
China's new trade offer looks generous. But SA must learn from the past
Chinese authorities may lower import tariffs for various goods from African countries. But SA needs to draw appropriate lessons from experience, says Wandile Sihlobo.
South Africa's agricultural export focus means the country must always keep an open eye for any potential new market expansion. One country that has consistently been on our radar is China. The country's dominance in global agricultural imports, stable economy, large population, and current low penetration by South Africa's agriculture make it an ideal area for expansion.
However, the nonexistence of a preferential trade agreement in agricultural products has disadvantaged South Africa relative to its competitors, such as Australia, Peru, and Chile, among others, which access the Chinese market at a tariff-free rate or with low tariffs.
It is against this backdrop that we found the official announcement by the Chinese authorities that they would consider lowering import tariffs for various goods from African countries encouraging.
While no official details have been released yet, we view the message as consistent with what the official representatives of the People's Republic of China have been communicating, particularly regarding agriculture. For example, in April, Wu Peng, current Chinese Ambassador to South Africa, stated that '…China and South Africa need to strengthen our bilateral trade and economic cooperation. Chinese government welcomes more South African agricultural and industrial products to enter the huge Chinese market.'
China's signalling the willingness to absorb more South African agricultural products is only the first step in what will likely be a long journey, as trade matters generally take time. Ideally, the following steps should be a clear and pragmatic plan for reducing import tariffs and removing phytosanitary barriers that certain agricultural products continue to encounter in the Chinese market. Indeed, the work must be led by South Africa's Department of Trade, Industry, and Competition, as well as the Department of Agriculture, and at specific points, also the Department of International Relations and Cooperation. This will help ensure that China proceeds beyond statements to actual business collaboration.
South Africa remains a small share in the Chinese list of agricultural suppliers, at about 0.4%. However, this current access in China is vital for the wool and red meat industry. China accounts for roughly 70% of South Africa's wool exports. There is a progressive increase in red meat exports, even though animal diseases currently cause glitches. The focus should be on expanding this access by lowering duties and other non-tariff barriers to encourage more fruit, grain, and other product exports to China.
Still, it is essential to emphasise that the focus on China is not at the expense of existing agricultural export markets and relationships. Instead, China offers an opportunity to continue with export diversification. As we stated recently, the Trade Map data show that China is among the world's leading agricultural importers, accounting for 9% of global agricultural imports in 2024 (before 2024, China had been a leading importer for many years).
The US was the world's leading agricultural importer in the same year, accounting for 10% of global imports. Germany accounted for 7%, followed by the UK (4%), the Netherlands (4%), France (4%), Italy (3%), Japan (3%), Belgium (3%) and Canada (2%). It is this diversity of agricultural demand in global markets that convinces us that South Africa's agricultural trade interests cannot be limited to one country but should be spread across all major agricultural importers.
Importantly, the approach of promoting diversity and maintaining access to various regions has been a key component of South Africa's agricultural trade policy since the dawn of democracy. For example, in 2024, South Africa exported a record $13.7 billion of agricultural products, up 3% from the previous year. These exports were spread across the diverse regions.
The African continent accounted for the lion's share of South Africa's agricultural exports, with a 44% share of the total value.
As a collective, Asia and the Middle East were the second-largest agricultural markets, accounting for 21% of the share of overall farm exports. The EU was South Africa's third-largest agricultural market, accounting for a 19% share of the market. The Americas region accounted for 6% of South Africa's agricultural exports in 2024. The rest of the world, including the United Kingdom, accounted for 10% of the exports.
In a nutshell, China's signalling the willingness to lower import tariffs is a welcome development. However, it will only become more substantial once more information becomes available. From a South African side, the relevant government departments should consider, through the local Embassy, sending an enquiry about unlocking this process.
Ultimately, China is one of the focus areas in South Africa's long-term agricultural export diversification strategy, and any opportunity to further this plan should be pursued vigorously.
Importantly, while China's offer looks generous, a country like South Africa needs to draw appropriate lessons from experience.
Unilateral duty-free, quota-free market access is a double-edged sword: in the short to medium term, they can help a country increase the share of its exports in a significant market, but since these are not anchored in reciprocity, the largesse can disappear if there are frictions between the two parties, for example, over geopolitics.
In short, non-reciprocal arrangements can lead to dependence and can easily be exploited by the benefactor as a means of political leverage to achieve strategic ends.
While South Africa—and indeed African countries—should take advantage of this opportunity, we must aim to conclude a bilateral trade agreement with China that guarantees predictability and certainty and is durable.
Wandile Sihlobo is chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
32 minutes ago
- News24
‘Anxious' South Africa urges dialogue to end Israel-Iran conflict
The South African government says it has 'noted with a great deal of anxiety' the entry of the United States into the Israel-Iran war. The Presidency issued the statement on Sunday just hours after US President Donald Trump said the country had struck three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday night. He said the facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan were 'completely and totally obliterated' and warned of further attacks if Tehran refused to 'make peace'. 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute,' Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said in a statement. 'South Africa calls on the United States, Israel and Iran to give the United Nations the opportunity and space to lead on the peaceful resolution of the matters of dispute, including the inspection and verification of Iran's status of uranium enrichment, as well as its broader nuclear capacity.' Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said the bombing was 'outrageous and will have everlasting consequences'. The US attacks come just over a week after Israel launched missiles at Iran and Tehran hit back by striking targets in Israel.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How a Cornered Iran Could Wreak Havoc on Global Oil Trade
(Bloomberg) -- US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are sharpening the focus on one option Iran has yet to really deploy in the conflict: disrupting regional oil trade, especially through the critical Strait of Hormuz. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Iran has over the years threatened multiple times to shut the strait — a narrow stretch of water through which a fifth of the world's oil supply flows each day. But in practice, Tehran has numerous less-drastic options at its disposal to calibrate a response that hurts its enemies while limiting the impact on allies like China, its biggest oil buyer. Follow Bloomberg's live blog on the US strikes A full closure of Hormuz for more than a few hours or days is a nightmare scenario that many observers think improbable. It would choke off flows and spike crude prices — JPMorgan & Co. analysts said by almost 70% — fueling global inflation and weighing heavily on growth. Up to Friday, oil shipping from the region, and indeed through Hormuz, had been relatively unscathed by the conflict. Shipments from Iran itself have surged, and oil tanker activity through the Strait of Hormuz remained largely steady. Still, Greece's shipping ministry on Sunday advised the nation's vessel owners to review the use of the strait. If it chooses to target oil in its retaliation against the US strikes, Iran's coastline onto Hormuz gives Tehran an array of options, from lower-impact harassing of ships in the region, to the more extreme alternatives: attacking tankers with drones, mines or bombs to the point that the strait becomes impassable for commercial trade. 'If Iran were to decide to begin to take action in the Straits of Hormuz, there's a wide range of things that can look like,' Daniel Sternoff, non-resident fellow at the Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, said on the center's podcast before the US attack happened. 'We can kind of draw a huge set of scenarios and unknowns which have all sorts of consequences.' Step Up Harassment An easy step for Tehran would be to increase harassment of commercial shipping through Hormuz. In the past, Iran has ordered ships into its territorial waters and even held vessels, a prospect that terrifies crews. A Giant Tanker's Fraught Journey Through the Strait of Hormuz The approaching of commercial shipping by small Iranian craft has been going on for some time anyway, according to the Combined Maritime Forces, a naval coalition operating out of Bahrain, which warned that the current tensions made the practice more dangerous. Depending how aggressive Iran were to be, this could force ships to travel in convoys under the protection of western navies. It would be highly inefficient for the maritime industry but, provided the tanker fleet had enough ships, it shouldn't affect oil supply. More Jamming One of the main impacts on shipping from the conflict so far has been the widespread jamming of GPS signals, with nearly 1,000 vessels affected daily since June 13. The disruption makes it harder to navigate safely in certain conditions, and was likely a factor in an oil tanker crash on Tuesday. The owner of one of the two tankers said that the incident had no relation to the conflict but the timing — just days after Israel had begun attacking — was unusual. Mining Ships Sea mines would have the potential for a significant supply impact by deterring traffic through the strait, although the resulting risk to Iran's own ships may make the move less likely. Bloomberg is tracking every ship that goes through Hormuz every day above 10,000 deadweight tons. About 110 to 120 per day have been going out, with little obvious sign of disruption through Friday. Back in 2019, American officials released images they said showed that Iran was involved in a mine blast that forced the evacuation of a tanker near the entrance to the Gulf. Tehran denied involvement at the time, and the owner of the ship refuted the US assertion that the blast came from a mine. Houthi Playbook Iran could mirror the tactics of the Houthi militants who have been attacking merchant shipping in the Red Sea in response to Israel's war in Gaza. The Houthis' targeting of commercial ships with ballistic missiles, sea drones and air drones forced owners to take the longer route around Africa instead of cutting through the Suez Canal, and commercial traffic through the area remains down by about 70% from 2022-2023 levels. While the militants officially targeted ships with ties to the US, UK or Israel, the link was often tenuous, and the attacks had a chilling effect on ship traffic across the board. Ships passing through Hormuz don't have an alternative route available to them, so the risk calculation will inevitably be different. But the supply impact could be significant if Iran targeted enough ships to create a deterrent. Regional Targets Iran's options to disrupt oil are not purely limited to Hormuz. The Basra oil fields in Iraq, for example, are just a few miles from the Iranian border. Back in 2019, Saudi Arabia blamed Iran for an attack on oil processing assets at Abqaiq, knocking out about 7% of global crude supply. Analysts say that a tit-for-tat that directly makes oil production a target is in neither side's interests, even if it can't be ruled out. Iran has filled up its key export terminal of Kharg Island and is ramping up crude exports, according to satellite imagery. Were that facility to be targeted this time, Iran would lose a key source of revenue but then have little reason not to strike back in kind. The only real winners in that scenario would be bullish oil traders and producers from outside the region. Relations with neighbors have improved and would be jeopardized by Iran taking action. Full Closure The extreme scenario for Hormuz is a full and prolonged closure. There is no other sea route for the about 20 million barrels a day of crude and fuels that goes out of the region. While OPEC+ members Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have spare capacity they could theoretically ramp up, they have very limited alternatives to Hormuz for getting oil out to export markets. 'We don't believe the Strait of Hormuz is going to close under any scenario,' said Navin Kumar, a director at maritime research consultancy Drewry. 'Maybe for a day or two, but it's unlikely there will be any closure for a week or more. It's highly unlikely.' Despite threatening to cut transit several times in the past, Iran never followed through with the threat, and it's unclear whether it possesses the military capability to implement it. US Vice-President JD Vance warned on Sunday that such a move would be 'suicidal' for the Middle East country's economy. 'You are looking at pretty much the biggest disruption to trade flows we've had in decades — prices would sky-rocket,' said Amrita Sen, director of research at consultants Energy Aspects Ltd. Healthy Buffer Still, while oil prices would inevitably surge, the duration of any disruption would be key. The world's consuming nations have at least 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel stockpiled between them, according to industry data compiled by Bloomberg that don't cover refined fuels held in non-OECD nations. The entire flow of petroleum through Hormuz is roughly 7.3 billion barrels a year, meaning there's a healthy buffer even in a worst-case scenario. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Where To Invest In Robotic Surgery
SS Innovations' surgical robots An automated Grey's Anatomy? Robots have proven their worth in manufacturing assembly lines, but they also have a big future in other places, in particular surgery. For one thing, robots promise technological exactitude—they don't shake like human hands. For another, the surgeon who directs an operation need not be physically present. Video and other tech systems allow the doctor to be hundreds of miles away, so patients needing urgent care doesn't have to wait for a specialist to travel to their bedside. Small wonder that robotic surgery's revenue is expected to double by 2029, reaching $23.7 billion, per research firm The question in this relatively new and burgeoning field is where to place your chips so you gain the best return long-term: with the top company, Intuitive Surgical, or a scrappy underdog, such as SS Innovations. There's a good case to be made for the underdog. Right now, robotics surgery leader Intuitive is riding on the success of its da Vinci Surgical System, which has been around for a quarter century. The company's shares have done well, almost tripling in value during the past five years, and since 2000 have soared over 50-fold. Intuitive's future seems bright. Solid revenue and earnings growth inspire confidence, with a commendable profit margin of 28%. The company 'offers ample growth opportunities, particularly overseas,' writes Morningstar analyst Alex Morozov. 'The ultimate ceiling for robotic surgery is virtually unlimited.' As Morozov notes, 'with the latest release of the next-generation platform, Intuitive should maintain its dominance.' Intuitive's da Vinci device uses a minimally invasive approach. It grew out of research by SRI International, with ample federal funding. Washington was drawn to the system's ability to perform long-distance surgery using robotics—a boon for battlefield medical care. As a standalone company, Intuitive first launched in Europe in 1999 and went public in the U.S. a year later. Still, while Intuitive enjoys a dominant position, another player in the field is worth a look as a value play—with a good chance of rewarding investors even more than the established leader will going forward. After all, Intuitive is not a cheap stock: Its price/earnings ratio is 75. Intuitive commands a market cap of $183 billion, while SS Innovations weighs in at just $685 million. SS Innovations International is a recent (founded 2019) startup that has shown encouraging growth, and joined Nasdaq in April, with its executives ringing the exchange's opening bell in early June. Its growth story is solid. To be sure, like most young companies, it is not profitable, but finances are improving. Annual revenue is up more than three times from 2023 to 2024. Cash is a reassuring 25% of total assets and long-term debt is zero. The company's strategic position appears to be firm, as well. It touts a price advantage of its latest product, SSi Mantra 3, over Intuitive's da Vinci. In the U.S., SS Innovations' focus will be on community hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers in medically under-served areas, such as rural America. SS Innovations is led by Dr. Sudhir Srivastava, its CEO (the SS in the business' name), and Dr. Frederic Moll, its vice chairman. Srivastava pioneered many current robotic procedures and has four decades of surgical experience. He holds 59% of the firm's shares. Moll, an American and onetime Johnson & Johnson executive, co-founded rival Intuitive. He holds approximately 10% of SS Innovation's shares. 'Our system is cheaper, more advanced and more user friendly,' Srivastava says. Plus, its remote feature is a big help for both doctors and patients, he goes on: 'I can do a surgery in Delhi with the patient in Bangalore, 2,000 miles away.' Another area where robotic surgery promises to be a boon is to help alleviate the doctor shortage in the U.S., Moll says. After all, surgery is a high-stress profession, and some practitioners bail out of their careers early, compounding the problem. Moll argues that the ease of using his firm's system will extend surgeons working lives. SS Innovations got its start in India, where Srivastava made his name using minimally invasive techniques. The company's SSi Mantra device is used around the world, primarily in Asia and South America. SS Innovations is next targeting the huge markets in the U.S. and Europe, and expects to receive a regulatory decision for SSi Mantra 3 from Washington in the first half of 2026. To date, the company has performed 4,000 surgeries over a large swath of categories, which include cardiac, gynecology, urology and colorectal procedures. Certainly, other companies offer surgical robotics. But unlike SS Innovations, these tend to be focused on specific types of ailments, such as PROCEPT BioRobotics (urinary and prostate), or are not a robotics pure play, like Medtronic (pacemakers, stents, insulin pumps). SS Innovations is all about robotic medicine, period. In cultural terms, robots often get a bad rap. Think HAL 9000 in the sci-fi classic, 2001 Space Odyssey: It murders the crew of astronauts. More concretely and currently, a lot of anxiety exists that artificial intelligence will dump humans out of their jobs. But robotic surgery, as seen by SS Innovations' promise, highlights the benign side of robots, and presents an investment opportunity worthy of consideration.