logo
A robotics tournament in a power outage

A robotics tournament in a power outage

Yahoo08-04-2025

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — As if the challenge of building and programming a completely autonomous robot weren't enough, hundreds of teams and thousands of students from across Oklahoma and Kansas had to complete preparations in the dark Saturday morning.
Regional Botball Organizer Steve Goodgame got an early phone call explaining the situation.
'I got a call about 5:30AM that the power was out,' he says. 'They said they were working on it.'
An overnight rainstorm cut power to the Centennial Building at the Oklahoma State Fairgrounds.
Junior Botballer Presley Bolton and friends from Pratt, Kansas worked through morning overcast away from the dark interior of the building.
She admitted, 'It's kind of hard to code in the dark but we moved right next to the window.'
Two separate divisions, two different eras in history met in one building, the Age of AI and the Stone Age.
Junior Botball contestants worked on a series of challenges that included retrieving soda cans from a pre-arranged grid.
Senior Botball teams worked with two robots at a time preparing food in a simulated kitchen.
Practice was supposed to start at 8 a.m. for these first time competitors from Allen-Bowden south of Tulsa.
7th grader Jesse Whitlock explained, 'A major obstacle is probably that we crammed in a lot of the programming last minute.'
The same went for a team from Millwood Schools in OKC.
'We coded five times,' chuckles one member of the team.
'We've had to run it and re-run it,'
Organizers like Goodgame present different challenges each year, a course impossible to fully complete.
The only think lacking in this simulated kitchen happened to be a Stone Age staple.
'No open flames?,' we ask.
'No open flames here,' Goodgame agrees. 'In fact, no kitchen. No power.'
In the cave of the Centennial Building where light came from cell phone flashlights and laptop screens, robots on battery power and students on cold Poptarts solved the kinds of problems humankind has always faced, getting a meal ready fast with no heat or light.
Survive and move on.
The 2025 Regional Botball Challenge did get underway later Saturday, April 5th.
Winners from both divisions qualified for the World Botball Conference scheduled for early July 8th in Norman OK.
For more information on Saturday's event, click here.
For more information on the World Conference go to kipr.org.
Great State is sponsored by True Sky Credit Union
Follow Galen's Great State adventures on social media!
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI is a Ticking Time Bomb for Your Data, Reveals New Report From Varonis
AI is a Ticking Time Bomb for Your Data, Reveals New Report From Varonis

Yahoo

time20-05-2025

  • Yahoo

AI is a Ticking Time Bomb for Your Data, Reveals New Report From Varonis

The State of Data Security Report shares findings from 1,000 real-world IT environments to uncover the dark side of the AI boom Varonis' State of Data Security Report: Exposing Data at Risk in the Age of AI MIAMI, May 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A new report from Varonis reveals 99% of organizations have sensitive data exposed to AI. The State of Data Security Report: Quantifying AI's Impact on Data Risk examines how much sensitive information is exposed and vulnerable to AI tools due to misconfigurations, overly permissive access, and other data security gaps. 'The productivity gains of AI are real — and so is the data security risk,' said Varonis CEO, President, and Co-Founder Yaki Faitelson. 'CIOs and CISOs face enormous pressure to adopt AI at warp speed, which is driving the adoption of data security platforms. AI runs on data, and taking a data-centric approach to security is critical to avoid an AI-related data breach.' Varonis analyzed data risk assessments from 1,000 organizations — providing empirical evidence of risk, not conclusions based on AI readiness surveys and polls. The dataset included nearly 10 billion cloud resources — over 20 petabytes of data — within popular IaaS and SaaS applications and services, including AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Box, Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Okta, Databricks, Slack, Snowflake, Zoom, and many others. In the organizations examined, Varonis found: 99% have sensitive data unnecessarily exposed to AI tools. 90% of sensitive cloud data, including AI training data, is open and accessible to AI tools. 98% have unverified apps, including shadow AI, within their environments. 1 in 7 do not enforce MFA across SaaS and multi-cloud environments. 88% have ghost users lurking in their environments. Get the State of Data Security Report: Exposing Data at Risk in the Age of AI. Additional Resources: See Varonis in action: schedule a 30-minute demo. Check out these Varonis integrations. For more information on Varonis' solution portfolio, please visit Visit our blog and join the conversation on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube. About VaronisVaronis (Nasdaq: VRNS) is the leader in data security, fighting a different battle than conventional cybersecurity companies. Our cloud-native Data Security Platform continuously discovers and classifies critical data, removes exposures, and detects advanced threats with AI-powered automation. Thousands of organizations worldwide trust Varonis to defend their data wherever it lives — across SaaS, IaaS, and hybrid cloud environments. Customers use Varonis to automate a wide range of security outcomes, including data security posture management (DSPM), data classification, data access governance (DAG), data detection and response (DDR), data loss prevention (DLP), AI security, and insider risk management. Varonis protects data first, not last. Learn more at Investor Relations Contact:Tim PerzVaronis Systems, Inc.646-640-2112investors@ News Media Contact:Rachel HuntVaronis Systems, Inc.877-292-8767 (ext. 1598)pr@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in to access your portfolio

The life-or-death case for self-driving cars
The life-or-death case for self-driving cars

Vox

time04-05-2025

  • Vox

The life-or-death case for self-driving cars

is an editorial director at Vox overseeing the climate, tech, and world teams, and is the editor of Vox's Future Perfect section. He worked at Time magazine for 15 years as a foreign correspondent in Asia, a climate writer, and an international editor, and he wrote a book on existential risk. A white Waymo self-driving car with rooftop sensor equipment is stopped at an intersection in San Francisco's Financial District on March 18. Gado via Getty Images I have some bad news: You are almost certainly a worse driver than you think you are. Humans drive distracted. They drive drowsy. They drive angry. And, worst of all, they drive impaired far more often than they should. Even when we're firing on all cylinders, our Stone Age-adapted brains are often no match for the speed and complexity of high-speed driving. There's as much as a 2.5-second lag between what we perceive and how fast we can react in a vehicle traveling 60 mph, which means a car will travel the equivalent of two basketball court lengths before its driver can even hit the brake. The result of this very human fallibility is blood on the streets. Nearly 1.2 million people die in road crashes globally each year, enough to fill nine jumbo jets each day. Here in the US, the government estimates there were 39,345 traffic fatalities in 2024, which adds up to a bus's worth of people perishing every 12 hours. The good news is there are much, much better drivers coming online, and they have everything human drivers don't: They don't need sleep. They don't get angry. They don't get drunk. And their brains can handle high-speed decision-making with ease. Because they're AI. AI takes the wheel The average American adult will spend around three years of their life driving. If robots could take the wheel instead, well, think of all the Netflix shows we could stream instead. But the true benefit of a self-driving revolution will be in lives saved. And new data from the autonomous vehicle company Waymo suggests that those savings could be very great indeed. In a peer-reviewed study that is set to be published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, Waymo analyzed the safety performance of its autonomous vehicles over the course of 56.7 million miles driven in Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and San Francisco — all without a human safety driver present to take the wheel in an emergency. They then compared that data to human driving safety over the same number of miles driven on the same kind of roads. The results of the study, almost certainly the biggest and most comprehensive research on self-driving car safety yet released, are striking. A master class in driving safety Compared to human drivers, the Waymo self-driving cars had: 81 percent fewer airbag-deploying crashes 85 percent fewer crashes with suspected serious or worse injuries 96 percent fewer injury crashes at intersections (primarily because Waymo detects red lights faster than humans) 92 percent fewer crashes that involve injuries to pedestrians. Had the typical human-driven fleet of cars covered those same 56.7 million miles, the Waymo researchers project it would have resulted in an estimated 181 additional injury crashes, 78 additional air-bag crashes, and 11 extra serious-injury crashes. But the numbers really get eye-popping when you extend this data across all 3.3 trillion vehicle miles driven by humans in the US in a typical year. Back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that if the same 85 percent reduction seen in serious crashes held true for fatal ones — a big if, to be clear, since the study had too few fatal events to measure — we'd save approximately 34,000 lives a year. That's five times the number of Americans who died in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined. Don't get in the way of progress Of course, there are plenty of caveats to the Waymo study and even more obstacles before we could ever achieve anything like what's outlined above. In part because serious injury crashes are (thankfully) very rare, even 56.7 million miles isn't long enough for researchers to be really sure that such crashes would occur significantly less often with robot drivers, so more data will be needed there. Waymo's cars were also being driven largely in warm, sunny locations, operating in geofenced areas that had been heavily mapped by the company. It's far less certain how they might do in, let's say, the snowy streets of Boston in the winter. This is also a company-run study, though it has been peer-reviewed by outside experts. And even if we decided to go all in on AI drivers, actually producing enough autonomous vehicles to begin to replace human-driven cars and trucks would be an enormous undertaking, to say the least. Still, the data looks so good, and the death toll on our roads is so high that I'd argue slowing down autonomous vehicles is actually costing lives. And there's a risk that's precisely what will happen. Too often the public focuses on unusual, outlier events with self-driving cars, while the carnage that occurs thanks to human drivers on a daily basis is simply treated as background noise. (That's an example of two common psychological biases: availability bias, which causes us to judge risk by outlier events that jump easily to mind, and base-rate neglect, where we ignore the underlying frequency of events.) This misapprehension is something I often see in news coverage and consumption, and it's one of the reasons I started Good News. The result is that public opinion has been turning against self-driving cars in recent years, to the point where vandals have attacked autonomous vehicles on the street. And of course, given that nearly 5 million Americans make their living primarily through driving, any wide-scale movement to self-driving vehicles would bring significant economic disruption. But still, 34,000 lives saved on an annual basis would represent tremendous progress. Maybe, after about 100 years of trying, it's time to give something else a chance behind the wheel. A version of this story originally appeared in the Good News newsletter. Sign up here!

Drone saves man hit by train in Oklahoma City
Drone saves man hit by train in Oklahoma City

Yahoo

time20-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Drone saves man hit by train in Oklahoma City

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — Cutting-edge technology is saving lives in Oklahoma City. Drone as First Responder (DFR) programs utilize drones to respond to calls quicker and more efficiently. The Oklahoma City Police Department and the Oklahoma City Fire Department has been laying the groundwork for the program here for a few years. 'It is deploying drones in docks spread out through the city of Oklahoma City that allows us to respond to calls for service in multiple different facets,' said Sgt. Dax Laporte with OKCPD. Drones are launches from rooftop docks and can be overheard in less than two minutes, sending back real-time footage. 'They are providing situational awareness they need to make better tactical decisions, more effective resource allocation and to have better outcomes in the incidents they respond to,' said Noreen Charlton, public safety strategy for Skydio. This program was proven successful just two weeks ago, when a train conductor called 911, believing he may have hit someone, but didn't know where and trains don't stop quickly. A drone was launched, finding the man within minutes and guiding fire personnel to the scene. 'Sold out!': Child recommends speeding ticket for mom in Moore 'Access was a huge issue in this instance and knowing which direction to come from, saving those seconds and that's really what made the difference,' said Lucas Qualls, district chief of support services. The man had serious injuries and likely would not have survived without the drone's deployment. The drones also have thermal imaging to help with fighting fires. 'We were able to put it above the burning structure and really give us an awareness of where the fires are, where victims or trapped occupants may be and where we can better serve the citizens that were responding to,' said Qualls. They can also determine a call's priority. 'If they can definitively clear this call, it allows it whether it be police, fire to cancel going to that call and it makes them available for something that could be even more priority,' said Sgt. Laporte. Drone company Skydio says Oklahoma City is the first place she's seen two departments work together to utilize the program.. Right now, there are only two docks in the city, but the plan is to have twenty by December. The end goal is 50 over the next few years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store