
Surcharge ban could raise prices: owner
"I can't really see any other way around it — our choices are to increase prices or to take away the ability for people to PayWave or use credit card," Bin Inn Dunedin co-owner Monique Beaumont said.
Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced late last month the government planned to ban some surcharges for in-store payments by May next year.
The ban would cover most in-store payments made using Visa and Mastercard, including contactless and eftpos, but not online payments, foreign-issued cards, travel cards or cards issued by other networks.
Ms Beaumont said a ban could reduce the level of choice customers had available.
The wholefood and specialty grocery store, in Crawford St, had a 2% surcharge on transactions made with credit cards and PayWave — an "avoidable cost" customers could choose to take on for themselves, she said.
Their bill for offering the transaction services was not insignificant, and could get "a lot higher" if more people started using them once the surcharges were banned.
This could mean putting their prices up, which would also make them less competitive with the likes of supermarkets.
"For a lot of our customers, they don't necessarily even have a PayWave option or a credit card, so they don't want to be charged for it through our pricing or anything else."
The total rate the business was charged by its bank could range between 2.75% and 4%.
The Commerce Commission last month issued a decision to reduce the interchange fees paid by New Zealand businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments.
This would reduce the estimated $1 billion annual cost to businesses by about $90 million a year — saving the average small business about $500 each year in fees.
But Ms Beaumont said interchange fees were a "really small" portion of the total fee her business paid to the bank.
The conversation needed to go a step higher than just the retailer, she said.
Mr Simpson said interchange fees were "the biggest part of the costs businesses face" for accepting Visa and Mastercard contactless and credit card payments.
The ban on surcharging would help ensure businesses passed these savings directly on to consumers, he said.
"As part of this change, the Commerce Commission will work on improving the information provided to businesses about their payment fees.
"With better information, businesses should be able to negotiate better deals and reduce their costs even further."
Commerce Commission head of payments Matthew Lewer said the price a business paid to accept Visa and Mastercard payments depended on the type of plan chosen.
Interchange fees made up 60%, or $600m, of the $1b it cost New Zealand businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, Mr Lewer said.
"The interchange fee caps are a meaningful step, but we are committed to ongoing oversight and further action to ensure that our retail payment system better meets the evolving needs of all New Zealanders."
tim.scott@odt.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Commerce Commission warning for Kmart over greenwashing
Photo: RNZ The Commerce Commission has warned national retailer Kmart NZ over an environmentally friendly claim likely to mislead consumers. The commission said the national retailer might have breached the Fair Trading Act in making unsubstantiated claims in its "100% sustainably sourced cotton" advertising. Commission general manager Vanessa Horne said greenwashing was a real concern, as well-intentioned consumers were led to believe products were more environmentally friendly than they actually were. "Consumers have a right to clear and accurate information, and greenwashing makes it virtually impossible for a consumer to identify if a product is genuinely sustainable," Horne said. "Kmart's absolute claim of '100 percent sustainably sourced cotton' implies a high level of certainty that we believe Kmart did not have." The commission said Kmart admitted its "Better Cotton" was mixed with conventional cotton in the supply chain. "Kmart could therefore not say with certainty whether 100 percent of the cotton in its clothing was supplied by Better Cotton farmers or was sustainably sourced." Horne said consumers increasingly considered the environment when buying goods or services. "Unsubstantiated claims are unfair for businesses who put in the time and resource to make sure their environmental claims are legitimate," she said. "We are very supportive of businesses getting involved in sustainability initiatives, but as with any advertising, claims made must be accurate and be able to be backed up to avoid breaching the Fair Trading Act. "Our message to businesses is simple: if you can't back it up, don't say it." The commission was inviting consumers to pass on their concerns about potentially misleading claims on its website. The 100 percent sustainable cotton claims were made from August 4, 2023 and removed on October 4, 2024. The commission said legal action remained available to the commission if the conduct was repeated. Kmart has been asked for comment.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Commerce commission warning for Kmart over greenwashing
Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The Commerce Commission has warned national retailer Kmart NZ over an environmentally friendly claim likely to mislead consumers. The commission said the national retailer might have breached the Fair Trading Act in making unsubstantiated claims in its "100% sustainably sourced cotton" advertising. Commission general manager Vanessa Horne said greenwashing was a real concern, as well-intentioned consumers were led to believe products were more environmentally friendly than they actually were. "Consumers have a right to clear and accurate information, and greenwashing makes it virtually impossible for a consumer to identify if a product is genuinely sustainable," Horne said. "Kmart's absolute claim of '100 percent sustainably sourced cotton' implies a high level of certainty that we believe Kmart did not have." The commission said Kmart admitted its "Better Cotton" was mixed with conventional cotton in the supply chain. "Kmart could therefore not say with certainty whether 100 percent of the cotton in its clothing was supplied by Better Cotton farmers or was sustainably sourced." Horne said consumers increasingly considered the environment when buying goods or services. "Unsubstantiated claims are unfair for businesses who put in the time and resource to make sure their environmental claims are legitimate," she said. "We are very supportive of businesses getting involved in sustainability initiatives, but as with any advertising, claims made must be accurate and be able to be backed up to avoid breaching the Fair Trading Act. "Our message to businesses is simple: if you can't back it up, don't say it." The commission was inviting consumers to pass on their concerns about potentially misleading claims on its website. The 100 percent sustainable cotton claims were made from 4 August 2023 and removed on 4 October 2024. The commission said legal action remained available to the commission if the conduct was repeated. Kmart has been asked for comment. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Complaints against early childhood education advocacy group filed with commerce commission
An organisation representing early childhood centre owners and managers has filed a complaint with the commerce commission about a sector advocacy group called the 'Office of Early Childhood Education'. Alexa Cook reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.