
Trade strategy will protect UK firms from ‘harm' amid global shift
The Government has unveiled a new trade plan aimed at boosting exports and protecting UK firms at a time of growing uncertainty for global businesses following Donald Trump's tariffs.
The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said it was the UK's first Trade Strategy to be published since Brexit.
It follows the publication of an industrial strategy earlier this week which set out plans to back UK industries which the Government thinks have the potential to grow.
The trade plan aims to make the UK the best-connected country in the world to do business, helping to loosen regulation and expand opportunities for exporters.
As part of the plan, the DBT pledged to introduce new tools and safeguards to help protect UK firms against the threat of a shifting global trade environment.
This is understood to mean expanding its ability to respond to unfair trade practices, guarding sectors such as steel, and potential powers to respond to deliberate economic pressures against the UK.
The decision to strengthen trade defences comes at a time of heightened uncertainty following Mr Trump's tariff announcements in April, which have hiked charges on most US imports and raised concerns over the future of global trade arrangements.
The strategy nonetheless follows a trio of major deals struck between the UK and India, the US and the EU in recent months.
The agreement with the US is set to implement quotas that will effectively eliminate the tariff on British steel and reduce the rate on UK vehicles to 10%.
Meanwhile, the deal with India opened up trade between the two countries by lowering tariffs on exports like gin and whisky.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the trade strategy was a 'promise to British business: helping firms to sell more, grow faster, and compete globally'.
Jonathan Reynolds, the Government's Business and Trade Secretary, said: 'The UK is an open trading nation but we must reconcile this with a new geopolitical reality and work in our own national interest.
'Our Trade Strategy will sharpen our trade defence so we can ensure British businesses are protected from harm, while also relentlessly pursuing every opportunity to sell to more markets under better terms than before.'
Trade minister Douglas Alexander said the Government was taking 'every step necessary to safeguard British businesses from the increasingly protectionist mood in much of the world by sharpening our defensive toolkit'.
Meanwhile, the newly created Ricardo Fund aims to set aside funding to tackle complex regulatory issues and remove obstacles for UK businesses selling abroad – which the DBT said could unlock £5 billion worth of opportunities.
It is also expanding the capacity of UK Export Finance – the country's export credit agency – by £20 billion to total £80 billion.
The body provides Government-backed loans, guarantees and insurance to help companies trade overseas.
Separate to the trade strategy, the DBT said it was calling for views across the steel industry about how future trade measures and protections should be shaped.
Steel producers and businesses across the supply chain will be invited to submit feedback over a six-week 'call for evidence' period.
Current safeguarding measures – which include tariff-free quotas on steel imports to limit sudden surges – expire in June next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war
Donald Trump said he is considering sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, as he renewed calls on Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end the war. The president added that he isn't ruling out a new defense assistance package, when he spoke to reporters at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. Trump, who has surrounded himself with isolationist-minded advisers who've publicly opposed continued support for Kyiv, responded, 'We'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort. Click here for the latest updates on the war in Ukraine Speaking at a press conference on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022. Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year. 'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.' He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine. He later added that Putin has been 'more difficult' than Zelensky, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship dating back to his first term, when a phone call with the Ukrainian leader launched a scandal that led to the first of his two impeachment trials in the Senate. Trump's relationship with Putin has long been far friendlier, but even that has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table. In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict. The president's changed view of the war and Putin's culpability also became evident when he had an emotional exchange with a reporter for the BBC's Ukrainian service, who asked whether the U.S. was prepared to sell more Patriot anti-air missiles to Ukraine. Last year, the Biden administration announced they would prioritize deliveries of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine on account of Russia's accelerated pace of aerial attacks against civilians and infrastructure, but Kyiv has had to expand their use of the missiles and has been running low on them. Trump asked the reporter if she was currently living in Ukraine, at which point she replied that she was based in Warsaw with her children while her husband has remained in Ukraine. The president responded: 'That's rough stuff.' He asked the journalist again to confirm that she was living outside of Ukraine and working as a reporter, replying 'good' when she answered in the affirmative. 'Let me just tell you, they [Ukraine] do want to have the anti-missile missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' he said. Trump added that such weapons were 'very hard to get' and 'very effective', while admitting that the U.S. had been prioritizing supplies for Israel amid that country's ongoing wars. 'They do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know,' he said before praising her 'very good question' and telling her to 'say hello' to her husband for him. Trump's apparent openness to sending more American aid to Ukraine comes as NATO's 32 member nations pledged to 'reaffirm' what they described as 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' calling Ukrainian security efforts a contribution to NATO's own security. The alliance also pledged to include 'direct contributions to Ukraine defense' as part of efforts to have each country meet a threshold of spending five percent of gross domestic product on defense.


Scotsman
29 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why UK needs to pander to Trump but should not necessarily believe him
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Following the US attack on Iran, Donald Trump said its nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated', setting back the tyrannical regime's plans by 'decades'. However, according to a leaked preliminary assessment by the Pentagon, the missile strikes only caused a delay of a few months. Amid the ensuing uproar over these very different takes, the US President attacked the media for reporting the classified document's findings, saying they were "scum" and "disgusting", while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused those behind the leak of being "professional stabbers". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, clearly, what matters is what has actually happened. If Iran still has the ability to quickly develop nuclear weapons, the world needs to be alive to that threat. With the situation still unclear, it would be far better to err on the side of caution. Keir Starmer speaks to US President Donald Trump at the Nato summit in The Hague (Picture: Kin Cheung/pool) | Getty Images Axis of Autocracies Where Trump deserves credit is that the US attack has demonstrated to Iran's leaders how vulnerable they are, and this may have a deterring effect on a regime, widely despised by its own people, which poses a very real threat to world peace. It is a member of what former Nato Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has described as the 'Axis of Autocracies', along with Russia, China and North Korea. The combined threat these dictatorships pose is the reason why the world needs a much stronger Nato. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And that means European leaders must sometimes swallow their pride and be rather sycophantic towards Trump, even as he continues to cast doubt on his commitment to the Nato treaty which states an attack on one will be treated as an attack on all. The UK and Europe have no choice but to spend more on defence – commensurate with the increased threats facing the world and also, again erring on the side of caution, in case Trump decides to withdraw from the alliance, formally or not.


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Third-country asylum plan shows UK is in ‘a very dark place', says Albanian PM
A UK plan to send refused asylum seekers to 'return hubs' in third countries shows post-Brexit Britain is 'in a very dark place', Albania's prime minister has said. In his first interview with the international media since leading his socialist party to a historic fourth term in office, Edi Rama said the idea of the UK wanting to 'look for places to dump immigrants' would have been inconceivable a decade ago. But it was in keeping with the shift in public discourse in Britain since Brexit, in which the 'totally unacceptable, totally ridiculous, totally shameful' had become normalised, he said. Announced last month by Keir Starmer during a visit to the Balkan state, the 'return hubs' scheme would involve centres in a third country processing the claims of people refused asylum who have exhausted legal pathways in the UK. 'It's one of those things that 10 years ago would simply not have not been imaginable … that Britain would look for places to dump immigrants,' Rama said from Tirana, the Albanian capital. 'The fact that today it's not just imaginable, it's happening, is not because of Keir Starmer or [Rishi] Sunak doing something outrageous; it's because of the country being in a very dark place.' Rama, who is renowned for his outspoken and contrarian views, voiced dismay at the level of public discourse in the UK. As a committed anglophile, he said, it was hard to take in. 'Eighty per cent of the things that are said, or are written, or are accepted as a normal part of the discourse in today's Britain are things that [before Brexit] would have been totally unacceptable, totally ridiculous, totally shameful,' he said. Under former Tory governments, relations between the UK and Albania became increasingly strained, overshadowed by boat crossings and accusations of illegal Albanian immigrants 'invading' British shores. Starmer's visit in May – the first ever by a British prime minister – – was aimed at putting bilateral relations on a new footing. While in Tirana, the Labour leader said talks were under way 'with a number of countries' to set up the hubs. But, in a move seen as a gentle rebuke to his guest, Rama said in a joint press conference that Albania would not be participating in the scheme. Seeking to put the record straight in the interview, Rama said that Starmer, a 'very decent [and] a delightful person', had neither made the request publicly nor been the first British leader to privately broach the subject. Rama said his response had always been the same: 'I have been clear about this since Boris Johnson asked me and Rishi asked me … I've always said no.' That Albania had previously agreed to a similar scheme with Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, was different because of the 'very special relationship' the two countries had. That deal, which envisaged intercepting people at sea and taking most of them not to Italy but to a reception centre in Albania for their asylum claims to be processed, has so far been obstructed by legal objections. From the day Albania's brutal Stalinist regime collapsed in 1991, Italy had stood by his country, Rama said. As a result his compatriots had 'a weak spot' for Rome. 'Practically we are one country made of two independent countries … Italy has been there for us in every dark moment and difficult situation since the day we got out of the hell of [being] the North Korea of Europe,' he added. '[We] have a weak spot for Italy, so when Italy asks us for something we say yes, full stop.' Rama's stance coincides with a newfound confidence as the small country, among Europe's poorest states, makes once-unthinkable strides towards joining the EU. With a dramatic change of pace and tone that he attributes to the new 'geopolitically driven spirit' of European policymakers since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, accession negotiations have accelerated as Brussels finally seeks to embrace the western Balkans. The region has long been viewed by Moscow as falling into Russia's sphere of influence. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Rama, who turns 60 in July, ran his election campaign on the promise he would push ahead with pursuing accession to the EU. He now believes negotiations will be wrapped up by 2027 and 'within 2030 we'll be an EU member'. Albania, which joined Nato in 2009, has been an accession candidate for more than a decade. 'The whole approach to the process has dramatically changed,' he said. 'Now they [the EU] are very eager to go forward … With the Russian aggression everything changed, so somehow Vladimir Putin also did this, he made Europe much more interested in unifying.'. He sees a similar effect on the EU from the new occupant of the White House and is '100% convinced that Donald Trump's election is a good thing for Europe'. Rama said Trump's victory jolted Europe out of its languor and had brought 'an unsettling spirit' that the world needed. 'I think that when Trump says God saved him because he had a plan for America, I think he says only half the truth. God saved him because he had a plan for Europe too, to wake Europe up,' he said. Later this year, the Albanian painter turned prime minister will launch a 'thank you' tour of diaspora communities who, in a first, were able to vote in last month's election, helping him secure a landslide victory. More than 500,000 ethnic Albanians are thought to live in Greece alone. Rama's hope is that he can lure them back 'because now our salaries are very close to [those in] Greece and it's home'. But the socialist party leader, at 6ft 7in (2.01 metres), a basketball player in his youth, also has his critics. Charges of corruption in Albanian society are widespread. So, too, are accusations of creeping authoritarianism – Rama will be the longest-serving leader since Enver Hoxha, the country's former brutal dictator – though the allegations are labelled farcical by admirers and mandarins in Brussels. One former EU minister said: 'Edi is larger than life. His problem is that he is too big for his country and I am not referring to his height.' If Albania succeeded in its membership bid, Rama said it would be 'the right and most wonderful moment to pass the torch'. It would be a personal achievement but also 'help Europe be less boring and more sunny'.