logo
Ukraine war latest: Ukraine, Russia agree on new prisoner swap, return of fallen soldiers

Ukraine war latest: Ukraine, Russia agree on new prisoner swap, return of fallen soldiers

Yahoo4 days ago

Key developments on June 2:
Ukraine, Russia conclude talks in Istanbul, a 1,200-for-1,200 prisoner exchange is in the works, Zelensky says
5 Ukrainian regions, ban on NATO, limits on Kyiv's army — Russian media publishes Moscow's official peace demands
34% of Russian strategic Russian bombers at main airfields damaged in Ukrainian drone operation, SBU reports
Over 160 Ukrainian drones downed across Russia, Moscow claims day after mass strike on airfields
Russia recruiting Ukrainians for illegal activities in Europe, Ukrainian intel warns
The Ukrainian and Russian delegations concluded peace talks in Istanbul on June 2, agreeing on a new prisoners of war (POWs) exchange but failing to reach a ceasefire.
The talks, hosted by Turkish officials, follow the first round of negotiations on May 16. The initial meeting ended with an agreement on the largest prisoner exchange of the war, but without any tangible progress toward a peace deal.
The parties agreed to conduct a major swap, which will include severely injured and young people aged 18 to 25.
President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the next prisoner exchange would feature at least 1,000 people on each side, and might reach a 1,200-for-1,200 swap that would possibly also include imprisoned journalists and political prisoners held in Russia.
Join our community Support independent journalism in Ukraine. Join us in this fight. Support Us
After the talks, Russia pledged to transfer 6,000 bodies of fallen Ukrainian soldiers and officers to Ukraine and also proposed a ceasefire for two or three days in some areas of the front line in order to retrieve the bodies of the fallen soldiers.
Zelensky said that only 15% of the mentioned 6,000 are identified and that Ukraine would need to check that the bodies Russia is willing to return are those of Ukrainian soldiers.
"We had instances when they returned bodies that later were identified as their own," Zelensky said on June 2.
Following the talks, the Kyiv Independent obtained the text of the peace proposals that Ukraine, in turn, presented to Russia in Istanbul.
According to the document, the Ukrainian delegation offered Moscow a complete ceasefire, the exchange of prisoners of war in an "all-for-all format," bringing back the children abducted by Russia, and the release of all civilians from Russian captivity.
Ukraine called for guarantees that would prevent Russia from repeating its aggression, as well as the involvement of the international community to achieve this.
According to Ukraine's proposal seen by the Kyiv Independent, Ukraine would continue on its path toward joining the EU and will become a member of NATO if there is consensus within the alliance.
Ukraine is also ready to agree to the gradual lifting of some sanctions against Russia, but with a mechanism for their renewal if necessary. Frozen Russian assets, in turn, should be used to rebuild Ukraine and pay reparations.
Read also: As Trump fails to sanction Moscow, few expect breakthrough during upcoming Russia-Ukraine talks
The Russian delegation handed Ukraine a so-called "peace memorandum" with its proposals for a ceasefire during the second round of peace talks in Istanbul, Russian-state media outlet TASS reported on June 2, publishing the alleged document.
The Russian memorandum began circulating online following the talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, during which the parties again failed to reach a ceasefire.
Among Russia's key demands is the official recognition of Russia's annexation of Crimea, as well as the annexation of Ukraine's Kherson, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Luhansk oblasts, none of which Moscow controls in full.
Russia also demands the complete withdrawal of all troops from Kherson, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Luhansk oblasts, followed by demobilization in Ukraine.
Moscow's other demands include that Ukraine sticks to its neutral status, abandoning its aspirations to join NATO and other possible military alliances, a ban on the redeployment of Ukrainian troops, and a cessation of arms supplies and intelligence to Ukraine by its partners.
According to the document, Ukraine must abandon its claims for compensation for damages from the Russian war, guarantee amnesty for political prisoners, make Russian the official language, and not allow foreign troops to be deployed on its territory.
Read also: As 50,000 Russian troops amass, Ukraine's Sumy Oblast braces for potential large-scale offensive
The Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) reported that the June 1 "Spiderweb" drone operation caused approximately $7 billion in damages and disabled 34% of cruise missile bombers in key Russian airbases.
The agency confirmed that more details about the attack will be revealed later.
"We will strike them (Russia) at sea, in the air, and on the ground. And if needed, we'll get them from underground too," the SBU said in a message.
This operation targeted aircraft that is used in frequent long-range attacks on Ukrainian cities, and the plan had been in preparation for over a year and a half.
According to a Kyiv Independent SBU source, first-person-view (FPV) drones were covertly transported deep into Russian territory and hidden inside trucks before being launched against four major airfields.
The source said one of the airfields hit was the Belaya air base in Russia's Irkutsk Oblast, more than 4,000 kilometers from Ukraine.
Olenya air base in Russia's Murmansk Oblast, the Diaghilev airbase in Ryazan Oblast, Ivanovo airbase in Ivanovo Oblast were also targeted.
More than 40 aircraft are known to have been hit, including the A-50, Tu-95, and Tu-22 M3, according to the source.
The Tu-95 is a Soviet-era plane that made its first flight in 1952. It was originally used to carry nuclear bombs but has since evolved to launch cruise missiles.
Each aircraft can carry 16 cruise missiles — either the Kh-55/Kh-555 or the newer Kh-101 and Kh-102 air-launched cruise missiles.
Russia has escalated its attacks against Ukraine in recent weeks, amid ongoing U.S.-backed ceasefire talks and negotiations.
On May 26, Russian forces launched the most extensive drone attack of the full-scale war, reportedly involving 355 Shahed-type attack drones and decoys.
Read also: Operation Spiderweb — everything we know about Ukraine's 'audacious' attack on Russia's heavy bombers
Russian air defenses intercepted 162 Ukrainian drones in a massive overnight attack across several regions, Russia's Defense Ministry claimed on June 2, with damage and explosions reported in multiple oblasts.
The reported attacks come as Ukraine ramped up its drone strikes inside Russian territory over the last few weeks, including a mass attack on Russian air bases a day earlier.
The new wave of drones targeted multiple cities and industrial facilities overnight on June 2, according to Russian Telegram channels. Explosions and air raid sirens were reported in at least six oblasts, including Voronezh, Kursk, Lipetsk, Ryazan, Ivanovo, and Volgograd.
The ministry claimed the drones were intercepted between the evening of June 1 and the early hours of June 2.
The largest number was reportedly downed over Kursk Oblast (57 drones), followed by the Belgorod (31), Lipetsk (27), Voronezh (16), Bryansk (11), Ryazan (11), Oryol (six), and Tambov (one) oblasts. Two drones were shot down over Russian-occupied Crimea, according to the ministry.
Ukraine has not commented on the claims, which could not be independently verified.
The attack follows a series of similar UAV raids in recent weeks targeting both military and industrial infrastructure inside Russia.
The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) claimed to have hit 41 Russian heavy bombers at four airfields across the country on June 1 in one of the largest operations inside Russian territory.
Russian intelligence services are actively attempting to recruit Ukrainian nationals for illegal operations across the European Union, Ukraine's military intelligence agency (HUR) said on June 2.
In a statement, the agency warned that Kremlin-linked operatives are offering money to vulnerable Ukrainians, particularly those from Russian-occupied territories, to conduct surveillance of critical infrastructure and carry out other tasks for the benefit of the Russian state.
"The recruitment of Ukrainians for hostile operations in Europe is yet another tool of hybrid aggression that the Russian Federation is waging against Ukraine and the entire European community," the agency said.
The intelligence agency urged Ukrainian citizens abroad to immediately report any contact with suspicious individuals to local law enforcement or Ukrainian diplomatic missions.
The warning comes amid a growing number of suspected Russian-directed sabotage and arson plots across Europe involving Ukrainian nationals.
British security officials are currently investigating possible Russian involvement in a series of arson attacks targeting properties linked to U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the Financial Times reported on May 23. The incidents include fires at Starmer's family home, a vehicle, and a former residence in London earlier this month.
Three men — Ukrainian nationals Roman Lavrynovych and Petro Pochynok, and Romanian Stanislav Carpiuc — have been charged with conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life. Prosecutors allege they acted in coordination with unknown individuals, and U.K. authorities are examining whether Russian agents may have recruited them.
German authorities have also accused three Ukrainian nationals of being involved in a Russian-orchestrated parcel bomb plot, according to Der Spiegel. The suspects were arrested in May during coordinated raids in Germany and Switzerland.
In a separate case on May 12, Poland charged two Ukrainians in connection with suspected Russian-backed arson attacks at an IKEA store in Vilnius and a shopping mall in Warsaw in 2024.
Additionally, Russian intelligence is believed to be behind a July 2024 fire at a DHL airport logistics hub in Leipzig, Germany. Investigators said a flammable package sent from Lithuania was marked for delivery to a fake address in Birmingham, U.K.
Western officials have repeatedly accused Moscow of using covert sabotage, cyberattacks, and disinformation as part of its broader campaign to destabilize European nations that support Ukraine during the Russian large-scale war.
The Ukrainian intelligence agency emphasized that such operations rely on exploiting desperate individuals and weaponizing them against host countries. It called on European governments to remain vigilant and closely coordinate with Ukrainian security services.
Ukraine War Latest is put together by the Kyiv Independent news desk team, who keep you informed 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you value our work and want to ensure we have the resources to continue, join the Kyiv Independent community.
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada coach Jesse Marsch condemns U.S. treatment, ‘lack of respect' for Ukraine
Canada coach Jesse Marsch condemns U.S. treatment, ‘lack of respect' for Ukraine

New York Times

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Canada coach Jesse Marsch condemns U.S. treatment, ‘lack of respect' for Ukraine

Canada men's national team coach Jesse Marsch offered his support for Ukraine and the Ukrainian national team on Friday while also taking aim once again at United States President Donald Trump. 'As an American, the treatment that we have given the President of the Ukraine and the lack of respect really bothers me. Without having to know what it's like to go through something like what these players, this coach and this federation has been through, I am just really excited to be able to show our support,' Marsch said in his opening remarks at a Friday morning event with the Canada Ukraine Foundation. Advertisement Marsch is likely referencing a tense and fiery exchange between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Feb. 28 that made global headlines. Marsch has previously taken aim at Trump, saying in February that Trump should 'lay off the ridiculous rhetoric about Canada being the 51st state; as an American, I'm ashamed of the arrogance and disregard we've shown one of our historically oldest, strongest and most loyal allies.' Due to the Russian invasion, the Ukrainian national team is required to play its matches in neutral venues. 'If you think about the challenges that the players from Ukraine have been through, they haven't played a home match in several years, they've had to play World Cup qualifiers on foreign soil, they've had players playing professionally and internationally with the concern of the safety of their country and their family and their friends,' Marsch said. 'In general, the ability for us to have empathy and sympathy for everything that their team, their nation, their team, their players have gone through is really important at a time like this.' Ukraine's upcoming home matches in UEFA Group D of 2026 World Cup qualification do not yet have a location. 'As the Canadian national team coach, to show how much we are behind them, we are with them, that we want to do everything we can,' Marsch said, noting that one of the beauties of international football is that it 'can take on so much more than what the sport is.' Ukraine is in Toronto to play Canada in the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Saturday. Ukraine will play its second match of the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Tuesday against New Zealand, while Canada plays Ivory Coast also on Tuesday. 'It's really a pleasure and an honour to show that friendship and respect are at the core of everything we try to do in this sport,' Marsch said.

At this year's NATO Summit the stakes couldn't be higher
At this year's NATO Summit the stakes couldn't be higher

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

At this year's NATO Summit the stakes couldn't be higher

At this year's NATO Summit the stakes couldn't be higher | The Excerpt On a special episode (first released on June 5, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Ukraine, Russia, defense spending and Trump's general disdain for the 70 plus year-old agreement are all on the table at this year's NATO Summit. Max Boot, a senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, shares his expert analysis on the issues at hand. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@ Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text. Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here Dana Taylor: Hello and welcome to The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. The 2025 NATO summit will be held at the World Forum in The Hague from the 24th to 26th of June. Among the topics of discussion will be defense spending, strengthening the alliance, support for Ukraine and bolstering defense capabilities. With the summit fast approaching, how might European powers fill the leadership and aid vacuum left by the US as the Trump administration's appetite for foreign conflicts dissipates? Here to share his insights on what to watch out for leading up to and coming out of the summit is historian and author Max Boot, senior fellow for National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. Thanks for joining me Max. Max Boot: Good to be with you. Dana Taylor: First, give us a very brief history of NATO, how it came to be and its overall aims. Max Boot: Well, NATO was created in the late 1940s as a way for the United States and Canada to work together with our European allies to counter the Soviet threat to Western Europe. And it's become the most successful alliance in world history. It's still together after all those years, and it has been throughout its history, the linchpin of security and stability in Europe. And after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, NATO expanded to the east to take in the newly liberated former Soviet satellite states and republics, including the Baltic States, Poland, Romania, and others. And it has played a massive role in stabilizing that part of Europe and preventing Russian aggression. I think it's very significant, for example, that Vladimir Putin is attacking Ukraine, which is not a member of NATO, but he is not attacking the Baltic Republics or Poland, which are members of NATO. I think that's a demonstration of the importance of NATO and the deterrent effect that it has in action. At this year's NATO Summit the stakes couldn't be higher Ukraine, Russia, defense spending and a general lack of U.S. enthusiasm are all on the table at this year's NATO Summit. Dana Taylor: Max, are we seeing a return to the United States pre-World War II diplomatic isolationism? What's the historical significance of President Donald Trump's threatening to change the US's participation in NATO? Max Boot: Well, it's very concerning to see a US president who labels his foreign policy America First because of course, that was the label used by Charles Lindbergh and other isolationists in the pre-World War II period, and their philosophy was completely repudiated and discredited by the outbreak of World War II. In similar fashion by the way, President Trump is not only the most unilateralist or isolationist US president since the 1930s, he's also the most protectionist and the Greatest Generation saw the consequences not only of isolationism, but also protectionism because protectionism like the Smoot-Hawley Tariff in 1930 was widely seen as one of the influences that made the Great Depression as devastating as it was and helped to lead the world to war. And so after World War II, the Greatest Generation in the United States and our European allies vowed never again, and they instituted policies of pursuing security alliances like NATO, of pursuing free trade, of trying to promote and defend liberal democratic institutions around the world, all in order to avoid the outbreak of World War III. And those policies have been stunningly successful in keeping the peace and expanding the global sphere of prosperity and democracy. And now they're, all of those basic tenets of US foreign policy for more than 70 years are under assault by President Trump, who doesn't seem to believe in any of those ideas that have served America so well for so long. Dana Taylor: During an ABC News interview with President Trump's envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, he said that Russia's concern over the Eastern enlargement of NATO was fair. He also reiterated that the US does not support Ukraine's entry into the alliance. Is this now a moot point heading into the summit and is the US the lone holdout? Max Boot: It is a moot point. NATO is certainly not going to extend an invitation to Ukraine at this summit or any summit anytime soon. On this issue the US is not the lone holdout. Germany among others has also been very reluctant. And this is not just the Trump administration, this is in fairness also the Biden administration was also not here to extend NATO membership to Ukraine. That's not a crazy position because obviously if NATO were to extend an invitation to Ukraine right now, there's a real concern that NATO would become embroiled into war against Russia. But there's a lot that the European countries and the United States can still do to help Ukraine without the NATO membership, including helping Ukraine to become a member of the European Union, and also ensuring that the pipeline of weaponry from the United States to the Ukraine continues, that pipeline is almost dry right now. But one point I would make about NATO, and I think very important to keep in mind, Vladimir Putin has used the boogeyman of Ukraine and NATO as an excuse for his unprovoked aggression against Ukraine. And that is to quote a previous US president, that is just malarkey because it's been evident that Ukraine was never going to join NATO anytime soon. And NATO is, in any case, a defensive alliance. It's not a threat against Russia. And by the way, if Putin's primary concern is to avoid the expansion of NATO, his invasion of Ukraine had the opposite consequence because it led Finland and Sweden to join NATO, which they had not done in the past, but now they have done because they are so afraid of Russian aggression. So that rationale that the Kremlin has advanced for its war against Ukraine doesn't hold up to any scrutiny, in part because everybody knows, and everybody knew even before the invasion that Ukraine was not going to be admitted to NATO anytime soon. Dana Taylor: Leading up to the NATO summit were peace talks that took place in Turkey on June 2nd. As of this recording, Russia is still refusing to back down on its demands that Ukraine give up large swaths of territory and agree to limit the size of its army. This is according to a memo reported by Russian media. What might move the needle in this negotiation? Max Boot: That's a great question because clearly at this point, Putin has no interest in negotiating. President Zelensky and Ukraine have agreed to a thirty-day unconditional ceasefire as demanded by President Trump. Putin has consistently rejected that demand and made clear that his war of aggression will continue until Russia achieves its war aims, which include annexing a large chunk of Ukrainian territory, changing regimes in Kiev, putting limits on the Ukrainian armed forces, and basically turning Ukraine into a quasi-colony of the Kremlin. And those are all conditions that Ukraine will fight to the death in order not to agree to. So clearly, as long as Putin sticks to those hardline demands, negotiations over a peace settlement are not going to go anywhere. And so far they haven't gone anywhere. In terms of your question, which is I think the right one to ask, what could possibly move the needle? I think it's sending clear signals that Putin will not be able to defeat Ukraine, that he will not win this war because right now he thinks he can still advance. He thinks that Trump will cut off Ukraine. He thinks that the Russian armed forces can still make major gains. I think it's imperative to signal to Russia that there is no battlefield solution for Russia here, that there is no way they will achieve their battlefield objectives. And how do we do that? Well, there are several ways of doing it. One way at the moment, the European countries have about $300 billion in frozen Russian assets. They should turn those over to Ukraine immediately so Ukraine can use that money to finance its own arms industry and build the weapons it needs to defend itself indefinitely. The US should also give or sell weapons to Ukraine and crack down on sanctions on Russia as called for in a Senate bill. All of these things combined together would send a very clear message to Putin, you're not going to win this war. You have to compromise. You have to negotiate in earnest. But so far, that message has not gone out. President Trump has said several times over the last couple of months that he's unhappy about Russian airstrikes on Ukrainian civilians, but he is not backing up those words with actions. And unless we do something to increase the cost to Russia, its aggression, that aggression will continue. Dana Taylor: President Trump promised, of course, to end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. After initially siding with Russia, Trump recently expressed his frustrations, as he said, saying Putin is gone, quote absolutely crazy unquote, with this massive ongoing military strikes against Ukraine. What's been the effect of Trump's mixed messages regarding Putin on a relationship with our NATO allies? Max Boot: I think this is very worrisome for our NATO allies because they want the US to take a tough line against Russian aggression as we were doing under President Biden. So they're very concerned about the mixed signals from Washington, and those mixed signals undercut any impetus for ending the war. I mean, if you want to talk about why Trump hasn't had any success in peacemaking, even though he promised that he would end the war in a day, a lot of the reason why he's not being more successful is he's not doing anything to put pressure on Russia. He's sending signals to the Kremlin that he is more interested in doing business with Russia than he is in forcing Russia to end its war of aggression. And so as long as that continues, it'll be very hard to bring this war to a close. But this is definitely a huge transatlantic divide because our European allies see this Russian invasion of Ukraine as an existential threat to themselves. They are very, very worried that if Russia prevails in Ukraine, Putin will continue moving further west, that the Baltic Republics or Poland, which are both NATO members, could be next, and an attack on those countries could trigger a massive global war. So the European countries want to hold the line against Russian aggression in Ukraine, and Trump seems to be at best ambivalent in terms of the war. And having the US and Europe at cross purposes, the only person that helps is Vladimir Putin. Dana Taylor: I want to turn now to the funding of NATO. President Trump has pushed for NATO members to pay their quote fair share, 2% of each nation's GDP on NATO defense. How have other nations responded so far? Max Boot: Well, actually, most NATO countries are now spending at least 2% of GDP on defense. But Trump is moving the goalposts. He's now demanding that NATO countries spend 5% of GDP on defense, which by the way is more than the US itself spends. We spend about 3.5% of GDP on defense. So I don't think this is a realistic demand, but I think the European countries are recognizing that even 2% is insufficient, and they're, I think, going to set 3% or 3.5% as a benchmark for their defense spending. And then they're going to do some creative accounting and claim that they're getting up to 5% by counting infrastructure investment as part of their quote unquote national defense budget. But I think clearly there is a recognition in Europe that they need to spend more on defense. They are spending more on defense. And the fact that we now have a government in Germany that is willing to do deficit spending, which is willing to take on debt in order to expand its defense budget, that's a big deal. That's a huge amount of money potentially that Germany's going to be able to pour into its defense budget. It's going to vastly enhance European defense capabilities. We see the UK just came out with a defense white paper that calls for an expansion of the British military and British defense spending. I think this is pretty universal across Europe. All these countries recognize that there is a threat, but it's going to take them a while to scale up spending. And I think the primary impetus is not so much President Trump's browbeating, it's the threat that they see from Putin, and they're concerned that they're going to be abandoned by the United States, so they're going to have to fend for themselves. Dana Taylor: In terms of the US remaining in NATO, some Americans may be joining Trump in asking, what's in it for us? So what's in it for us? Max Boot: Well, what's in it for us is a more prosperous, stable and mutually beneficial world order. I mean, Europe is one of our largest trade partners. It's a massive continent of 350 million people. We do a tremendous amount of business with them. We share common values with them. These are all liberal democracies. So it's imperative that we stand with our allies as we have done since 1945 to ensure peace and stability in Europe. The alternative is too horrific to contemplate. We're already getting a small taste of it in Ukraine with the most serious war of aggression that Europe has seen since 1945. We don't want to see the rest of the continent becoming embroiled in war. And the most effective way to avoid conflict is to deter aggressors. And nothing deters aggression more than NATO. We've seen that over more than 70 years. NATO has keep the peace, that's very much to America's benefit, as well as to Europe's benefit, and indeed, the entire world's benefit. Dana Taylor: And finally, Max, as I mentioned, this year's summit will be held in The Hague, the city synonymous with international justice. What's at stake with this year's talks? Max Boot: Well, I think there's a lot at stake we've talked about, the divisions between the US and Europe on how to deal with Ukraine. There also, although this is not a NATO issue per se, the fact that President Trump has declared trade wars on our allies is also something that strains ties and makes it harder for us to cooperate on defense and strategic matters when we're at war with each other on tariffs. And again, this is not going to be something that's going to be resolved at the NATO summit, but I think it is imperative for the Trump administration to back off its tariff threats and to reach accommodations with our European allies. I think there's a general sense of that what's at stake is the future of the Transatlantic alliance. Do we have enough in common anymore between the US and Europe to keep this alliance together? And I would emphatically argue yes, but nobody knows if Trump is convinced of that, because in the past and even now, he's been much more critical of US allies than he has been of US enemies. He continues to denounce the Europeans as freeloaders and people who are taking advantage of us. None of that is true, but it puts a massive strain on the alliance, and I think there'll be an opportunity to try to heal some of that strain at the NATO summit. Dana Taylor: Max, thank you so much for being on The Excerpt. Max Boot: Thanks for having me. Dana Taylor: Thanks to our senior producers, Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan for their production assistance. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending a note to podcasts@ Thanks for listening. I'm Dana Taylor. Taylor Wilson be back tomorrow morning with another episode of The Excerpt.

New AT&T data leak links previously exposed info to Social Security numbers, birth dates
New AT&T data leak links previously exposed info to Social Security numbers, birth dates

Tom's Guide

timean hour ago

  • Tom's Guide

New AT&T data leak links previously exposed info to Social Security numbers, birth dates

In a trend that absolutely no one wants to get behind, another older data leak has been paired with additional customer information to get re-released as a new data leak to expose even more customer info and personal details. As reported by BleepingComputer, an old 2021 AT&T data leak which contained millions of phone numbers has been linked with Social Security numbers and birth dates of the individual users. The company has stated that cybercriminals will commonly repackage previously disclosed data for financial aim, which is what they believe is happening here, and that when they learned of the data going up for sale on the dark web they began a full investigation. While the threat actor who leaked the data onto a popular Russian-speaking hacking forum claimed it was the data stolen during the 2024 AT&T 'Snowflake' cyberattack, which is what was initially reported by HackRead. However, after BleepingComputer analyzed the exposed information, the news outlet determined it was actually from the 2021 data leak which was caused by a hacker dubbed 'ShinyHunters.' This is not the first time the 2021 ShinyHunters data has been leaked or even linked to additional personal information. For instance last year, the data was leaked along with names, addresses, mobile phone numbers, encrypted date of birth, encrypted Social Security numbers and more. This leak has cleaned up that data to remove internal AT&T information and added the unencrypted Social Security numbers and dates of birth to each customer record. There are reportedly over 86 million unique records of this nature, with more than 48 million unique phone numbers that have associated customer information. This is due to customers having multiple records with the same phone number being used at different addresses. Not sure if you were one of the customers affected by these breaches? At this point, if you're an AT&T customer, you should be taking steps to see if you've been affected and then to lock down your own data in order to keep yourself safe. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. As with all data breaches, the biggest threat will be phishing attacks and online fraud. Now that hackers can easily figure out your identity, they might try to reach out to you posing as AT&T. That means you'll need to be extra careful when checking your inbox and messages. Avoid clicking on links or downloading attachments from unknown senders as hackers often set up fake pages to steal your credentials, credit card data and other sensitive info. For this reason, you want to go directly to AT&T's page instead of clicking on any links on search results, social media or even ads that claim to take you to it. If you haven't signed up for one of the best identity theft protection services, now might be a good time to look into them. You can also consider putting fraud alerts on your files with the Big Three credit-reporting agencies Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, and even instituting a credit freeze (although doing so can complicate getting a loan or opening new payment accounts). This 2021 data leak seems to be the gift that keeps on giving for hackers, so I wouldn't be surprised if this stolen info is used in future attacks. Don't worry though as we'll be keeping a close eye on this one.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store