
From the Sahyadris to the sea: The 12 Maratha fortresses in UNESCO World Heritage List
Prime Minister Narendra Modi last week expressed joy at the inclusion of 'Maratha military landscapes of India' in the UNESCO World Heritage List. UNESCO described the inscription as including 12 major fortifications, 11 of which are in Maharashtra, and one in Tamil Nadu. 'These forts,…built, adapted, or expanded by the Marathas between the late 17th and early 19th centuries [were] strategically located on coastal and mountainous terrain,… [and] formed a complex defence system supporting Maratha military dominance, trade protection, and territorial control,' UNESCO said.
🔴 BREAKING!
New inscription on the @UNESCO #WorldHeritage List: Maratha Military Landscapes of India, #India 🇮🇳.
➡️ https://t.co/seTyyVu3sT #47WHC pic.twitter.com/mEpa6RWLRx
— UNESCO 🏛️ #Education #Sciences #Culture 🇺🇳 (@UNESCO) July 11, 2025
In a post on X, Prime Minister Modi said the Maratha Empire is associated with 'good governance, military strength, cultural pride and emphasis on social welfare', and the 'great [Maratha] rulers inspire us with their refusal to bow to any injustice'.
'I call upon everyone to go visit these forts and learn about the rich history of the Maratha Empire,' Modi said. This is a list of the forts in the UNESCO World Heritage List, and their histories in short.
Once the capital of the Maratha Empire because of its strategic location and colossal size, Raigad fort is located in the north Konkan region of Maharashtra. The fort is surrounded by deep valleys, and access is only through a steep pathway in front.
The fort has special significance in Maratha history because it was here in 1674 CE, that Shivaji Maharaj was crowned and he took the title of Chhatrapati. Subsequently, the control of the fort passed to the Mughals (1689 CE), followed by the Ahmadnagar Sultanate (1707 CE), before returning to the Marathas (1727 CE approximately). The British eventually took control of the fort in 1818 CE.
Within Raigad fort were located royal palaces, a royal mint, 300 stone houses, offices, a garrison for soldiers, a market, water reservoirs, and gardens.
2. PRATAPGAD
Built by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in 1656, Pratapgad fort is situated in the rugged terrain of the Western Ghats, 24 kilometres from Mahabaleshwar.
The fort is famous for its defensive architecture, which is regarded as a sign of strategic genius. The Upper Fort at Pratapgad served as an observation defence point with sturdy, towering walls. The Lower Fort, which was constructed along the slope of the hill, was crucial to defending the buildings inside the fort.
3. PANHALA
Panhala Fort near Kolhapur was designed to be a self-sustaining settlement. Originally built in the 12th century CE by the Shilaharas, a feudatory dynasty of the Rashtrakutas who ultimately founded their independent kingdom, the fort was occupied by the Yadavas of the Deccan, the Bahmani sultanate, the Adil Shahi kingdom of Bijapur, and finally the Marathas.
Panhala is among the largest of the Maratha forts, with a perimeter of 14 kilometres. It was a formidable military fortress with robust walls, hidden passages, bastions, secret supplies of water, and underground granaries to cope with a prolonged siege.
Panhala fort is the site of the famous Battle of Pawankhind of July 1660, which is remembered by the people of Maharashtra for the heroic stand of the great Maratha general Baji Prabhu Deshpande who, along with a handful of soldiers, engaged a large force of the Adil Shahi sultanate as Shivaji Maharaj escaped from the enemy.
4. SHIVNERI
Shivneri Fort, located near Junnar in Pune district, is the birthplace of Shivaji Maharaj. The antiquity of the fort, triangular in shape and surrounded by cliffs, dates back to the 6th century CE, when it was built as a strategic military outpost.
Shivneri was designed to withstand a prolonged siege. The seven-tier defences of the fort, intended to block enemy advances at multiple levels, are among its most striking aspects. The attackers would have to fight an uphill battle because each of the seven enormous gates served as a protective barrier.
Within the fort were the Ganga-Jamuna springs, which flow even today, and water reservoirs like Badami Talav, which ensured a steady supply of water.
5. LOHAGAD
Located near Lonavala at an elevation of more than 3,000 feet, the 'Iron Fort' was originally built by the Lohtamia dynasty in the 10th century CE, and subsequently passed into the possession of the Chalukyas, the Rashtrakutas, the Yadavas, the Bahmanis, the Nizam Shahis, the Mughals, and eventually the Marathas.
Shivaji Maharaj took the fort in 1648 but was forced to give it up to the Mughals in 1665. The Marathas recaptured the fort in 1670, after which it was used as a storehouse for the loot from the Surat campaign.
Lohagad Fort is known for its four huge gates, namely the Ganesh Darwaja, Narayan Darwaja, Hanuman Darwaja, and Maha Darwaja. The 'Vinchukada', or 'Scorpion's Tail', is one of Lohagad's most striking features, a long, narrow, fortified spur that extends from the main fort.
6. SALHER
Salher Fort is located in Satana taluka of Nashik district, near the village of Salher. It is a significant landmark of the Sahayadri mountain range, the highest fort in Maharashtra and one of the highest in the Western Ghats, located at a height 1,567 metres (5,141 feet).
At different times in its history, Salher has been known as Gavalgarh and Sultangad. It is the site of the pivotal open-field Battle of Salher (1672 CE), in which the Maratha forces under Moropant Pingle, the first peshwa of the Maratha Empire, and Prataprao Gujar, the commander of the Maratha army, decisively defeated the Mughals led by Diler Khan, Ikhlas Khan, and Bahlol Khan.
This was the first such battlefield victory of the Marathas under Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj over the Mughals.
7. SINDHUDURG
The fort stands on the island of Khurte in the Arabian Sea, off the Konkan coast. It was constructed in 1664-67 by Hiroji Indulkar, the chief military engineer of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, to provide a secure base for maritime operations against the Portuguese, the British, and the local Siddis.
Sindhudurg is known for its skillfully camouflaged main entrance, which is very difficult to spot from the outside. Within the fort is a temple, one of the very few dedicated to Shivaji Maharaj himself.
8. SUVARNADURG
The 'Golden Fortress' is another island fortress built by Shivaji Maharaj off Harnai port in Ratnagiri district. Suvarnadurg has a sister fortress on the mainland known as Kanakadurga; the two structures used to be connected by a tunnel, which is now unusable.
Initially built by the Adil Shahi dynasty, Suvarnadurg was captured and rebuilt by Shivaji in 1660. As an important base of the Maratha navy, it was not only a fortress but also housed a shipbuilding yard.
During Sambhaji's reign, when the commander of the fort tried to defect to the Siddis, Kanhoji Angre, then only 18 years old, stopped him and arrested the traitor. As a reward, Sambhaji made him the commander of Suvarnadurg. Kanhoji Angre would grow up to become the chief of the Maratha navy, and one of the most renowned admirals in Indian history.
9. VIJAYDURG
One of the oldest of the Maratha forts, the 'Fort of Victory' on the Arabian Sea coast in present-day Sindhudurg district was originally built by the Shilahar dynasty in the late 12th century. It was then known as Gheria.
The fort was captured by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in 1653, who renamed it after the Hindu solar year, which was then extant, 'Vijay'. Vijaydurg would later be the site of fierce naval battles with the British East India Company, which would finally conquer it in 1756 after several failed attempts.
A striking feature of Vijaydurg is a hidden undersea tunnel, 200 metres long, connecting the fort with the mainland. At a short distance from the fort, up the Waghotan river, is the Rameshwar dockyard, which was used by the Maratha navy to build and repair its warships.
10. KHANDERI
Khanderi, a small island off the coast of Alibaug, was fortified by Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in 1679 to secure Maratha control over the coastal waters.
After Shivaji Maharaj sent 300 soldiers and 300 labourers to build defences on the uninhabited island, the English, the Portuguese, and the Siddis, all contested his attempt at occupation. Shivaji's admiral Daulatkhan succeeded in reinforcing the island and establishing artillery positions despite English naval attacks and the efforts by the Siddis to stop him.
In time, Khanderi would become a key maritime outpost, reflecting Shivaji's strategy to challenge foreign naval dominance and protect Maratha interests along the Konkan coast.
11. RAJGAD
The 'King of Forts' was captured by the young Shivaji Maharaj in 1647, and served as his capital for 26 years before Raigad. This was where Rajaram I, the son of Shivaji Maharaj, was born, and where his first wife, Saibai, passed away. It was also the fort where Shivaji Maharaj planned many of his military campaigns and safeguarded the wealth from the Surat campaign of 1664.
The fort houses many architectural marvels like the Padmavati Machi, which was the residence of Shivaji Maharaj, and had the Padmavati Temple. To the west stood the three-layered stronghold of Sanjivani Machi, a stunning example of military engineering that was intended to repel enemy invasions.
12. GINGEE/ JINJI (Tamil Nadu)
Gingee Fort is located in the Villupuram district of Tamil Nadu and is considered one of the most formidable fortresses of peninsular India. Like many other forts, Gingee has served as the stronghold of several dynasties, such as the Vijayanagar Nayaks, the Bijapur Sultans, the Mughals, the Marathas, the French, and the English.
Perched atop three rocky outcrops — Rajagiri, Krishnagiri, and Chandrayandurg — the complex is made up of interconnected citadels fortified with ramparts and deep moats that create a nearly seamless triangle of defence.
Noteworthy interior structures include the multi-storey Kalyana Mahal (marriage hall), granaries, prison cells, and a temple dedicated to the local deity Chenjiamman. It has reservoirs and natural springs, which were critical in sustaining the fort during prolonged sieges.
The writer is an intern with The Indian Express
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What NCERT history textbooks get right about Marathas
Written by Deepak Solanki The recent debate surrounding the NCERT revision of the Class VIII textbook Exploring Society: India and Beyond is suggestive of what can be called 'decentralisation of history'. It is the consequence of the rise of regional histories and scholars in academia. In the recent past, most of the textbooks jumped from the Mughal Empire to the British Raj. The long transition in the 18th century that led to the capture of political power by the British was mostly omitted. This subsequently led to the erasure of the story of resistance put up by various native/regional powers against the British. There were three Anglo-Maratha wars, four Anglo-Mysore wars, and two Anglo-Sikh wars, indicating that these powers vehemently resisted British power. The revised NCERT intends to give a more holistic picture of medieval and early modern history, giving space to marginalised regional kingdoms such as the Ahoms and Gonds. Until recently, Medieval India was Mughal India. These new changes and debates open new dimensions of looking at historical events. Here, I focus on the changes in the NCERT syllabus vis-à-vis the Marathas. Why do they matter? Were they the sturdiest contenders who fought the British? Did the British in effect take India from the Marathas more than from the Mughals or any other power? Going through the new NCERT chapter on the Marathas, we see a resemblance with the Tamil Nadu History textbook of Class XI. There is a separate chapter on Marathas, and importance has been given to a ruler not heard enough of: Serfoji II. Marathas established their rule in Thanjavur after defeating the Nayak rulers of Madurai. This branch of the Marathas is popularly known as Tanjore Marathas. Serfoji II became the ruler of this kingdom in 1787. He was taught by a German missionary and mastered several European languages. He established a printing press. Serfoji's most striking initiative was the founding and management of free elementary and secondary schools for orphans and the poor in Thanjavur city. He also established Dhanvantari Mahal, a research institution that produced herbal medicine for both humans and animals. Valiant women leaders like Tarabai and Ahilyabai Holkar have also been mentioned in the new NCERT book. This is no coincidence but corroboration of the importance of Maratha history in Indian historical discourse. The second Anglo-Maratha War (1803-1805) is specifically important as it finally paved the way for the British to enter the coastal region. It was even more important because the British were successful in taking over Delhi, the symbolic seat of imperial power. Randolf Cooper, in his book The Anglo-Maratha Campaigns and the Contest for India, explicitly mentions that 'the Marathas were the last indigenous South Asian power that was militarily capable of not only halting but also rolling back the consolidation process that ultimately produced the British Raj.' These wars further suggested that the organisational capabilities of the Maratha armies were not inferior to the British. Shivaji's army had a cosmopolitan character. He hired the Portuguese into his navy. Muslims were part of his naval armada. The Maratha armies in the 18th century were quite secular and included Hindus from every caste. The emergence of Maratha sardars such as Scindias and Holkars in north Indian politics in the 18th century alludes to their growing power. The history of the Marathas matters not just because of their victories, but also the socio-cultural setup they put in place. The Marathas were the most socially inclusive power, where a slipper bearer (Shinde) could go on to become a ruler. Amar Farooqui, in his work Sindias and the Raj, explains that Mahadji Shinde initiated a major overhaul of his military in the last quarter of the 18th century because of the possibility of an all-out war with the British. The Mughals had put up a cloak of royalty and made desperate efforts to keep up appearances. The Mughal emperor faced defeat in the battle of Buxar. He lived in Allahabad for 12 years and only returned to Delhi on the promise of Maratha assistance (Mahadji Scindia and Tukoji Holkar). However, soon Ghulam Kadir, the Rohilla chief, wreaked vengeance on the Mughal emperor. Timely Maratha intervention saved the emperor and Delhi from more atrocities. The Mughal emperor could rule under the protection of the Marathas. William Dalrymple, in his book The Anarchy: The relentless rise of the East India Company, rightly asserts that the Battle of Delhi (also known as the Battle of Patparganj) in 1803, a part of the Anglo-Maratha campaign, decided the future fate of India. The last power that could have ousted the Company had been humbled. One of the company officials, Thomas Munro, realised it with clarity and exclaimed, 'We are now complete masters of India'. The writer teaches History at Shaheed Bhagat Singh College, University of Delhi


New Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Maratha reservation: Activist Manoj Jarange warns of fresh hunger strike on August 29
JALNA: Reservation activist Manoj Jarange on Tuesday accused the Maharashtra government of betraying the Maratha community by failing to implement key promises and warned of launching a fresh hunger strike in Mumbai on August 29. Addressing the media at Antarwali Sarthi village in Jalna district, Jarange said the state government had deceived the community by not fulfilling four major demands, despite repeated assurances. 'The government has once again betrayed the Maratha community. We have waited patiently for two years, but the time has come to rise. I urge all Marathas — don't remain silent. Finish your farming in the next two months and get ready to march to Mumbai,' he said.


NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Actor Vijay Slams BJP For "Drama" On Cholas, Party Responds
Chennai: Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) chief and actor-politician Vijay has launched a scathing attack on the BJP and the ruling DMK, calling their recent posturing over Tamil pride and the Chola legacy a "coordinated drama" aimed at political gain ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections. Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to Ariyalur to commemorate the 1,000th anniversary of Rajendra Chola I's maritime expedition to Southeast Asia, Vijay accused the BJP of "lecturing Tamil Nadu on its own history" while simultaneously "discriminating" against the state. "Had the DMK government given the Chola emperors the full honour they deserve, the anti-Tamil Union government wouldn't have stepped in to take credit. Instead, the DMK has welcomed PM Modi's visit as a matter of honour - this is not pride, it is surrender," said Vijay in a strongly-worded statement. The actor-politician alleged that the DMK had "mortgaged Tamil pride" to the BJP, describing it as "taking refuge under the very force it claims to oppose." He also pointed to the centre refusing to accept Keezhadi excavation findings, which the state believes establishes the antiquity of Tamil and Iron Age in this region much earlier than present estimates. "After attempting to hide strong evidence of Tamil civilisation and history at Keezhadi, the Centre's sudden talk of Chola pride is pure drama. And the DMK, founded by Annadurai, has compromised itself and surrendered to the anti-Tamil BJP," he charged. Vijay also reminded that it was his party that had last year demanded the setting up of a grand museum in Chennai celebrating the Chera, Chola and Pandya dynasties. He warned that the people of Tamil Nadu would "see through the political theatrics" and deliver a "fitting response in 2026." BJP's Karu Nagarajan responded sharply, accusing Vijay of peddling falsehoods and misrepresenting facts for political mileage. "Has any other Prime Minister embraced and showcased Tamil culture to the world like Narendra Modi? PM Modi has acted as an ambassador of Tamil pride," he said. He also dismissed Vijay's charges on Keezhadi, saying the central government had been fully supportive of archaeological excavations and discoveries in Tamil Nadu from the beginning. "It is unclear what Vijay is trying to achieve by linking the BJP and DMK. People are not fools," the BJP leader said. Though officially positioned as a cultural and historical event, Prime Minister Modi's visit to Ariyalur is being widely seen as part of the BJP's broader outreach to Tamil Nadu - a state where the party currently has little presence. With the 2026 Assembly elections on the horizon, both the BJP and emerging parties like Vijay's TVK are recalibrating their strategies. While Dravidian parties tread carefully, celebrating the Chola dynasty in a limited way, mindful of what they call "the severe caste discrimination and dominance of Aryan traditions" during the reign, the BJP is trying to capitalise on this.