AI-generated Pope sermons flood YouTube, TikTok
WASHINGTON - AI-generated videos and audios of Pope Leo XIV are populating rapidly online, racking up views as platforms struggle to police them.
An AFP investigation identified dozens of YouTube and TikTok pages that have been churning out AI-generated messages delivered in the pope's voice or otherwise attributed to him since he took charge of the Catholic Church last month.
"There's natural interest in what the new pope has to say, and people don't yet know his stance and style," said University of Washington professor emeritus Oren Etzioni, founder of TrueMedia.org, a nonprofit focused on fighting deepfakes.
"A perfect opportunity to sow mischief with AI-generated misinformation."
After AFP presented YouTube with 26 channels posting predominantly AI-generated pope content, the platform terminated 16 of them for violating its policies against spam, deceptive practices and scams, and another for violating YouTube's terms of service.
"We terminated several channels flagged to us by AFP for violating our Spam policies and Terms of Service," spokesperson Jack Malon said.
TikTok similarly removed 11 accounts that AFP pointed out -- with over 1.3 million combined followers -- citing the platform's policies against impersonation, harmful misinformation and misleading AI-generated content of public figures.
With names such as "Pope Leo XIV Vision," the social media pages portrayed the pontiff supposedly offering a flurry of warnings and lessons he never preached.
But disclaimers annotating their use of AI were often hard to find -- and sometimes nonexistent.
On YouTube, a label demarcating "altered or synthetic content" is required for material that makes someone appear to say something they did not. But such disclosures only show up toward the bottom of each video's click-to-open description.
A YouTube spokesperson said the company has since applied a more prominent label to some videos on the channels flagged by AFP that were not found to have violated the platform's guidelines.
TikTok also requires creators to label posts sharing realistic AI-generated content, though several pope-centric videos went unmarked.
A TikTok spokesperson said the company proactively removes policy-violating content and uses verified badges to signal authentic accounts.
On TikTok, one Spanish-language video received 9.6 million views while claiming to show Leo preaching about the value of supportive women. Another, which carried an AI label but still fooled viewers, was watched some 32.9 million times.
No video on the pope's official Instagram page has more than 6 million views.
Experts say even seemingly harmless fakes can be problematic, especially if used to farm engagement for accounts that might later sell their audiences or pivot to other misinformation.
The AI-generated sermons not only "corrode the pope's moral authority" and "make whatever he actually says less believable," Green said, but could be harnessed "to build up trust around your channel before having the pope say something outrageous or politically expedient."
The pope himself has also warned about the risks of AI, while Vatican News called out a deepfake that purported to show Leo praising Burkina Faso leader Ibrahim Traore, who seized power in a 2022 coup.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
WASHINGTON - SpaceX's rockets ferry US astronauts to the International Space Station. Its Starlink satellite constellation blankets the globe with broadband, and the company is embedded in some of the Pentagon's most sensitive projects, including tracking hypersonic missiles. So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. - Space monopoly? - The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. NASA, meanwhile, appeared eager to show that it had options. "NASA is assessing the earliest potential for a Starliner flight to the International Space Station in early 2026, pending system certification and resolution of Starliner's technical issues," the agency said in a statement Friday to AFP. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, Forczyk cautioned, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. - Private power, public risk - But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favoured buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Tech Billionaires and Political Power: The stakes of Trump and Musk's relationship
THE unravelling of the relationship between President Donald J Trump and the tech billionaire Elon Musk has raised to global significance the old age yet urgent question. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP THE unravelling of the relationship between President Donald J Trump and the tech billionaire Elon Musk has raised to global significance the old age yet urgent question. What, if anything, will possibly trigger the avalanche or sequence of dialectical events that would definitively spell the end of the empire? Keen observers have long theorised that the factors that could herald the Thucydides transition of these times would not result from a military invasion of the United States by a foreign power. By all indications, the factors would be internal, which by the sheer scale of their social depth and intractability and indeed the many dimensions of their complexities, would result in its implosion. Donald J Trump may be the last Emperor of the US hegemony, to the catatonic shock of the believers of its invincibility. And it came from an unexpected angle. The billionaires who have been plotting to have dominion over the machinery that rules over the empire have lost patience with the cycles that define democratic biorhythms and their contrived pretences of socio-political civility. The stakes are high, and the battle lines drawn are the hard ones, fixed and immutable. It is the people's power through their sovereign vote against techno fascism, a form of rulership by the technology billionaires, or what Naomi Klein refers to as corporate Zionism. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ If Trump blinks, for whatever reason, deducted or speculated, the empire will meet its spectacular demise at the sphincter of fascism, plunged deep in its heart by the richest man in the world. If Musk blinks, however, the power of the people's will and the continuity of the values that sustain their sovereignty will forever spell the indomitable and victorious spirit of their foremothers and forefathers who sacrificed everything for the legacies they so delicately enjoy. The consequences for so many parts of the globe are dire for some and desperate for others in equal measure. South Africa is a case in point. Musk portended a lot of promise for far-right and fascist tendencies in South Africa. The expectation was that the SpaceX and Tesla mogul would forever inhabit the gilded hallways of the White House and whose influence will be brought to prevail on whoever would be temporarily residing there, according to his dictates. This would have allowed Musk to go to any country and threaten them at will, at the back of US military might and the power of unilateral sanctions against anyone, rightly or wrongly. Musk cannot lose this battle. Being out of the White House, and in mortal combat with the main principal at the Oval Office, what possibility is there that Musk would influence the politics of South Africa as he wishes? The stakes are really, really high. And his vassals in the Republic of South Africa who have been advocating for regime change by alleging genocide against caucasian South Africans in general or that section of them who are farmers, would, as an existential necessity, revise their strategic imperatives in the light of these developments. All the trips to the US, both announced and those undertaken at pains of secrecy, had a singular objective. That is, to persuade the entire Christian Nationalistic movements of the United States, the fascist right movements, tech billionaires and above all, the ruling Republican Party, of the delegitimacy of the South African government. Or to be absolutely correct, the ANC's role in it. The playbook was somewhat simple. Claim genocide against white farmers. Derecognise the current genocidal construct, recently graduated from being a xenophobic lot. Facilitate the establishment of a forever transitional government that would exclude either the EFF and MKP or both. The script best suited for regime change artistes like USAID became too convoluted for Trump, and he abandoned his part in it midplay. Notwithstanding a second contingency of so-called 'genocide refugees' said to have quietly arrived in the US sometime last week, this raging battle for the God complex will snap the refugee scam rather abruptly.
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Trump says Musk has ‘lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts
Trump struck a milder tone late Friday when asked how seriously he is considering cutting Musk's contracts. US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk (R) speak in the Oval Office before departing the White House. Picture: AFP / Roberto Schmidt US President Donald Trump said Friday that Elon Musk had 'lost his mind' but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally. The blistering public break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful is fraught with political and economic risks all round. Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials told AFP. 'Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran… I'm not thinking about Elon Musk, I just wish him well,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to his New Jersey golf club late Friday. ALSO READ: Accusations and threats fly as Trump and Musk alliance melts down in blazing public row Earlier, Trump told US broadcasters that he now wanted to focus instead on passing his 'big, beautiful' mega-bill before Congress – Musk's harsh criticism of which had sparked their break-up. But the 78-year-old Republican could not stop himself from taking aim at his South African-born friend-turned-enemy. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump said in a call with ABC when asked about Musk, adding that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to the tycoon. Trump later told Fox News that Musk had 'lost it.' Just a week ago Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after four months working there. 'Very disappointed' While there had been reports of tensions, the sheer speed at which their relationship imploded stunned Washington. After Musk called Trump's spending bill an 'abomination' on Tuesday, Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe on Thursday in which he said he was 'very disappointed' by the entrepreneur. Trump's spending bill faces a difficult path through Congress as it will raise the US deficit, while critics say it will cut health care for millions of the poorest Americans. The row then went nuclear, with Musk slinging insults at Trump and accusing him without evidence of being in government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump hit back with the power of the US government behind him, saying he could cancel the Space X boss's multi-billion-dollar rocket and satellite contracts. READ MORE: Elon Musk unceremoniously steps down from Trump administration Trump struck a milder tone late Friday when asked how seriously he is considering cutting Musk's contracts. 'It's a lot of money, it's a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look – only if it's fair. Only if it's to be fair for him and the country,' he said. Musk apparently also tried to de-escalate social media hostilities. The right-wing tech baron rowed back on a threat to scrap his company's Dragon spacecraft – vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. And on Friday the usually garrulous poster kept a low social media profile on his X social network. But the White House denied reports that they would talk. 'The president does not intend to speak to Musk today,' a senior White House official told AFP. A second official said Musk had requested a call. Tesla giveaway? Tesla stocks tanked more than 14 percent on Thursday amid the row, losing some $100 billion of the company's market value, but recovering partly Friday. Trump is now considering either selling or giving away the cherry red Tesla S that he announced he had bought from Musk's firm in March. The electric vehicle was still parked on the White House grounds on Friday. 'He's thinking about it, yes,' a senior White House official told AFP when asked if Trump would sell or give it away. Trump and Musk had posed inside the car at a bizarre event in March, when the president turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom after viral protests against Musk's DOGE role. But while Trump appeared to hold many of the cards, Musk also has some to play. His wealth allowed him to be the biggest donor to Trump's 2024 campaign, to the tune of nearly $300 million. Any further support for the 2026 midterm election now appears in doubt – while Musk could also use his money to undermine Trump's support on the right. NOW READ: Malatsi's move 'a shameless sellout to American oligarchs Musk and Trump'
