
‘I've slashed my asking price by £150k. I still can't sell my flat'
London flat owners are in trouble. Not only has the average price of the city's apartments stagnated over the past nine years, according to Zoopla, many blocks have been marred by cladding scandals and a wider realisation about the perils of leasehold and uncapped service charges.
As a result, flat owners in the capital have seen their investment lose a quarter of its value in real terms, on average – and in some cases they have been unable to sell up, leaving them trapped or faced with making a significant loss.
Telegraph Money speaks to three such homeowners, who face the grim reality of selling their homes for far less than they believed them to be worth.
'It's devastating'
Laoise Davidson, 56, has been forced to reduce the asking price of her London flat by £150,000 since putting it up for sale last February.
She bought her two-bedroom leasehold flat in West Hampstead, in a converted synagogue, in 2004 for £350,000. By 2016, the flat had been given a valuation of £800,000, so Davidson assumed that she was well on her way to making a healthy profit.
But after putting her property on the market for £725,000 last year – the amount an estate agent told her it was worth – she was unable to secure a sale.
'The estate agent did a social media campaign and loads of work to get interest. He got us three viewings in three months, but then we never heard back,' she says.
As Davidson was getting married in July, she and her now-husband took the flat off the market for a few months.
'The signs were saying that the economy was doing well, so we put it back on at the end of August with a local agent – there was more interest.'
But in the space of less than a year, Davidson has been forced to slash the asking price to £575,000.
'It's devastating. It's still not really getting any interest – we had one viewing last week and one this week, and we haven't had feedback from either of them yet.
'My husband and I want to buy our forever home in London – we can't both live in my flat, as he is a piano teacher and needs more space. We are looking at houses, but it is really tricky as house prices are going up while flats aren't. We can't afford the house we are looking for, and we are really stuck.... I wish I'd sold in 2016.'
Davidson attributes part of her trouble selling to the service charge she pays on her flat, which rose from around £3,000 a year to almost £4,000 after there was a water leak in her building, raising its insurance premiums.
'There is a smaller flat on the other side of my road which has a lower service charge, and that includes a swimming pool, a gym and somebody looking after the place. We don't have any of that, but there is nothing I can do about it,' she says.
Nonetheless, Davidson thinks negative attitudes towards leasehold properties are overblown.
'I think leaseholds get a bad name – there are benefits not being discussed, it seems to be one-sided. We have a good managing agent and the building is looked after… if you [buy freehold] you have to do your own repairs and maintenance, so you end up spending a similar amount,' she says.
'But that said, I wouldn't want to go leasehold again – but that's the phase of my life that I'm in.'
'The property ladder myth is still hurting me now'
Liam Chennells, 35, bought his leasehold flat in Willesden, north-west London, in 2016. Since then, the value of the property has fallen by around 15pc, and Chennells finds himself unable to sell the property, in part because of the building's ongoing cladding issues, and the fact that it comes with an annual service charge of almost £3,000.
'The property ladder myth got me at the age of 25, and is still hurting me now. I had worked hard enough to save a significant deposit of 10pc while renting in London – I didn't have any help from my parents. It seemed like an excellent idea.
'I think we are hard-coded in Britain to get on the property ladder – it's one of the things people want to check off. It's an aspirational thing when you're doing well.'
But Liam – who now lives in Hertfordshire and has resorted to renting out his London flat – seriously regrets his purchase. He urges young people to think very carefully about buying property and taking on a mortgage, as his experience has left him wishing he had just rented instead.
'Rent everything – you get freedom, flexibility. Mortgage rates are a joke. If you extrapolate the information about the payments you have to make and for how long, it's nonsense.
'One of my big things is education – we don't get taught any of this stuff in school.'
'I won't break even. It's a bitter pill to swallow'
Eliza*, 39, who wished to remain anonymous as her property is still for sale, purchased a one-bedroom leasehold apartment in Stepney Green – a trendy area of East London – in 2016, for £440,000.
She used the Help to Buy scheme to fund 40pc of the purchase. This government-backed initiative ran in England and Scotland from 2013 to 2023, giving buyers a government loan to help them purchase a new-build home. While the loan is interest-free for the first five years, after this time interest of 1.75pc is charged on the amount borrowed, which must be repaid alongside mortgage repayments.
'I couldn't afford a flat in Zone 1 or 2 without the Help to Buy scheme,' she says. 'I didn't have a big inheritance or anything like that, and thought it was a no-brainer. I love the flat – it was perfect, with great transport links.'
However, having recently had a baby with her husband, Eliza is now desperately trying to sell up in order to buy a house outside the city. But, despite being on the market since last March, the flat remains unsold.
'The first estate agent wanted to put it on at £490,000, but we had no offers. We got an offer for £450,000, only £10,000 more than I [paid for it], so I would not break even with all the interest. That's a bitter pill to swallow. And then that offer fell through. 'We put it back on at £450,000,' she says, 'but we didn't get too much interest as it was winter.'
Eliza and her partner have made an offer for their dream home, but as the flat is still not selling, it looks like it will fall through.
'We're going to lose this house that we really want. I'm on maternity leave, so I'm not going to get another mortgage like that unless I work full-time, which I don't want to do.'
Eliza believes there are several factors at play that are prolonging the sale of her flat. One is the £240 monthly service charge.
'All the stories of service charges escalating and getting out of control are putting people off, and people generally don't think investing in a flat in London is a good idea,' she says.
She also suspects that if she had put her flat on the market at a more competitive price in the first place, it may have sold, and she would be moving into her dream home with her partner today. 'Estate agents tell you what you want to hear so you'll go with them. If they'd told me my flat was worth £450,000 originally, would I have gone with them? Probably not.'
Ultimately, Eliza thinks the price she paid for the flat in 2016 was inflated due to the Help to Buy scheme. The scheme has been criticised by experts and MPs for contributing to higher flat prices when it was active, and may have 'encouraged people to buy property they couldn't actually afford', according to Ranald Mitchell, of Charwin Private Clients.
'I do blame Help to Buy for inflating house prices,' she says. 'They knew people needed the scheme, and that it sounded great on paper.'
All things considered, Eliza is not particularly hopeful about selling her flat in future. 'We might just have to auction it and move on.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nigel Farage calls for ‘re-industrialisation' of Wales
Nigel Farage has said his party wants to restart Port Talbot's blast furnaces and 're-industrialise Wales'. On a visit to South Wales, the leader of Reform UK said the resumption of traditional steelmaking and coal production is the party's long-term ambition if it comes to power. The speech came one year ahead of the Senedd elections in May next year, where the party is looking to end Labour's 26 years of domination. Addressing reporters, Mr Farage acknowledged that plans to open a traditional furnace could take years and cost 'in the low billions'. The GMB Union has branded the plans 'more lies from an opportunistic chancer'. Port Talbot's remaining blast furnaces were shut down in September last year, with a new electric arc furnace being built in their place. 'Our ambition is to re-industrialise Wales,' Mr Farage said. 'We are going to be using more steel over the next few years than we have probably ever used. 'As we increase military spending and as we attempt a house building programme in Wales, and even more so in England, of massive proportions, just to catch up with the population explosion over the last 20 years, we are going to need a lot of steel.' The Reform leader said 'specific types of coal' are needed in the UK, particularly for a new blast furnace. 'We should be producing ourselves, rather than importing,' he said. While he acknowledged 'mining is dangerous', he said the industry could provide well-paying jobs. Mr Farage acknowledged the plan to open a new furnace would cost 'in the low billions' and would be 'no easy thing'. 'It's a massive, expensive job to re-open blast furnaces, we're going to need cheaper energy, we're going to need much cheaper coal, we are going to need private business partners prepared to come into a joint venture,' he said. Responding to the GMB Union allegations that his party's plans were 'lies', Mr Farage said the union was tied to the Labour Party as one of its biggest funders. He said: 'They see us as a challenge, and therefore, they'll be rude about us. 'What you will find is that increasingly, GMB members are going to vote for us, and the more GMB members vote for us, the more upsetGMB officials and leaders will become. 'Frankly, the trade unions have done nothing to protect British workers through open borders over the last 20-25 years.' During his speech, Mr Farage said he doubted that the electric arc furnace, which is due to come online in 2028, 'will ever, ever be switched on'. Challenged on what evidence he had, he argued that with British energy prices being so high, it would be producing 'very, very expensive secondary steel'. He added: 'I hope I'm wrong, an electric arc furnace is not the real deal, but it's better than nothing.' Mr Farage said the party's campaign for the Senedd election next May 'starts today', but would not say when Reform would announce aleader in Wales. Regional officer Ruth Brady, speaking at the GMB's annual conference in Brighton, said: 'The people of Port Talbot will see this for what it is – more lies from this opportunistic chancer. 'Nigel Farage was happy to let British Steel go to the wall. He'll trot out any line when the cameras are rolling. He doesn't care about steel communities or steel workers.' Ms Brady said the plans to shut the blast furnaces were made by the last Tory government and the union wanted Labour to 'make good on their promises to our members in Port Talbot'.


Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Church sacked accountant for being non-Catholic
A church sacked an accountant after she was discriminated against for not being Catholic, a tribunal has found. University of Cambridge-educated Janet Parker argued with her female boss after she asked for leave to care for her newly adopted daughter. When the 55-year-old's request for flexible working was refused, she complained, observing that 'the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care'. Ms Parker was then subjected to a 'witch hunt' investigation for alleged professional negligence, which led to her dismissal from her £60,000-a-year role. She has now won claims against Clifton Diocese after a tribunal ruled it discriminated against her, harassed her and then unfairly sacked her because she was not religious. Ms Parker, who later told a reporter that she was an atheist, claimed the diocese's approach to her flexible working request was 'tainted by negative views of adoption, emanating from the religious beliefs of its staff'. Disapproval of adoption leave Details of her tribunal claim emerged at a disciplinary hearing, conducted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICAEW), into abusive messages she sent to Lyn Murray, the diocese chief operating officer, after her dismissal. According to the full judgment – which has not been made public – the hearing in Bristol was told that she had worked at the diocese, which covers the west of England, from February 2015 until her dismissal in October 2021. Ms Parker, described by the tribunal as a 'very intelligent, articulate, and able woman', had been a chartered accountant since 1998 and worked in London at Deloittes and Credit Suisse before moving to the charity sector in 2009. In 2019, her application to adopt a baby girl was approved and in January 2020 she informed Mrs Murray, who she said had previously been supportive, of her intention to take 52 weeks of adoption leave. The tribunal was told: 'Mrs Murray did not react well, arguing that she did not believe that [Ms Parker] could 'go on leave with no notice,' as she described it, and expressed dissatisfaction that [she] would 'do that to her'.' Ms Parker began her leave in September 2020 but the tribunal heard that during her absence, her replacement flagged potential financial irregularities in the accounts for which she had been responsible. Church launched disciplinary investigation In July 2021, Ms Parker had a conversation with Mrs Murray about reducing hours and working from home because she was struggling to find childcare for her daughter. However, her request was refused, and the following month the diocese launched disciplinary proceedings against her before putting her on suspension. Ms Parker responded by issuing a grievance against Mrs Murray, she said: 'This behaviour is not in accordance with the professed beliefs of the Catholic Church. 'I know that the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care, but I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago. Maybe I am wrong.' The hearing was told that the ICAEW was asked to investigate the allegations against her and eventually found there was insufficient evidence to support the complaints. However, at the conclusion of its investigation, the diocese decided to dismiss her for gross misconduct. The tribunal heard this led to Ms Parker sending an email to Mrs Murray saying: 'There is one thing I always wanted to say to you. Now I can. F--- OFF YOU B---H.' and 'Your god might forgive you but I never will. B---h.' She then put out Facebook posts saying: 'You asked for it and I'm coming for you,' and 'Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, b----es,' – meaning 'don't let the bastards grind you down, b----es' in Latin. 'Witch hunt' Employment Judge Adam Midgley said Ms Parker, as a non Catholic, had been religiously discriminated against. He said: '[She] has argued that from the moment she challenged the [diocese], particularly from the point at which she referenced the Catholic Church's treatment of vulnerable children, her card was marked, and [it] closed ranks to protect itself and dismiss her.' 'Those are very serious allegations. The claimant is required to produce some evidence from which we could, properly directing ourselves, conclude that the reason for the matters she complains of was her religion or belief – ie that she was a non-Catholic.' He described the investigation that led to her dismissal as appearing like 'witch hunt' and said it was 'derisory in its depth, unbalanced and focused on establishing fault'. Ms Parker has yet to receive compensation following the judgment as the diocese is understood to have launched an appeal. Speaking after the ICAEW issued her a caution over the abusive messages, Ms Parker said: 'I wasn't happy with the ICAEW outcome but I suppose it was the best outcome given the situation. I don't think what I did was wrong and I think I just did what probably millions of people around the country want to do when they leave their jobs.'


Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages
The developer of Britain's largest solar farm has told residents of three Norfolk villages that appear in the Domesday Book that their land may be 'required'. Dozens of villagers in Hempnall, Saxlingham and Tasburgh were sent letters warning them that their homes may be needed to create space for the East Pye Solar project. The development will cover 2,500 acres, an area the size of Chichester, in West Sussex, and it is 10 times bigger than the UK's current largest solar farm in Flintshire, Wales. Letters sent in the last two months asked villagers detailed questions about their mortgages. In total, residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss are believed to have been sent the letters, which state their land may be 'required'. If the East Pye Solar proposal goes ahead, it would deliver up to 500 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 115,000 homes annually. As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP), the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land. Farmers around the UK have been threatened with the possibility of compulsory purchase orders for solar farm development, but this is believed to be the first time homeowners have been approached. Residents of Hempnall, which has a population of 1,238, criticised the letter's 'impertinent' and 'unreasonable' line of questioning. Yvonne Davy, 89, is among dozens of residents who received letters from the developer's lawyers, Dalcour Maclaren. Ms Davy, who has lived in Hempnall since 1973, said she received three letters, dated April 9, May 2 and May 29, and an unwanted phone call. The great-grandmother, who has an electric car and solar panels on her roof, said: 'I thought that can't be right. They were asking about my finances and my mortgage. It is quite impertinent. I wasn't very pleased when they rang me at the seaside, and I told them what they're planning to do isn't very nice at all. I don't know how they got my number.' Developers would get her land 'over her dead body', she added, saying: 'They're putting these vast numbers of panels, and it's going to blight the countryside. Where I walk and where I live is going to be surrounded by solar panels the height of a house. It would be dreadful. 'I'm going to be 90 this year, and I'm happily settled. I don't want to lose my property.' Robert Eagle, 77, has also received multiple letters, with the first in early April, followed by three reminders to fill out the questionnaire. Mr Eagle, who has lived in Hempnall for 27 years, said he felt 'unreasonably' chased by the company for his financial information. He said: 'At first I was surprised to receive the letter because I didn't realise such detailed information would be needed at this stage. If I had to give up my home, I would certainly not be pleased. We've been here a long time and we'd like to remain here. 'The thing that really hits us is how unreasonable the project is in terms of scale.' David Hook, the chairman of Hempnall Parish Council, said it was 'extremely concerned' about the solar farm proposals. He said: 'The East Pye scheme, if permitted, would surround our village and cover in total 2,718 acres of South Norfolk countryside with solar panels. 'Our objection to these schemes is due primarily to the fact that their construction would result in the industrialisation of large areas of attractive, tranquil countryside with solar panels and security fences. 'The NSIP regime also provides developers with compulsory purchase powers and this is causing great concern to many local residents, in Hempnall and many other villages included in the scheme, who have received letters saying their home 'may be required'. Island Green Power said: 'As part the development consent order process, East Pye Solar will be undertaking land interest questionnaires to identify people and organisations that have a legal interest in land or property that may potentially be impacted by the scheme. 'This is a statutory obligation under the 2008 Planning Act, and is routine for helping to identify those with legal interest in land. 'Completing land referencing questionnaires allows these stakeholders to be consulted on the development consent order application and ensures they receive formal notification such as when the scheme is accepted for examination.' The Telegraph has contacted the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero