
Q1 2025 Driven Brands Holdings Inc Earnings Call
Good morning and welcome to Driven Brands first-quarter 2025 earnings conference call. The earnings release and the net leverage ratio reconciliation are available for download on our website at investors.drivenbrands.com. On the call with me today are Jonathan Fitzpatrick, President and Chief Executive Officer; Danny Rivera, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Mike Diamond, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In a moment, Jonathan, Danny, and Mike will walk you through our financial and operating performance for the quarter. Before we begin our results, I'd like to remind you that management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. You can find the reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures on the company's investor relations website and in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the course of this call, we may make forward-looking statements in regards to our current plans, beliefs, and expectations. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Please see our earnings release and our filings with the Securities Exchange Commission for more information. Today's prepared remarks will be followed by a question-and-answer session. We ask you to limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Now, I will turn it over to Jonathan.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Driven Brands Q1 2025 earnings call. (Operator Instructions) This call is being recorded on Tuesday, May 6, 2025. I would now like to turn the conference over to Joel Arnao, SVP of Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Story Continues
Jonathan Fitzpatrick
Good morning. Thank you for joining us today to discuss Driven Brand's first quarter 2025 financial results. I want to acknowledge the hard work and great execution by the more than 7,500 Driven Brands team members and our amazing franchisees for how they continue to deliver in a dynamic macroeconomic environment.
Having accomplished the sale of our U.S. car wash business, our focus for 2025 is on our key priorities of delivering our 2025 outlook and utilizing excess free cash flow to reduce debt.
Now I will begin with a review of our Q1 2025 highlights and then turn it over to Danny, who will be taking over as CEO this week, and he will discuss the business in greater detail. And then Mike, who will detail our first quarter financial results.
For Q1 2025, Driven delivered revenue of $516 million, up 7.1% versus the prior year, supported by 177 net new stores over the past 12 months and 0.7% same-store sales growth. Our 17th consecutive quarter of positive same-store sales growth. We generated diluted adjusted EPS from continuing operations of $0.27 and adjusted EBITDA of $125 million.
We closed our U.S. car wash transaction on April 10 and used the majority of cash proceeds to retire debt. As of today, we have paid down nearly $290 million since the beginning of this year. And since the beginning of 2024, this brings total debt repaid to more than $0.5 billion.
I'll now turn it over to Danny.
Daniel Rivera
Thank you, Jonathan. Our growth in cash playbook continues to generate predictable high quality growth and robust free cash flow. Q1 was a clear demonstration of the power of our platform. Even in uncertain times, customers depend on their vehicles to live their lives and care for their families. Whether it's a routine oil change, a broken AC, squealing brakes, or a collision, Driven Brands' diversified portfolio, anchored by our non-discretionary services, meets those needs.
Take 5 Oil Change, home of the stay-in-your-car 10-minute in oil change, continues to deliver industry- leading growth. Take 5 delivered same-store sales growth of 8% for the quarter, marking its 19th consecutive quarter of positive same-store sales. We complemented this organic momentum with 168 net new openings over the past year, leading to a strong year-over-year revenue and adjusted EBITDA growth of 15% and 14%, respectively, while maintaining healthy adjusted EBITDA margins of 34%.
We have a robust pipeline of approximately 1,000 sites in place which has been organically built over the past five years. We continue to have direct real estate visibility into more than one-third of this pipeline, which provides a clear line of sight to achieving our target of at least 2,000 total locations over the next five years. Take 5 Oil Change continues to be our most compelling growth engine, fueled by a proven operating model, strong consumer demand, and disciplined execution. This growth is made possible by the outstanding efforts of our franchisees and our corporate teams who support them every day. This quarter, that momentum was recognized as Take 5's climb to number 27 on entrepreneurs' list of fastest growing franchises, further validation of the brand's momentum and unit level economics.
Our Franchise segment, home to some of the most iconic names in the automotive aftermarket, including Meineke, Maaco, and CarStar, remains a strong contributor to free cash flow. Despite some top line softness this quarter, primarily driven by Maaco, the segment delivered exactly what we needed, solid adjusted EBITDA margin performance of 62%.
Our International Car Wash segment also posted a very strong quarter, delivering one of its best revenue and adjusted EBITDA results to-date. Same-store sales grew 26% while year-over-year revenue and adjusted EBITDA increased 25% and 36%, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA margins remain solid at 36%, representing approximately 280 basis points of improvement compared to the prior year.
As we've shared in previous quarters, having the right portfolio of assets is imperative for Driven. As Jonathan mentioned, we're pleased to report that the U.S. car wash transaction officially closed on April 10. This strategic move delivers three immediate benefits to Driven Brands. First, we used the majority of proceeds to repay debt, supporting one of our highest priorities. Second, it will help us achieve our outlook for net CapEx, which is approximately $70 million less than last year. Third, this divestiture simplifies our portfolio by removing its most discretionary component. Deleveraging remains a key priority for Driven. With proceeds from the car wash sale, we remain firmly on track to meet our goal of reducing net leverage to 3 times by the end of 2026.
Tariffs are also top of mind as we look ahead to the rest of 2025. We've analyzed the potential impact through two lenses: Margin and demand. On the margin side, our diversified sourcing strategy and pricing power, anchored by the non-discretionary low frequency nature of our services, help us mitigate foreseeable risks. On the demand side, our offerings remain essential. Even in uncertain times, people rely on their vehicles. Our brands offer compelling, cost-effective solutions to consumers. And our iconic brands remain trusted providers to get people back on the road.
Before I hand it over to my partner and Driven CFO, Mike Diamond, I want to thank the thousands of employees and franchise partners across Driven Brands. Their dedication and execution powered a solid start to the year. And while macro uncertainty lies ahead, I remain confident in our team and our ability to deliver.
I also want to personally thank Jonathan for his leadership, vision, and guidance through the years. And I look forward to continuing to partner with him in his new role as Chair of the Board.
With that, I'll turn it over to Mike.
Michael Diamond
Thank you, Danny. And good morning, everyone. Q1 2025 was another strong quarter for Driven marked by robust operating performance led by our Take 5 Oil Change business. Additionally, the sale of our U.S. car wash business provided liquidity for debt pay down and refocuses our business on its non-discretionary service foundation. As a reminder, with the announced divestiture of our U.S. car wash business, the results for that business are included in discontinued operations and are not included in financial details provided today, unless otherwise noted.
Driven recorded its 17th consecutive quarter of same-store sales growth, increasing 0.7% in Q1. Total units were flat in Q1 as continued growth in our Take 5 Oil Change locations was offset primarily by the negotiated departure of a 19-unit franchisee in our Franchise brand segment. System-wide sales for the company grew 2.2% in Q1 to $1.5 billion. Total revenue for Q1 was $516.2 million, an increase of 7.1% year-over-year.
Q1 operating expenses increased $41 million year-over-year. Key drivers of this increase include an increase in company and independently-operated store expenses of $19.6 million driven by higher sales volumes and more stores in Q1 of 2025 versus Q1 of 2024. An increase in SG&A of $19.2 million, approximately $7 million is the result of lapping a gain in Q1 of 2024 from the refranchising of company locations, offset in part by losses from assets in Q1 of 2025. The remaining $12 million increase is driven primarily by investments and growth initiatives.
Operating income declined $6.8 million to $61.3 million for Q1. Adjusted EBITDA increased 1.9% to $125.1 million for the quarter. As a reminder, this growth came without the benefit of PH Vitres, which we divested in August 2024, but the results of which are still included in Q1 2024 results. Adjusted EBITDA margin for Q1 was 24.2%, a decrease of roughly 120 basis points versus Q1 of last year, as sales growth was offset by the aforementioned increases in store expenses in SG&A.
Net interest expense for Q1 was $36.5 million, $7.2 million lower than Q1 last year, driven primarily by ongoing debt pay down. Income tax expense for the quarter was $7 million.
Net income from continuing operations for the quarter was $17.5 million. Adjusted net income from continuing operations for the quarter was $44.2 million. Adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations for Q1 was $0.27, up $0.02 from Q1 last year, driven by strong operating performance and continued debt pay down.
Our new segmentation better highlights the attributes of our business model, including the strong trajectory of our Take 5 business and the stable cash flow generation of our Franchise brands. As a reminder, in mid-March, we included unaudited pro forma 2024 quarterly results for these new segments to aid investors in evaluating our business. This detail can be found on the Investor Relations page of our website.
Q1 performance for each of our segments include Take 5 Oil Change, which had another impressive quarter of growth with same-store sales growth of 8% and revenue growth of 15.3%. Strong sales continue to be driven by a combination of non-oil change services, which is now above 20% of Take 5's total system-wide sales and the continued benefit from the use of premium oils which account for approximately 90% of our oil changes.
Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $100.9 million, reflecting growth of 13.5%, compared to Q1 2024. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 34.4%, a decrease of 50 basis points versus Q1 last year, driven by higher repair and maintenance and rent expenses. Additionally, we opened 22 net new units in the quarter, of which, 17 were company-operated stores and 5 were franchise-operated.
Franchise brands recorded a 2.9% decline in same-store sales. While we do not plan to break out our Franchise businesses by brand, we will provide additional color from time to time if there are significant variations in performance. In Q1, there was such a variation, with softness in the segment driven primarily by Maaco.
Segment revenue declined $4.6 million or 6.1%. Adjusted EBITDA declined $3.2 million to $44.4 million. Adjusted EBITDA margin for Q1 declined approximately 40 basis points from Q1 of 2024 to 61.9% driven by the decline in revenue. During the quarter, we closed a net of 19 units driven primarily by the negotiated departure of a 19-unit franchisee.
Our Car Wash segment, representing our international car wash business, had one of its most profitable quarters ever with the same-store sales growth of 26.2% driven by improved operations, expanded service offerings, and more favorable weather relative to a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA increased $6.4 million to $24.4 million in Q1. Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 280 basis points to 35.9%.
Turning to liquidity, leverage, and cash flow for Q1. Our cash flow statement shows a consolidated view of cash flows for Q1, inclusive of our discontinued operations. Net capital expenditures for the quarter were $47.5 million consisting of $56.2 million in gross CapEx, offset by $8.7 million in sale leaseback proceeds. Capital expenditures from our U.S. car wash operations in Q1 were approximately $3 million.
Proceeds from assets held for sale in Q1 generated an additional $3.5 million of cash. As a reminder, we now sold through a majority of our assets held for sale and would expect to generate modest amounts of proceeds through the rest of 2025.
Free cash flow for the quarter, defined as operating cash flow less net capital expenditures, was $27.6 million driven by strong operating performance. We utilize this cash to continue executing our strategy of systematic deleveraging.
We ended Q1 with net leverage of 4.3 times net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA, reflecting a debt paydown of $43 million in the quarter. In late February, we extended our revolving credit facility for an additional five years. The facility now matures in February of 2030. This facility will continue to have a capacity of $300 million and bears an interest rate of SOFR+ between 2% to 2.25%.
During Q1, we announced the sale of our U.S. car wash business for approximately $385 million which is comprised of gross cash proceeds of $255 million and a seller note of $130 million. The seller note, which bears paid-in-kind interest, will be held on our balance sheet at its present value as a long-term note receivable starting in Q2. This transaction closed on April 10. Following close, we used almost all of the net proceeds to pay down a meaningful portion of the outstanding balance on our term loan. As of today, we have paid down a total of $246 million against the term loan in Q2 and have an outstanding term loan balance of roughly $81 million. This reduction in debt will save us more than $15 million of annualized interest expense, which was reflected in our outlook provided on the Q4 call.
I'd now like to spend a bit of time on the current operating environment, including the potential impact of tariffs on our business. As Danny mentioned earlier, the driven portfolio benefits from providing generally non-discretionary services for an asset, a person's transportation, that is essential for their livelihood.
While declining consumer sentiment can impact frequency among our more discretionary brands and services, like Maaco, our business model remains resilient overall. We are mindful, however, that if consumer sentiment continues to worsen, it could affect certain segments of our business.
While the margin side is a bit more dynamic, we believe we are well-positioned thanks to our strong supply chain team and a geographically diversified supply chain. We source a meaningful portion of our products from domestic suppliers, Mexico and Canada. Furthermore, almost all products from Mexico and Canada are covered under the USMCA and are generally exempt from tariffs. And the cost of oil, our largest individual product category, is driven by global market prices with minimal exposure to direct tariffs.
Our supply chain is nimble and can adjust quickly to changing conditions. Although we expect some cost increases, given the nature and breadth of our products, our pricing power will help mitigate the potential impacts of current tariffs. More importantly, we are actively managing the situation through ongoing internal and external conversations to ensure we remain agile and well-positioned as tariff rates continue to evolve.
We are reiterating our fiscal 2025 outlook on revenue, same-store sales, net store growth, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS. We remain appropriately cautious for the upcoming quarter. We expect Take 5 growth to moderate as it continues growing over a larger base. Our Car Wash business to generate more moderate growth and softer trends in our most discretionary business, Maaco, to continue. These factors combined with the changes in our business from the divestiture of our U.S. car wash business and PH Vitres, lead us to reiterate our expectation that the second half of 2025 should contribute a percentage in the low 50s for our full-year revenue and adjusted EBITDA. We remain focused on achieving our net leverage target of 3 times by the end of 2026, with the majority of our free cash flow earmarked for reducing outstanding debt on both the revolver and term loan.
We're encouraged by our start to the year and confident in our ability to sustain momentum even amid a dynamic operating environment. As we focus on continuing to grow our Take 5 business and maintaining the strength of our franchise segment, we remain committed to generating cash and executing our deleveraging plan.
With that, I will turn it over to the operator, and we are happy to take your questions.
Question and Answer Session
Operator
(Operator Instructions)
Simeon Gutman, Morgan Stanley.
Simeon Gutman
Good morning, guys. I wanted to start with Take 5, thinking about the EBITDA margin which was solid on an 8% comp, the margin itself, I guess was down a little year-over-year, is there a way to think about how do you manage that margin? And then in subsequent quarters, if same-store sales slows, could we see a reverse dynamic where margin actually goes up? Was there anything that was unusual in the first quarter? Thanks.
Michael Diamond
Morning, Simeon, I'm not sure I would say anything unusual. I think as we discussed, the key drivers of that margin were a little bit of pressure on both repair and maintenance and rent expense, both of which are really just engineered to make sure that we have the right assets and the right locations that are appealing to our customers. I think that the main takeaway is while there's a little bit of pressure, we feel really good about what the team is doing to manage their costs, and we feel really good about, in general, the top line performance, even if it does moderate a bit through the rest of the year. In general, that team is operating at a very high level and we're confident in their ability to continue to perform.
Simeon Gutman
Is there anything you can share as a follow-up on the Franchise brands? If the comp softness continues, is there any way you can drive EBITDA up in that scenario, or is it going to be proportionate to the sales direction?
Michael Diamond
I would say, in general, the nature of our Franchise business is there aren't as many levers to pull, but that's okay because the stability is exactly what we need to drive the consistent cash flow. I would say, in the long term, we feel very good with where the Franchise brands can go. You think about the stable iconic brands we have that have been around for over 50 years and have weathered many different types of pressures. As we mentioned, this softness is driven largely by our most discretionary business, Maaco, but feel good with where the trajectory of that segment is going over the long term of 2025.
Simeon Gutman
Okay. Thanks. Good luck. Congratulations, Danny, Jonathan.
Operator
Justin Kleber, Baird.
Justin Kleber
Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. First one for me, just as we think about the shape of comps over the balance of the year, you were below the annual guide in 1Q. Sounds like you expect kind of the softness to continue in 2Q. So the question is, are you expecting positive comps in 2Q? And then what would drive the implied acceleration over the back half of the year? Is that just easier comparisons or is there something else identifiable that you would point us to?
Michael Diamond
I'll say a couple of things. We're not going to provide quarter-specific guidance, although we try to give a little bit of color on how we see, at least, Q2 shaping up. Our full-year reiteration of all of those metrics incorporates performance we've seen so far to-date through Q2. I think if you look at the construct of Q1, obviously, we had strength from our Take 5 brands and a little bit more softness from Granchise. I think that overall for the rest of the year probably equilibralizes, although it may take a little bit of time, just given some of the discretionary pressure we see in Maaco. But we still feel good with the 1% to 3% just based on the trends we're seeing.
Justin Kleber
Okay. And then just a follow-up on Simeon's question on Take 5 margins, how quickly does the decline in what we're seeing with like base oils show up in your product costs? What's the typical lag as we think about the potential margin tailwind in that business from the decline in oil?
Michael Diamond
We reset that every quarter. Now, as a reminder, we have a franchise system as well that we sell to, so there is a little bit of a ballast that comes down as the oil price comes down. But in general, it's about a quarter lag from the oil prices.
Justin Kleber
All right. Thank you, guys. Best of luck.
Operator
Seth Sigman, Barclays.
Seth Sigman
Good morning, everyone. I wanted to get an update on the glass business. It seems like we get back into it and maybe that business was positive in the quarter. But any more perspective on how it's performing and how it's starting to ramp?
Daniel Rivera
Hey Seth. This is Danny. Look, I'd say a couple things on the glass business. Number one, still a multiyear business for us, multiyear strategy for us. Nothing's changed in the underlying dynamics of the industry. We still feel good about being in that space. And we started to focus on growth last year. And towards the back half of last year, we mentioned several areas where we're showing growth in terms of landing insurance carriers and landing commercial accounts. I mentioned at the time that it takes a couple quarters from the time that you ink those deals to the time that you operationalize those accounts and you start to see the traffic flow through your stores. We're seeing the benefit of that here in 2025. So I'd say, look, good business. Nothing's changed in the underlying dynamics. We're seeing growth towards the back half last year which is materializing. And we're in early innings still, so I'd say nothing has changed from that respect.
Seth Sigman
Okay. Helpful. And then on the international car wash momentum. For the last couple of quarters, I feel like it's been overshadowed by the challenges in the U.S. car wash business. So it's nice to see that now. Can you update us on the performance there? Remind us what's different about that business versus the U.S. And you had called out whether how incremental do you think that is versus just underlying strength in the business. Thanks.
Daniel Rivera
So to your point, Seth, I mean, car wash international, that business has been a good business for a long time. You can see it now obviously with the financials that we're posting comps of 26%, margins of 36%. I'd say there's two fundamental differences to the U.S. business. Number one, it's not really a franchise business. It's an independent owner model. So it's a slightly different from a business modeling perspective. And number two, we are the industry leader in Europe, so there's a clear differentiation there.
I'd say, look, the team continues to do a great job. Nothing new there. You're just seeing the numbers broken out for the first time. I'd also highlight, to Mike's point, while the business is doing quite well and we did benefit from some weather, let's say, last year which helped our comps in Q1, we'd expect the comps of that business to normalize through the back half of the year.
Operator
Brian McNamara, Canaccord Genuity.
Brian McNamara
Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. I'm curious if you have observed any signs of oil change deferrals from your customers, at least, recently as kind of the widely consumer confidence has gotten hit? And what trends you're seeing in terms of car counts in those units? Thanks.
Daniel Rivera
I mean, suffice it to say, we are thrilled with the 8% comps that Take 5 put up in the first quarter. That business continues to be an absolute juggernaut. And we're happy, honestly, with both sides of the equation. Volume is good. We're seeing great increases -- majority of the increases coming from the Czech side of the house. So we're not seeing any material changes to the trends that you're referring to. If anything, I think, Mo Khalid and Mike DeTrana, who are the President and Vice President of marketing respectively, continue to do just a great job with our kind of two-pronged approach from a marketing perspective. We've got great top of the funnel brand marketing that's in place, keeping Take 5 top of mind for consumers. And they're doing an amazing job from a performance marketing perspective at the bottom of the funnel being really data-oriented and surgical. So we're just continuing to see great trends out of that business.
Brian McNamara
Great. And then secondly, I know the last several calls have been all about Car Wash and Auto Glass. I'm curious if you could provide an update on Auto Glass. It's great to actually talk about Take 5 taking up the predominant portion of the call. But any update on Auto Glass would be helpful. Thanks.
Daniel Rivera
Nothing more than what I said a second ago. I mean, Auto Glass, we put it in the corporate and other segment, again, as an indication that it's early on from an EBITDA percentage. Of overall EBITDA, it's quite small. We're incubating that business. We still believe in the long term growth of that business. Multiyear plan. The team's focused on growing revenue through insurance and commercial partners. And we're seeing the growth internally and where those numbers are flowing through in 2025.
Brian McNamara
Great. Thanks a lot, guys.
Operator
Chris O'Cull, Stifel.
Christopher O'Cull
Thanks. Good morning, guys. My question relates to Take 5 franchise unit growth during the quarter. It looks like franchisees added five units, but were there more gross openings all set maybe by closures? I'm just trying to understand why franchise unit growth at Take 5 during the quarter was a little lower than the recent trend.
Daniel Rivera
I would say that there's nothing to highlight per se. I mean, generally speaking in franchising, if you've been around franchising for some time, Q4 tends to be a heavier period in terms of openings. As folks try to rush to get the numbers in by the end of the year, Q1 can therefore be a little bit lighter. I would say, overall, if we look at Take 5, it continues to be just an amazing business from a growth perspective, so 22 net new openings for the quarter, 168 on a trailing 12-month basis. And nothing's changed, Chris, in terms of how we think about the long term growth of that business. We're still targeting north of 150 units a year. We're still targeting to have two franchise locations for every one corporate location. So Q1 maybe be a little slower traditionally, but nothing to call out.
Christopher O'Cull
Danny, do you expect tariffs to raise the cost of equipment or construction for franchisees that are opening units?
Michael Diamond
I'll take that one. I would say, it's obviously something that's on our radar, but nothing that we've seen so far that gives us any concern. We obviously track CapEx per unit very closely. And so far, that has been in line with our expectations that we designed at the beginning of the year. So we'll keep an eye on it. But I would say, at this point, it's more just something we observe and not anything that we're seeing really impact the cost of the builds.
Daniel Rivera
Yeah. Chris, the only thing I'd add is, we keep a pulse obviously on franchisees and how they're feeling about growth. And there's no slowdown from what we're seeing, right? The franchisees are very happy to spend their time in Take 5, to put their capital to Take 5, and it just continues to be a great return on their investment.
Christopher O'Cull
Great. Thanks, guys.
Operator
Peter Keith, Piper Sandler.
Peter Keith
Thank you. Good morning. Nice quarter, guys. Great results with Take 5 Oil Change. I guess you are calling for the comp to slow in Q2. Certainly, it's tough to call for acceleration from an 8%. But you do have an easier compare. And any reason why it would slow or you just want to be prudent?
Michael Diamond
I think I'll give the answer I've given in the past which is I may pressure the internal team to deliver as good a numbers as they are, but I think it's unrealistic to assume an 8% continuing, especially when you think about that business continues to grow. Danny mentioned the 168 new units. What that does is create just a bigger base across which the growth has to cover. And so I think, it's really just prudence recognizing the continued success of that business. But also just the continued growing base makes the math a little bit harder to math as you work through it.
Peter Keith
Okay. Makes sense. And then on the Maaco side and I guess on collision, in general. Maaco, I guess, you clarified non-insurance claim based and so it's just more discretionary collision repair. CarStar is more insurance based. I guess can you confirm that dynamic? And what's happening with insurance claims? I know that's been under pressure. Has that started to get better on the CarStar side?
Daniel Rivera
Hey Peter. This is Danny. So to your point, right, the easiest way maybe to think about the dynamic between Maaco and our collision businesses, generally speaking, if you're pulling up in a flatbed truck, you're probably going to a collision shop. If you've got a light fender-bender, you're probably going to a Maaco. That's probably the easiest kind of layman's way to understand it. So to your point, since Maaco's a bit more of a discretionary business, it also focuses a lot more on overall paint jobs which, again, is a little bit more discretionary in nature. We're seeing a little bit of softness here in Q1.
I'd reiterate, look, Maaco's a 55-year-old business, I believe. It's been through many upward cycles and downward cycles. It's a very stable, iconic business. And the team has a good action plan in place. So while I think we'll continue to see softness into Q2, we think we can get that business back on track in the second half of the year.
As far as the collision space, so we flagged a few quarters ago and certainly, our public peers out there has mentioned this. There has been a bit of softness in the collision space for some time now. We haven't seen a material change to that softness. But that being said, we've also mentioned that we believe, based on all the industry data that we have, that we're taking share during that softness. And in Q1, we believe we've continued to take share. So I'd say primarily, the softness for the Franchising segment is driven by Maaco, the fact that it's a bit more discretionary. And again, we've got plans in place to hopefully get that back on track here by the second half of the year.
Peter Keith
Very helpful. Thank you so much.
Operator
Robbie Ohmes, Bank of America.
Robert Ohmes
Thank you. So maybe for Mike, just the the store expense pressures and the SG&A pressures you talked about, maybe a little more color on what you're seeing in SG&A pressures and how we should think about that in 2Q and also 2H?
Michael Diamond
Yeah. I would start by saying, we view ourselves as a growth company. And obviously, one of the things you need to do, even in periods of economic uncertainty, is to continue to grow. I've looked at numerous studies that show those that create long term comparative shareholder value are those that are able to invest regardless of the economic cycle. And so really, what you're seeing in some of our G&A increases are just a willingness to invest in some of those growth initiatives.
To give you a couple of examples, Driven Advantage continues to be a growth lever for us. We see a big opportunity longer term for us to be able to add third parties to that platform and really drive additional longer term performance. We also have a strong fleet business that has the opportunity to continue to drive that red thread across all of our driven portfolio. Obviously, that's a discretionary area that we can investigate if and when or if results become more tight. But we think we have a good growth platform, not only with Take 5, but some of these other business opportunities. And we want to make sure we continue to give it the support it deserves.
Robert Ohmes
Thank you. And then just to -- discretionary has come up a few times in the Q&A, can you remind us if the environment gets more challenging in the U.S. and inflation goes up because of tariffs or whatever and new car sales weaken, when you look across the U.S. businesses, is that more of a negative for you guys or are there some areas that would strengthen in that outlook?
Daniel Rivera
Hey Robbie. This is Danny. First and foremost, I guess I'd highlight, the vast majority of the services that we provide are non-discretionary in nature, right? So discretionary has come up only from the perspective of Maaco's experiencing a little bit of softness. But the vast majority of the portfolio is non-discretionary in nature which, obviously, if you're going into economic uncertainty, that's a good thing. We believe that at the end of the day, our customers need their vehicles, in good times and in bad. And presumably, in bad times, you need it even more, right? Because you want to make sure that you keep your livelihood intact. So that's number one. And then, yeah, in a world where consumers back off of buying new cars, that would be a tailwind for Driven Brands, right? At the end of the day, an aging car park is a good thing for us. It means more repairs and more services for the sweet spot of customers that we serve.
Robert Ohmes
That's really helpful. Thank you.
Operator
Kate McShane, Goldman Sachs.
Good morning. This is [Mark Jordan], on for Kate. Thank you for taking our question. We're thinking about Take 5 at a great comp during the quarter. Can you maybe talk about how performance trended by month and maybe if you can, what you might be seeing to-date?
Michael Diamond
We're not going to break out specific month-by-month other than to say, in general, if you think about Q1 and Q4, results were somewhat similar. And so I would say Take 5 continues to be a fairly consistent performer. Our reiteration of our full-year outlook reflects performance for all of our brands through the month of April. And what I mentioned earlier, to answer the unasked question is, as we preach a little bit more moderation in the Take 5 longer term growth, it's more just a recognition that that powerhouse of growth from a unit perspective ultimately creates a larger base. And so even stronger growth over a larger base ends up (inaudible) down to a slightly lower number.
Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator
Christian Carlino, J.P. Morgan.
Christian Carlino
Good morning. Thanks for taking our question. I was wondering if you've seen any quick (inaudible) competitors get more price competitive given the oil prices are falling in a more subdued consumer backdrop. I know it's a historically rational industry in terms of pricing and promotions and things like that, but I'm curious if you've seen anyone sort of opportunistically go after share just given the moment in time.
Daniel Rivera
Hey Christian. This is Danny. Look, I would say nothing material worth mentioning, right? Here and there, certain markets, certain pockets, based on kind of local dynamics whether it's a certain competitor opening more stores or something in a certain (inaudible) and maybe they're getting a little aggressive, but from a macro perspective, I'd say there's been really nothing material worth talking about.
Christian Carlino
Got it. That's helpful. And you've talked about serving maybe the medium income consumer and given Take 5 is a premium service, while you can only defer maintenance for so long, I was wondering how you've contemplated the risk maybe that consumers shift their oil change spending to other channels, whether that's their repair and maintenance mechanic or one of the retailer club offerings, just given they felt a lot of inflation over the past couple of years and could potentially see more significant inflation in other areas of the wallet. Thanks.
Daniel Rivera
Yeah. It's a great question. Look, I mean, at the end of the day, Take 5 creates and delivers great value to the consumer, right? Value can be defined in different ways. So at the end of the day, we're the only oil change provider of any kind of scale that can deliver stay-in-your-car 10-minute oil change with MPS scores in the 70s, right? And consumers like what we do, they like how we go to market, as evidenced by the fact if you look at comps for the quarter, 8% is obviously a pretty good print. So the reality is, Christian, we're just not seeing it from a growth perspective. We don't break out volume versus average check, but we're quite happy with both sides of that equation. And we're really happy with what we're seeing from a demand generation and from a loyalty perspective sitting here today.
Christian Carlino
Got it. Thank you very much. Best of luck. And congratulations, Jonathan.
Operator
(Operator Instructions)
Phillip Blee, William Blair.
Phillip Blee
Good morning, guys. Thanks for the question. You talked about EBITDA margin contract in the Franchise brand segment this quarter. Is that entirely driven by the comp decline or there are other drivers here? And then is there a certain level of comp that we should be thinking about that's necessary in this segment to drive leverage here? Thank you.
Michael Diamond
You hit the nail on the head. The margin pressure in this quarter was driven by sales decline. The beauty of a franchise system is that there isn't a lot of -- as I mentioned, there's not a lot of additional levers, but there's also not of additional cost. So you start to gain leverage pretty quickly once sales grow. And so as we talked about earlier, while we think there may be some continued short term softness, particularly in our most discretionary focus on Maaco, in general, we feel comfortable in that business's trajectory over the medium to longer term. And that's part of what drove the confidence in the reiteration of the guide.
Phillip Blee
Okay. Great. Very helpful. And then can you just talk about a little bit about your outlook assuming the broader health of the consumer? Appreciate the vast majority of your business is defensive here, but I'm sure you can appreciate we're just modeling out different scenarios. So any color, I guess, if there's any other areas in the model outside of Maaco that could be softer upon a broader downturn? Maybe how those have performed during prior periods of volatility? And then how quickly you typically see a rebound there? Thank you.
Michael Diamond
I mean, I don't want to speculate too broadly and wouldn't be wise for you to trust me if I did just because given how uncertain the overall economic environment is. But let me offer you a couple of data points, right? So if you think about oil changes, one, it is not optional, it is necessary for a car. Danny mentioned the stats around COVID and the fact that Take 5 was able to generate positive same-store sales growth. We've looked as far back as the global financial crisis and know that even during the GFC, overall, oil changes across the industry were flat to up during that period. And so that gives us confidence that even in uncertain economic times, oil changes will remain steady. And as Danny has mentioned, we think as the only national stay-in- your-car 10-minute oil change with an NPS above 70, we are poised to benefit from, that volume maintaining or increasing.
As you then think about the rest of our portfolio, one could argue that even in periods of economic uncertainty or pressure, what happens is an aging car park, which I would argue can benefit us as you think through people choosing to stay in their own cars as opposed to go find new cars. And so, again, I'm not promising that. I think one of the beauties of the underlying driven model is its diversification and the fact that its pieces move so well together both operationally, but in times of potential economic dislocation, we have natural built-in hedges across several of our brands that provide us some comfort and some ballast as we think about how the overall numbers will perform.
Phillip Blee
Very helpful. I appreciate it. Best of luck.
Operator
There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call over to Jonathan Fitzpatrick, President and CEO, for closing remarks.
Jonathan Fitzpatrick
Thank you. And as this is my final earnings call after 13 years as CEO, I wanted to take a moment to thank all of our franchisees and Driven employees for making my time here an unforgettable journey. I'm excited to stay on the board as Chair and look forward to continuing to support Danny in his well-deserved new role in the future growth of Driven. With that, operator, we will close the call. Thank you.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Money Managers Are Selling Nvidia Stock Hand Over Fist, With One Notable Exception
Form 13Fs provide a way for investors to track which stocks the smartest money managers have been buying and selling. One of Wall Street's top billionaire asset managers is increasing his position in artificial intelligence (AI) titan Nvidia. However, a laundry list of billionaire investors have been paring down or completely exiting their stakes in Nvidia for two years -- and it may have to do with more than just profit-taking. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › For the last two and a half years, no trend has captivated more attention or capital from investors than artificial intelligence (AI). With AI, software and systems are capable of making split-second decisions without the need for human intervention. This is a technology with seemingly limitless long-term potential. With AI offering some form of utility in virtually all industries around the globe, the analysts at PwC pegged its worldwide impact on gross domestic product by 2030 at $15.7 trillion. A figure this massive ensures there will be a long list of winners. No company has been a more direct beneficiary of the evolution of AI than Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), whose market cap skyrocketed by more than $3 trillion in less than two years. But what's interesting is how Wall Street's most prominent billionaire money managers have approached Nvidia stock. Specifically, billionaire investors have been selling shares of Nvidia hand over fist... with one notable exception. No later than 45 calendar days following the end to a quarter, institutional investors overseeing at least $100 million in assets are required to file Form 13F with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This filing details for investors which stocks Wall Street's smartest money managers were buying and selling in the latest quarter. Whereas most billionaires have been persistent sellers of Nvidia stock (a topic I'll touch on a bit later), Tiger Global Management's billionaire chief Chase Coleman has been the exception. Accounting for Nvidia's historic 10-for-1 forward split that was enacted in June 2024, Coleman's fund has expanded its stake in the company from 9,683,550 shares, at the end of 2023, to 10,967,550 shares, as of the end of March 2025. Coleman's investment strategy has historically focused on a mix of large- and small-cap growth stocks, with a tendency to lean into next-big-thing trends and innovations. The rise of artificial intelligence certainly fits the mold of a game-changing trend that would interest Tiger Global's billionaire investor. Chase Coleman choosing to expand his fund's exposure to Nvidia likely has to do with one or more of the following four factors. First, Nvidia's share of the graphics processing unit (GPU) market in high-compute data centers can be described as monopoly like. Businesses have lined up to purchase Nvidia's Hopper (H100) and successor Blackwell GPUs, and there's been no evidence that demand for these products has slowed. Wall Street tends to reward companies with perceived-to-be sustainable moats. Secondly, AI-GPU scarcity has been working in Nvidia's favor. Even with Wall Street's AI darling and other direct competitors pushing out as many GPUs as possible, the chip fabrication supply chain is currently maxed out. With demand heavily outpacing the supply of AI-GPUs, Nvidia has been able to charge a triple-digit percentage premium for Hopper and Blackwell, relative to some of its direct rivals. This helped to lift Nvidia's gross margin above 70%. The third factor that likely played a role in enticing Coleman to expand his fund's Nvidia stake is CEO Jensen Huang's ambitious innovation timeline. Huang is overseeing the debut of a new advanced AI chip on an annual basis. Blackwell Ultra (second-half of 2025), Vera Rubin (second-half of 2026), and Vera Rubin Ultra (second-half of 2027) are next in line after the ultra-popular Blackwell chip. Nvidia looks to be in no danger of ceding its clear-cut compute advantages in AI-accelerated data centers. Fourth and finally, Nvidia stock tumbled at times during the first quarter, which may have brought its forward-year earnings multiple down to a level that intrigued Coleman. However, Chase Coleman's actions are out of the ordinary among billionaire fund managers. Since Nvidia stock kicked off its historic run-up, most billionaires have pared down their exposure to the AI colossus or completely exited their respective positions: Stanley Druckenmiller of Duquesne Family Office sold all 9,500,750 shares of Nvidia stock between June 30, 2023 and Sept. 30, 2024. Stephen Mandel of Lone Pine Capital dumped all 6,416,490 shares between June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2024. David Tepper of Appaloosa shed 97% of his fund's stake (9.95 million shares sold) in Nvidia since Sept. 30, 2023. Philippe Laffont of Coatue Management has sent over 41.2 million shares to the chopping block since March 31, 2023 and reduced his fund's holdings by 83%. Israel Englander of Millennium Management, who regularly hedges with put and call options, has trimmed nearly 28.3 million shares (a 75% reduction) since Sept. 30, 2023. This persistent selling activity may well be explained by nothing more than simple profit-taking. We've never witnessed a megacap stock gain $3 trillion in market cap in less than two years before, which has offered plenty of opportunity for billionaires to cash in their chips. But there may be more to this consistent selling than just a desire to take profits. For example, competition is inevitable in AI-accelerated data centers. Even if Nvidia continues to be the preferred option in high-compute data centers, it's unlikely to retain its monopoly like market share as direct competitors ramp up their GPU production. What's potentially more worrisome is that most members of the "Magnificent Seven" are internally developing AI chips to use in their data centers. While these GPUs are no threat to Nvidia's compute advantages, they are notably cheaper and not backlogged due to demand. The mere presence of these chips means less future opportunity for Nvidia's hardware, as well as less in the way of premium pricing power. There's also the very real possibility of Jensen Huang's accelerated innovation timeline hurting, not, helping, his company. Though bringing a new chip to market annually will cement its compute advantage, it has the potential to quickly depreciate the value of prior-generation chips. Wagering on Nvidia's largest customers to upgrade their hardware on an annual or near-annual basis is risky and may not pay off. Perhaps the biggest concern for a majority of billionaire money managers selling Nvidia stock is the prospect of history rhyming. Every game-changing trend and innovation for more than three decades has endured an eventual bubble-bursting event early in its expansion. This is due to investors overestimating the mainstream adoption and/or utility of a new technology or innovation. Considering that most businesses aren't generating a positive return on their AI investments, nor have they optimized their AI solutions, it looks to be a matter of time before the AI bubble bursts. If history were to rhyme, no company would be expected to take it on the chin more than Nvidia. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,102!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $882,344!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 996% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Billionaire Money Managers Are Selling Nvidia Stock Hand Over Fist, With One Notable Exception was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cardiovascular Collaboration and Licensing Deals Report 2025: A Detailed Analysis of 589 Cardiovascular Deals from 2016 to 2025 - Key Players, Payments, and SEC Contracts Explored
The Cardiovascular Collaboration and Licensing Deals report details 589 biopharma agreements, analyzing financials, royalties, and deal structures. It includes links to actual contract documents, trends by therapeutic focus and technology, and insights into the most active dealmakers, offering critical benchmarking for future negotiations. Dublin, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Cardiovascular Collaboration and Licensing Deals 2016-2025" report has been added to Collaboration and Licensing Deals provides a comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the cardiovascular deals entered into by the worlds leading biopharma revised and updated, the report provides details of 589 cardiovascular deals from 2016 to report provides access to deal payment terms as announced between the parties. This data provides useful insight into the payment and other deal the flexibility of a prospective partner's negotiated deals terms provides critical insight into the negotiation process in terms of what you can expect to achieve during the negotiation of terms. Whilst many smaller companies will be seeking details of the payments clauses, the devil is in the detail in terms of how payments are triggered and rights transferred - contract documents provide this insight where press releases and databases do report contains a comprehensive listing of collaboration and licensing deals announced since 2016 as recorded in the Current Agreements deals and alliances database, including financial terms where available, plus links to online copies of actual licensing contract documents as submitted to the Securities Exchange Commission by companies and their initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of cardiovascular dealmaking and business activities. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report, whilst chapter 2 provides an analysis of the trends in cardiovascular 3 covers the financial deal terms for deals signed in the cardiovascular field with stage of development announced. Deals are listed and sectioned by headline value, upfront payment, milestone payment and royalty 4 provides a review of the top 25 most active biopharma companies in cardiovascular dealmaking. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract via the Current Agreements deals and alliances 5 provides a comprehensive and detailed review of cardiovascular deals signed and announced since 2016 where a contract document is available. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on 6 provides a comprehensive directory of cardiovascular deals listed by therapeutic report also includes numerous table and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in cardiovascular deal making since addition, a comprehensive deal directory is provided organized by company A-Z and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on Collaboration and Licensing Deals provides the reader with the following key benefits: Understand deal trends since 2016 Browse cardiovascular collaboration and licensing deals Benchmark analysis - identify market value of transactions Financials terms - upfront, milestone, royalties Directory of deals by company A-Z, therapy focus and technology type Leading deals by value Most active dealmakers Identify assets and deal terms for each transaction Access contract documents - insights into deal structures Due diligence - assess suitability of your proposed deal terms for partner companies Save hundreds of hours of research time Report ScopeCardiovascular Collaboration and Licensing Deals is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding of cardiovascular trends and structure of deals entered into by leading biopharma companies Collaboration and Licensing Deals includes: Trends in cardiovascular dealmaking in the biopharma industry Overview of collaboration and licensing deal structure Directory of cardiovascular deal records covering pharmaceutical and biotechnology The leading cardiovascular deals by value Most active cardiovascular licensing dealmakers In Cardiovascular Collaboration and Licensing Deals, the available deals are listed by: Company A-Z Headline value Therapeutic area Technology type Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the actual deal record, providing easy access to each contract document where Collaboration and Licensing Deals provides comprehensive access to available records for deals, including contract documents where contract agreements allows due diligence of: What are the precise rights granted or optioned? What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company? What exclusivity is granted? What is the payment structure for the deal? How are sales and payments audited? What is the deal term? How are the key terms of the agreement defined? How are IPRs handled and owned? Who is responsible for commercialization? Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture? How is confidentiality and publication managed? How are disputes to be resolved? Under what conditions can the deal be terminated? What happens when there is a change of ownership? What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed? Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon? Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type? Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law? Key Topics Covered: Chapter 1 - IntroductionChapter 2 - Trends in cardiovascular dealmaking2.1. Introduction2.2. Cardiovascular partnering over the years2.3. Cardiovascular partnering by deal type2.4. Cardiovascular partnering by industry sector2.5. Cardiovascular partnering by stage of development2.6. Cardiovascular partnering by technology type2.7. Cardiovascular partnering by therapeutic indicationChapter 3 - Financial deal terms for cardiovascular partnering3.1. Introduction3.2. Disclosed financials terms for cardiovascular partnering3.3. Cardiovascular partnering headline values3.4. Cardiovascular deal upfront payments3.5. Cardiovascular deal milestone payments3.6. Cardiovascular royalty ratesChapter 4 - Leading cardiovascular deals and dealmakers4.1. Introduction4.2. Most active in cardiovascular partnering4.3. List of most active dealmakers in cardiovascular4.4. Top cardiovascular deals by valueChapter 5 - Cardiovascular contract document directory5.1. Introduction5.2. Cardiovascular partnering deals where contract document availableChapter 6 - Cardiovascular dealmaking by therapeutic target6.1. Introduction6.2. Deals by cardiovascular therapeutic targetDeal directory Deal directory - Cardiovascular deals by company A-Z 2016 to 2025 Deal directory - Cardiovascular deals by technology type 2016 to 2025 For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Why CoreWeave (CRWV) is the Best AI Stock You've Never Heard Of
Many investors may have overlooked one of the best-performing stocks in the U.S. right now: CoreWeave (CRWV). The AI cloud platform has hit the bullseye with its specialized GPU-powered cloud infrastructure, at just the right time, leading to a tripling of the stock price since March. Confident Investing Starts Here: Yet, the broader market continues to underestimate (and undervalue) the company's strategic role in the rapidly expanding AI infrastructure sector. While CoreWeave may not yet be widely recognized, it holds significant potential for those with a forward-looking perspective on the AI landscape. For investors seeking focused exposure to AI beyond the typical software offerings, CRWV may represent a compelling opportunity. An Under-the-Radar Hyperscaler with Genuine Traction CoreWeave was founded in 2017 by a team of entrepreneurs with backgrounds in both finance and technology. Initially focused on cryptocurrency mining, the company quietly pivoted in 2020 toward cloud infrastructure, making an early bet that GPU computing would become the foundation of the next wave of technological advancements. In April 2025, CoreWeave went public on the Nasdaq, raising approximately $1.5 billion and debuting with a market capitalization of nearly $23 billion. Since then, growth has remained robust. In FY2024, CoreWeave reported revenue of $1.92 billion, a more than 700% increase from $229 million in 2023. What sets CoreWeave apart is its native design for the AI era. Unlike legacy cloud providers such as Amazon Web Services (AMZN) or Microsoft Azure (MSFT), which were initially architected for general-purpose computing, storage, and web hosting, CoreWeave was purpose-built to handle the high-performance demands of AI model training and inference. It is not simply a GPU reseller; CoreWeave owns and operates its entire technology stack, including data centers, hardware, and proprietary orchestration software. This vertical integration enables it to exert a level of control over pricing, performance, and scalability that generalist cloud platforms struggle to match. While competitors such as Lambda Labs and Cerebras Systems (CBRS) are pursuing similar approaches, CoreWeave currently leads in both execution and enterprise adoption. Turning to snazzy PR stunts, including branded vehicles, has raised awareness and brand recognition. Top Investors Look Beyond Narratives to the Financials The financials are just as compelling as the technology. In FY2024, CoreWeave generated $1.92 billion in revenue with an impressive gross margin of 74%. On an adjusted EBITDA basis, the company reported $1.2 billion in profit, highlighting the underlying strength of its operations, despite recording a GAAP net loss of $863 million, primarily driven by substantial capital expenditures and debt servicing associated with its rapid expansion of infrastructure. This pattern is typical of capital-intensive businesses in the early stages of growth and expansion. Crucially, CoreWeave is not pursuing growth through unsustainable customer acquisition spending; instead, it is investing in building a durable, long-term foundation for AI computing infrastructure. Its ownership structure also indicates a stock that's in it for the long haul. CoreWeave is undoubtedly trading at a premium valuation. At the time of its IPO, the company was valued at approximately 12x trailing revenue, or closer to 15x on an enterprise value basis when accounting for debt. While these multiples may appear elevated, they are not out of line with other high-growth companies in the AI space. Firms such as Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir (PLTR) have historically traded at comparable or even higher valuation levels, and private companies like Databricks are reportedly targeting similar or greater valuations in the private markets. If CoreWeave can maintain strong revenue growth in the range of 30–50% annually, there is a reasonable path for it to grow into its valuation. In my view, the primary risk lies more in operational execution than in the current valuation itself. Risks Don't Have to Be Deal Breakers No company experiencing rapid growth is without risk. One of the most notable concerns for CoreWeave is customer concentration. In 2024, Microsoft accounted for over 60% of the company's total revenue—a level of dependence that is far from ideal. On one hand, it reflects a strong vote of confidence from a leading technology firm, reinforcing CoreWeave's credibility and technical capabilities. On the other hand, it exposes the company to significant revenue risk should Microsoft decide to shift workloads back to its own Azure platform. Additionally, while CoreWeave recently signed a five-year, $11.9 billion agreement with OpenAI—offering some diversification—this new partnership does not fully mitigate the concentration risk. Sustained long-term success will depend on CoreWeave's ability to broaden its customer base and reduce reliance on a few large clients. Another significant risk is CoreWeave's substantial capital expenditure requirements. Building and scaling high-performance GPU clusters is inherently costly. To support this infrastructure expansion, CoreWeave has raised over $15 billion through a mix of equity financing and asset-backed lending. While the current returns appear strong, the model could be tested if AI demand slows or if access to capital becomes more constrained. Broader macroeconomic and geopolitical risks also loom large. For instance, any disruption in the semiconductor supply chain, particularly involving Taiwan, a key hub for advanced chip manufacturing, could delay GPU shipments and impact CoreWeave's operations. That said, while these risks are real, I view them as manageable and ultimately justified by the potential long-term upside. The AI Infrastructure Era Has Just Begun What makes CoreWeave particularly compelling is our early position in the broader AI infrastructure lifecycle. According to McKinsey, global data center demand for AI workloads is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 20% through 2030. GPU-as-a-service—once a niche segment—is projected to become a $27 billion yearly revenue market by the end of the decade. CoreWeave is well-positioned at the forefront of this transformation, with its vertically integrated model offering the scalability and performance needed to meet surging demand. What is the Price Target for CRWV Stock? On Wall Street, CoreWeave has a consensus Moderate Buy rating based on seven Buys, five Holds, and zero Sells. However, the average CRWV price target is just $47.42, indicating a whopping 70% downside potential over the next 12 months. Clearly, Wall Street expects CRWV stock to give back some of its recent gains, so buying on the dip may be the best approach. I'm Staying Bullish and Watching Closely CoreWeave has delivered a triple-digit stock price gain to its current shareholders so far this year. However, its growth story is just beginning, given the early stages of the total addressable market CRWV is targeting. CoreWeave's strategic positioning is exceptionally strong, and the market it is targeting—AI infrastructure—is simply too large and too important to ignore. While the valuation is undoubtedly ambitious and the risks are real, the potential rewards are equally significant. Investing in CoreWeave offers exposure to the foundational layer of the emerging AI economy. This is not a speculative or hype-driven play; it's a high-growth, cash-generating business that stands to benefit from what may be the most transformative technology trend of the decade.