foreign policy nor does it foreshadow a major realignment in the global tech landscape. In his second term, Trump has doubled down on his view that the US must be ruled not by institutions but by personalities. He has no patience with those who challenge his centrality. Musk, once an object of Trump's admiration, has become a rival personality. The former's influence spans multiple domains — space, artificial intelligence, electric vehicles and digital media. In the eyes of Trump, this influence must be subordinate to political loyalty. Musk's criticism of Trump, whether on policy, personality or principle, has thus drawn an inevitable response. Yet Musk is no innocent bystander. His relentless need to comment, provoke and insert himself into the political arena has increasingly eroded the neutrality that once insulated Tesla and SpaceX from partisan warfare. Since acquiring Twitter — renamed X — Musk has made the platform a personal amplifier of his views, often blurring the line between corporate strategy and personal vendetta. Just as Trump cannot resist attacking, Musk cannot help but respond. The result is a digital 'blood sport'. At a deeper level, Musk's recent provocations may be to deflect attention from his growing troubles. Tesla, long seen as the undisputed champion of electric vehicles, is now steadily losing global market share to China's BYD. Despite Musk's early-mover advantage, the Chinese EV juggernaut has surpassed Tesla in both unit sales and technological innovation, especially in markets across Asia and the Global South. This shift is not just commercial — it is geopolitical. China's industrial policy, from lithium refining to battery standardisation, has enabled firms like BYD to undercut and outpace American competitors. Tesla, by contrast, faces domestic regulatory scrutiny, investor fatigue and inconsistent leadership. Musk, who once rode the wave of futuristic optimism, is now increasingly seen as a mercurial figure whose ventures are overextended and reactive. While American media and pundits obsess about this feud, Asean must resist being distracted. The region is entering a critical decade in which its ability to lead on green transition, artificial intelligence governance and maritime security will define its global role. Whether Musk and Trump call each other names or trade blows on social media is irrelevant to the Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific, or to the implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Moreover, if there is a lesson to draw from this spectacle, it is the danger of personalising power. Asean's strength has always rested in its ability to temper egos through consensus and consultation. That is not a flaw but a survival mechanism. The bloc should be wary of importing political styles rooted in personality cults, where institutions are hollowed out in favour of personal charisma and performative leadership. Musk and Trump are both creatures of the same American pathology: the belief that individual willpower, when fused with wealth or fame, is enough to override complex systems. But Asean is different. The region's success depends not on dominant personalities but on the patient weaving of trust, rules and interdependence. Ultimately, Asean must tune out the noise. There are far more pressing issues to confront — from resolving the Myanmar crisis and addressing climate-induced migration, to strengthening regional supply chains and ensuring cybersecurity. The Musk-Trump bust-up may dominate headlines in Washington, but it is only a sideshow to the real geopolitical currents shaping Asia's future.
